|
| |
|
FAQs about Marine Angelfish Selection 2
Related Articles:
Marine Angels, The
Ultimate Angelfish Aquarium; An amazing and challenging collection of
marine angelfishes by
Peter Giwojna,
Related FAQs:
Marine Angel Selection 1,
Dwarf
Angel Selection, Marine Angelfishes In
General, Angelfish ID,
Behavior, Compatibility,
Systems,
Health,
Feeding,
Disease,
Best
Marine Livestocking FAQs 1, Best FAQs
2, Marine Livestocking FAQs 1, FAQs
2,
FAQs 3,
FAQs
4, FAQs 5, FAQs
6, FAQs 7, FAQs
8, FAQs 9, FAQs 10,
|
 |
New 750 gallon aquarium, stkg SW
4/27/08
hello bob.....i am so happy to see that many of you try to help people that
you don't even know... i love your website and i need some answer from you
please... my tank is currently cycling and in 2-3 weeks it will be ready for my
first few fish.. i just want to ask you the compatibility of these fish...
1) Annularis angel 5-6 in
2) Blue face angel 5-6 in
3) Koran angel 7-8 in
4) Majestic angel 5-6 in
5) French angel 7-8 in
6) Cream angelfish 3-4 in
7) Asfur angel 5-6 in
8) Queen angel 5.5-6.5 in
9) Emperor angel 5-6 in
<I'd start all these Angels at the 3-4 inch length to start... much more likely
to be healthy, get along>
10) 3 Heniochus butterfly 3-4 in
11) 2 falcula butterfly 3-4 in
12) 4 pacific blue tang 2.5-3.5 in
13) desjardinii Sailfin tang 4-5 in
14) Naso tang 5-6 in
15) powder blue tang 3-4 in
16) 2 Scopas tang 3-4 in
17) 2 purple tang 3-4 in
18) 2 yellow tang 3-4 in
19) magnificent foxface4.5-5.5 in
20) blue throat trigger 3.5-4.5 in
21) Humu Humu trigger 3-4 in
22) black trigger 3-4 in
23) niger trigger 3-4 in
24) rectangle trigger 3.5-4.5 in
25)2 tomato clownfish 2-3 in
26) 2 Pakistani butterflyfish 2-3 in
27) 2 auriga butterfly 2-3 in
28) 6 cleaner wrasse 1-2 in
<Either skip these or just two>
please tell me your opinion and if you think i shouldn't add some fish.....i
really appreciate your opinion...i know cleaner wrasse are hard but someone told
me that they very important and with a fish population this big. they'll have a
lot of food..
<All should be carefully acclimated, quarantined (per WWM) before introducing.
Bob Fenner>
|
Passer Angel... Sys.
3/14/08
Hello Bob I'm looking at getting a smaller of one of the larger angels, and
have been reading alot
<... no such word>
on the Passer/King Angelfish. In one of your articles you had stated they should
max out at around 9", but I have read 9", 10", 12" and 14". Could you point me
in the right direction for the passer's max size in a aquarium.
<... really mainly depends on the size of the system... the nine inch is a good
general maximum length for almost all hobby sizes...>
I have a 125 gallon,
<Won't get even this size here>
will a 4" to 5" through adult size passer be ok with blood shrimp, boxer shrimp,
cleaner crabs and snails,
<May eat any/all...>
1.5" neon goby, 3" p. clown, 4" yellow tang and a 3" regal tang? If not would
one of these be a better angel for my system, and are these max sizes right?
Annularis (max 8")Queensland Yellow Tail ( max 10") Black Velvet (max 8")
<None of these Pacific Angels is really suitable for a 125 gallon volume>
Also I would like to get a dwarf angel, maybe a flame, can you mix dwarfs and
large angels? Thanks alot Todd
<See WWM re... BobF>
Re: Passer Angel... Large
angels, sel., need to proof writing... for grammar, clarity – 03/18/08
How's it going Bob I didn't realize a passer angel was such a bruiser, with
more reading I have realized that.
<... run on...>
It sounds like a asfur angel or a emperor angel would be ok with my shrimp,
crabs and some of the smaller fish, they sound a little more peaceful (or at
least not as aggressive). Do you agree?
<With what? Relative compatibility? Not really>
Would a queen angel be ok with shrimp, crabs and smaller fish, I've heard good
and bad about the queen's, What's your opinion?
<... posted>
You stated that a passer angel will not even get 8" in a 125 gallon, I thought
angels would out grow their tank if it was not big enough, and that was the
point off getting a big enough tank or a small enough (growing to max size
adult) angel, to start with.
<...? What? To provide adequate living space, expression (age...), health...>
That's why I was looking for one of the smaller, bigger angels. The asfur angel
and emperor angel get about 15" to 17" max size, and the asfur angel will max
out at about 8" to 9" in captivity, Will the emperor angel max out at 8" to 9"
also in captivity?
<Often>
I though a 72"X18"X20" aquarium would be plenty big enough for a 8" to 9" angel,
<Not really>
I know they need room to swim, but that seems like enough for that size angel, I
can see that size not being big enough for a 15" to 17" angel, but i figured it
was plenty for a 8" to 9" angel. What size do you suggest for a 8" to 9" angel?
<... For what? Size system? Eight feet long or larger, 2-3 hundred gallons>
In a previous email on cleaner shrimp and gobies you stated that (they don't eat
the encrusted stage of ich lying on the sand and rocks, or at least reliably,
and the other two stages can't be seen). So how do they help control ich then,
if they can't see two of the stages and the third one they barely feed on?
<Ahh! Posted also... Control, not cure... mostly (apparently) by making the host
fishes feel better>
I have seen them cleaning fish lots of times, I always thought they were picking
the parasites off?
<Nope. RMF>
Re: Passer Angel,
responding to folks who don't have the common courtesy to follow simple
instructions... go someplace else – 3/18/08
Bob
<Todd>
I know a lot of that stuff is posted, I just don't understand all of it,
which is why I'm writing you about the stuff. And I'll be the first one
to tell you my grammar isn't the best, but I try my best for you. Don't
you enjoy talking about this stuff???? Seem's like you just want to use
your expertise to be a jerk to the inexperienced!!! You were a teacher
right? When your students didn't understand the material and asked
questions, did you just tell them its posted? It's obvious you care more
about belittling me and other fish hobbyists about our grammar and what
we don't understand, then to give us a hand and help us out. I've always
been very nice to you in my emails and it's ridiculous the way you act
towards me in your replies (considering how much you say you love the
hobby). One of my hobbies is racing and sports cars. I couldn't imagine
acting like you do towards somebody that was asking a question about
something that was one of my favorite things in life. I would love to
help them, no matter how bad their grammar and how stupid the question.
Seem's your only nice to the knowledgeable one's with good grammar.
<Thank you. Go elsewhere. B> |
|
Time to setup a new tank, but
with some stocking questions related to large Marine Angels. Many different
opinions out there.
Big Aquarium- Big Fish? 3/12/08
Hey Crew,
<Hey there! Scott F. in today!>
I had to take down my tank about a year ago and sell it, due to the real world
getting in the way of my hobbies.
<How does THAT happen? LOL>
Now, I have a brand new 125G (72"L x 18"W) tank, about 165 pounds of live rock,
140 pounds of live sand and a bunch of different ideas for stocking!
<Nice position to be in!>
I have been reading WWM a lot as well as a few other sites. I hear and read a
lot of differing opinions and have heard many different stories from friends to
guy next to me at the LFS. I know that Bob and Scott Michael tend to vary a bit
in their writings on minimum tank sizes for certain species.
Maybe my answer will be in the middle.
<Perhaps both Bob and Scott would tell you that they are offering suggestions
for each species, and that these are based on their experiences and judgments.
Like so many things in the hobby, this can vary.>
The main issue that I have is that you guys say my tank is too small for a large
marine angel. Others say I should be ok. Let's say the Queen or Emperor Angel I
buy (just an example) does reach 18" long, so wouldn't a 215G be too small as
well? It's only another 6" in terms of width. I would think that the fish would
still be cramped. I hope I am not coming off as rude or argumentative, just
seeking an unbiased answer. You guys write to people with the fishes' best
interest and not of the aquarist or LFS. I can appreciate that, and that is why
I am writing you.
<I agree with you. I am pretty conservative in my stocking philosophy, and I
would not even think of keeping a full-sized angel in any aquarium less than 8
feet in length. To be quite honest, I am not a fan of keeping these fishes at
all, which is certainly against the grain of many of my peers. Many of these
fishes range over huge tracts of reef in nature, and really deserve to live
their lives in extremely large surroundings. Anything else is like you or having
to be confined to our living rooms for the rest of our lives: Survivable, but
intolerable over time.>
I am still in the planning stage and trying to look ahead to any problems. I had
a juv. Emperor for about a year and a half before he ended up dying. I just
didn't have the time to take care of him or the tank properly and he suffered
for it. I ended up having to euthanize him. I gave my other fishes away to a
friend. It sucks, but it happens. I have to say that he really was an endearing
fish and that I would really like to try again. In this sized tank, just how
long would one last (assuming everything goes well and he does well in
captivity) starting from a 2-3" juv. specimen? If it is a few years, then I will
go for it.
<I really don't think it would be that long. Maybe a year or two, if that.
Although these fishes do not grow super fast, they can grow quicker than we
might like, and do need correspondingly large quarters as they grow. I do not
subscribe to the theory that "they will grow to the size of their aquariums.">
Or, are there really any large angels that would be ok in that system for the
long haul? Some say an Emperor can last for the long haul, some disagree.
<Last, sure. Thrive? It depends, really, on what your definition of "thriving"
is. I am probably a bit too biased, but I'm skeptical of their long-term
viability in anything less than aquariums of hundreds of gallons of volume.>
I am also considering a Blue Angel (H. bermudensis) or a Blue-Ringed Angel (P.
Annularis). Or would it be different species, same problem? Maybe I would be
better with just 2 dwarf angels.
<I would definitely consider the Dwarf Angel pair or trio instead.>
I am not looking more than a few years into the future regarding keeping the
fishes as I have learned a lot can happen before you know it and keeping fishes
may not fit into your life. We all plan/hope for the best when starting out new
endeavors, but I know it doesn't always work out that way.
<Absolutely. I'm glad you feel this way.>
But at the same time, I believe if someone is to do something, then he/she
should do it right or at least to the best of his/her abilities. Who knows, I
could have the means (and space) to get a 1,000G system in a few years. If it
turns out the fish outgrows the tank, I will act in the best interest of the
fish. I will either donate it, trade it or upgrade to a bigger tank. I will
cross that bridge when/if I get there.
<Yes...and best not to assume that you will have such a system available in the
future.>
I would really like to try my hand again at an Achilles Tang, but maybe that one
is just better left in the ocean. The last one I had I thought would be the 1
out of 10 that would make it. Seemed well adjusted socially/mentally and readily
accepted food, put my Blue Hippo to shame as far as wolfing down food goes...
