
|
|
FAQs about "Coral" Reproduction/Propagation: Troubles, Fixing
Related Articles:
Growing Reef Corals For Profit by Anthony Calfo,
Coral Propagation, LPS Corals,
True or Stony Corals, Order Scleractinia,
Propagation for Marine Aquarium Use,
Trachyphyllia Reproduction Event,
Related FAQs: Coral Propagation 1,
Coral Propagation 2, Coral
Propagation 3, Coral Propagation 4,
& FAQs on Coral: Coral Prop Livestock
Selection, Frag Sources (Info.,
Livestock, Supplies), Frag
Tanks/Systems, Frag Methods,
Frag Tools, Frag Feeding,
Frag Health, Propagation Economics,
Fraggle Rock (just kidding), & FAQs Files on: "Frag Momma
Frag, Whatcha Gonna Do? " by Group:
Cnidarian Reproduction, Caryophyllid
Propagation/Reproduction,
Soft Coral Propagation, Growing Reef
Corals, Livestock
Business, Stony Coral Identification, Stony
Coral Behavior, |
|
Re: MACNA & Frag Exchange, StevenP 8/15/07 Yeah
Mac, it is official now. Frag Exchange is not going to be an
exhibitor at MACNA XIX, so if you can, get one of the WWM passes.
In case you were wondering, I have long hated that the coral
propagation workshops fragment freshly imported corals. It is simply
poor husbandry and contrary to what Eric, Anthony, and I all
recommend. But up until now, I could do nothing about it other than
not do the workshops. But this year, we made the decision to only
fragment corals that had been held for 1-2 months prior to the show.
I let John know this back in early May and he agreed to the terms.
MACNA XIX would give Frag Exchange a quad booth, four 10' by 10'
booths, with 5 full show passes provided he could obtain
corals ahead of time. In the end, he failed to live up to his end
and we felt we had no other choice than to go with plan B and
leave Frag Exchange out.
Re: MACNA & Frag Exchange , MacL
8/15/07 Hey Steven and Anthony and Eric and Bob, I
included you all in this email since Stephen said that having corals
that have been kept for a while before they are used was a joint
decision recommended by all of you. <Not anything to do with me>
I totally understand why you would dislike fragging freshly imported
corals. They have been stressed in various ways by their
importation and the changes that they have gone through and then
they come in to be fragged. But my question for you is, isn't that
the reason to frag corals to begin with? <In part, yes> Yes
people frag their friends coral that is in great shape but more
often they want a piece of the coral that is dying and want to try
to save it. In our demonstrations, we take the dregs of the corals
that have been shipped. We ask for corals that are stressed and
in poor condition to do our demonstrations with. We talk to the
people and we tell them these corals have been severely stressed. We
are trying to take corals that would for the most part be disposed
of anyway from these distributors and put them to good use and in a
lot of circumstances SAVE the coral or a part of the coral. I do
think its a lovely idea to bring in corals from the local clubbers
and we usually do have some of these. I recognize that when they do
the demonstrations that you guys perhaps would prefer to use corals
that look nicer but I know Anthony always mentions that he uses
fragging to assist in saving the coral. In fact, I believe Anthony
prefers damaged corals. I know that sometimes these corals look very
bad and are very badly stressed but many corals go on to survive and
thrive from these shows. I personally have a gorgonian that is from
the very first show that frag did so I know for a fact that they do
survive. I had planned to bring a frag of this coral and frag it at
this show. Additionally, our coral sponsors for the show are very
generous people and have been kind enough to let us have corals for
both IMAC and MACNA but asking for corals without a gap in time
between our requests to me seems to be abusing the generosity of a
group who is giving us something. It was mentioned Steven that you
had space in your greenhouse to keep the corals should they have
been donated to us early as you requested but I also worried that
that could cause additional problems and suggestions of impropriety
with the corals. For instance, what happens if they ship 25 corals
and only 19 survive to make it to the show. What kind of
documentation would be necessary to provide proof of what happened
to the corals. In the past I would have said that only your word
would suffice but after past circumstances I don't think that would
suffice anymore. <Certainly seems a "Catch 22"> Additionally
you have the complications of what to do now with the frags that you
all will be fragging. What will you do with them? Will the club give
them out?? Will the club "store" them? That's where having the
corals that are not in the best conditions come into play as well.
The vendors cannot see them as competition to what they are selling
because they are corals that are damaged and we are essentially
trying to "safe" them. <Good point> I do want to point out
that our philosophy has always been to save the reefs and that at
any time if we thought that we were doing damage to the reefs we
would stop fragging period but its our philosophy that by teaching
these people how to frag and by letting them have hands on
experience at the booth that we are giving them something that they
can't get anywhere else. I was disappointed at IMAC that more people
didn't get that experience but at the last MACNA we reached out to a
tremendous amount of people and let them have hands on fragging
experience. This is something they do not get from just watching a
fragging demonstration and something that FRAG can give them. If you
look on frag you will see a connection to pictures with a
demonstration of one person who had never fragged before and when he
left he became comfortable with it. Once again the corals that get
fragged on the first day would be put in tanks with others. There
isn't really any other way around this but we have done everything
we can to prevent problems by using as many methods as possible to
keep the tanks clean including doing multiple water changes, diatom
filtration, and using ozone.? I also want to mention the support
that frag has always given to all of you. I realize that while
we may not have the most sponsors or the most hits of any of the
sites there are always people on the site and looking at information
on the site from searches on Google and other search engines.
