|
| |
|
FAQs About Water Evaporation, Make-Up H20 1
Related Articles: Marine Water Change, Captive
Seawater Quality,
General
Marine Maintenance
Related FAQs: Make-up Water
2, Water Changes for Marine Systems 1,
Water Make Up Gear,
Controllers, Treating Tapwater, Marine
Water Quality, Marine Plumbing,
Phataria unifascialis
(Gray 1840), the Blue Sea Star.
|

|
|
Plumbing Issue
12/19/07
I have a bit of a plumbing issue getting water for water changes
into my aquarium. I put a basic diagram together in Visio to understand
the issue.
First some comments on why this was put together.
1.) I do not want to put more holes in the aquarium, otherwise I'd take
the water directly here
<Understood.>
2.) I do not want to take water to the sump as the water auto siphons
out, put water in the sump and drain it back out, you are not diluting
much actual aquarium water by doing water changes, this makes water
changes much less effective.
<OK>
Any ideas to solve the issue on the diagram. I think the issue has
something to do w/ the pressure on the line.
Bryan Heitman
<Your pump should be able to pump the water higher than you show in your
diagram. Are you sure your solenoid is truly open? Also, you may want to
try shutting off your sump return to see if you get better results. If
you are running much flow through your drains it is possibly it is
creating too much pressure for your pump to overcome. I hope this helps,
good luck, Scott V.> |
|
 |
Salinity and water changes
10/25/07
Hello,
I would like to start by saying that your site and staff members have been
essential in helping me maintain a healthy saltwater aquarium for many years.
<fabulous>
I recently upgraded to a 125 gallon tank which I plan to maintain as FOWLR. I
have about 150 lbs of LR and a 6 in. live DSB, SG will be kept around 1.022.
<This is too low. Although most fish can tolerate lower salinities, the
micro-crustaceans and other inverts which put the "live" in live DSB and live
rock need a salinity much closer to natural sea water (ideally, 1.024-1.026).
Please see here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/spg_salinity.htm>
The tank has been drilled and drains into two connected sumps (30 & 20 gallons
respectively). The 30 gallon houses a refugium with a live DSB, LR, and two
types of macro algae. The 20 gallon has been divided into two chambers, one with
my remora protein skimmer and the other holds a Rio 1300 return pump. My
livestock consists of 1 juvenile Koran Angel, 1 Powder Brown Tang, 1 Tiger
Wardii Goby, and about 40 Nassarius snails. Since this will be my first
adventure with a tank this size, I was seeking your advice concerning husbandry.
Given the inhabitants and system, how much water should I change on a weekly
basis?
<5 to 10% weekly or 20 to 40% monthly. Please see here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/water.htm>
Also, do you recommend keeping the SG relatively low if I do not plan to add
corals?
<No, please see above.>
Thank you for your time and advice.
Kiet
<De nada,
Sara M.>
pH of top-off water 9/23/07
Good morning all,
<Kim>
As always, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with all of us out here
on the learning curve of this hobby. I have been struggling with maintaining the
PH level of my top off water. I have attached the information that I have found
on WWM below for reference/background, as this person had the exact same problem
I am experiencing.
<Okay>
I keep about eight gallons of top off at a time right now. Recently I purchased
a RO/DI unit, and at the same time I switched from using Kent Marine Buffer over
to SeaChem Marine Buffer. Since then I have not been able to keep the PH up in
the Top off water. After researching here, I thought that maybe the powerhead I
have in the bucket is not strong enough.
<Mmm, shouldn't matter>
I upped it to a Maxijet 1200, and it hasn't helped at all. I aerate the water
with the powerhead, and keep it heated as well.
<Good>
I also keep a cover on the bucket. If I buffer it to proper PH at night, the
next day it is consistently back down below the PH scale.
<May need to leave the top off...>
Do you have any other suggestions as to what could be wrong? I'm wondering if
the process works such that when you add the buffer and test an hour or so
later, the test should be off the charts, but settle back the appropriate level
the following day?
<Usually so, yes>
Presently I'm only adding enough buffer to bring it up to the 8.2ish range
within an hour or so.
As an aside, like the other inquirer, I live in an older home, so it is not
super-well insulated.
<Actually better most times for air exchange...>
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Kim in Boston
<I would first try leaving the mixing container top ajar for a day... Next I
would try adding a teaspoon or two per five gallons of simple baking soda
(Sodium Bicarbonate) to see if this moves the pH. Please do re-contact me/us re.
Bob Fenner>
Fresh water top offs... SW
chem. confusion, not reading... 8/2/07
Hello Bob & Co,
My water PH is 8.0.
1. Is it wise to bring the PH of the fresh water I use to compensate for
evaporation, to 8.0 by adding baking soda, before topping off?
<Yes... but not with sodium or other bicarbonate... need carbonate, other
material with higher kOH...>
2. If so, how many teaspoons per gallon of fresh water do I need to add, to
raise it from 7 to 8?
Cheers,
Gans
<Please read here: http://wetwebmedia.com/marphalk.htm
and the linked files above. Bob Fenner>
Minor Debacle... Automated Top-Off system...
snail... 7/14/07
Hi Folks,
I chose to automate the aquarium rather than add a refugium this summer.
<Mmmm, are the functions of these refugiums automate-able?>
In fact, I saw an automatic water top-off (ATO) on sale last summer and
purchased it with a priority to free myself.
<Okay>
There were a few early and difficult choices that determined my current
predicament: (1) a rather small 55-gal show glass tank from first marine
experience was a fundamental constraint, (2) an annual unbudgeted need for a
chiller (with a suspicion that Cyano grows much faster in warmer waters than
cooler waters),
<This is so in general>
and (3) a desire to plan one annual holiday away.
<I strongly agree with this last... In fact, with four scheduled trips away...
one per quarter... a minimum of time to look forward (in anticipation) and back
(in reflection)...>
Friends have been great in the past but requires scheduling, planning,
coordinating, and luck. Auto seemed to be the way to go.
<Mmm, well, our lives are "on auto" to extents in many ways... as well as the
minor part which are our avocations...>
The summer allows more aquarium time, which is perfect for semi-annual
maintenance and upgrades from the previous 12 months of observation and
experience. Automation made the most sense as well as advancing the tank to
support the growth of stony coral frags. Ricordea, and leathers have flourished.
Tripled in size over the past year and are ready for propping themselves. I even
have the toothpicks, and super glue ready with a plan on how to maximize the
number of new divisions (cultivars?)... gardening is fun too. So, that has been
the plan.
I set up the ATO and it has been functioning great. I remember reading the
design of the sensor reduced problems with snails and frankly, never gave it
another thought. I also purchased 2 cobalt-blue moonlights.
Flashlight-lit night observations were just too voyeuristic for me. :-)
<Heeeee!>
So, I placed them on the tank divider and was deciding where best to locate and
how best to affix to compact lighting unit. Well, a snail managed to interfere
with the operation of the ATO and lucky for me, I woke up to a damp floor.
<Yikes>
I starting turning on lights, grabbing towels, and making multiple observations
about the tank...I still had no idea what was happening.
1. The pumps were working to the filter and the protein skimmer.
2. There was a red sensor on the ATO.
3. All the fish were swimming (key-hole dwarf angel, 6-line wrasse, and
2 PJ cardinals),
4. Frags were on the gravel-bed,
5. All shrooms, polyps, and leathers were compressed, or constricted.
Never have all of the leathers and shrooms ever compressed at the same time.
They had always alternated this compression behavior in the past.
So, my immediate reaction was everything seems to be alive...whew! Then I
noticed all 5 margarita snails were on the gravel bed and snails gone.
(Wrasse?) or the fact that there was a snail on the inside of the ATO shut-off
sensor preventing it from cutting off the water pump. As the water rose it
submerged the moonlights. Thank goodness for the GFCI, however, it is my
assessment that the tank is experiencing a recovery from poor husbandry skills
leading to the unexpected environmental JOLT caused by water mixing with
electricity. They are both very predictable and formidable forces.
<Agreed. Well-stated>
I shut-off the ATO. Removed the snail from the sensor. Mopped up the floor...I
am so lucky (My summer project 2 years ago was installing laminate flooring in
the great room and dining room. The aquarium is in the great room). And tested
the tank parameters. Everything was okay...slight elevation of nitrates to 5.0
which had recently been bobbing its head, and a slight rise in ammonium to 0.25.
Otherwise, pH (1.024), nitrites and phosphate were zero, alkalinity (9-10), and
calcium (340-360) so they were normal.
I very healthy and self propagating colony of zoo were only partially compressed
and seem to be opening more from day to day. The toadstool leather opened today,
even though there is a notable amount mucous around it. The finger leather is
still rather compressed. I actually thought it was recovering yesterday, now I
am uncertain. A blue lankia
<Linckias sometime live in areas where there is sudden, large influx of
freshwater>
star is moving through the aquarium without visible distress. Astrea and
Nassarius snails doing well. However, while doing a scheduled water change I
noticed a lot of very small empty snail shells???
<May have died from the sudden lowered spg... been on/in the LR>
The Galaxea
seems to be the most injured, and I am uncertain whether it will withstand this
acute episode of environmental stress.
What would have happened to copepods? nanoplankton? other circulating creatures.
For that matter, did this event affect algae counts?
<Yes... all>
Do I need to replace the GFCI?