Bob and I exchanged a few emails and he suggested Spectrum. The fish just turned
his nose at it. Every fish has its own taste I guess. Everything seemed to be
going great and one day I go to turn the light on and the fish is as dead as
dead can be. From what I have been reading the last few months, I am not alone
in this experience. I guess that is what "just not well suited for captivity"
means.
<Perhaps!>
It seems that the Gold Rim Tang (A. Nigricans) is a better choice. But how much
better is it really? I also read that it really isn't much easier than the
Achilles Tang. Am I going from "darn near impossible" to "likely impossible"
with the Gold Rim? Some say the Gold Rim is under the "moderate" level of care.
I don't know why, but those two just appeal to me more than any other.
<I'd be doing a disservice to you if I said it was an easy fish to keep.
However, it is not impossible. Many criteria come into play when considering
keeping such a fish (ie; the source, handling, etc. of the fish before it arrives
at your LFS).>
Basically what I am looking at is this: (all of them would be considered
small/juv. {2-3" when purchased})
One large angel (in juv. form of the variety listed above, although most likely
Emperor)
One Flame Angel
One Blue Hippo Tang
A pair of clowns (either Maroon or Percula)
Maybe one Achilles or Gold Rim
Maybe a Butterfly (I wish the Ornate was on the good list)
I don't think that sounds overstocked, what do you guys think? Any thoughts or
opinions are welcome even if not what I want to hear.
<Well, you asked. To be honest, I believe that this is too much bioload for this
system. You really need to pare down the stocking list to only one of the two
larger Tangs (either the Hippo or the Gold Rim).>
Trust me; I don't want to be that guy who stuffed 25+ angels into a 250G tank.
That article was insane.
<Yep!>
Best Wishes to you all,
Jeremy
<Well, Jeremy, I think you hit it on the head. Responsible stocking involves
taking into account a multitude of factors, many of which you have already
addressed. Go with your gut feelings and your fish will benefit! Good luck!
Regards, Scott F.>
Re: Time to setup a new tank, but with some
stocking questions related to large Marine Angels. Many different
opinions out there
-03/17/08
Hi Scott F.! My replies will
be in double carrots.
Hey Crew,
<Hey there! Scott F. in today!>
I had to take down my tank about a year ago and sell it, due to the real
world getting in the way of my hobbies.
<How does THAT happen? LOL>
Now, I have a brand new 125G (72"L x 18"W) tank, about 165 pounds of
live rock, 140 pounds of live sand and a bunch of different ideas for
stocking!
<Nice position to be in!>
<<Well, it was by design... ;) I originally bought it for the Emperor
Angel that I had. I have had a bunch of aquarium stuff sitting in the
garage for about 16 months now. Now I get to re-cure most my live rock
again because I just checked it and it doesn't look too well. At least
the dead matter should be of use as an ammonia source to start the
cycle. Out of sight, out of mind I guess. A big oops on that one... I
will let it cycle naturally on its own anyway for at least 2 months. In
addition to that, wouldn't it help any parasites (namely crypt) die off
on their own before any livestock is introduced? BioSpira is some good
stuff, but I am more of a naturalist. Then again, why not do both?>>
I have been reading WWM a lot as well as a few other sites. I hear and
read a lot of differing opinions and have heard many different stories
from friends to guy next to me at the LFS. I know that Bob and Scott
Michael tend to vary a bit in their writings on minimum tank sizes for
certain species. Maybe my answer will be in the middle.
<Perhaps both Bob and Scott would tell you that they are offering
suggestions for each species, and that these are based on their
experiences and judgments. Like so many things in the hobby, this can
vary.>
<<I was just using Bob and Scott as examples, but you got the idea. That
and their opinions are so varied. Bob says Emperors will outgrow 215G
tanks and Scott (and Live Aquaria) says that 100-125G is the minimum
tank size or something to that effect. That is a lot of variation. I am
not accusing anyone of being "wrong;" it just creates a lot of
confusion.>>
The main issue that I have is that you guys say my tank is too small for
a large marine angel. Others say I should be ok. Let's say the Queen or
Emperor Angel I buy (just an example) does reach 18" long, so wouldn't a
215G be too small as well? It's only another 6" in terms of width. I
would think that the fish would still be cramped. I hope I am not coming
off as rude or argumentative, just seeking an unbiased answer. You guys
write to people with the fishes' best interest and not of the aquarist
or LFS. I can appreciate that, and that is why I am writing you.
<I agree with you. I am pretty conservative in my stocking philosophy,
and I would not even think of keeping a full-sized angel in any aquarium
less than 8 feet in length. To be quite honest, I am not a fan of
keeping these fishes at all, which is certainly against the grain of
many of my peers. Many of these fishes range over huge tracts of reef in
nature, and really deserve to live their lives in extremely large
surroundings. Anything else is like you or having to be confined to our
living rooms for the rest of our lives: Survivable, but intolerable over
time.>
<<That's pretty much how I look at it as well. The biggest problem that
I have is me here. If it wasn't for Angels and Tangs/Surgeonfishes, I
wouldn't bother to have an aquarium in the first place. Fresh water
systems have never interested me. Not that I have any prejudice against
them, I just see it as a common thing and somewhat boring because of
that. I am not saying I am right to feel this way, but the fact is that
I do. No offense meant. FWIW, I actually volunteer for a public park
here in Houston and I take care of their aquariums when my schedule
permits. Each tank symbolizes a part of the pond (Surface, bottom,
mid-zone, etc.). I do it to give back, but it really hasn't changed my
opinion of freshwater systems.>>
I am still in the planning stage and trying to look ahead to any
problems. I had a juv. Emperor for about a year and a half before he
ended up dying. I just didn't have the time to take care of him or the
tank properly and he suffered for it. I ended up having to euthanize
him. I gave my other fishes away to a friend. It sucks, but it happens.
I have to say that he really was an endearing fish and that I would
really like to try again. In this sized tank, just how long would one
last (assuming everything goes well and he does well in captivity)
starting from a 2-3" juv. specimen? If it is a few years, then I will go
for it.
<I really don't think it would be that long. Maybe a year or two, if
that. Although these fishes do not grow super fast, they can grow
quicker than we might like, and do need correspondingly large quarters
as they grow. I do not subscribe to the theory that "they will grow to
the size of their aquariums.">
<<If a year or two is what I am looking at, I think I will go for it.>>
Or, are there really any large angels that would be ok in that system
for the long haul? Some say an Emperor can last for the long haul, some
disagree.
<Last, sure. Thrive? It depends, really, on what your definition of
"thriving" is. I am probably a bit too biased, but I'm skeptical of
their long-term viability in anything less than aquariums of hundreds of
gallons of volume.>
<<"Last" wasn't the best choice of words as you pointed out. I guess
what I was going for would be more to succeed in keeping the fish
healthy and disease free. At least as far as keeping captive fishes go
anyway. I don't know how anyone or anything could truly thrive in
captivity.>>
I am also considering a Blue Angel (H. bermudensis) or a Blue-Ringed
Angel (P. Annularis). Or would it be different species, same problem?
Maybe I would be better with just 2 dwarf angels.
<I would definitely consider the Dwarf Angel pair or trio instead.>
I am not looking more than a few years into the future regarding keeping
the fishes as I have learned a lot can happen before you know it and
keeping fishes may not fit into your life. We all plan/hope for the best
when starting out new endeavors, but I know it doesn't always work out
that way.
<Absolutely. I'm glad you feel this way.>
<<16 months is a long time to have a bunch of stuff in the garage...
LOL>>
But at the same time, I believe if someone is to do something, then
he/she should do it right or at least to the best of his/her abilities.
Who knows, I could have the means (and space) to get a 1,000G system in
a few years. If it turns out the fish outgrows the tank, I will act in
the best interest of the fish. I will either donate it, trade it or
upgrade to a bigger tank. I will cross that bridge when/if I get there.
<Yes...and best not to assume that you will have such a system available
in the future.>
<<I have already learned that lesson the hard way. That and a QT isn't a
good recommendation, but a must have... We all start somewhere I
guess.>>
I would really like to try my hand again at an Achilles Tang, but maybe
that one is just better left in the ocean. The last one I had I thought
would be the 1 out of 10 that would make it. Seemed well adjusted
socially/mentally and readily accepted food, put my Blue Hippo to shame
as far as wolfing down food goes... Bob and I exchanged a few emails and
he suggested Spectrum. The fish just turned his nose at it. Every fish
has its own taste I guess. Everything seemed to be going great and one
day I go to turn the light on and the fish is as dead as dead can be.
From what I have been reading the last few months, I am not alone in
this experience. I guess that is what "just not well suited for
captivity" means.
<Perhaps!>
It seems that the Gold Rim Tang (A. Nigricans) is a better choice. But
how much better is it really? I also read that it really isn't much
easier than the Achilles Tang. Am I going from "darn near impossible" to
"likely impossible" with the Gold Rim? Some say the Gold Rim is under
the "moderate" level of care. I don't know why, but those two just
appeal to me more than any other.
<I'd be doing a disservice to you if I said it was an easy fish to keep.
However, it is not impossible. Many criteria come into play when
considering keeping such a fish (ie; the source, handling, etc. of the
fish before it arrives at your LFS).>
<<I have another question/issue here. I don't like to put people on the
spot on a public page, but Live Aquaria advertises that they quarantine
and house certain difficult species in their own facility before they
offer them for sale. Assuming this is true, this seems like the odds are
more tipped in favor of the aquarist here instead of going the usual LFS
route. Obviously, we should still put the fish in our own QT when
arriving, but it would seem like the fishes would be more
suited/adjusted to captivity this way and not still going through the
shock/stress of the transport from ocean to LFS. Any thoughts?>>
<More suited to captivity, perhaps. Of course, there are still issues
related to the shipping and handling of the animals before they reach
you. You hit it on the head when you suggest the need to quarantine
regardless. And yes-Live Aquaria has a terrific reputation for quality
and selection. I would not hesitate to order from them.>
Basically what I am looking at is this: (all of them would be considered
small/juv. {2-3" when purchased})
One large angel (in juv. form of the variety listed above, although most
likely Emperor) One Flame Angel One Blue Hippo Tang A pair of clowns
(either Maroon or Percula) Maybe one Achilles or Gold Rim Maybe a
Butterfly (I wish the Ornate was on the good list)
I don't think that sounds overstocked, what do you guys think? Any
thoughts or opinions are welcome even if not what I want to hear.
<Well, you asked. To be honest, I believe that this is too much bioload
for this system. You really need to pare down the stocking list to only
one of the two larger Tangs (either the Hippo or the Gold Rim).>
<<Fair enough. I do know that Tangs are hard on the bio-filter.