Our presence is mainly at the shows and we need to keep going to the
shows to keep alive as you all well know. I don't know what plan B
is but it has to be hurtful to frag and the many people who have
supported MACNA and IMAC and you gentleman over the years. I would
really like you to reconsider this decision Steven. I do understand
the reasons why you have made them but I hope you have come to know
more why I personally objected to storing the corals before hand and
why I think it is essential that frag exchange be at the show.
Whether it is represented by me personally or not. As you know, I
have other interests along with Frag. Thanks Mac <Mac Lewis
is part of FRAG as well as WWM. Bob Fenner>
Re: MACNA & Frag Exchange, EricB's go 8/15/07
Dear all: Since this is my first foray into this ongoing
discussion, I will be brief. I have gotten to the point where I
am generally against all commercial wild collection of corals for
aquariums, period. <Unrealistic... what will indigenous peoples
do with their resource if this "higher and better use" cannot be
made of/with it? Cement? Building material? Dynamite fishing?...
think> I am even against Mariculture at this point until
standards are set to avoid the pest species now being introduced by
Mariculture operations, <Unrealistic as well... who is going to
produce, enforce such standards? Who is going to pay for it?>
although I am hopeful an upcoming workshop may help address those
issues. And, I am against frag trading by clubs without
quarantine and proper post fragmenting husbandry for the passing of
pest species and the potential of non-native and invasive
introductions by the many coastal dwelling aquarists of the world.
<...> Ethically, I do like to save damaged corals, especially
from other aquarists who are having tank problems, but I am less
assured that the average aquarist is able to save a stressed or
damaged coral. I am unsure of the survival of fragments we create
since there is no post monitoring period, and we don't take our own
frags home to see if it is the post fragmenting conditions or the
aquarist who takes home the frags that results in any mortality. I
know when I frag my own corals they don't die. I know when I try
to save a stressed wild coral, it might make it and it might not. I
can even say that for healthy wild corals. But those sick and
healthy wild corals are then replaced by more, and frankly it just
sits wrong with me. <Perhaps another interest... like human birth
control?> And, let's face reality here. The aquarium hobby isn't
saving reefs in any way shape of form no matter how much talk there
is of our concern. Concern and action seem to be Kapela <<? RMF>>
and always have been. <Mmm, I/we disagree... the long term
effects of acquaintance, knowledge of the living world protect it
more than any other activity... Is this/the "cost" worth it? I
believe so> I did not know the terms Steve and Anthony suggested
for this MACNA, until now, but fully support them and think their
suggestions are, as mentioned, long overdue and well thought out. I
resent any implications that Steven would be involved with
impropriety of gifted corals. We have more corals than we know what
to do with - I could give away a tank full and never notice they
were gone - and the novelty of having this coral or that coral - and
I think I speak for all of us - has long ago ceased to be a
temptation as it is for so many hobbyists. I dare say we have had or
kept just about every species available and could get them easily,
if not for free, if we desired. In terms of the support given by
sponsors or vendors, I also really don't have any interest in their
financial success of failure though always appreciate the generosity
of others as we have so generously donated our time and effort for
literally two decades now. I appreciated being able to help Frag
with demonstrations and by their hospitality at events. In terms of
personal gain to us, I have a few T-shirts and some conversation for
a few hours a year, so it is not particularly important to me either
way. My main concern is that the corals entrusted to us survive and
all the rest is virtually immaterial. Steven, Anthony and MACNA XIX
seem to have attempted to address this concern and I stand by their
decision. Eric Borneman <Bob Fenner. It is my understanding
that EricB has never worked in the ornamental aquatics industry>
Re: MACNA & Frag Exchange, MacL responds 8/15/07
Well since I apparently have opened a can of worms here. I can only
speak to these things from MY personal experiences. Corals I have
fragged, responses I have seen, people that we see at the shows. And
once again let me point out this is NOT my website and I cannot
speak for anyone from there besides myself. I personally value all
that you all have done for Frag both for myself and for the website.
I have had much success with fragging corals and sending them home
and yes I have fragged corals straight out of the box both at the
shows and at stores. I do see the value of having the corals settled
but I also see where they would be disturbed by moving them to the
shows as well. <Mmm, the thought here is likely to promote better
circumstances for the candidate... and business for the folks
involved> As for any impropriety I do NOT think that Steven would
ever do anything wrong. But I know you wouldn't as well Eric and I
personally shut several people up at IMAC that started to tell me
crap, My point being that there are people who do not know or
respect you like I do. At this point it doesn't matter as Anthony
said its over and done. I am sorry if I have offended anyone, I just
for once felt my opinion should be known. For the less than two
cents its worth. Mac <Thank you for sharing. BobF>
Re: MACNA, Fragexch., advocating more gov't unrealistically...
8/15/07 Hi Bob: <Howdy Eric> Not arguing the realism of
your post. <Realism?> My remarks are personal decisions and
controlling behavior and things of which are in the realm of
control. <For yourself I take it> I can't stop, nor have
connections to stop, all major threats to coral reefs. I drive a car
but wouldn't if there were viable options. I opt not to have a lawn
and to eat organic and no meat. Will it solve global warming? No.
<But does help> Unrealistic? Yes. But a journey begins with a
single step. To me, everything makes a difference and arguing that
"our contribution" won't make it right is why things are so f'ed up
in the first place. E <Thanks for your further input. BobF> |
|
|