<Mmm, not likely... use the test/re-set buttons... if they work, it's fine>
Was the damage limited due to the low wattage of the moonlights or the
effectiveness of the GFCI?
<Likely both>
Although, I believe there was some contributory negligence on the part of the
snail, I should have been more cautious with the temporary location of the
moonlights.
I had some plastic toothpicks and superglue on-hand for another planned project.
So, I constructed a snail-guard around the ATO water sensor to prevent this from
happening in the future. Perhaps others can benefit from same.
<I, we and they thank you>
I am not blaming the ATO. I think it is a great and necessary equipment upgrade
to manage evaporative loss...for me that is about 0.5-0.75 gal/day.
What can I expect in the short and long run. Will I loose all of the creatures
slowly?
<Likely the worst is over...>
Will they survive if they made it this far? Is there a source on the effects of
acute environmental distress by electricity in marine aquariums and coral reefs?
Something else I should be doing to encourage healing??
<Mmm, slowly (like a thousandth of specific gravity) per day... raising the
density of the water... but otherwise, general good husbandry should save the
day, your livestock here. Cheers, Bob Fenner>
Big Change: Water Evaporation
6/24/07
Hello WWM,
<Hello, GrahamT here tonight!>
You are a tremendous resource and we can't thank you enough for the time and
effort your whole team puts in to making this wonderful hobby even more
enjoyable. The daily questions are a daily read for us - more so than the
newspaper. Thank you again.
<Thank you for your kind words on behalf of our dedicated crew! I am convinced
that reading the dailies... well, daily, can make an advanced hobbyist out of
any of us!.>
We have a 75 gallon FOWLR which has been running nicely for three years now. As
per your recommendation, we upgraded to a Remora Pro skimmer about six weeks
ago. This has been maybe the best thing we have ever done for our tank.
Producing an incredible amount of the nasty green stuff.
<Very good to hear. Some people can fine tune the amount of food they give by
the amount of gunk collected in their skimmers.>
When we first introduced the skimmer, we had a difficult time keeping the
temperature steady as the Mag 3 pump gave us 4-5 degree fluctuation daily. It
was easily fixed by adding a small fan blowing across the top of the tank.
<Ahh, yes... evaporative cooling can be very useful and economical.>
Our tank temperature is now consistent at 76 degrees. The problem we are having
is with water evaporation.
<Hence the term, "Evaporative cooling".>
Before adding the skimmer, we would have to add a couple gallons every couple
days or so. Now we have to add three to four gallons per day.
<Happens, I'm afraid...>
There are no leaks anywhere and we are wondering why this is the case. At first
we though maybe it was due to summertime, but we haven't had this issue in the
past.
<You're experiencing one of the drawbacks to evaporative cooling. Really, there
isn't much to say here, since slowing down the evaporation means warming the
tank. You should be ok with letting the temps rise slowly to 78-degrees, if you
have a lower speed for the fan you use. Other than that, I think you're stuck
with it. One thing you need to watch out for with increased water-loss through
evaporation is the problem of concentrated "leave-behinds" that are being
reintroduced every time you top-off, and as the water leaves, the levels are
rising. If you use purified water and perform frequent water changes, this may
not be a concern. Food for thought...>
Thanks in advance for your help,
Tracy and Scott
<You are most welcome, folks!
-GrahamT>
Freshwater or Saltwater To Replace Water
Lost To My Skimmer? – 06/05/07
Should I use RO/DI or seawater for the replacement of the waste water
created by my skimmer on my 65g? Skimmer kicks out about a quart of waste
every day or two.
<<You pose a very good question. One of the fundamental keys to success in
the hobby is the ability to provide “stability” to your system. Many authors
have/will state that water parameters such as salinity and temperature often
don’t have to be “spot on” as long as they are stable...though small gradual
changes are usually deemed acceptable. But if I may digress a moment...I
have been shore-diving off the coast of the Big Island of Hawaii where great
quantities of cold, fresh, water were seeping out of the rock in to the
ocean. This created stratifications in the water column where the
differences in both salinity and temperature were neither small nor
gradual...and the fishes appeared little bothered when traversing through
one to the other. This doesn’t mean I advocate we as hobbyists should be
making/allowing large swings in our tank’s water parameters...but it is some
food for thought. But more to the point of your question...You “can” monitor
salinity on a daily basis and make adjustments using a brine solution if you
wish to do so, and in some extreme cases this may even be necessary...but
for the majority of aquarists, as long as you are monitoring the salinity of
your system and making needed adjustments during your water changes, topping
off with RO/DI water (preferably buffered) to replace both evaporation and
the gradual amounts lost to skimming is perfectly acceptable...in my
opinion>>
Many thanks in advance.
Gene
<<Is my pleasure to share. EricR>>
Tap water straight from faucet to aquarium? 4/1/07
HI I use all distilled water for my FOWLR tank,
<Careful, some distillers use copper coils.>
but recently I took the tops off and switched out for egg crate. I am
experiencing lots of evaporation which is in turn using a lot more of my stored
distilled water for water changes. Can I use un-aged, untreated tap water for my
top offs?
<I wouldn't. Not only will here be chloramines and heavy metals but unwanted
nutrients such as phosphates. AND...depending n where you live a multitude of
other nasties, tap is so variable and even when it's to be used it should be
aged/treated/aerated.>
My concern of course is chlorine or possibly chloramines but its my
understanding in a 75 gallon tank the effects would be so little of adding like 1
gal. that it would not hurt anything?
<Yes but the "nasties" mentioned above would add up over time.>
I would be nice to be able to get room temp water from the faucet and add it
right in. Thanks.
<See above and articles posted on WWM. Adam J.>
Water to use. Tap trtmt 10/03/06
I have a 60 gallon DAS with 65 pounds live rock and 110 pounds live sand.
Currently I only have a hammer coral and xenia and some cleaner crews going. The
tank has been set up for 2 months. I am having some evaporation. I understand
that I need to add some water that does not have salt in it since the salt does
not evaporate. My question is Do I have to get RO water or DI water or can I
filter my own water through an inline filter that I can get at Lowes or home
depot to remove the chlorine and such?
<You do need to use RO or DI. I suggest using a system designed for aquarium
use. The drinking water systems at the big box stores (or anywhere for the most
part) are not a good idea for use in a tank with invertebrates.>
Thanks a million,
<Very welcome and best of luck - Emerson>
Mark
Evaporation Rock 3/22/06
Hello,
You all are the best!
<Hello! We aim to please>
I have a 60g cube FOWLR and I recently added a 1/5hp chiller which successfully
brought the temp and the evaporation down. Evaporation was one gallon a day and
is now down to half that. <That is a decent reduction, I wish I had that.>
I want it even less. I do have live rock sticking out of the water right under
the halide. Do you think
this is working like a wick and accelerating the evaporation? <It could be, but
I don't think so.
However I would make every attempt either to control that evaporation anyway
(How about an auto-drip?)
but either way you should try to move that rock so it doesn't see air.
Desiccation is never a good thing
for long periods of time.> Thanks for your response. <No problem, have a great
one. Jen S.>
Sid.
Kalkwasser And Top-Off Systems - 08/08/05
I have a 29 gallon reef with a 175w metal halide and two T5 actinics with a
Remora hang-on skimmer and running some Rowaphos in an Aquaclear filter. My
inhabitants are mostly softies, xenia, star, zoos, Ricordea and also some SPS (Stylos,
Montipora, stag frag). I will be upgrading to a 55 gallon corner tank soon.
<<neat>>
I plan to build a remote sump system in my garage and want to make a dependable
freshwater top off system using a 7 gallon container (salt bucket size) filled
with R/O water and using a float switch and an Aqualift pump (2-3 gallons per
hour).
<<ok>>
I have been told I can use Kalk solution in this setup.
<<yes>>
Basically mix Kalk and 5 gallons of R/O then after it settles, siphon off the
water to fill my evap makeup reservoir. I was told I could run this setup 24
hours a day since it just adds water in small amounts many times a day, just
refilling with this Kalk solution once a week or so.
<<As needed, yes.>>
The next better option may be to use a Kalk reactor??
<<Matter of preference...the reactor is less troublesome in my opinion
(easier/quicker to service).
Can you help me be smarter about these two setups and how they would work for my
tank? Any suggestions or "counseling" is really appreciated. :)
<<Well Bob, either would/will work fine. Many, many folks do what you propose
(or similar) with mixing up Kalkwasser solution and using it to top up your tank
evaporation. This is one of the easier/more simple methods for dosing Kalk
(aside from Anthony Calfo's slurry method). My preference is to use a Kalk
reactor, but these are more difficult to build/expensive to purchase. Both
methods utilize your makeup reservoir and pump (water is pumped through the
reactor) to dose the Kalk, the reactor just does the "mixing" for you. But
don't fret, you don't "need" a reactor, you're original plan sounds fine. Have
a look at our FAQs on water top-off systems:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/h20makeupfaqs.htm>>
Thanks
Bob
<<Regards, EricR>>
Re: Water change - Top Off Strategy 8/27/05
Thanks for the quick response. A follow up if I may.
<Sure>
I got a new pH pen today and discovered my pH is 7.7. Not 8.1 like the test kit
told me! KH is 9.5 and Calcium is 300. Tank is 90 gallons, 7 weeks old with a
few soft corals and 3 small tank bred clowns.