Honestly, I think my filtration setup should be able to handle it. It
looks like more reading in order here.>>
<You sound like a very conscientious aquarist. I have no doubts that you
will enjoy much success!>
Trust me; I don't want to be that guy who stuffed 25+ angels into a 250G
tank. That article was insane.
<Yep!>
Best Wishes to you all,
Jeremy
<Well, Jeremy, I think you hit it on the head. Responsible stocking
involves taking into account a multitude of factors, many of which you
have already addressed. Go with your gut feelings and your fish will
benefit! Good luck! Regards, Scott F.>
<<Thanks for your time and candor Scott. I still have a lot of reading
to do. No decisions just yet, with the exception of trying a large
angel.>>
<Enjoy the journey, and feel free to drop us a line again any time.
Scott F.> |
Can I Add An Angelfish?
1/19/08
Hello again, Crew. Thanks as always for the great advice. I'm looking to add
a "showpiece" fish to my existing fish-only tank (250g, no live rock). The tank
has been up and running for about 3 years. Current stock are a Sailfin Tang,
Porcupine Puffer, Squirrelfish, blue jaw Trigger, Dog Face Puffer and a
male/female pair of Bird Wrasses. I make weekly water changes and keep the water
quality good. Everyday, I feed frozen krill, silversides, and a cube of thawed
mysis or brine shrimp, all soaked in Selcon. I also hand-feed the Sailfin Tang a
big pinch of Spirulina (which is also enjoyed by the wrasses and the trigger).
I'm considering adding an Angelfish to the group. My research on heartiness and
compatibility has narrowed the choices down to a Koran, French or Queen
Angelfish.
<All good choices>
I'd appreciate your advice on whether these species are likely to be successful
in my tank and if so, whether one of these three is a better choice in this
situation. Would you recommend a different species?
<Mmm, not necessarily>
If I add an Angelfish, should I put a piece of live rock into the tank from time
to time as an extra source of grazing food for the Angelfish and the Sailfin
Tang?
<I would definitely add a "box" or two of re-cured (by yourself, outside the
system) live rock here... for several good reasons... And am inclined toward the
Koran (would be my first choice, staying smaller) or French over the Queen (may
become too dominant)...>
Thank you very much.
Michael
<Welcome. Bob Fenner>
|
Chaetodontoplus
septentrionalis in a captive reef?
Gambling With Corals (Risking A Large Angelfish With Invertebrates)?
1/16/08
Hey guys and gals:
<Scott F. your guy tonight!>
Simple question. Is Chaetodontoplus septentrionalis an angel that can be placed
in a captive reef aquarium (90G) without being too destructive?
< I guess it's all relative..."Destructive" to some reef people is the loss of
one polyp of coral. Yes- fishes in this genus will nip at all sorts of sessile
invertebrates. It's rather uncommon in the U.S. trade, seeing how it has a
rather limited distribution (mainly Southeast Asia and Japan). If you have a
source and are up to keeping this beautiful fish, the risk may be worth it! My
main concern is the size of the fish. This species can and will hit around 10
inches, and a 90 gallon aquarium is simply not large enough to house this
species for anything close to a normal life span, IMO. You really will need an
aquarium that is six feet or greater in length (preferably 8 feet), as they roam
over large areas of reef in nature, and they do like caves and crevices to hide
in.>
I have a few LPS corals and a few softies (no SPS) and I'm willing to tempt fate
on one of my favorite fish of all time if it could possibly be kept without
tearing everything up.
<A total dice roll, my friend!>
If the fish is well-fed enough (3 times daily with New Life Spectrum pellets
along with frozen foods -- all soaked in Selcon), could it be somewhat trusted
not to be a holy terror to corals? I was thinking about keeping a clam, but I
wouldn't trust a large angel with a clam since I've seen first hand one getting
nibbled to death in the past and I'd much rather have a huge want of mine in the
septentrionalis if at all
possible.
<Again- there is no guarantee. Even fishes with a "reputation" for NOT munching
on corals can turn on them. Like people, fish are individuals, and we cannot
expect them to conform to our behavioral expectations.>
It's either that, or I was thinking of going with a Pomacanthus annularis which
is my distant 2nd choice (but another gorgeous fish to say the least) which I've
read in the FAQ's is one of the 3 large marine angels Bob would tempt fate with
in a reef environment.- Jon
<Well, Jon, I have seen the P. annularis in reef systems. Again, it's a gamble,
but it's up to the hobbyist to decide his/her threshold. A more pressing concern
is the HUGE size that this fish can attain (like 15 to 18 inches), and its need
for correspondingly huge quarters! Keeping one of these fish in anything less
than an aquarium of hundreds of gallons is cruel and unusual, in my opinion. My
advice to you, my risk-taking friend: Try fishes better suited to the quarters
that you can provide, such as a rare Centropyge species (try pricing a C.
hotumatua or C. joculator if you want sexy and expensive!), which are just as
challenging (and potentially destructive to reef invertebrates), but generally
max out at 4 inches or less. Regardless of what route you take, there are
tradeoffs that you must make, so be prepared and go for it based on what is best
for you and your animals. Good luck! Regards, Scott F.>
Jonathan Philpot
Re: Chaetodontoplus
septentrionalis in a captive reef?
Big Angels- Little Angels! 1/17/08
Thanks for the quick response, Scott.
<MY pleasure! Didn't want to be a "buzzkill", but I just felt that I needed to
highlight a few things.>
Question in regards to P. annularis -- on the WWM site it's listed as a max-out
of 8 inches or so in captivity and I must say that I've never seen one anywhere
near the size you gave me (the 15-18 inches). The two older specimens I've seen
(one around 6 or so years old in the LFS display tank of around 600 gallons and
another in a 125 gallon tank belonging to a friend of mine) have both been
roughly the 8 inches listed from what I've been able to tell.
<I must be honest with you- I have seen at least 3 specimens of this
species well over 12 inches, and one that was darned close to a foot and a half.
I'm gonna render advice based on what I have seen. Sure, they may not all reach
that size, but the potential does exist...And you can't ignore that, IMO.>
But I've seen the fish listed anywhere from 8 inches to 12 inches and now you
mention possibly a foot and a half as well. A bit confusing (and trust me, I'm
not doubting you -- just confused by my own witness of the fish and by the
multitude of length listings out there in both print and online).
I've also seen so many different tank size suggestions which really makes it a
bit frustrating since I've had the possibility to attain a few nice specimens at
a reasonable price but passed because I've been so confused!
<I totally agree! It is confusing. I can only speak from my
experiences/observations. They can and do get quite large. Always take any
advice you find-mine or anyone else's-with a grain of salt. In the end, you need
to gather your information for yourself, from sources you know and from personal
observations, and temper your decision with a healthy dose of skepticism. In the
end, go with what your observations tell you. However, always think of the "end
game" with large fishes. They need such large quarters to live healthy, happy
lives.>
I'll probably pass on both large angels until I can make a move to a larger
aquarium in the future and stick with the Centropyge angels that I've had
success with in the past.
<I commend you on this decision. If you can house these fishes successfully (and
I have no doubt that you can), you will enjoy much success, and the fishes will
enjoy longer, happier lives!>
I do a lot of "trading" of fish with a few fellow aquarists I know and trust so
I've had quite a few species of fish over the years and have kept my tanks
pretty varied.
<Cool!>
Thanks for the response, again, though. I'll likely give the Centropyge potteri
another go since I did have success in my first go-around until my tank crashed
in a very rare power outage. Though I'd love to find the blue/black variant of
it since it is a truly magnificent coloration in my opinion (not that the normal
coloration isn't magnificent).
- Jon
<I hope you have every success, Jon! I have seen a blue morph of the C. potteri
in a store in Chicago, and it was awesome! Probably a temporary aberration, but
what a beauty! Take care! Regards, Scott F.> |
Angel fish for the aquarium
01/06/2008
<<Hello Jody, Andrew here>>
After being in the fish hobby for more than five years (and learning many hard
lessons) my parents have given me for Christmas your great book The
Conscientious Marine Aquarist--(which I asked for) albeit the older version from
1998
<<still a great book>>
(the new one retails for over $150).
<Good gosh... wait, the new edition hasn't been release as yet. RMF>
From the info in that book and wet web media I have not concluded if I
have the means (space) for any type of angel fish. I have always been afraid to
attempt keeping an angel because of their high price and reputed difficulty in
keeping. What do you think?
<<Angel fish do require a little aquarium experience before adding>>
I have a 60 gallon FOWLER:1 med Porcupine puffer
<<this will outgrow your current tank, recommend 90+ gallons>>
, 1 med Lunare wrasse who is fairly nice, 1 med Foxface Lo, 1 med Fuzzy dwarf
lionfish and 1 med common clownfish.
<<I would say that your close on your stocking limits as you currently stand at
the moment>>
I have read recently that Flame angels and Coral beauties are difficult in
non-reef tanks. I realize you probably get hundreds of E-mails a day so any
response would be greatly appreciated.
<<Questions are always good, as this says that your conscious about your
aquarium>>
Thanks,
Jody Goens
<<Thank you for the questions, regards, A Nixon>>
Adult passer angelfish,
shipping trauma. 12/15/2007
<Very common... specimens more than about 4" total length don't "ship well">
I recently received a large adult passer angelfish from a mail order fish store
which shall remain nameless since they have been nice about this. The fish
arrived in terrible condition, dazed and confused and in ~65 degree water that
was loaded with waste.
I've had it in my 175 gallon tank for a day now and not surprisingly it won't
eat and it is very sluggish though mobile, taking laps around the tank
occasionally.
<The last behavior leads me to have hope...>
I wonder if any of you know what types of stress tropical marine fish can take
and what the prognosis for such a fish is and what I can do to maximize chances
of keeping it alive and even better acting like the bold, curious fish it is
supposed to be. It really is very sad seeing such a beautiful fish like this
fall apart.
Thanks, Omar.
<I'd keep the lights off to low... if you have to for other livestock... and not
be overly concerned if the fish doesn't feed, do much of anything for a few
days. Again, the swimming about behavior is a good sign. Bob Fenner, who did
collect this and other "key" (i.e. expensive) species al sur off and on for
decades.>
Compatibility question, SW
angel comp.
Hello WWM crew. I most first say I love your site and have been reading for
some time now, but have never asked a question. I know this a common
question/interest of many salt water hobbyist, but have gotten some conflicting
information and would like to get a specific answers to my setup. I have a 250
gallon setup well maintained (by me) w/all proper filtration a plenty of hiding
places (big hiding places and small). Also it is lightly stocked w/ no angels. I
would like to add a queen angel and a emperor angel. I'm thinking I would get
the queen first at a small medium size letting him get well? settled in then
purchasing the emperor larger then the queen.? Do you think this could work? Is
there a better way to introducing both these fish? or Should this? not be
attempted at all??? Thank you in advance Peter.
