|
| |
|
FAQs on the Rainbowfishes 2 Related Articles: Rainbowfishes, Fishes
at the rainbow’s end; An
introduction to the Atheriniformes, the rainbowfish and silversides
by Neale Monks
Related FAQs: Rainbowfishes
1, & FAQs on: Rainbow Identification,
Rainbow Behavior,
Rainbow Compatibility,
Rainbow Selection,
Rainbow Systems,
Rainbow Feeding, Rainbow Disease,
Rainbow Reproduction, |
|
rainbow fish 5/10/08
hey, I am starting a rainbow fish tank,
<Er... I guess you didn't read the 'house rules' regarding grammar, punctuation,
etc.
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/faqstips.htm
Also, here in England at least, someone saying "Hey" to a complete stranger is
considered extremely rude.>
what are some recommendations (plz no tank sizes)
<Why don't you want to know the tank sizes? All the fish you're considering need
a fairly spacious tank, certainly upwards of 180 litres/45 gallons. Non-dwarf
Rainbowfish comfortably reach 10-12 cm in many cases, often slightly more. It's
just plain cruel to keep them in any aquarium less than 1 m/36" long -- they
need the swimming space.>
I am putting 4 Australian rbs, 4 incisus rbs, 4 boesmani rbs,
<You need at least 6 of each of these. Not 4. These are *schooling* fish, and
you will NOT see them at their best in small groups. They need to be in big
groups so that the males and females are in sensible, equal numbers. ONLY kept
this way will the group be peaceful and the males develop their strongest
colours. For example, some people try to keep just males, and then wonder why
their Rainbowfish don't ever become fully coloured. Well guess what -- those
colours are for a reason -- to show off to females. No females, no mating
colours. And if you want a nice mix of males and females, you need 6 of each
species, at least. In addition, in groups of less than 6 the fish won't school.
So instead of nice, coordinated group of fish schooling together, you'll get a
jumble of scared-looking fish with weak colours. Trust me on this: after a
couple of weeks of this, you'll be very disappointed with your aquarium. So
instead of three different species, how about 12 specimens of just one species.
The result will look a hundred times better, and this is how professional
aquarium designers work when creating exhibits with Rainbowfish for offices,
public aquaria, etc.>
like what tank ornaments/substrate etc.
<Rainbowfish do indeed like tank ornaments and substrate.>
Thanx
<Chz Neale>
|
New Tank question, stkg.
Melanotaeniids, Colisa lalia 3/12/08
Hello. I am new to aquariums and have purchased several books and read tons
on your site (which has been VERY helpful) in an attempt to be the best fish
owner possible. I have some questions that I can't seem to find specific answers
to, even though I have done several searches on your site.
Some background info:
I purchased my fish from a local fish store that has the best reputation in the
area. These are the fish (all locally raised) I purchased based on their advice:
3 angels (started with 4, one just died after a bout with an eye infection fish
store thinks was due to injury - I removed sharp fake rocks)
<Bad choice for your first aquarium, and for what it's worth, the eye infection
is more likely aggression between the Angels followed by a secondary infection.
Fish just don't normally scratch themselves.>
3 turquoise Gourami (again started with 4 but one died almost instantly, fish
store said sometimes that "just happens"!??)
<Fish Store somewhat correct. These are Colisa lalia, a fish that is plagued
with an incurable viral disease. Inbred forms like the turquoise variety are
even more flimsy than otherwise. Colisa lalia is a complete waste of money.>
2 blue rainbow
<Should be kept in groups of at least six specimens: Melanotaenia spp. are
schooling fish, so what you're doing is cruel. Depending on precisely what
species you have, these may be too large for your tank. Many Melanotaenia reach
12-15 cm.>
2 Hoplo catfish (acquired about 3 months after the others)
<Far too large for your aquarium; Hoplosternum littorale gets to over 15 cm in
length and is extremely boisterous in temperament. A superb choice for a 55
gallon tank; an appalling one for anything smaller.>
I have a 29 gallon tank that I set up and let run for 2 weeks before purchasing
any fish.
<Just "running" isn't enough -- how did you mature the filter? What source of
ammonia did you add? Ammonia from a bottle? Bits of rotting shellfish? If you
did nothing, and just let it sit there, then it is no more cycled after two
weeks than it was when you started.>
All the fish did fine in their new home (excepting the one Gourami). I test my
water regularly and do a 20-30% water change every week. I have had the tank set
up for almost 6 months so now I am in the process of adding live plants. (I put
in 2 live plants a couple of weeks ago and they did well so I just added some
more).
So now on to the question(s):
What is the best temperature for this grouping of fish? The fish store said 72F
but everything I read says it should be warmer. Should I listen to local advise
or let majority rule?