<Okay>
My plan is to use SeaChem Marine Buffer 8.3 (1 teaspoon for 20 gallons) and add
Seachem Kalkwasser (1 teaspoon per gallon) to my change water. I will then
change 10% of the water per week and hope that the pH starts to climb with the
water changes.
<Sounds good>
Is this reasonable or do I need to take more drastic measures to the tank right
away. I am trying not to shock my fish as they all seem happy.
<Mmm, no... nothing drastic... not many good things "happen" quickly with marine
aquariums>
Does the Kalkwasser dosage seem high or do you really need to add that much!
<Mmm, depends on a few factors... bio-load mainly, but experimentation is key
here... add some, test later...>
Do I need to be careful not to siphon of any unused Kalk in the bottom of my
water change bucket?
<Mmm, no... Please read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/kalkh2ofaqs.htm
and the linked files above>
Sorry for all of the questions but this is very confusing.
Thanks.
Keith
<Keep studying, contemplating... you'll be less confused... Bob Fenner>
Vacation, auto top off
Hi Crew,
<Aaron>
Wanted to thank you guys for your reassurance on some trouble I was having with my
colt. I did indeed just leave it, but did remove the necrotic tissue. The sponge was removed, back to a QT, that I will now be forever leery of, and everything is popping back to normal,
albeit
slowly. Again thanks for the info, I think it was early enough.
<Thank you for this update>
I will be leaving for the east for about a week this Spring, Baltimore, will visit and take lots of pictures of The Aquarium at the Inner Harbor. I've tried to design my system to be as fool proof (me being the fool most often) as possible. I do keep Anthias, and I have them on Prime Reef and Formula One and Two flakes,
mixed. I added a bunch of slots to a pond feeder I have and it starts to distribute food at about 9am and drops little bits in till about 6pm- seems to work ok for 8
days. All the fish eat this, but I usually supplement in the morning and evening with higher quality
foods. I figure a week won't kill anybody in this department, although I do feed filter feeders as well every two days. I will be able to have someone come by about every other day, I'm leaving enough food for 3 feedings, that's 6
cubes. I've added six cubes all at once to see what would happen.
<Good experiment>
Algae's what happens - sooo I'm ok there I think (any suggestions very much appreciated, as I seem to have
painted myself into a corner with a tank that no one I know can take care of). Display is 180 gallons, sump is 30, holding about 20, refugium is 45
gallons. With the light intensity and time of year I'm burning about 3.5 gallons of
evaporative water daily, that would mean I'd need a reserve tank of at least 26
gallons, should probably make it closer to thirty. And this is the real questions, sorry for the rant, should I just bite the bullet on this and buy two
DC solenoids, run them in series and plumb the sump to the RO unit using the LifeReef floats?
<Could>
I'm a biomedical engineer, and I tend to err on the side of caution with medical equipment, seems reasonable to do so with marine systems as well since it's technically life support.
<Agreed... am far more a fan here of a restricted source/volume... like car boys... of about thirty gallon total... simple float valving>
Anywho, I've neglected to do this because, well, in the hospital, if a dosing pump fails, there's several people available at all times to fix
it. It would be REALLY unfortunate to come home and find the house is totally and completely flooded with
brackish water, and I'm unaware of any coral that would do very well with a constant influx of sterile
water. Sooo the reserve or the plumb, that is the question!
<Agreed...>
Really appreciate any input.
PS: What came first the Zooxanthellae or the Coral?
<The algae>
An often argued subject between my wife and myself, she says the algae because they are the primary
producers...
<One logical approach... also, in terms of "fossil evidence", PCR manipulation history... the thallophytes are much simpler, pre-date the cnidaria... Look to the popular works of Lynn Margulis here... you will enjoy the speculations as to origins of mitochondria, other endoplasmic inclusions>
I say the coral because there are zooxanthellae species in both false and true corals, don't know which of these came first either- so what came first-
time- wise?
<The Monerans...>
Thanks, Aaron and Michelle
<Bob Fenner>
DI water for top off
Hello, I have a Kent DI unit that is attached to a float in my sump that
automatically replenishes my evaporation water, now this water is not buffered
and I suspect it is one reason for my PH staying in the 8.0 to 8.15 range (also
run a calcium reactor). I was trying to think of a way to buffer the water
without changing my current set up and had a "crazy" idea that I would like to
get your opinion on. I was thinking of adding another stage to the DI unit at
the end before going to my sump, fill the canister with some media that would
dissolve raising the buffer and PH, if I filled the canister with the same media
used in my reactor would this work? I know the water is acidic coming from my
well and the DI makes it no better so my thoughts are the media would dissolve
(just like in my reactor) and therefore buffer my top-off water. Thanks for your
time, all comments are appreciated.
Thanks
<Hello, I think your idea might work but I probably wouldn't go that route. I
would get a aqua doser from Kent or some other similar doser and just dose at
night with Kalkwasser. It will be more easily controlled than trying to use
aragonite to buffer the water from your D.I. unit. Good Luck. MikeB.>
Automated water changes
Hi MacL, <HI! Timon>
I live in tropical Thailand and the temperature of the room where my refugium
and sump are located will vary greatly depending on if the sun shines that day
so I am worried that the evaporation rate will vary a lot from day to day. <It
might be a problem for corals as well as your tank temp is bound to fluctuate a
bit>
I have learned today that I can use a conductivity controller that can control a
pump based on pre-set minimum and maximum conductivity values. Do you think this
is a good way to make up for evaporation? <I think it might be your only option
because of the fluctuations. Please if you decide that's the way to go and it
works, Please let me know. MacL>
Thanks
Timon
RO Top off in a 300 gallon aquarium 9/24/04
I have a 300 gallon aquarium with an additional 75 gallon sump/refugium
underneath. The system is in the high desert in a very dry environment and I am
running around 2000 watts of VHO/Halides.
<wow... truly an excessive amount of light even for shallow water SPS corals. No
other complaints from me though if you are happy and coral pigments are
surprising dark, rich>
As a result, I have a very high amount of evaporation.
<with 2K watts of lights... I bet you can see it ripped off as steam <G>>
I haven't checked exactly, but it is around 4-5 gallons each day, possibly more
during hot, dry days. I also travel a lot and can't rely upon my wife to top of
the tank. I have relied upon a RO unit, with an automated top-off system based
on the level in the sump. The system works extremely well and I can leave for
almost any period of time without worry. I do small water changes each week and
run a calc reactor.
<very good>
The calcium level is consistently above 400 and the PH is stable around
8.3. The problem is that the alkalinity is 2.5 meg, barely acceptable for SPS
corals and I am sure that low alkalinity is caused by the RO water, which is
pumped directly into the sump.
<a small Yikes escapes the lips>
Aerating the RO water is not an option because it requires my constant
presence.
<ahhh... OK. Or not, mate. DO invest in an infrared float switch or like quality
unit. These are in the $100-200 range as float switches go... but are well worth
the investment.>
Are there other solutions?
<yep... adding/dosing buffer and/or running RO input through a bed of
lime/carbonate chips like the second chamber on your Calcium reactor>
Are there products that can be added to an RO system or should I simply start
adding an alkalinity buffer each week? Thanks
<you have your answers/good intuition my friend. Roll with it. Anthony>
How do I top off water in my Nano Reef?
Hi Crew,
<< Hi there >>
I have a 10 gallon saltwater tank. I replace 1 gallon every week. Since the
weather has heated up the tank temperature started climbing into the low
80's so I got a small fan which keeps it around 78. But now I get a lot of
evaporation, as much as a gallon a week. So I need to add a gallon of new
unsalted water. << Yep, this is very common, just keep adding freshwater (not
from the tap, but dechlorinated of course) as needed to keep the tank level
filled. >> Do I still need to remove a gallon and replace it since
evaporation does not remove any pollutants? << Yes this top off water doesn't
count towards the water changes. A 10 gal is very easy for water changes,
considering one gallon of freshly mixed salt water is a 10% change. Just be
sure to slowly add the new water, make it is well mixed with the correct
temperature before hand. >>
<< Blundell >>
Iodine use
Hi
I have constructed a 500 gallon system for cryptic filter feeders.
There is an algae scrubber and a skimmer. I will be importing tunicates,
sponges,
Dendronephthya, file clams... water movement is via a fast current generated
by a large water lift into the scrubber, and a Wave2K. The system has three
tanks and two refugia, so that I can isolate and experiment.
There is an automatic top off unit for RO water. My question is- is
there any problem (other than the controversies about using iodine at all) with
putting the iodine in the freshwater top off tank? << I don't there is a
problem, but I would probably dose into the tank. >> This would allow continuous
infusion. Also, if no problem, can I also add two part alkalinity/calcium
supplement to the same reserve with no interactions (i.e. does iodine
precipitate
on calcium carbonate)? << Well you can't add the two parts of a two part
solution together. You could add buffer to your RO water, or add calcium, but
you can't add both. Soooo, I would suggest dosing iodine and calcium, and
adding your buffer to your RO water. I wouldn't mix calcium or iodine in,
because you don't really know what reactions may take place. >>
Thank you so much!