<Is a possibility... I'll give you even odds here that these disparate species
will get along... This would not be my choice of angels to mix... Better to seek
out species whose geographic range overlaps, that have a natural pecking
order/dominance. Bob Fenner>
|
Large Angelfish et. al sel. and
crowding –
10/30/2007
I have a 375 gallon tank and would like to keep multiple angelfish. I
understand that large tanks and good water quality are a requirement in keeping
these fish successfully. I would like to know if my tank size is big enough to
house multiple angelfish.
<It is... in fact, better to purposely overcrowd pomacanthids in such a
system... Have seen this done on many occasions... One large East coast service
company built their business on such stocking>
The only fish that is housed in my tank is a gold spotted rabbitfish who is
doing well, but tends to be on the shy side.
<Is their nature>
The current list I am developing consists of the following fish:
Golden Butterfly
<A schooling species... I'd have more than one>
Scribbled angelfish
Majestic angelfish
Emperor angelfish
Flame angelfish
Flameback or Cherub angelfish
Blonde Naso Tang
Is this a realistic list? If not, what would fish would you drop?
<Could be done... the Majestic you'll want to especially be sure is healthy,
feeding>
I assume the emperor angel and Naso tang are the last fish to be added due to
their bully nature (?)
<Yes, this would be my choice as well>
Appreciate any suggestions you may have.
Thanks
<Should be a nice display Kirk. Bob Fenner>
Re: Large Angelfish
et.al sel.
Bob,
<Kirk>
After doing some more research and readings from you (WetWebMedia and
Conscientious Marine Aquarist book), I am thinking about adding a Queen
angelfish to the list of angels. Does this angel fit into my existing
angel list (majestic, scribbled, emperor, flame, and cherub) I plan on
keeping?
<Could, yes>
Or is this pushing it?
<Well, the smaller, last two species, may have a tough time of getting
enough food here... but the crowding will likely be fine>
If it is possible, should this be placed in the tank before or after the
majestic?
<I would place the Queen last... is on average, the most aggressive of
the species listed... and does make a difference, though coming from the
Atlantic...>
On a separate note, I have placed a order for a pair of Golden
butterflies from a LFS. It may be till the end of the month until
another Red Sea order comes in.
Thanks for your advice.
Kirk
<Welcome. BobF>
Re: Large Angelfish et.al
Bob,
<That gentleman named Kirk>
Wow. I would have never thought the Queen was more aggressive than the
Emperor.
<On average, very>
Should I request a certain region that the Queen come from? Or is the
Atlantic the only place that it is collected.
<... only is found in the TWA...>
I am glad I sent a reply to you. Thank you.
<Welcome>
After 10yrs in the hobby I still learn something new; This is why I love
this hobby so much.
Kirk
<Even longer stint, and I feel the same. Cheers, BobF> |
|
Chrysurus Angel Sick, sel. – 10/18/07
Hi Crew
I need help again please. I bought chrysurus angel about a month ago. He's been
great eating well chasing my clown here and there and what have you. The last
week his side fins are turning white cloudy and inflamed at the base
<Not good>
and now he's hiding alot.
<No such word>
I don't see any signs of ich or velvet. He did eat 5 minutes ago. He's a big
fish 8 inches
<Too large to start... a big part of the issue here...>
in a 220 gallon tank with few tankmates. 1 clown and a damsel and a coris
wrasse. They all have no interest in him. I paid alot of money for him and it is
my dream fish. Was hard to find. Am not sure how to treat and was going to let
it run its course but seems a little worse everyday. He does rub on the rocks
here and there and also another thing he has like seizures? Like twitching. His
body looks good otherwise. I have done searches on your site and have read the
angel section but cant quit find what's wrong. Any help or thoughts would be so
much appreciated. Thanks In Advance.
<Do you know the origin (country) of this fish? As stated, for the genus and
species, this specimen should have been left in the ocean... too difficult to
ship, adapt at this age, size... What you are seeing is likely "just" resultant
from capture, handling... Hopefully this fish will recover on its own here. No
treatment is advised but good care. Bob Fenner>
Re: chrysurus Angel Sick
10/19/07
Thanks for the fast response. I'm not sure of the area he was collected from
but I thought they only came from off the Kenya coast? He is gorgeous otherwise.
He was at the fish store for about 2 months and I guess nobody wanted to spend
160.00 on him
<Likely the "freight" for this specimen was more than half this...>
but from what I have seen I thought was a bargain. He was great at the fish
store and stooped there 4 times in 2 months and always ate and looked great. The
only difference is my SG is 1.20-1.21 while there's is kept at 1.15-1.16.
<Both too low>
Said they use that for parasite control.
<Mmm, yes, and to save on salt mix, allow for greater/easier gas diffusion...>
I have already taken your advice and will let run its course. He is still eating
great and I have increased my water changes to twice a week and not sure what
else I can do. My wife is waiting in the background to say I told you not to
spend so much on a fish. How long should I wait to take any action do you think?
<What action?>
It does not effect any other fins. His color is great also. I will try to get a
good pic to you today if I can. Do you think its fungal or a bacterial
thing? Any knowledge you will share is always appreciated.
<I think it's an "environmental thing" mostly... I would raise the spg, check
and assure "reef" type conditions... BobF>
Re: chrysurus Angel
Sick 10/20/07
The action I mean is if it gets worse under ideal water conditions
which are pretty good now? 0 nitrites 0 ammonia 5-10 nitrates 8.2 PH,
not sure if I should treat for fungus or bacterial?
<...>
I think its bacterial. I noticed today after looking close that when he
opens his pectoral fins it looks white on his body where the fins lay
against. Not sure if that was there but I'm afraid it will spread.
Thanks Again
<... Please read... on WWM re infectious disease and marine fishes. B>
Re: chrysurus Angel Sick –
10/20/07
I did read through tons of your site as I stated it still left me somewhat
unsure. I'm sure its bacterial or fungus but with the blood spots I would have
to lean towards bacterial. I started treatment today with API triple sulfa
<... had you read... you would NOT be doing this>
in a QT tank and will let you know how it works out. If I read to much more to
much time will pass and so will my fish. Thanks
<I understand... but isolating this fish, leaving it in a quarantine or
treatment tank will not get you toward improving its health. As stated, only
time, good care will possibly resolve the white rings around the pectoral
fins... NOT an infectious issue... Bob Fenner>
Re: chrysurus Angel Sick –
10/21/07
Yes I understand but its getting worse everyday and today there's blood
showing but he still ate but not with the vigor he once did.
<Yes... but this has little to do with a treatable state/infection...>
Didn't want to take a chance and I guess I'm desperate and just want to give him
a chance.
<...>
Even though I did get a deal on him its still a ton a money to me. Plus its the
1st one I have seen at a LFS and I have a ton around me in the Tampa FL area.
<Still an inappropriate/too large specimen...>
While I was browsing your site I read on one of the questions that the Meg
<...? Mag?>
pumps are over rated on there gallon per hour. Reason I'm asking is I want to
improve the water quality as much as I can like you stated and I was looking
over my hole system and never really knew what my little giant pumped per GPH so
I looked it up. I was surprised to see it pumped only 500 GPH @ 1ft head height.
Well overflows are 1200 gallon per hour so I was thinking about getting a mag 12
or 18. I don't want the 18 to pump so much my sump goes dry because the
overflows cant keep up. I have been using the little giant for
some time now and have been happy but I want to get the most out of it.
<... please see WWM re pump selection. Please look before writing...>
I also went and bought a refractometer and was surprised to see how far off my
swing arm hydrometer was off. I'm very devoted to my fish and hobby and your
site is so helpful I even tell the guys at the LFS about it. So much info you go
in there for one thing and get tied up with a ton of different things. If I can
get him to pull through I'm going to try a DSB I stumbled upon your site for
nitrate control. Thank You Again
<A shame we did not chat before your purchasing this specimen. Is the source
willing to take it back? There is little chance of it adapting to captive
conditions... BobF>
|
Good lesson...? Angel sel.
9/2/07
I recently lost some nice fish to a parasite, so know i just invested in a
full quarantine setup. anyways will be starting to restock a 75 gallon fish only
with live rock and a refugium, and skimmer. I would like to add some of my
favorite fish in this tank, they are C. argi, c. potters, flame angel, flagfin
angel, and the golden angel, I realize they cannot all go in this size tank so
which is the best for this setup, and is it possible to mix any if there added
at the same time. there is also an anemone in this tank,
<What species? Could be trouble...>
other possible fish mates are a pair of clowns, a yellow tang, and a small
wrasse, thanks Ron.
<Likely so. I'd try the Little TWA Angel and the Flame... Potter's and Flagfins
are way too touchy and Goldens need much more room than this... All this could
be surmised by perusing WWM. RMF>
Please help me select two angelfish for
two separate tanks 8/23/07
Dear Bob and friends,
Thank you for all your previous answers. I really appreciate it very much.
<Welcome>
I have two identical 170 gallon tanks. I wish to house only one large angelfish
and a two tangs in each of the tanks. Could you help me chose two angelfish so I
could house them in separate tanks.
<Mmm, maybe>
I have six in mind but I am having difficulty choosing because they all seems so
hardy and beautiful. I was thinking of 1. Holocanthus ciliaris (Queen
Angelfish), 2. Pomacanthus Imperator (Emperor Angelfish), 3. Arusetta Asfur
(Asfur Angelfish), 4. Pomacanthus Annularis (Blue ring angelfish), 5.
Holocanthus Passer (King Passer) and lastly Pomacanthus Maculosus (Yellow bar
angelfish). Please help me make a decision.
Thank you and I will be awaiting for your reply. Thank you so much for your
help.
<All gorgeous animals... and all would/will eventually outgrow this volume/size
system... I am esp. particular with the subgenus Arusetta... and the Annularis
is a fave for being good-looking and rather peaceful... BobF>
Large Angel, sel. 4/22/07
Hello everyone
<Matt>
I been wanting to get a large angel for awhile and not to sure on which
would be best for my system. I have a 200 gal that's 2'W X 2'H x 7'L.
120lb+ of LR, 40 gal refugium, Coralife Needle Wheel Skimmer rated for a
220 gal, and 3 XP3's. I have a 16" Panther Grouper, 5" Foxface Lo, 8"
Spiny box Puffer, and a 4" Sargassum Angler & very peaceful.
I really wanted a Queen angel but after reading your site I see that's
not a good idea. And Dwarfs stay too small and might end up as lunch.
Maybe a Koran or a Blueface?
<The former is a far better choice... much more likely to live>
I didn't see to much about the Blueface
<I lumped this species with its two subcongeners (the subgenus
Euxiphipops) as they're all about the same in terms of use, husbandry.
Please read here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marine/fishes/angels/pomacanthus/euxiphipops.htm
and the linked files above.>
but I did read some about the Koran. And I been eyeballing LiveAquaria
and they have had a large adult Koran that's 5" to 7" for $130 over a
month now, plus they have had a 8"in there Divers Den section for awhile
too. I know you should get one around 4" but my LFS wants doesn't
guarantee there SW fish and LiveAquaria has a great one. Any advice
would be great!