<Neither. Science isn't democratic or based on local wisdom. Each fish has its
own preferences dependent on its point of origin. Buy and read a decent aquarium
book so you don't have to depend on what the guy in the shop says. Aiming for 25
C/77F would be about right for your fish.>
I have been having a heck of a time keeping the water quality stable. It seems I
am always fighting against high ammonia or high nitrites/nitrates. Since I
monitor this regularly, I am able to take corrective action before I get any
further than the "mildly stressful" levels according to the test kits - but I
would REALLY like to get everything stable and not always be worrying about what
is going wrong!!
<Poor water quality depends on three factors: stocking, food, and filtration. If
you are getting poor water quality even six months after setting the tank up,
then you are either overstocked, overfeeding, and/or under-filtering. Pick and
choose from these. Do also check you aren't doing anything stupid like killing
the filter bacteria every time you open the filter, for example by changing all
the media or running the media under a hot tap.>
I have hard water with a pH of 6.8 and currently my ammonia and nitrite readings
are 0.
<Fine.>
I think maybe I am feeding too much? I read that as long as all the food is
eaten in a couple of minutes, then it is the correct amount.
<Depends on the fish and the food. A juvenile Angelfish for example needs 3-4
"flakes" per day. Consider each flake about the same a medium-sized steak would
be to a human. Alternately, a single wet-frozen cube of bloodworms would be
adequate for all your fish for one day. Fish need very small amounts of food.>
My fish do eat all the food in that time period and come to the top afterward
acting like they are starving, so could it be I am still feeding too much?
<Maybe.>
How do you know exactly how much to feed? This question has been driving me
crazy for six months! I alternate between flake food and frozen brine shrimp,
and I just started giving seaweed 1-2 times a week. I don't want to overfeed but
I also don't want my fish to be hungry!
<Well-fed fish should have a gently rounded abdomen. If the abdomen looks chunky
or swollen, you're overfeeding; if the ventral surface is concave or
"knife-edge" in appearance, you're underfeeding.>
Then I just got a new filter. The one I had was an used AquaClear 70 that worked
OK but made a horrible racket and I just couldn't take the noise any more! So I
purchased a Marineland Emperor 400 (for up to 80 gallon tank) as I liked the
idea of the bio-wheels and not risking the biological filtration every time I
cleaned the filter. I know this is big for my tank but I went with the
assumption that it would keep the water cleaner (and maybe therefore help
stabilize everything) and also I hope to get a bigger tank in the future and
this way I won't have to buy another new filter. I added the filter material
from the old filter to start with (planning to remove it in a couple of weeks)
in an attempt to keep the biological filtration going - I have no idea if this
worked.
<Should do, but don't remove the old filter media for at least 6 weeks.>
But this filter makes the water much more active and I don't know if my fish
like it! My Gouramis are turning darker since the change, even though they are
eating and swimming normally. Is this grouping of fish OK with active water or
should I change back to a smaller filter that won't move the water so much? They
are all swimming around fine, not seeming to be buffeted or anything, but I
notice it especially when feeding as the flakes now move rapidly around the tank
and the fish get pretty hyper chasing the food. Is this stressful? My rainbows
are chasing each other at feeding time and they never used to do that.
<What matters is water turnover. Look at your filter: it will have a turnover
rating in gallons (or litres) per hour. Compare this to your tank. You are after
4-6 times the volume of the tank in turnover per hour.>
I raised the water temperature to 77F when I was dealing with the hurt angel
(per fish store) and I haven't lowered it yet. Could that be the reason for the
hyper behavior and color changes?
<No idea, but leave the temperature there anyway.>
Overall my fish seem happy with each other and the new plants (nibbling on them
and hiding in them), but the angels are starting to get really big and I know
the rainbows and Hoplo can get big too so I am worried about whether they will
continue to get along. Or if maybe the angels are harassing the Gouramis and
that is the reason for them getting darker colored?
<Possible, and the Hoplosternum are also a bit more robust that one would
normally want with Gouramis.>
I also notice a white area on 2 of the Gouramis (it is not raised or cottony or
anything, looks more like a small layer of scales is gone) which makes me wonder
if there is some fighting going on of which I am not aware.
<Or the start of Dwarf Gourami Iridovirus.>
I want to be a good fish owner and I love my fish, but so far I have spent much
more time worrying than enjoying! How do I create a happy, stable aquarium
environment?
<Primarily by reading first. Knowledge is power.>
I apologize for the long message. Thanks so much for your help and all the
invaluable information on your website!