Charles Matthews
<< Blundell >>
- Temperature Adjustments in Top-off Water -
Hi Crew,
Sorry about this question and the answer maybe obvious to some of your readers
however, I am going to as since you can never ask a dumb question. <The only
dumb questions are the ones that remain unasked.>
I like others am losing water to evaporation in my 200 ltr Marine Tank. To Top
this off, Can I fill up a 10 liter container with fresh water straight from the
tap, add some de-chlorinator and add some boiling water to bring the temperature
up, then simply add it to the tank. <You could, but better to let the water
sit... bring the temperature up with an aquarium heater. The possibility exists
that the heat of the boiling water would either be too much or break down the
dechlorinator.> I noticed that my protein skimmer, loves this and starts pumping
out what appears to be water (unless the fresh water has a lot of proteins in
it). <More likely is the dechlorinator.> So I figure something is just not quite
right here. I would be grateful for your thoughts on this.
Cheers
AO.
<Cheers, J -- >
- Top off During Vacation -
I'll be going out of town for a little bit this summer and I'm leaving a
relative in charge of my tank. <Hooo boy!> I'm not so much worried about feeding
but more so about evaporation and the specific gravity. <Yes... is perhaps one
of the more difficult things to have non-experienced folks maintain while out of
town. I've been burned this way more than once.> I'm preparing about 15 gallons
of water, and am going to make it easy on my caretaker to just top-off the tank
to a designated level every week. <Yes... easy to just put a piece of tape on
the outside of the tank or sump to show the desired water level.> If my Specific
Gravity is at 1.0235 what should the specific gravity of the water to be added
be? <0.000 - You want top off water to be freshwater.> I'm thinking around 1.020
range, as last time I had a spike in my specific gravity. <Not a good idea...
your tank salinity will slowly creep upwards if topped off with saltwater.>
Suggestions? <Freshwater will be fine... just add a small amount every day or
perhaps every other day.> Thank you very much for your time.
-David
"A man who goes to sea without a reason would go to hell for a holiday."
<Cheers, J -- >
Hello and Thanks again...quick question 5/31/04
I have included some photos this time to aid you in visualizing the
tank setup so you can help me out.....Thanks for taking the
time...First question is about auto top off....what is the correct way to do it
on a 120 gal. reef and what is the best equipment to do it with...ro/di Tunze
osmolator etc? ro/di to storage container with float valve? Then Tunze osmolator
hooked to storage tank and display or sump to activate auto top off?
<I am not a big fan of auto top off devices because of the risk of
failure. I would suggest that whatever delivery method you choose
that the water be drawn from a reservoir. This will limit the amount
of water that can run into your system at once if the device sticks open.>
Also the second question is about pump sizing...I have included the pictures for
this purpose....
<Your pic was not attached, but I will try to do my best without it.>
The return pumps... I will have 2...one for each side of the tank and I am
looking for 1500 to 1700 gph total between both of them...
<Good plan. Having two pumps offers a nice measure of safety if
one fails.>
From each pump the return line runs up through the custom overflow box with dual
1 1/2 Durso standpipes (o.d) into a "T" connector one output runs
along the upper portion of the tank to the top right rear corner with a ball
valve attached to regulate flow....the other part of the t runs down the outside
of the overflow box and to the front bottom corner ...second return pump repeats
the same sequence on the left side of the tank. (see attached photos)
<I think I understand your description. Be sure that you place at
least one outlet very near the surface of the water. This outlet will
allow air to enter and prevent siphoning back to your sump if the pump
stops.>
taking into consideration the return line layout (3/4 " pvc) what pump
would reliably give me the output for that side of the tank to reach a combined
total of 1500 to 1700 gph..
<Many submersible or external pumps will fit the bill. Look for
models in the 1000 gph range each to get your desired flow after frictional and
head losses. I am a big fan of Iwaki and GRI for external pumps and
Mag-drive and the new Quiet-One for submersibles.>
and also how can I stop the tank from draining if the pump fails being that two
outputs will be in each front lower corner? Thank you for your
time...
<See my comments above about placing outlets near the
surface. Best Regards. Adam>
Buffering Makeup Water
WWM crew,
<Hi there! Scott F. here today!>
HI I'm new to your site but I have already found a wealth of helpful info. After
extensive research of your RO water FAQs I still have a question about buffering
fresh RO/DI water. I hadn't been buffering my raw water, well until
about a week ago, anyway I tried to buffer with ESV ALK booster but
the ph would go to 8.6 then slowly fall until it hit 7.2. Not
likening to add more chemicals than necessary I decided to fill a
filter bag with 2# of crushed coral and throw it into my makeup water holding
tank. Now the ph stays at 8.0. OK now for question. Is this an
acceptable way to buffer my makeup water? I also have a power head circulating
and aerating the tank.
THANKS FOR SUCH A GREAT SITE, AARON SCHOTT
<Well, Aaron, if it is working for you, why not keep it up! As long as you
are using material that is not leaching phosphates or other nasty impurities, I
don't see any harm in this practice, myself!>
Treating RO/DI water? 2/13/04
Anthony--I lose a quart a day, that I need to top off. Should I use
buffered top off water, or just straight rodi water for a couple of
days, since I added to much of SeaChem's buffer already. Thanks
Charlie
<its fairly risky my friend. Its a better habit/solution to dilute a chemical
imbalance with a water change (as other manipulations of chemistry may have occurred)
and then resume with properly aerated and buffered seawater or fresh water for
top off. Under almost no circumstance should you use raw, unaerated and/or
unbuffered RO/DI/Distilled water for SW aquariums. Too unstable. Anthony>
- Automating SPG/Top-off -
Greetings Oh Great Ones,
I have searched the web (including WWM FAQs) for days and spoken to everyone I
know in the hobby with no success so its time to bug you guys! I am
looking for a system to maintain spg in my 125g FOWLR. I want a monitor/RO
dosing pump setup but have not been able to find a system that actually monitors
SPG. <Hmm... you are looking for conductivity meters - this is the monitor
for SPG. That being said, I don't think this is the way you really want to
handle top-off. Unfortunately, as you mix in freshwater, the changes in SPG will
not be immediately evident to a monitor/control device - you could end up adding
much more water than should be before the probe registers the change.>
Most systems I have found (including Tunze...mmm love my other Tunze stuff)
utilize water level, and this is not accurate enough for my needs. <You may
not think so, but it is... have been using such a system for a while now - works
very well.>
I've only been able to find a couple of electronic SPG monitors, and none allow
a away to control a dosing pump.
When my homes heat is on I lose about 1-2g's a day and in summer and the fan
over the sump is running I lose the same; otherwise I lose about 1/2g to evap.
This is causing a swing of up to .001 a day if I don't top off. Of course I do
top off about 3 times daily in an attempt to keep the spg as stable as possible,
but babysitting the tank is becoming a serious pain.
Any help would be great! <Take a look at http://www.innovativeaquatics.com/
- they have refurbished, medical dosing pumps with electronic float switches -
keeps the top off very consistent.>
Thanks, E
<Cheers, J -- >
Buffer Question <2/1/04)
Hi Bob, <Steve Allen covering tonight.>
I was wondering about the use of "buffer" additives to the RO water used to replace evaporation from my reef tank. Currently I do not add any buffer materials, but I am considering whether it would be wise to do so. My understanding is evaporation with remove 'n' number of H2O molecules (i.e., pure water evaporates); thus we have lost 2'n' hydrogen atoms. Therefore the top-up water needed to replace this should also be 2n hydrogen atoms, to ensure the effect on System pH is identical. Is my understanding
correct? <Merely incomplete. You are not considering the factors that affect free H+ ions. True, pH measures these, but it is buffer that keeps them bound up so the pH stays alkaline in seawater. Otherwise, the tendency is to head to neutral (7.4), or even lower due to organic acids in animal waste. By performing RO on your tapwater, you have removed all of it's buffer capacity. Marine tanks naturally lose buffering capacity (carbonate hardness) over time, requiring replacement. There's a lot of good info available on this subject both at WWM and other web sources such as Advanced Aquarist Online.>
If so, does this suggest top-up water should not contain buffer
additives? <no> Or is it the case that marine tank pH tends to drift downwards due to the bio-load <yes>, and we are simply using the top-up water as a convenient mechanism to replace hydrogen lost due to the filtration of the System? <Not hydrogen lost. Buffer capacity to keep the H+ ions bound up and maintain the alkaline pH we need.>
The reason I ask this question is that my reef tank starts the day at pH7.9 and ends at 8.1. <A reef ought to be kept higher. At or around 8.2 to 8.3 would be better. It would be nice to not have the pH drop below 8.0-8.1. I monitor mine electronically, and it never goes less that 8.1 or higher than 8.3> I am starting to benefit from a newly established reverse lit refugium with a DSB - hopefully my pH will continue to improve as the refugium matures. <Yes, this can help stabilize pH if you have macroalgae in it.> Besides weekly 8% water changes the only "additive" to my
system is a calcium reactor. <Also great for replacing buffer.> I try to do without additives as they can prove costly over time, mistakes can be made with application (we are all only human!) and leaving the System to go on holiday becomes a larger burden for
the person who looks after the tank. <For those who can afford the initial investment, this is a great way to go. Anthony is big on
Kalkwasser. I use the 2-part buffer/calcium from B-Ionic, but the cost of that adds up over time. Someday I'll figure out where to fit a calcium reactor in my
system.>
If adding a buffer to top-up is the "done thing" in the industry then I will follow suit, but reading through the WWM pages left me uncertain if there was consensus in this area. <No absolute consensus out there.> What is your take on this subject? <IMO, the bottom line here is that you are replenishing the buffer in the tank with your calcium reactor. The reason to buffer your RO water is to replenish its own buffering capacity that was removed by the RO process. I have been very satisfied simply adding the recommended per-gallon dose to my RO water only when making new salt water for water changes. My water is so hard here that I do not seem to need to add buffer to my top-off RO (no DI), which has a pH of 8.8. I'd suggest you check the pH of your top-off. If it is in the pH range you need, then you don't need to buffer it.>
As always, thank you very much for your advice. Andrew Senior <Hope this helps. I do not profess to be a chemist. Do read more if you desire a deeper understanding. Here's a start:
http://advancedaquarist.com/issues/may2002/chem.htm
>
pH problems 1/31/04
Hey, just a quick question for you guys. First of all, thanks for the great website and for all the effort everybody has put into it. It has really helped me through
a lot in this sometimes frustrating hobby.. I have searched through all the
FAQs on Ph and Alkalinity and couldn't find the answer to my problem. I also searched through the RO sections. I did however find a person with the same problem, but it was never cleared up. Ok, the question.. <Wow! Sounds like you have been quite diligent.>
When I make up top-off water I heat and aerate the water for 24 hours to drive off carbonic acid.. I do this in a 5 gallon bucket of old salt mix with a
MaxiJet 1200 on the bottom facing upwards to create surface agitation. I have a pump with air stone I use also to make extra sure it aerated good enough.. I then add a half teaspoon of Seachem marine buffer and a half teaspoon of Seachem reef builder. I let this mix and circulate for another 12-24 hours. After about 90 minutes after adding the
buffer the water test at 8.4 ... I then waited 7 hours and tested another time.. It tested at 8.2 ... I waited another 7 hours after that and retested. It tested at 7.8.. I have tried opening windows. I have tried aerating for a couple of days prior to mixing and nothing seems to help. I tried mixing for 3 days or so thinking the buffers haven't had time to dissolve totally, but nothing seems so help.. It still falls to 7.4-7.8.. after 24 hours or so. I just can't figure out why the buffer and reef builder is falling out of solution or being eaten up some how. I shouldn't have to add buffer ever day to keep a constant ph level. I just can't figure it out.. Maybe you guys can enlighten me on what's going on.