Thanks Matt Owens
<Mmmm.... well... your tank is going to be very full... and by and large
it is better to pick a sub-adult pomacanthid... Bob Fenner>
Angels - Personifer, Chrysurus, Annularis 11/22/06
Hi Crew -
<Bret>
I am trying to do some research on the above mentioned angels. I have a very
lightly stocked 135G reef tank that needs a centerpiece fish with some
personality.
<Mmm, well any of these three will outgrow this volume... first
psychologically...>
The tank has been up for several years and is very stable, it currently houses
a selection of soft and LPS corals, a large clam, a rose BTA
<These angels consume anemones in the wild... possibly soft and stony coral
polyps...>
and a few small fish. The tank is heavily circulated and skimmed with an
oversized LifeReef sump setup. I understand the risks to LPS corals, clam and
anemone, and am willing to move them out to my other tank for the right
fish. If one of these angels would work I would simply accept the tank as a
live rock and-whatever-the-angel-doesn't-eat-tank.
<All three species are rated for historical survivability on WWM... Please read
there. Bob Fenner>
My problem is I can't find a lot of specific information on these particular
species. I'd like to get the fish small and let him grow out in the tank. I
know 135G isn't big for an angel which is why I'm "trying" to target some of the
smaller members of the family. The only tank mates are a pair of ocellaris
clowns, a royal Gramma and a 2" Hawkfish. Can you comment on the suitability of
any of these fish for my setup? I have no interest in buying a fish that will
require a bigger tank. I'd love to expand, but it isn't very realistic. My
main concerns are tank size requirements and adaptability to an aquarium
environment. Thanks in advance for your advice.
Bret M. Packard <<Yikes... didn't see this part. RMF>>
Livestock Choices - 10/9/06
I'm about six months into a 240 marine tank and have stocked it with a
Purple and Yellow Tang, a Coral Beauty, two small tank raised Maroon Clowns,
half a dozen blue and green Chromis, two Neon Damsels, two Fairy Wrasse, a
Pseudochromis, two Neon Gobies, two small tank raised Queen Conks, a couple of
Electric Blue Crabs. I have a tank raised juvenile Mac Angel on request at the
LFS, and was told they should have some in a couple of months. Don't plan to
purchase any more fish, long term plans are to settle in and enjoy.
<I would not recommend adding a Maculosus with your current stocking list. Your
mix of peaceful and aggressive fish may be pushed too far with the addition of a
huge bully like the Mac. If you really want a Mac you may consider trading in
the fairy wrasses and Chromis.>
Aggression is very limited, fish wise.
<For now. You have some fish that tend to grow up into bullies.>
One of the Clownfish bites my hand whenever I change the lettuce or seaweed.
After feeding Sharks, Rays and Eels in the wild without a nibble, it's strange
to be attacked by one of my own fish! Per advice of Wet Web, I purchased some
live rock for the Coral Beauty to graze on, and took out some of the 'dead'
rock.
<If by “dead” you mean base rock then leave it in the tank. With the addition of
live rock your base rock will eventually become ‘live’ and beneficial.>
I was horrified to read that Dwarf Angels don't live as long in a fish only as
they do in a reef system. I immediately changed the GE natural lights to ones
that are supposed to bring out algae and other beneficial things in the live
rock.
I also converted the tank to RO water, and am very pleased with the results.
Water is crystal clear, perfect PH, with a 30 gallon change and lots of fresh
charcoal every two weeks. The chiller keeps the temp at a solid 78 degrees. I
threw away that cheap plastic hydrometer, and bought a decent one. Fish health
is very good. They are fed three times a day, with Selcon and vitamins mixed in
for one feeding. I plan to purchase a quality skimmer, other than that, is there
anything else to insure keeping the fish healthy for the long term?
<Are you currently running a skimmer? Research and then purchase the best
skimmer you can afford. 30 gallon water changes weekly would also be a great
idea. Skimming and water changes can be a key to success with any tank, but even
more so with fish only tanks. It’s good to see your ph and temp are well
regulated. I’d also suggest skipping the lettuce and sticking with seaweed/Nori
soaked in Selcon.>
Plans for a small reef tank, around 45 gallons, are in the works, to enjoy the
reef between dives. :)
<Your fish list in its current form is reef safe. You could always turn the 240
into your reef tank <G>.>
Best,
<Best of luck to you. Continue educating yourself and I am certain you will meet
with success! – Emerson>
Teresa
Re: Less Problematic Large Angel In SPS Dominated Reefs 9/4/06
James at al.,
Thanks for your reply.
Trying to obtain all the info I can get on this issue before I decide, I've been
re-reading your "angel compatibility FAQ", and noticed one of your crew answers
that, somehow, I missed before.
When asked the top three large angels he'd choose for a reef, on a "blind
decision", Bob Fenner answered: "<Okay... Pomacanthus annularis, Genicanthus
species of any kind you like, Chaetodonoplus mesoleucos... my choices. Bob
Fenner>.
The Genicanthus spp. is easy to understand, but I've been wondering why the P.
annularis. Specially in number one. Is it because of a specific diet or
behaviour that is distinct from the other Pomacanthus?
<I don't believe that Bob recommended these fish as "safe" reef dwellers, just
the ones he would choose "if" he had to make a choice. The annularis will nip
at base of sessile invertebrates including corals. They are also known to
pick/nip on tridacnid clams.>
I did not consider the P. Annularis before, because I had the impression it
would be similar to the P. Imperator (which I prefer) as regards its "reef
safeness", but this statement made me look at it with new eyes... And if the
Annularis is less "Russian roulette" than the ones I've been considering, I may
opt for it.
<If you MUST have an angel, I would go with Bob's suggestions keeping in mind
that none are totally safe.>
Regards,
<And to you. James (Salty Dog)>
João
Angelfish choice 8/8/06
Hey guys,
<And ladies>
Well further to some in depth discussions with Eric about angelfishes and
butterfly fishes a few weeks back, I have now come to a conclusion (I was
previously very undecided). I definitely want to get a large type angel as the
centre piece fish (holocanthus or Pomacanthus). Really the tank is going
to be all about the angelfish, and everything else will have to be arranged to
suit than animal, including type of set up and tank mates.
<Good approach>
To that end, I am trying to decide on which species of angel to go for:
1. Queen Angel (H. ciliaris)
2. Maculosus angel (P. maculosus)
3. Emperor Angel (P. imperator)
4. Navarchus Angel (P. navarchus)
While the navarchus is the smallest, it is probably also the most delicate.
I have had an emperor before, and would be like to try something different. That
draws me to the other two - the Mac and the queen. Of the two, which is
most likely to be the better long term choice?
<The former... tank bred availability, much easier going personality... Just
needs a good deal of space...>
The tank will probably be my existing 180 (which is currently in storage, dried
out, while renovating my house).
<Will need something bigger... like a 300...>
Tank mates will probably be a nice tang (powder blue maybe, purple tang.....
nothing huge like a Naso tang), along with a dwarf angel (probably flame
angel), a couple of gobies (probably pair of yellow watchman) and a shoal of
Chromis.
The angel will be last to be added. I was thinking of adding a 5 or 6" young
adult (adult colours) rather than a small juvenile.
<Better to start at 3-4" overall length>
How quickly is an angel of this size likely to grow, and how big is he likely to
get. Like everyone, I would love the animal to grow to full wild sizes - but in
reality I think
this rarely happens.
Thanks for your input.
Regards,
Matt
<Please read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/fishes/angels/pomacanthus/maculosus.htm
and the files linked above. Bob Fenner>
Blue line angel... sel... Ignorance 7/28/06
Hello,
I live in corpus Christi and I went to Houston and bought a Big BLUE LINE ANGEL.
<Best not to buy "big"...>
She has developed cloudy eyes and will not eat and stays up in the corner of the
tank and she shakes every now and then. She also floats on one side. I think I
am going to loose her.
<And likely lose this fish as well>
She has not eaten anything.
<...>
I have stayed up with her one night all night just to see if she would eat when
the lights were off but nothing.
<? Pomacanthids don't eat at night...>
Please help me. Also I wanted to know if a fish had a bacterial infection
<What?...>
if it rubbed on another fish would that fish get sick and die also?
<Where do folks get such notions? How can people get by with such ignorance of
simple biology? Physics, chemistry? Do my fellow citizens know more about Oprah
than reality?>
Thanks,
Kim
<Where to start here? Have you read our archives on Marine Angels? Selection,
Disease? What did you think re buying a "big" specimen? Please read what is
posted. RMF>
Genicanthus personatus 3/17/06
Dear Crew, <Lawrence>
Couple of questions here. 1. Does the G. personatus do well in captivity? <I
wouldn't recommend it. They are a deeper/cooler water fish.> 2.
Where can I go (online) to purchase this angel fish? <Think you will have a
difficult time finding. Do a google search.> I understand that they are rare
and come from Hawaii. <Yes.> If they are too hard to come by, my next
choice would be an Emperor angel. I do have a reef tank loaded with Xenia,
Gorgonia, green star polyps, zooanthids, mushrooms (green hairy, purple and
red) colt coral, pagoda, galaxy and a handful of sps coral. I've read where
the Genicanthus angels are the safest and the emperor is somewhat safe but
will nip at some of the coral mentioned above. I'm very nervous about putting
the emperor in, but have heard success stories as well, unless they were
delusions. <Wouldn't do this with corals present, especially if the angel is
adult size.> I have a collection of tangs (4 yellow, 1 purple, 1 unicorn, 1
sailfin and 2 regal blues) that the fish will be introduced to. There should be
plenty of space (500 gallons). 3. What would you do if you had to have an
angel fish? <Remove the coral.>
thanks for your help...<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Lawrence
Queen angel selection and age - 03/11/2006
Hi Bob
I want to purchase a medium queen angel , about 3- 5" as recommended. My LFS
has one that's about 3-3 1/2" with its juve coloration almost gone. I was
debating whether to buy it or hold out for a bigger one.
Is there any difference in terms of acclimating to a home aquarium between 3" or
5" angel?
<The three inchers are much better...>
Which one would you recommend? Also, approximately how old is a queen at 3"
<Under a year...>
and what is their growth rate in captivity?
<Mmm, five, six inches in two years... six, seven in three...>
Currently I have a 125tank and I'm getting a 265(7ft x 2ft) early next year.
<Will need this. Cheers, Bob Fenner>
Cyano and Show Angels 11/02/05
Hey Ali, Thanks for your reply Ali...always informative and very helpful. It's always good to hear from you.