Cathy
<Good luck, Neale.>
Re: New Tank question... Outside
power filter
3/14/08
Thank you for your response to my questions. Your response has raised two
more questions. I did search your site before writing to you again, and I spent
almost 3 hours reading without finding the answers to my questions, so I hope
it's OK to write to you again.
<It's fine! Ask away!>
The first is concerning the fish I was advised to purchase. I am stuck with
these fish now and want to make the best of the situation.
<Agreed.>
I feel really bad about the rainbows and plan to get a larger tank and more
rainbows as soon as it is possible. So that leads to my question - I have
already had these fish for 6 months and am not sure how long it will take me to
gather the money for the larger tank set-up - at that point, I can only assume
that the rainbow fish I have are going to be a good bit larger than the new
fish. Is this going to be a problem in terms of them getting along and
schooling, etc.?
<Shouldn't be a problem. Rainbowfish usually school with one another happily
regardless of size. Mature males might chase one another, but normally no harm
is done.>
I'm also very aggravated that they told me to get the hoplos as I told them I
wanted two small catfish... and they were small when I got them :-) but have
grown an enormous amount already and are very, very active - running into/over
all the other fish if they happen to be in their way
<Indeed, Hoplosternum littorale is far from a "small" catfish.>
The 2nd question regards my new filter... it turns over 400 gallons per hours. I
have a 29 gallon tank so this is obviously more than 4 to 6 times the volume of
the tank. Does that mean I am now over-filtering?
<Seriously? 400 gallons per hour is a HUGE filter. This would be a
top-of-the-line filter costing several hundred dollars and would be churning a
29 gallon tank into something like Niagara Falls! I'm pretty sure you're
misreading something, and what you have is a 400 litres per hour filter, which
is pretty standard for an entry-level filter. 400 litres is about 100 US
gallons, or in other words a turnover about 3 and a bit times the volume of your
tank per hour. Under-filtering rather than over-filtering.>
Do I need to get rid of this filter and get something smaller? I am reluctant to
do that (since I am planning to get a bigger tank), but I will if it is what is
best for the fish.
<Save up for the aquarium. At this point your problem is you have a bunch of
fish that need a bit more space than you have. I'd recommend at least 55 US
gallons. To keep costs down, save up for that tank and then install an
undergravel filter. Coupled with the filter you already have, these two
different filters will combine to provide excellent water quality. Undergravel
filters aren't compatible with plants that have roots, but they're fine with
floating plants and plants stuck to rocks (like Anubias and Java fern). Old
school technology perhaps, but cheap and effective.>
Thanks again for your help!
Cathy
<Cheers, Neale.> Re: New Tank
question... filter
According to the box, my filter does run 400 gallons per hour (see specs
below)! It is a huge filter - taking up most of the back of the tank. I paid
around $80.00 for it. The water is active but not churning... should I get
something smaller? Or maybe just figure out how to adjust the flow pump (that
wasn't in the directions)?
Thanks!
Cathy
Marineland - Emperor 400 Power Filters
*Model Number **400*
*Flow Rate (L/H) * 1500
*Aquarium Size (L) *<300
*Flow Rate (GPH) * 400
*Aquarium Size (G) * <80
<Hi Cathy. Okely dokely; my mistake. But seriously, a 400 gallon per hour filter
on a 29 gallon tank will have a turnover of more than 13 times per hour. That's
more than the average marine aquarium! I can't imagine angelfish and other
community fish of that sort being happy. The normal turnover for community tanks
with freshwater fish is between 4-6 times per hour. In other words, just as the
ratings suggest, this filter would be ideal for an 80 gallon tank (5 x 80 =
400). So yes, I'd be looking for a smaller filter, and would save this one for
as/when you get a large tank. Cheers, Neale.>
An addendum: Regarding Emperor 400 filter
On 3/14/08 Neale answered a question from Cathy (Re: New Tank question)
3/15/08
Hi there, Crew! I just had a note to add. Regarding Emperor 400 filter On
3/14/08 Neale answered a question from Cathy (Re: New Tank
question) regarding her Emperor 400 filter on her 29 gallon tank.
Neale suspected that this filter couldn't possibly be so vigorous as 400 gph,
but this is actually what it is rated at! In fact, I've seen
two of these filters powering a 250 gallon tank with a single Koi, at my fave
Pan Asian restaurant. It seems to suffice.
This web page explains some basic modifications you can make to maximize
efficiency:
http://www.cichlid-forum.com/articles/power_filter_tricks_v.php
Emperor filters are workhorses, and they do deliver ample flow.