<Two things are occurring in some combination. First, the buffers in these products are actually LESS soluble in fresh water than in salt water (I know this is counter intuitive, but trust me!). Second, the manufacturer puts a variety of chemicals in these products so that long term use does not lead to the accumulation or depletion of certain ions from your aquarium. The combination of these two things will lead to precipitation in your bucket. I suspect that you have noticed a powdery white precipitate in the bottom of your bucket, or the water becomes slightly cloudy. My suggestion is to use these products one at a time (alternate between them) and only add them to the
aerated water immediately before use.>
I hate to bother ya'll with stuff like this, but it really has been bothering me. I don't want to drive my tanks ph down by adding low ph water. I have read through just about every faq page on the website over the years for knowledge and for when any question arose.. It has been a blessing indeed. Keep up the good work. Thanks in advance, Jeff Trumble
<No need to worry about driving your tank pH down. The buffers are still there, and in the CO2 consuming daylight hours in a reef tank, they will resort back to the desired pH. You just won't be getting the most effect for your money. Glad you have found benefit from WWM! Adam>
We Get Rain, Let's Use It!
>Hello,
>>Hello.
>I have a 50g reef tank. I was wondering if using rain water in Los Angeles
that comes directly from the sky (not from drains or runoff) is alright to use
for make-up water?
>>Treat as you would RO/DI (it would be VERY soft, and require proper
buffering).
>Should I worry about pollutants in the
air? thanks. Jason
>>I would not use the "first rain", but living in L.A. myself, I
would think that what we got yesterday would give you quite a bit after the
first half hour or so. I think you can certainly try (do keep an eye
on our news stations' air pollution reports for your best information), and if
in doubt, filter through carbon and a Polyfilter, then buffer. Marina
- Shut-off Switch, Follow-up -
Hi again Crew,
I was able to locate a few vendors who sell such a switch, but I guess my real
question is: Is this something I should spend the $$ on? <Too me, peace of
mine is often worth paying for.> Does this offer me some protection against
overflow or is it prone to sticking and causing more problems then not having
it? <Depends on the nature of the float switch. May pay to give it a rinse
from time to time.> Have any of the Crew used this or know about them?
<You left out the important information - what is 'this'? You didn't name the
actual product.>
Thanks
<Cheers, J -- >
Re: sump shut off switch 12/7/03 (2)
Crew,
Sorry, One that I found is the UltraLife float switch at MarineDepot and
premium aquatics. Thanks.
- Shut-off Switch, Follow-up -
Hi again Crew,
I was able to locate a few vendors who sell such a switch, but I guess my
real question is: Is this something I should spend the $$ on? Too me, peace
of mine is often worth paying for. Does this offer me some protection against
overflow or is it prone to sticking and causing more problems then not having it? <Depends on the nature of the float switch. May pay to give it a rinse
from time to time.>
Have any of the Crew used this or know about them?
<You
left out the important information - what is 'this'? You didn't name the actual
product.>
Thanks
<Cheers, J -- >
- Chemical Filtration & Makeup Water Heating -
I have done some reading about the two products Chemi-pure and
Phos-Zorb. They sound like really good products for my reef
tank. What I would like to do is place these two in a hang off the
side filtration system will they work that way? <Yes.> I have several dual
chambered hang off side systems lying around from my cichlid
days. Not worried about unsightliness because I bought a tall tank
and stacked the live rock all the way up to the water line. It gave
the tank an interesting effect. I have fish living in an almost
apartment style from top to bottom. I installed mirrors on the wall in back of
the tank with dim lights to see what goes on back there. A lot let me
tell you. It's a regular dance club. Complete with bass players and a sand
bar. I also have several corrals put on the rocks I took the time to
make sure all are secure ( I built little PVC holders custom made for each coral
to keep them off of the rocks and out far enough to let them fully
expand and grow. Very ugly at first but now all are overgrown with
coralline algae) I put light lovers at the top, deeper water ones down at the
bottom, aggressive corals with plenty of room. I also have a few anenomes
in and around the rocks. Very aggressive skimming a Sea-Clone 100 (I
know not the best skimmer, but I made a few modifications on the air inlet valve
and now I get a whole lot of brown goo in the cup about every other
day.) The reason I wanted to know about these two products is I use a
very simple filtration system. A gravity flow of water from the
bottom of the tank into a modified plastic bucket filled with floss and
activated charcoal and a big power head to pump it back up into the tank. I
guess really the power head helps suck the water through the filter so it is
more of a gravity assisted filter. It has worked well for over three
years, Sea-Clone 8 months, but I want to do the best I can for my
conversation piece (aquarium). Also I keep 33 gallons of
salt water for my every two week ritual of water changes, I only aerate
it. I have been reading that some people heat their water in the
container. <I'd be one of those people.> I always thought this to be a
grey area. <Not in my mind.> Should I keep all 33 gallons at 78F or heat
it just before I use it? <Yes... or at least heat it up a day or two before
you use it - adding water that is not temperature matched to the tank can be a
source of stress for your animals.>
Thanks ahead of time, Craig
<Cheers, J -- >
Question from new retailer continued II 10/30/03
That sounds very clever, I like it. One thing that is kind of
confusing me... what is a seawater float... is this different than a regular
float switch?
<ahh... my fault my friend. Not clear. Both float switches are the same... by
seawater, I mean that one is hooked up to bleed in saltwater (the coarse,
fast-tuned one), while the other (the sensitive slow-tuned one) simply bleeds in
freshwater for evap top off. Thus a sharp drop in water level (as from sales and
siphoned saltwater) will allow the seawater float switch to top of faster than
the FW bleed can make a difference. And the sensitive tuned FW bleeding float
can feed FW for slow evap while the SW float is tuned to coarse to even sense
the slow drop in water level>
And thanks for filling my daily need for Bob. I was getting a little
worried when he didn't respond within 60 seconds.
<ha! tis the standard we try for <G>>
Thanks, Matt
<best of luck>
- Top Off System -
Hey guys,
I have a 75 gallon tank that evaporates about 1 gallon per day (very
aggravating). <Have had my own set of aggravating top-off problems.>
Several months ago I set up a 5 gallon bucket as a top-off reservoir. I
put a powerhead in the bottom and ran a hose into my sump. The
powerhead plugs into an outlet that I have wired to a switch, when I flip the
switch, powerhead comes on. Beats having to pour water in everyday. However,
I was still having to fill my top-off bucket every four to five days, so,
tonight I went to the store and purchased a 30 gallon trash can. I
figured that should hold me for at least 1 month. I kept the set up
the same, however, after topping off my tank I returned one hour later to find
30 gallons of water on the floor. <Fun, not.> It seem that once I turn the
power off to the powerhead there is still a siphon. <Yep.> I cut a large
hole that would "catch air" breaking the siphon, but it did not work. How
can I set this up for water to only come through when the powerhead is on, not
thereafter as well. <Not so easy with a trashcan full of water - even if you
were to plumb a through-hull, you'd still have the weight of 30 gallons of water
wanting to empty out through the powerhead. If I were you, I'd take a look at
the peristaltic pumps available through Innovative Aquatics in Connecticut: http://www.innovativeaquatics.com/
- I purchased one of these units several weeks ago and have been quite satisfied
at the results. The unit I chose has a float switch which turns the pump on, and
then you can select a rate at which to pump water. The nature of the peristaltic
pump does not give way to siphons. The fact that this pump eliminated my top-off
problems [unreliable float valve] made it worth every penny.>
Thanks so much!