<You too Steve...>
Follow up question for you or any of the other gurus at WWM:
I have two large SEIO power heads, of which one of them was moved to flow over the section of substrate where the Red Cyano is forming without much improvement. I physically remove the Cyano, but within a few days it comes back. I feed daily, and give just enough for them to consume quickly without settling out, then give a little more, until they have all received some food. The Rabbitfish is a "pig" (as you said he would be), so I have
to sometimes trick him away so the others can eat. Also, I give a small piece (3" x 3") of Nori each day for grazing.
Do you think I should go to every other day with either of these? Every place that sells fish recommends feeding multiple times daily, so I considered my feeding practice less than that. I have chatted with other hobbyists and many indicate that the daily recommended feeding schedule is "hogwash" and that the fish should only be fed 3 - 4 times per week. I can tell you that since each fish have
arrived, within a short period of time they gain girth and look very healthy.
With the Cyano however, I wonder if I should cut back?
<Steven, how often are you doing your water changes? Siphon out as much of this gunk each time you do change your water. I believe you have a fish-only with live rock aquarium, correct? If so, what is your photoperiod? Do a large water change, siphoning out as much
Cyano as possible. Then simply turning your lights completely off for 3 days. Afterwards, cutting your photoperiod back to 2 to 3 hours per day for 2 to 3 weeks.
I'm not sure how your current system is plumbed but consider once again increasing water circulation. Regarding the water changes, it goes without saying that RO/DI water is a must; however check your TDS as you may have old filter cartridges. Sometimes the cartridges can wear out in just a couple months depending on your tap water quality. It may also be time to change your membrane as well. Additionally, make sure you use a high-quality
salt mix. This Tropic Marin Pro-Reef salt is just phenomenal and I would look into that further as well.>
Last question: I am looking at adding a spectacular Angel. Considering the following: Pomacanthus Chrysurus, Gold Flake Angel, and last but certainly not least a Conspicillatus. What is your feeling on these with regards to quality of fish after transport, transition to captivity, and hardiness?
<All three can be incredibly hardy once adjusted. The P. chrysurus being the easiest to acclimate to captive life. Small/Medium sized
Conspics do great, where as the larger full-blown adults have a much harder time adjusting. If you do purchase this fish, make it a point with your dealer to provide you with the smallest one possible. Over the years however, the smallest
Conspic I've ever seen come through L.A. was a little over 3inches. Smaller ones also do tend to fetch a higher price than the larger ones, but well worth it if you can locate one. Goldflakes are generally a hardy fish as well. Most tend to adapt quite easily to captive life. I know several people who have tried them and from I know, everything has been going smoothly so far.>
I would like to get a large "show" fish, however it appears that the more common found for sell is a medium size at best. Would the medium be more likely to acclimate well, or should I keep looking for the large or extra large variety?
<Medium/Small is always your best option. Generally speaking, avoid tiny, large or extra large fish unless they are aggressively eating prepared foods.>
Again your comments are greatly appreciated. Y'all take care!
Steven
<You too Steve...Good luck! - Ali> Done with the Goni., addressing overstocking - Holy Cow! 10/25/05
Hi Adam
<Ignatio.>
Again, I need to confess that seems I over stocking my fishes.
<Uh-Oh!>
In my 100 gallon (the age: 9 months), I have: 9 fishes + 4 Lysmata amboinensis 1 blue face 4" (2 months already)
<This guy is a tank buster…needs a much larger tank as an adult.>
4 Flame angels 2" (3 months already)
<Is that a typo?! Four flame angels…. honestly I’m surprised you haven’t had more problems, as harsh as this may sound you really should consider ridding yourself a few of them.>
1 Regal angel 3" (2.5 months already)
<That’s another angel that needs a boat-load of room. WAY to many angels my friend. As well as not having enough physical room, there could….there WILL be aggression later down the road. Seems like you want this tank to go in the direction of a reef so in that case all but maybe the flame (only one preferably) should be omitted. Even without considering the future reef these fish need new homes at earliest convenience, to avoid aggression and space restraints, especially the larger angels and at least 2 of the flame angels…preferably 3 out of 4 as mentioned above.>
1 Chaetodon lunulatus 1.5" (only eat open brain coral) (3 months already)
<Careful now it could pick on other corals down the road, including your new
Goni, best to omit this one to in a full blown reef.>
1 Yellow tang 2.5" (1 month)
1 Purple tang 2" (2 weeks)
<Oh yes the warring Zebrasomas we have spoke of in our previous conversations, well as I said earlier their will be aggression especially as they both become adults, eventually you will be only able to keep one and that’s IF your yellow decides to play nice for the time being, you may have to remove one sooner than later.>
All of them are healthy and want to eat, some times I saw my biggest flame angel is chasing each other but not too
aggressively because I put them in the same time. (the same case like yellow vs. purple tang).
<It will get worse as they get older, these animals weren’t “built” to live in this proximity. What seems like harmless nipping, chasing can be quite stressful>Fortunately my Blue face not bothering the
others.
So what do you think the longevity of my fishes for 9 of them
<This array of 9 fish is not at all a wise long term assortment. The blue face and the regal alone need tanks upwards of 200 gallons (separately not together). I would seriously consider re-thinking your stocking list especially if you want a reef, look into
gobies, clowns, blennies and cardinals to name a few (after you fix the current problem that is). Lots of enjoyment in these fish most are “reef-friendly” and would make much better long term citizens.>
Do you ever go to Indonesia?
<<Di Fenner says Indonesia is one of her favorite places on earth to
visit. MH>>
<No…farthest away from the mainland I have been is our tropical island chain
State known as Hawaii.>
Thank you Adam
Best regards
Ignatio
<Good luck, and if you want some more ideas restocking your tank I would be happy to help, Adam J.>
Marine Angels: (Holacanthus bermudensis) 10/11/05
Bob and the Crew,
<Adam J with you tonight.>
Thank you so much for this awesome site...I have come across this site a few months ago and I have enjoyed
reading all the posts here tremendously...(not to mention learning new things every day). Thanks!
<And thank you for the kind words, I will share them with rest of the crew.>
Today I have a question and I hope you guys can help me with... I have a 29g Fish only tank running for 6 months,
fully cycled with
Ammonia 0
Nitrite 0
Nitrate 5 ppm
Ph 8.3 and stable
Currently I have one tomato clown and everything went well...Recently I bought a juvenile Blue Angel fish
(1" size).
<Small sizes like this rarely adapt to captivity (most perish in shipping and acclimation). Best to purchase specimens around 3”. I am also glad to see this tank is temporary.>
Since I am planning to upgrade to 125g tank
<180-gallons would be better for the adult size of the angel.>
in 6 months time and I love raising this beautiful fish, I decide to go ahead trying out this plan.
Upon bringing him home, I then had this Angel quarantined for three weeks and he was very lively,
eating and playing actively...
< A good sign.>
The only unusual thing was that I notice his swimming was erratic occasionally (like charging or bolting forward unexpectedly). I
checked all water parameters carefully (including electrical grounding) and everything was normal and I
thought it could be due to his shyness (when he saw shadows etc...).
<In the wild, juveniles of this size rarely venture out into open water, they are usually hiding amongst the shadows and rock, be sure to have lots of hiding spaces. Intense lighting can also spook them. Subdued lighting would be best to “comfort” him.>
Today I take him to the display tank where the tomato clown is and I notice his behaviour did not change. He
is hanging around with the clown (they are both the same size) and the clown does not bother him at all...
However he is still occasionally bolting/charging forward which is now staring to stress the clown as
he may be startled and probably thinking the Angel starts attacking him... His erratic behaviour looks
very unsettling and I am not sure what is wrong with him...The clown behaves normally as always, but a bit
stressed out if anything.
Please help...
<Sounds like he is insecure of his surroundings. Make sure there are plenty of caves in which he can hide himself. Furthermore even at this size I suspect the confines of 29 gallons is getting to him, Angels love room to roam.>
I have a short movie clip as well of his behaviour, if this helps...
Thanks much, Rob
<Read here for more info: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/fishes/angels/holacanthus/, Adam J.>
Angel Fish Deaths 9/21/05
Over the past year, we have had multiple angel fish deaths. They have
all occurred suddenly without any apparent injury to the other fish in
the tank. The saltwater tank has been set up for two years, and we do
regular water changes, and have no abnormalities in the water.
Currently, we have a damsel fish, two clown fish, and a yellow tang, in
addition to shrimp, crabs, and snails with live rock. Each new addition
to the 70 gallon tank (all have been angel fish. a blue angel, six bar
angel, coral beauty, and flagfin angel) have lived for a couple months,
and then died suddenly. Prior to their death, they appear well
integrated into the tank, have no outward abnormalities, no signs of
trauma, and are eating well. We can't seem to figure out what the cause
of death could be. Please provide any suggestions to help. Could there
be any other hard metal abnormalities even though that we use a RO/DI
filter? Copper, lead, and iron testing have all been negative. Thanks
for the help, Dale <First impression is you are not meeting their
requirements/diet, etc. Read some of the articles here, Dale. http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/fishes/angels/
James (Salty Dog)> <<Also, most of the angels mentioned are not hardy for
aquarium use... RMF>>
Bigger Tank...Bigger Fishes? (Cont'd.) 7/31/05
Scott,
Thanks for the reply.
<You're quite welcome!>
Lots to think about.
You mentioned the Genicanthus sp of angels. Never even really heard of them
before. Did some quick looking up and they look like beautiful fish!! Do you
think that a Swallowtail Angel would work in my system?
<They are nice fishes, but they can be a bit sensitive, coming from deeper
water. They are subject to stresses from the collection process. Acquisition of
a specimen from a reliable source is critical. They do get to pretty good sizes,
so you do want to make sure that you have a lot of room for the fish to maneuver
in its captive environment, as well as tankmates that don't harass it.
Quarantine is crucial!>
On another note, I also saw a small (3") Singapore angel at the LFS. Opinions?
<This fish is a notoriously tough fish to keep. Many don't acclimate to captive
life and failure to feed. I'd pass on this one, myself. I kept one for about two
years, after which it died most mysteriously! I haven't heard too many success
stories about this fish in the long term, and have been rather cynical about
keeping this fish again. That's my personal two cents on the fish!>
If the larger angels are out, what are the odds of adding a second pigmy angel
to my tank with an established Coral Beauty? Always wanted a Flame Angel.
<Always a potential catastrophe in the making, IMO. I just received
correspondence from another hobbyist who attempted this unsuccessfully. It's not
impossible- but it is very challenging and fraught with potential problems. If
your system was specifically set up just for Centropyge, and stocked with them
carefully from the start, there is potential for success. Breeding groups, or
"harems" can be established if carefully managed. My advice is to pass on this
experiment unless you go this dedicated species-specific route.>
Perhaps some ill-tempered, mutated Seabass!!! lol
<Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight! :) >
On a totally different note, how would you recommend QTing a clam? Do I need
the intense lighting for the QT??? I just have a little 10-gal (also have a
29avail now) simple setup with a HOT filter and a sponge filter with the screw
in PC bulbs.