Unfortunately, these filters are the "cartridge type" with some blue floss and
crumbles of carbon in a grid...I *highly* recommend to anyone who uses them,
that they swap out the disposable cartridges for the largest AquaClear media
they can find. Specifically the foam sponges and the Biomax bags. All of my
tanks have hang-on back filters (some also employ canister filtration) and I use
AquaClear media on all of the hang-on back filters, even though some of them are
not AquaClears. The AquaClear media comes in an array of sizes, so will fit most
any HOB filter. Rinseable, reusable media is the way to go!
Incidentally, that filter must be roiling the water on that 29 gallon tank a
whole lot. Since as I recall, Cathy has three dwarf Gouramis in there, maybe she
should try to diffuse that flow a bit. One suggestion would be to secure
floating plastic plants just under the filter's flow path. Some black binder
clips holding up the plants on either side of the filter ought to do the trick,
although a more elegant and lasting solution could probably be effected
eventually. Just food for thought!
As always, thank you for all your efforts.
Nicole
<Thanks much for this Nicole. Will send along to NealeM and accumulate. Bob
Fenner>
<As Bob said, thanks for this. Without the filter being named in the original
e-mail, I simply had a hard time imagining anyone would put such a big filter on
such a small tank. But I was wrong! I agree with you, the water current is
perhaps overkill for Gouramis, but then again, I imagine the "gallons per hour"
of the average Southeast Asian river is pretty substantial, too! Cheers, Neale.> |
Neale re: threadfins (Rainbows)
4/24/08
Hello again Neale,
<Hello Aileen,>
I have been fish keeping almost a year now and it amazes me how much I learn
every time I look through pages of this site. Sometimes too much and the
information gets all jumbled in my head (could be age too) and other times I
learn enough to lead me to ask more questions.. it really is a wonder resource.
<Thank you!>
You mentioned some time ago that if I wanted threadfins I should consider
another tank. I thought you were nuts at the time but...I am going to look at a
used 40g tomorrow. Actually somebody had a 100g I can have but I think two
monster tanks might be a bit much. My thinking is leading me to include in this
tank: threadfin rainbows, wrestling halfbeaks, Corydoras and then I was
wondering about bumblebee gobies or something with some colour. I was reading on
WWM that most bumblebee gobies are considered brackish except one species, which
may or may not, tolerate fresh water better?
<BBGs are complicated: you cannot possibly identify species; even scientists
have trouble doing this under a microscope, let alone with live fish! Most BBG
species seem to be found in a variety of habitats, from blackwater streams to
brackish water. But in aquaria they are temperamental, and slightly brackish
water does seem optimal. This is a lot like Mollies for example, which may be
freshwater fish in the wild, but unquestionably are easier to keep in brackish.
Because BBGs are very difficult to keep well fed, I'd not keep them in a
community tank.>
My water is liquid rock. What are your thoughts on this community and any
numbers you may think appropriate? Are there any other species you might include
instead?
<Almost anything that doesn't explicitly need soft water should thrive. pH
stability is more important than pH value in most cases, and people routinely
keep all sorts of things in hard water conditions. With Threadfin Rainbows, I'd
be looking at Corydoras (and their relatives, like Aspidoras and Dianema) in
terms of bottom dwellers. Kuhli loaches and small Loricariidae such as Whiptail
Catfish would also be appropriate. You might also opt for some surface fish like
Halfbeaks. Tetras and Barbs are best avoided because of potential problems with
fin nipping, but Rasboras and other small Rainbowfish are certainly an option.
Livebearers are certainly a possibility, though some Goodeidae are fin nippers
so choose with care.>
And since I have your attention, I was reading on here some time ago about
separating swordfish fry before the appearance of the sword to prevent
inbreeding. So I immediately set up another 10 gal to do so. But I realized when
I was trying to sex them that they appear to be all female! Is this a
probability?
<No. While the idea that Swordtails change sex is widely held, there are
actually no scientific studies that backs it up. It is much more probable that
aquarists mistake undeveloped males for females. Male livebearers don't develop
their sexual characteristics until a certain age (usually around 2-3 months
depending on the species). Obviously until the gonopodium is formed they cannot
fertilise the females, so you don't need to separate them until that time.>
Or am I missing something like the triangular fin I am supposed to be seeing on
only the females? Is the differentiation not as great in fry as adults? I ended
up separating by size as it seemed the best alternative at the time. Since I was
having so much trouble purchasing healthy vibrant red swords I decided to keep
the try of a lone surviving, vibrant female. The batch was small but healthy, I
have not lost any and they are about 5 months old. But still, not a sword in the
bunch...I was hoping for some nice deep red males for another long term plan.
<If you have just 5 fry, it is statistically possible, though unlikely, they are
all one sex. But if the fry are less than a couple months old, you can't sex
them anyway.>
Thanks in advance for your help
Aileen
<Good luck, Neale.>
| |
|