<Cheers, J -- >
- DIY Dosing Question -
Hey guys :) I made a DIY drip unit for my top-off water, which
will be distilled water buffered to the proper KH. My question is
this-Can I dose Iodine with the buffered water? <I wouldn't.> Can I add
gluconate CA to it as well? <You could, but I wouldn't.> I'm no chemist,
and don't claim to know anything about it, but it seems as though these could be
dripped together in one unit. <They 'could', but I wouldn't - I'd stick with
the standard bearers - kalkwasser or just clean water for top off. As for the
iodine - I just wouldn't add this without testing. Gluconate+calcium is not the
optimum way to get calcium into your tank, and then leaves you with all those
sugars... look out problem algae. So no... I wouldn't bother topping off with
either of those.> Thanks guys, you rock.
<Cheers, J -- >
-Top-off water questions-
Hey Kevin,
Mike again, the leaves are starting to change color here in Edmonton so you know
that "Winter is a comin". < :( One or two doing that around here
too...>I am re-reading and re-reading over articles and FAQ about water
changes since this is the number one thing a person can do to provide a good
home for the little guys. I was rereading for about the 10th time this article http://www.wetwebmedia.com/water.htm
and I am wondering. Do I need to buffer my tap water for water changes to get
the pH to be the same as the tank, Target a pH of 8.2-8.6? or do I just have to
be concerned about similar temperature, specific gravity and treat to remove
chlorine/chloramine? <That would depend on what your test kit reads after you
fully salt and aerate the water overnight. Every salt creates a slightly
(sometimes not so slightly!) different batch of seawater.> If so/In addition, baking
soda can be used to raise Ph. how much would I use to prepare 5 gallons of
pre-mixed water for water changes? <Check the carbonate hardness and pH
before toying around with any additives, the salt should contain all you
need.> and would you recommend this method? Thanks again Kev. <Good luck,
don't forget to break out the long underwear! -Kevin>
Cheers.
Mike Tol
-Infrared auto top-off by... Tunze?!-
WWM Team/Kevin,
I wanted to follow up on this question. Turns out the AquaSense top
off monitor is no longer manufactured. <Doh! I should have looked a lil
deeper...> However, I did find one that still is. It's called the
"Tunze Osmolator Universal 3155". <I had no idea Tunze had such a
product> Here is a review: http://www.pelzer.com/index.html?page=/reef/osmolator.html. Marine
Depot.com sells it. Now, the big question: Is this top off
monitor worth $165? <After doing a reefcentral search I came up with many
positive experiences with this product. The review alludes to a kalk dispensing
"kit" that can be purchased separately, but I didn't see if for sale
on marine depot.> Possibly, if hooked up to a Kalk dispenser but I'm way too
new to the hobby to offer any "formal" guidance at this time
(hopefully soon). Thanks again for your help. <I may try one of these on my
own system (was going to use a LiterMeter, don't need float switches getting
crusty or clogging up impeller driven pumps) in conjunction with a kalk reactor
(I would assume that if the unit pumped freshwater into the reactor which then
made its way into the tank that one wouldn't need the kalk kit, but who
knows...) Cool! -Kevin>
Mark
- Infrared Auto Top-off? -
I saw on your website that infrared auto top-offs are the best. Where
can I buy products like this?
Thanks!
Mark
<It took a few google searches to come up with
something, but I came up with a product called AquaSense. Here's some reviews:
http://www.saltcorner.com/sections/reviews/productreviews/aquasense.htm
by Bob Goemans and http://www.animalnetwork.com/fish/library/articleview2.asp?Section=&RecordNo=185
by Richard Harker. I'd check with Marine Depot b/c I found this http://www.marinedepot.com/dp_aquasense.htm
on their site, but with no price or availability. Good luck and let us know how
it goes! -Kevin>
Water Treatment
I have just found this site and I am grateful for the archives in Q&A
type format. Thanks for all the great info.
<Thank you for the kind words! We enjoy bringing it to you! Scott F. with you
today!>
I live in the United Arab Emirates, in an apartment, with limited space. It
would be very handy for me to use bottled water (5 gal. water cooler style) from
a local supplier. I have obtained a water quality report (see below). They claim
that the water undergoes a RO process. Would you suggest that I buy an
additional unit (something cheap and portable like the product shown here -->
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_Display.cfm?siteid=6
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_Display.cfm?siteid=6&pCatId=4484&pCatId=4484 and put the water through another processing for my new marine
tank under construction that will house fish and possibly some corals? Would the
fact that I plan on regular water changes impact this decision? Thanks.
Water Product Specification
* pH @ 25 degrees C = 7.8 8.2
* Conductivity @ 25 degrees C (|uS/cm) = 95 - 105
* TDS @ 25 degrees C (mg/l) = 95 - 105
* Total Hardness as CaCo3 (mg/l) = 35 - 45
* Total Alkalinity to pH 4.4 (mg/l) = 45 - 55
* Calcium (mg/l) = 15-20
* Magnesium (mg/l) = 03 - 05
* Sodium (mg/l) = 25 - 35
* Potassium (mg/l) = 0.5 - 0.7
* Bicarbonate (mg/l) = 55 - 65
* Chloride (mg/l) = 20 - 30
* Sulphate (mg/l) = 05 - 10
* Fluoride (mg/l) = 0.45 - 0.55
* Total & free Chlorine (mg/l) = Nil
* Turbidity (NTU) = Nil
* Taste & Odor = Acceptable/Good
Carolyn Munson
<Well, Carolyn- your water looks to be pretty good, however, I'd highly
recommend further treatment via an RO/DI unit. This is the best way to obtain
consistent, high quality water. Hope this helps! Regards, Scott F>
- Buffering Top-off -
<Good morning, JasonC here...>
I was just told by another experienced reefer, that he does not buffer his top
off water in a reef tank... using ro/di top off. He is using a calcium reactor.
Are calcium reactors typically automated to the extent that they make up for the
acidic top off. <No... calcium reactors are fed from the tank and return to
the tank, and essentially a zero-gain when it comes to water additions. Likewise
the effluent from a calcium reactor is about pH 6.7 so not buffering the top-off
is not a good plan.> I am planning my set up, and I would like to plan a
vacation so that the wife does not yell at me for not wanting to do anything but
pet fishing. Therefore I am trying to plan my top off H20 for a 10 day
excursion. I have dripped Kalk before, but at the 3 gallons a day I will most
likely evaporate, I do not have anyone that I could trust to secure my system in
my absence. <Time to find them... look perhaps for a tank maintenance
company.> Any thoughts would be appreciated. <You might also consider
filling a garbage can with top-off water and using a float valve to do the work
in your absence. Test this before you leave town, but should work.
Cheers, J -- >
- RE: Buffering Top-off -
So I suppose I treat/buffer the garbage can water, then I still drip kalk or
make a kalk slurry. <Yes.>
Does a kalk reactor provide a better auto system. <I think that is how
kalkwasser reactors are intended to be used, but given that you evaporate three
gallons a day, that's a lot of kalkwasser to be adding. I would stick with
normal top-off and then supplement that, but not use a kalkwasser reactor
exclusively.
Cheers, J -- >
Evaporation effects
>Re: my 55 gallon acrylic marine tank: when water evaporates, what goes with
it?
>>Pretty much H2O.
>How bout ammonia, nitrates, phosphate, calcium, magnesium, iodine, etc.
>>No, those are not evaporated away, especially the mineral substances.
>And what are the benefits or disadvantages of having your tank mostly
uncovered (power compact lights are maybe 4-5 inches above water level with high
powered fan cooling everything)?
>>The biggest disadvantages are losing fish (the jumpers), though this can
be prevented by utilizing fiberglass/plastic window screening, and evaporation. However,
this is offset (significantly so) by the cooling effect of evaporation (it's
much easier, technologically speaking, to heat a tank than to cool it), and the
ease of gas exchange (O2xCO2) at the water's surface.
>Also, it is true that if you have a window open your tanks pH will rise a
bit, if so, why is that?
>>This has to do with the pH lowering effects of CO2 (carbon dioxide),
often experienced in closed up rooms with poor ventilation. In Nordic
countries this can become a significant issue, *especially* if heating is
achieved via wood fire.
>Ok, last question. If marijuana smoking occurs within tank
proximity, what are the possible detriments?
>>I have found that there are no detrimental effects observed (pers.
exp.). Of course, this is assuming that the room itself is relatively
well-ventilated (no "Up in Smoke" recreations, please). Cigarette
or cigar smoke may pose more of a problem, ESPECIALLY if foam fractionation
using a venturi-type air inlet is being used, as the smoke from the air can
conceivably be pulled into the reaction chamber. But with the wacky
tobaccy, I think at worst your fishes will be feelin' a little groovy. They
may get the munchies, so have some nori and other good-for-them snacks on hand,
eh?
>Your council's wisdom is precious to me..
>>This crewmember has spoken, the council may weigh in with other
information. Best of luck to you! Marina
Top off system
Hi All,
Thanks for the help in the past. I owe all my knowledge and successes
gained in this hobby to Bob, Anthony, Craig and rest of the Crew!
<Glad we could help my friend!>
Anyway, on the topic of RO make up water to replace evaporation in my reef, I
understand the benefit of buffering it before use - since the PH is very low
(around 6).