<In a quarantine setup, you can get by with this type of lighting because of the
proximity to the light in such a small tank. Supplemental feeding will help
compensate for the lower levels of lighting. You can elevate the clam on an
eggcrate/PVC platform. This will increase proximity to the light, and also allow
potentially disruptive organisms (such as parasitic snails) to "fall off" to the
bottom of the tank. Do read up on the WWM site under "Quarantine of Marine
Invertebrates".>
Thanks again!!
Ray
<My pleasure. Good luck!>
Juvenile Chrysurus 27 Jul 2005
I have a juvenile Chrysurus angel that is probably about the size of a
quarter. I didn't mean to get him so small.<Hi Brandon, MacL here with you
today. No worries on the size as long as we can get past the barrier of getting
him to eat.> I ordered him on the net from Marine Center, so I know the fish was
properly cared for. That said, I've had him for about 2 to 3 weeks. He hasn't
eaten any prepared foods, and that includes live brine. He is constantly picking
at the rocks however, showing somewhat of a feeding response. <If he is
constantly picking he is probably eating copepods found in the rocks. He is more
than likely getting enough to sustain him but unless you have a way to refill
what he eats or you reseed the tank with pods he will eventually wear out the
supply. There are many places that you can buy pods to restock or you can use
this time to get him eating other things. One of my new favorites is
www.seapods.com. A new business that sells beneficial pods to help replenish.>
There are no fish in the 125G tank to pick on him. <Does that mean there are no
other fish at all or just that no one there will pick on him? Often they can
learn to eat other foods based on examples from other fish.> He has now
developed a large white clump on his left pectoral fin. It looks very large, too
large to be ich. <Sounds to me like it might be lymphocystis, you might check
the site to determine if it is. If so good water conditions should take care of
the problem.> I'm worried that his immune system may be compromised from not
eating. <Perhaps just a bit stressed from being a small tyke and shifted.> Any
ideas of what to feed when live brine won't work? <Lots of stuff might appeal to
him. He might eat mussels cracked open. He might eat Mysis either frozen or
live. Did you contact the marine center to ask them what he was eating while
there. I have had a lot of success with fish not eating by putting garlic on the
frozen foods. Seems to encourage them to eat.> He chases it, only to look and
not eat. <Good luck, MacL>
Thanks.
Large angelfish selection 7/17/05
I just wanted to say thank you, I was convinced that I had to have a 6
banded angel, and that no others would do! That was until I read your article
and realized that it would be so selfish of me to buy this beautiful creature
only to have it die after only months.
<Likely weeks, even days.>
I would never want to be a part of the death of such a magnificent
creature! Your article has convinced me to get a Koran when I am ready for
one! I really appreciate all of your wonderful advice, especially since my LFS
has NO IDEA about anything. ( They recommended and I now own the
problematic Seaclone 150!) No longer will I take their word for it! I think
people like you and sites like this can help hobbyists realize that many are out
to push the product, and not truly interested in the well being of the
fish! Thank you again, Tanis Montminy
<Thank you for your acknowledgment and bolstering our sense of what we're doing
here. Bob Fenner>
Which Angel(s) would be best?
Hello! This is my first time writing after reading many...many items
from the website.
I find your information and suggestions very helpful and obviously well
thought out.
<We've... walked the walk... and are able/willing, even eager to "talk the
talk"...>
Anyway....I have stocked a FO 90gal "show" type tank with a few peaceful
residents.
A Christmas wrasse, Fiji puffer, Royal Gramma, Orangetail Butterfly,
Yellow Watchman Goby, and a small school (5) of Green Chromis. I would like to start adding
the final fish to the tank and thought a combo of Angels would finish off the tank nicely.
<...>
I am thinking about maybe one full size Angel and one dwarf.
<Mmm, no... this tank is too small for a large angel...>
Could you give me suggestions
on a good combo for this size and type of tank. The tank has good filtration and
skimmer.
Thanks in advance,
Donald R. Wear
<Look to one of the medium to smaller genera, species... Genicanthus,
Centropyge... reviewed and evaluated on WWM. Bob Fenner>
Question About Pomacanthus annularis - 06/05/05
First of all, let me say that I think your website is wonderful, and I've
read your book cover to cover.
<<Hello Steve, Eric R. here today, and I assume you're referring to Bob's
book...excellent reading it is.>>
I've gained much knowledge from reading the FAQs and your readers' questions.
<<Yes...much to be found/discovered among these pages.>>
This started as my wife's hobby, but I found myself helping out allot,
especially in the LFS. I guess I'm a good listener so
I've been able to help my wife decipher what the LFS sales guys are saying. I
also refurbished the filtration system on an old 125 that I bought used, so I
guess I'm becoming a hobbyist.
<<Tee hee! Does go that way sometimes. Hopefully you're enjoying the
involvement.>>
Finally, I have a question for you. Currently, I have a fish only 125 gallon
marine aquarium with the following fish.
<<Wait! What's this "I" stuff? Thought you said this was your wife's hobby
<Big Grin>?>>
Clarkii Clown, Flame Hawk, Niger Trigger, Green Bird Wrasse, Hippo Tang, Wolf
Eel Blenny
Some of the sales people are telling my wife she can have a dozen or so fish (or
more if they're small).
<<Not surprising to hear, but, stocking a tank is MUCH more involved than basing
numbers on the size of the tank and the size of the fish. Factors such as
hardiness, activeness, temperament/compatibility, etc. must be considered. Each
addition must be researched carefully, and any decisions on size should be based
on the fishes SIZE AT MATURITY.>>
She is definitely wanting to add an Annularis angel.
<<Ahh...Pomacanthus annularis...beautiful fish.>>
I'm thinking that this would still be ok, but we should probably not add any
more after this. Do you think there's room for an Annularis? I realize the
tang and trigger can get very large <<and that bird wrasse grows to a foot on
the reef.>>, but they're both still quite small. Your input is much
appreciated.
<<To be honest Steve, I'm hesitant about this mix of fish. The tank is large
enough for the angel (though at a mature 20" I would prefer to see it go in to a
tank twice this size) but will become quite crowded as all these large fish
grow. I think all would be happier/healthier in the long run without the tang
or the trigger; my vote would be to remove the Hippo Tang (too skittish and
disease prone in small systems, IMO).>>
Thank you, Steve
<<Welcome, Eric Russell>> Question About Pomacanthus annularis II -
06/07/05 actually PYTB
Thanks so much for the reply.
<<Happy to do so.>>
That's not the first time I've heard about Hippo Tangs being a little harder to
keep. Is this something that happens later
in life?
<<Not in my opinion...I've noted/read of their skittish nature, proclivity to
succumb to ich at all ages.>>
Our Tang looks like one of the most healthy fish we own. He eats well and is
always grazing on algae, and this fish has grown from 2.5" to almost 4" in
around 6 months.
<<Perhaps you are the exception. These fish are naturally very robust and very
active. They need lots of food, and this fish actually requires a diet higher
in protein than vegetable matter.>>
It's actually one of my favorites, and I'd hate to give it up to make room for
someone new. Maybe the upgrade to 300 gallons will
be sooner than I thought.
<<Always a good reason to go bigger (like you need a reason <G>). A 300 would
make a terrific display for the selection of fish you listed originally...and
maybe a couple more discreet additions as well.>>
Thanks again for the response, and I'll be talking to you all soon.
<<Looking forward to it.>>
Steve
<<Eric R.>>
Emperor Angelfish
Hello. I was very concerned about the Emperor Angelfish I would like one of my
own, they are so beautiful and majestic... so I was wondering first are they at all difficult? Do they require expert care? I own a glass 150gallon tank at full
grown could several exist in my tank? Write back soon thanks!
<Read here my friend.
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/fishes/angels/pomacanthus/imperator.htm
- James (Salty Dog)>
Passer Angelfish Switcheroo With a Flame Angel - 15 May 2005
I am angry right now as I went to purchase a flame angel for my 75 gal tank and came home with a Passer Angel because I was told it would only grow to about 8 inches!
<Yowsa, someone either was majorly misinformed or majorly confused.>
He is beautiful and approx 3.5 to 4 inches right now.
<They are a stunning fish.>
He came with a high price tag and now that I have done some research realize I am going to have to upgrade my new 75 gal within 6 months.
<Definitely a very quick growing fish.>
Not what I want to do and my husband would kill me anyway.
<Eeek>
Do Saltwater fish stores take fish back for the same price normally.
<I think that a reputable fish store would take the fish back simply because you were misinformed about his total size. Now they might give you store credit instead of cash back. That often depends on different stores.>
They are closed today so not sure of what to do.
<Call first thing as soon as they are opened and only speak to a manager or owner of the store.>
Believe me I am learning the hard way and will get better at this, already learning LSWF may not be as educated as I which is not much at the moment!
<I'm sure it was an honest mistake and like you said they were not as educated. If I might make a suggestion, it might behoove you to put any fish you want on hold then get educated about what they need before you make the purchase. I'm not sure the type of store that you bought the fish from but often many of these stores aren't specifically for fish and don't give the staff the appropriate education. I'm sure that its more a lack of time constraint than anything else but you might also do some research to find a store in the area that can give you the information you need.>
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Great site, very informative!!!!!!
<How kind of you to say, thanks MacL>
Annularis Angel, James' go
Hey crew, on the last question I forgot to mention in previous email: How
do
you feel about putting an annularis angel in a 65g FOWLR setup? He will be
one of only about three other smaller fish, I really can't seem to find any
angels I like that don't outgrow my tank and he's the smallest so I'm really
considering him? <I've search a few sites and the Annularis (Blue Ringed Angel)
can attain a length of 12'. They are considered hardy as far as the angel
family. Myself, I would prefer the Blue Girdled Angel. They would fair a little
better in a 65. Your tank size is slightly below borderline for any of these
angels as they will grow. James (Salty Dog)>
Thanks <<This is a VERY POOR choice IMO... James, see WWM, the web, references
re. RMF>>
Blue Ringed Angel
Hey Jim, blue- girdled angel? That's received a (3) rating and a "difficult maintenance" from everywhere I have researched. So, that angel is HARD to
keep and dies often and mysteriously within a month or two. Why would I take my chances on something that has a poor and dismal survival rating. Are you
sure you're knowledgeable about this particular thing and you should be replying
to emails? And next time try to be a little more professional.
<Jay, I probably was in err suggesting that to you. My basis for that lies with
other people and myself who have kept them. Together we felt they were not that difficult to keep
as far as angels go. No angel is easy to keep. But also keep in mind that all other parameters have to be strictly maintained. That is a 125 or larger, pristine water quality along with 10% water changes and an excellent diet. The tank also needs to be loaded with live rock and been set up at least six months. I'm wrong in suggesting that since I don't know your experience or skill level. Most newbies (if you are one) generally will not go through the work necessary to maintain this fish and therefore the fish would probably rate a three on a one to four level. I do try my best to give
professional, informative and safe suggestions in my responses. But since I am human, the chance for error can exist. My apologies, and you should stick with the Blue Ringed Angel or a Koran which I would rate at a two level in degree of difficulty. James (Salty Dog)>
Bad advice
Bob,
Probably wrong, but I based this on my having kept a couple of Blue Girdled and on advice from a few site who sell these type angels.