<And Alk too!>
My concern is this:
I am using a daily 2-part buffering system that maintains my Ca and Alk params
perfectly. My top up is dripped in 24/7 using an automated system
with a float switch, so there are no sudden PH swings (I understand the risk of
using such systems, but I'm willing to accept it because it makes my life a
whole lot easier and the hobby much more enjoyable).
<If this works well for your system then I would stick with it. You *are*
dosing both parts A and B separately, (as per the label) *right*? Likely
using the buffer part *alone* as the drip to "stabilize" pH? This is
okay.>
In my case, is the risk even that severe anyway? Am I correct to say
that all 4 gallons of RO @ 6PH dumped in at once would drop the PH in 90gallon
system @8.2 down to about 8.1. If this is about right, it doesn't sound too
critical to me.
<If one considers pH only. Not too much to worry! What happens to your temp,
salinity, alkalinity, calcium, etc. when you dump 4 or 5 gallons of cold RO
water into your system? The effect is dependent on overall volume,
(and where it's released) which is why I sent you to the DIY pages to size your
top off volume to your overall volume in case such an event were to take place.
Consider all water params in this case to be safe!>
I calculated this as follows:
5% Total Vol. 6PH
95% Total Vol. 8.2 PH
50/50 would bring PH down to about 7.1 or for calculation purposes, we'll use 1
full point.
Divide by 10 to get 5% and we get .1 - is this a good enough calculation?
I personally see that in my case buffering my top up a moot issue. I
agree that in the event all my top-up gets dumped in at once (i.e. during a
failure) the impact would be less with buffered water, but other than that is it
really required? Doing so will just make the effort of maintaining
consistent and balanced Ca/dKH more difficult - not to mention the added
costs and time of doing so since my tank evaporates about a gallon a day.
Thoughts always appreciated! Steve
<Your system will likely evaporate more than a gallon per day in the summer
months, do consider using kalkwasser dripped to maintain calcium/pH and periodic
additions of buffer/carbonate alkalinity supplements as opposed to two part
additives in larger systems like a 90....very expensive unless ease of use is
paramount, in which case, continue on mate. At any rate, 4-5 gallons of cold,
unbuffered water into 90 gallons could/would be problematic in proportion to how
fast (and where) it is released. Through a float valve into a sump, overall, not
much to worry about....unless it floods. Even then, in view of how much water I
can put on the floor, 4-5 gallons is a slap on the wrist!
No worries! Craig>
Buffering RO for Top Off
Dear crew:
If I would like to hook up a RO unit through a solenoid and a float
switch to replace my evaporated water, do I need to add buffer to the new RO
water before I add into the sump?? Or can I even just hook up the water line
without the RO?? Will that be ok?
Eric
<Hi Eric, Because RO removes most to all mineral content, the
resulting product is acidic, in the pH 6 range. This water should be
reconstituted or buffered to raise pH and supplement the lost carbonates in reef
systems, unless it will be used to mix kalkwasser (then use it as is). I
recommend running the RO into a secondary container, like a Rubbermaid tub or
trash can and running a solenoid or float switch for a pump or gravity feed into
your sump. There are several good plans for these on the web, search for them at
WetWebMedia.Com under top off systems and DIY.
The best system I have seen, used a float valve, gravity fed with a limited
supply, (sized to the system) so a failure wouldn't have overwhelmingly negative
impact. A solenoid or float valve failure will then only introduce so
much top off water. Many people periodically add buffered water to supplement
carbonates but mainly top off by dripping kalkwasser which you don't
want to buffer. Many options available including several commercially available
systems. Check out some of our sponsors for these. Yours, Craig>
Evaporation top off systems
Help Please!
I have a 125 reef tank with ecosystem filter. I evaporate a little
over 1 gallon per day due to cooling fans. A local fish store
recommended a cheap way to add evaporated water would be to use a vacuum
pump. The vacuum pump would take water from a 10 gallon tank and with
a timer, pump water into the filter. I plan to use a power head to
circulate and aerate the 10 gallon reservoir tank. Does this sound
like a good idea?
<I would go to this page and look at several ideas...
http://www.ozreef.org/diy/index.html#TOP_UP
>
Can I add my additives to the 10 gallon reservoir tank? Steve.
<Some can be dosed together and some not. Depends on which additives you use.
Follow label, do not mix carbonate alk/buffer and
calcium/mag/strontium/kalkwasser in any case. Take care that your top
off can't overflow your system or overdose additives/FW. Craig>
Evaporation Situation!
Hi,
<Hi there! Scott F. with you today>
Thank you for all of the great info that you provide. I searched
through the FAQs, but I couldn't find an answer.
<Okay- let's give it a whirl! LOL>
I have a question that I hope you can answer for me. I have a 90 gal
SPS coral tank with metal halide lighting. It evaporates
approximately 1.5 to 2 gallons of water daily which maintains a 24 hr
temperature between 78 and 80 degrees. This water is replaced with RO
ozonized water buffered with Seachem buffer. All tank inhabitants are
doing great and I have not had any temp related diseases such as ich. Is
this too much evaporation?
<Well, any evaporation is too much, as far as we are concerned, right?
However, in an open-topped tank with halide lighting, the usual reef pumps,
etc., it seems pretty typical, actually>
Should I invest in a chiller?
<A chiller will help keep your tank temperature at acceptable levels, but it
will not prevent evaporation. Your tank temperature and fluctuation seem quite
acceptable. Short of hermitically sealing the tank (not an option!), diligent
top-off seems to be the best way to go... Some people design and install
automatic top-off systems, but they scare the heck out of me, really (I have no
less than 4 friends who have had outright catastrophes, ranging from flooded
homes to complete wipe-outs as a result of malfunctioning automatic top-off
systems.>
Thanks in advance for your response! Cheri Pawlak
<My pleasure, Cheri. Just keep on top of things, and your tan
Auto Top-Offs
-Jason,
<Good evening...>
I've reviewed as much info as I could find on your site regarding auto top offs
and my primary concern is the failure of a valve or switch. <I think perhaps
I wasn't entirely clear - I was trying to convince you into a different 'way' to
change the water; not in small, constant amounts, but in one fell-swoop - more
akin to using buckets, but also incorporating your desire to use these tanks. I
do not propose you go full-blown auto top-off, but rather crank the valves by
hand.> How reliable are the Kent float valves. <They work.> What's the
most reliable switch? I like the simplicity of a float valve but it would be
difficult to build in redundancy as one could by using multiple switches.
<Again... these items add unnecessary complication - consider just putting a
hand valve where you might use a float switch.>
Regards,
George
<Cheers, J -- >
- RE: Semi-Auto Top off -
Jason,
<Good morning.>
You were clear as far as your water change recommendation, thanks. <Oh good -
sometime I worry that I prattle on too much.> Seems like I read a reply from
one of the crew that said that some commercial breeders and public aquariums use
a slow, constant exchange method and that it was superior, but I am convinced
that I need to stick with the simpler method you suggest. Likewise, I thought
that small, frequent automatic top off amounts were better than introducing
larger amounts of fresh water to the system less frequently, but I am paranoid
about failed float valves or float switches. <Don't blame you there...>
Think I'll stick with a manual top off system as well. Can't wait to get the
nuts and bolts issues out of the way soon and start talking about animals.
<Sounds good.>
Many thanks,
George
<Cheers, J -- >
Top Offs...
Thanks for all of your answers!
<Glad to be of service! Scott F. with you again!>
Is it OK if I keep forwarding the previous message so that you will remember my
set-up?
<It's fine with me, but we usually can't print the previous messages in the
interest of space..>
One more question about the refugium.
<sure!>
If I grow macro-algae within 16 inches from the surface what sort of lighting
should I use? Coralife makes some 10 watt 50/50 that screw into a normal 110V
light bulb socket. If these would work well in this application, how many should
I use? If this was your refugium what would you use?
<I use compact fluorescents. I think that 2- 32 watt, or 2- 65 watt bulbs
would be just fine>
Last question for today. I use RO water for everything, and like I stated before
it tested out at 4ppm dissolved solids (quite well I was told). Could
there still be phosphates in this water that is fueling cyano algae?
<Could be. The dissolved solids could be just about anything, unfortunately.
It does not take too much phosphate to generate nuisance algae growth, so it is
possible. If the membranes on the RO unit need replacing, it's possible that
undesirables are getting through...check them! Also, use of good chemical
filtration media, such as Poly Filter, will help remove excess phosphate and
other impurities from the water once it's in your system...>
Also what is your opinion on automatic top-up devices (float devices) inside a
sump?
<Honestly, they scare the hell out of me! Sure, they work, and there are many
well-constructed systems out there. But I have had a few friends who have
experienced outright catastrophes from malfunctioning units over the years. I am
of the old-fashioned, labor-intensive, haul-the-water-in-a-bucket school of
water top off! If you are a DIYer, check out the great site Ozreef for some
better plans>
Will this cause a problem, seeing that the water is not aerated or buffered?
<Frankly, I think that it's better to prep the water before adding it to the
tank or auto-top-off system>
If I do add water via this method is it OK to just compensate with buffer to
keep ph and alkalinity up?
<I'd treat it like any other source water that you'd use in the tank. Hope
this helps! Regards, Scott F>
Can you make a recommendation on the automatic top off?
Right now my R/O unit goes to a 80 gallon reservoir which I will use for my
premix.
I was thinking of teeing off the existing supply to the 80-gallon reservoir to
the sump and controlling the flow with a Kent marine float valve. In
other words, the R/O unit would feed both the 80-gallon reservoir and another
line directly to the sump. Kent marine, however, does not recommend
having a float valve in the sump connected directly to the R/O unit. for
some reason this is bad for the solenoid, since the constant evaporation from
the sump will keep the R/O unit working constantly or at least turning the
solenoid on and off constantly.
The recommendation was to get yet another reservoir to which I would
periodically pump water from the existing 80-gallon reservoir. This
second reservoir would be solely for fresh water and would gravity feed the sump
and be controlled by a float valve. This second reservoir would have
to be refilled every week or so, so the automatic top-off would not be fully
automatic, just automated during the week.
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
<There are two ways to do this depending on your system. The above system
allows you to buffer your top-off water as needed, but is less automated. The
opposite idea works as well, automated with dosing pumps, calcium reactors, etc.
You need two containers as above. The main reservoir is fed by the RO unit
controlled by the Kent float. The pre-mix container should be the container that
is periodically filled when needed, not the top-off. The top-off system can then
be run with a small pump in the main reservoir, controlled by a solenoid in the
sump (either DIY or one of the commercially available units) which refills the
sump automatically.
Check out marine set-ups at WetWebMedia.com Craig>
Re: automatic top-off
Two perceived advantages of not using the main reservoir as the automatic top
off:
(1) The R/O unit isn't running all the time from the constant dribble replacing
evaporation from the sump;
<This is a non-issue, RO's that feed drinking water tanks have the same
intervals/use. It will run as long as required to fill the reservoir,
regardless.>
(2) in the event of malfunction, only a limited amount of fresh water gets
dumped in the tank.
<This is a good reason to go with the gravity fed top-off of limited volume,
only so much water can be accidentally added to the system.>
What the perceived advantages of what you propose? Solely automation? The
task of refilling the automatic top off seems hardly burdensome. It's
a flip of the switch.
<I got the feeling you were concerned with automation, if not, I would go
with what works best, is safest for you and your inhabitants. Enjoy! Craig>
Re: Automated water changes for mini-reef
Hello, and thanks for the great website and instructive information.
<thanks kindly... please keep reading, learning and sharing>
I'm interested in attempting the following experiment: to maintain a 180 gal.
community mini-reef system with automated water changes from the regeneration
(the rinse water that cleanses the ion-exchange resin bed) from my
household water softener.
<I see some likely problems already if your household softener uses potassium
or sodium chloride to recharge: imparting chlorides which skew alkalinity in the
aquarium for post treated water... OR...(your case) the impart of hardened
"purged water" which has mostly useful hard water elements (exchanged
for chloride by the softener) BUT(!) also has un-exchanged sodium chloride. This
unregulated NaCl allowed into your aquarium without the other
balanced minerals and trace elements of seawater will naturally effect your SG
but without the other necessary elements. In simpler terms... you can add enough
NaCl table salt to a glass of water that gives you a desired reading for marine
life, but without the trace elements... marine life will die in this salted
water even though the hydrometer says differently>
We use a 38,000 grain "on demand" water softener (using sodium
chloride)
<Houston we have a problem...>
and a RO system. (THE RO brine is used for another application -- a humidifying
water fountain). The hardness of our municipal tap water is approx. 16 grains.
It is chlorinated, but has low (undetectable) total dissolved solid, phosphate,
copper and iron content. Each regeneration uses approx 35 gallons, and
regenerates approx. every 5 days. Approximately 3lbs of salt is used for each
regeneration:
<Ughh>
The water chemistry of this "brine" consists mostly of
sodium chloride, calcium and magnesium.
<Oh, ya!>
I have 2 pH readings, 8.1 and 8.2 I'd like to have this water run through some
activated carbon and a specified amount of additional synthetic sea salt --
before it hits the sump.
<sorry... how do you reckon the incidental plain salt carried in? Even if you
could easily measure it, do you really want to get into making your own
synthetic trace element slurry to dose and temper the stray plain NaCl?>
The tank would be appropriately fitted for overflow drainage.
<way too complicated here, bud. Your best bet would be to get a seperate
(small is OK) 2-column de-ionizer and completely demineralize this water if your
goal is saving water. The high pH of this effluent that will be lost through the
DI is a small loss and easily/cheaply recovered post treatment>
The issues, as I see it are as follows:
1: Maintaining the specific gravity of the tank by fine-tuning the requisite
additional salt; (including fiddling with the evaporation rate, by changing the
amt. of uncovered surface area.)
<a complete nightmare... complicated and recommended only if you enjoy the
challenge and are a chemist>
2: Accounting for an accelerated removal of trace elements (strontium, etc.).
<accelerated? They were never there in the first place. Not sure we are on
the same page here. I am talking about you reckoning the sodium chloride that
you are bringing in with this rinse water but without the slurry of balanced
trace elements to make SW>
Before I reinvent the wheel, do you have any information about other attempts in
this area?
<no one bothers when time and expense are issues. This would have to be a
personal challenge for you, because there is no practical reason otherwise for
doing it. The irony is that your tap water through carbon is probably the best
water could you have in the house for a marine tank. Reconstituting pure DI
water is probably second.>
Are there any flies in the ointment I'm missing?
<a whole swamp full of flies, brother!>
Other considerations?
<this really all boils down to not bringing plain salt into the make up water
or being a brilliant chemist with a lab to check the daily/weekly variances and
compensate for them with your own home-made synthetic sea salt mix>
-- e.g. are there some reef species that would be more tolerant to this?
<cruel and unnatural to do so... doesn't happen in the wild>
Species to avoid?
<Ha!... All<G>>
Are there other automations to help minimize other tank maintenance,
<I can forward you a chapter from my book about setting up automatic water
changes with solenoids>
such as substrate maintenance?
<thin substrate, strong water movement and active sand sifting animals>
What other issues should I consider?
<hmmm... I'd suggest that you try treating this more like a hobby instead of
a science, my friend :) ... unless you truly enjoy the science more than the
organic living components (our fishes and corals!)>
Thanks!-Frank Pogoda BTW: I plan to keep a journal on this project & publish
my results to help others who may be curious about this operation.
<indeed, that would be excellent at any rate. Kind regards, Anthony>
Automated water changes for mini-reef
Whew! I haven't been sobered up that aggressively since college mid-terms!
<Ha! With a college flashback like that, did you also suddenly get the
munchies too? And for lack of a beer at hand, chug your scalding hot coffee
chanting "Go. go...go...go...GOOOOOO!" in your head? Just
checking?>
Your sense of humor and gracious style, Anthony, is why when you ring in folks
like me (and you sure did) we laugh along....good job! And thanks for the good
feedback.
<Wow... thanks kindly :) But I was really just taking the long way around the
barn for calling you a sadist with mad scientist tendencies. I'll take the
credit just the same <G>. Heehee...>
Your reasonable protestations aside, let's assume I (pigheadedly!) go through
with this experiment.
<OK>
Should I seek out a SW product that is markedly higher in balanced trace
elements than others?
<that depends on how involved you want to get here. If the science of it
isn't appeal in the purist form... and you just simply want to make it work: my
advice would be to simply purchase the semi-solid synthetic sea salt
concentrates they make for the big commercial operations (actually quite
economical... but you must mix every time EXTREMELY well or make whole batches
(400gall) at a time). These SW slurries have everything in it you need except
plain salt. Then... you will only have to calculate the influx of sodium
chloride with the source water and supplement proportionately>
Is there a trace element compound available without sodium chloride?
<yep... most of the big manufacturers make it. Best to seek an aquaculture
supply house for this. Fritz used to make such a product for public aquariums
and shrimp/food fish farmers.. perhaps still do?>
Maybe the trace element/SW slurry (including the correct amount of salt to
balance the brine) could be set below the activated charcoal/carbon, ready to be
washed into the tank with the regenerated water. What other suggestions do you
have
to make this work?
<Jack Daniels... by the gallon>
I know using that automating a system with inferior water is
complicated, ultimately may not work, and is repugnant to many. But the allure
of utilizing water that is so close to ideal, and is generated a mere 5 feet
away from the tank, and can lop off a HUGE chunk of time, and is an intriguing
alternative to the conventional way -- is all too enticing for me.
<some merit to it, some extra complications too. The high pH and high mineral
content are easily provided/supplemented and cheaply too otherwise. You may find
that using this water is not time saving at all, and simply resort to carbon
filtered tap water>
BTW, I will NOT jeopardize any marine wildlife with this Dr. Demento
contraption.
<understood my friend>
Live rock will be added only when I can easily maintain the
correct SW chemistry. Finally, I agree with your suggestion that I treat this
more as a hobby than as a science. That's what I'm doing! Rather than anally
adhering to scientific rules set in stone, I'm trying a different path to the
same destination.
<you're a heroin addict, aren't you? Ahem,... I mean... "Why yes, I
concur wholeheartedly with your reason and rationale for embracing the science
of aquariology without becoming enslaved to it." Errrh... or something like
that <G>>
From where I sit, my friend, that's the approach that makes mini-reefkeeping a
hobby. Thanks again, and do let me know your additional input to this
unconventional approach to make and
maintain safe sea water. With great appreciation, Frank
<best regards in this endeavor... we'll watch for you on the news. :)
Anthony>
| |
|