<Mmm, well, this is what you should do... and folks' experiences do vary... I assure you though... as recorded on the Net, in print... that the subgenus
that includes this fish... almost never thrive in captivity>
Then again, if LFSs want to sell them instead of flushing them down the toilet, they are
not going to tell you they are difficult. But anyway, the two I've had lived a few years before they outgrew my 125 and had to be sold. They
readily accepted any food I gave them. Quite possible that I was lucky, don't know. Thanks anyway for the response, and I will always keep this in
mind.
Regards, James (Salty Dog)
<Thank you... will archive this with our input. Bob F>
Blue face angel, large angel sel.
HI and thanks for the opportunity for my question. I have the
opportunity to purchase a 30 cm Blue face angel. I personally think it's
wrong to capture fish this size for the aquarium trade but means nothing to
the blue face I'm thinking of buying. I would like to ask you if you think
it's wise buying a fish this size,
<I do think it's a poor idea to send such illiterate messages... use your
spelling, grammar checkers, please>
( I really feel for the poor thing and it is a stunning fish), and what size
tank should it really belong in so it's quite comfortable. I have a 550
litre tank, 4x 2 x 2 ( sorry we work in litres in Australia) to accommodate
this fish while another tank can be established. Any advice you can give
would be greatly appreciated.
<In general large specimens of pomacanthids collected wild fare poorly...
You can read re my opinions re Euxiphipops on WWM. Bob Fenner>
Mis-matched Marine Set-up -II ... (file under skimmer and angel selection)
Thanks for your quick response and vital info. Three last questions please.
You suggested to get a better protein skimmer for my 125g tank when I set it up for the fish transfer. Seaclone makes a larger model for up to 150 gallon
tanks. Is it just an inferior design versus other makes?
<Yes... read on re... get something better>
Secondly, if I were to upsize to a 150 or 180g would it still be unadvisable to add a large angel,
or any large fish, to the mix of Hippo Tang, Purple Tang, Foxface, Clown, Gobies, Cherub Angel, 6 line wrasse, Royal Gramma and Orchid Dottyback?
<Mmm you could add a "larger" species of Angel... at least for a period of a few years in a larger system...>
And if not, what type of large angel would have a better chance to mix, a blue face,
blue girdled, or imperator ? Thanks for the help.
<Of these, the Emperor. Bob Fenner>
A Marine Angel in Mumbai
Hi,
I am from Mumbai India and I've a 120 gal FOWLR marine tank that I've set up 5 months back. I've read and admired your site for more than a year now ... great work.
<Thanks, everyone works hard to help when and where we can.>
Currently I've 2 BTA with maroon clowns , 1 blue damsel , 1 yellow tang and 1 blue tang. My LFS has currently got a emperor angel (3 inch) and a blue face angel (4 inch). Both are in good health and eating prepared food. Since we do not get marine fish readily here
I am tempted to buy both. I am planning to upgrade to a 180 gal tank next year. My question is (1) will there be a compatibility issue between the two angels and (2) if I've to choose, which will be your recommended choice.
Thanks,
Sumit
<Hello, I am glad we have been able to help. I am sorry to say that I don't think the two fish will get along long term in your tank. A general rule as it pertains to angels is that if they are large in size and similar in color then they won't get along. An adult Emperor Angel and an adult blue face will be similar in color and might fight. I have seen it happen both ways. One where they coexisted and one where they fought. I would suggest to you not to try it. I don't think that it would be fair to the fish and that you would be asking for trouble. If I were to choose between the two fish I would go with the Emperor for the color or I would chose the Blue face for the smaller size so I could put more fish in the tank. Good Luck.
MikeB.>
- Dwarf Angels -
Greetings crew,
After reading through compatibility FAQ's for "dwarf" and Pomacanthidae I found questions and answers relating to my situation, but not close enough to keep me from bugging you. Sorry, but here comes another "can I put this and this in this tank" question....
My 125g FOWLR tank is currently fallow following an error in judgment regarding a Tang in QT suffering from stress and reaction to copper used for a case of ich. Never again will I move a fish from QT to display early. Anyways I lost a Yellow Tang and 2 Damsels, but my 4" Passer Angel,
Talbot's and Fiji Devil Damsel are now recovering nicely in QT.
I've been contemplating the restocking, and would really love to place 2 Centropyges in the 125.
<Would suggest only one in a tank of this size.>
I have a 2nd 20g QT to setup, and could introduce the new Angels at the same time I reintroduce the Passer and Damsels.
<Would actually introduce the Centropyge first.>
The tank has about 100lbs LR and 1" sandbed in the display and a 50g sump/fuge containing an oversized Tunze skimmer and 4" DSB w/ macro and @10lbs LR in the fuge.
Is this a gamble I should take?
<It would work, sure, but as I've mentioned, would suggest only one of those you list, and put it in before the Passer.>
I haven't decided on the particular species but was considering the Flame, Heraldi, Venustus, Rusty, and
Eiblii. That is if this is advisable.
<All very nice choices.>
Thanks for your help
Kenney
<Cheers, J -- >
Centropyge V Genicanthus 8 March 2005
I have a 48x24x24 reef tank that has primarily LPS and SPS.
<Great size for a tank.>
I am considering adding an angel to my tank and have narrowed the choices to a Centropyge multicolor and Genicanthus watanabei. I was wondering if you have any thoughts on which would be the most appropriate for a reef tank?
<I have had both types of angels. The multicolor is probably one of my favorite fish in the entire world. That being said I did not find mine entirely trustworthy in a reef tank. He picked on my clam a bit and ate some my xenias. I had suspicions that he nibbled on some of my
SPS' as well. But let me do say that you cannot get a more beautiful angel. In my experience the
Centropyge's are individuals. Some individual fish will nibble on things while others do not. I know that makes it difficult to assist with the decision but its more an accurate assessment of what the
Centropyge will do.>
I have read most of the summaries on the wetwebmedia.com site along with the FAQs but cannot find much information on the multicolor in terms of a reef tank. It appears that the Centropyge can be coral eaters and I was wondering if this is true for the multicolor, or if, since this is a deep water species, if that means that it would likely not eat coral? If there is a chance that it would eat coral then I would likely go with the watanabei since it appears that this species does not bother corals.
<I have never seen a Genicanthus that bothered a coral. Not one of them so they are more likely to be the best candidate for a reef tank.>
Anyway, if you could let me know your thoughts it would be much appreciated.
<Hope that helped, Good luck, MacL> Multicolor
Thanks very much for the great information. I guess I kind of knew that the
Genicanthus was the safer choice but was holding out some hope for the multicolor since I saw one for the first time in a store a few days ago and
it is a very nice looking fish, though the watanabei is beautiful as well.
<You know Brian honestly if you find the fish of your dreams I really suggest getting it and making whatever
accommodations you find necessary to keep it. You might not have ANY problems whatsoever and its worth it to have something that you find amazing. Good luck, MacL>
Angelfish Trade-Offs
Hi Bob,
<Scott F. in this afternoon!>
I was interested in getting an Emperor Angelfish, or Majestic or Maculosus Angelfish but I am unsure of
their compatibility with cleaner shrimp.
<Fish, like people are all different. However, I would generally not be too concerned about these fishes attacking Cleaner Shrimp. This is not to say that they WON'T, but they are typically not much of a threat, in my experience. If you are keeping sessile inverts, like corals- forget it, as they will make a meal out of almost all corals you'd care to keep!>
I have a 220g tank with the following fish:
Powder Blue Tang
Yellow Longnose
Heniochus sp.
Green Chromis
Yellow Damsels
Blue Chromis
Yellow Watchmen Goby
Mandarin
Pistol Shrimp
Sand Starfish
Blue Crabs
Banggai Cardinal
Cleaner Wrasse
Fairy Wrasse
Flame Angel
2 Fire Gobies
2 False Percula Clownfish
<A nice group of fishes and inverts...>
Do you think these Angelfish are good? If not, any recommendations?
Also, what about introducing a Sailfin tang to my powder blue tang?
Thanks for your help.
Candice
<Well, Candice- each of the angels that you mentioned can be excellent pets if you select quality, healthy specimens, acclimate them carefully, and provide a stable environment. However, your tank has a pretty good population already, and these "full size" angels require a lot of physical space and territory. In fact, a rule of thumb offered by Bob and others is that you should dedicate at least 100 gallons of your system alone to just the angel. Maculosus Angels are awesome fish, however! If it were me, though, I'd be inclined to try a more "outgoing" Centropyge angel, like the Lemonpeel Angel (C. flavissimus) in your situation. It can reach a comfortable 5", is pretty outgoing and
able to take care of itself, and can be quite hardy if you get a net-caught specimen. These guys are territorial with other angels, but should settle in nicely with your other fishes. I tend to encourage people to keep these "dwarf" angels more often, as they do have many of the endearing attributes of the bigger guys, but are generally less demanding in terms of space requirements. They can, of course, be challenging in their own right. In my opinion, the large Angels, particularly the Emperor, are best suited to situations where they are the "showcase" fish, and are surrounded by smaller, less active fishes. Housed this way, they can be
spectacular! Also, I feel that you tank has too many smaller fishes in it to be able to house one of these guys comfortably for a
natural life span. Remember, the Emperor can reach up to 15", and the others that you mention can hit a foot or more as well. I maintain a 72"x 24"x 30" (225 gallon) system, and I would be hesitant to house one of these fishes in anything less than an 8 foot long tank. Some people may disagree, but if you've ever seen one of these fishes at size in the wild, you'll realize that most of us should be thinking about smaller fishes in our systems. With regard to your question about the Sailfin Tang...This is another awesome fish, but it, too can hit 15" plus, and requires a huge tank as well. They are excellent fishes, however, durable and displaying great personalities! I would not add one to your tank at this point. Perhaps a
Ctenochaetus species, like the Kole Tang, which is a much more modest-sized fish, would be a better choice. Or, there's always the old standby, the Yellow Tang. Common, but a good fish nonetheless! You have a very interesting tank, so any addition that you make should compliment the existing animals and add some interest, without overwhelming the system! Hope my diatribe inspires you to look into some of the smaller versions of the "big guys" found in the trade! Good luck! Regards, Scott F.>
Pomacanthus annularis query
Hey crew, on the last question I forgot to mention in previous email: How
do
you feel about putting an annularis angel in a 65g FOWLR setup? He will be
one of only about three other smaller fish, I really can't seem to find any
angels I like that don't outgrow my tank and he's the smallest so I'm really
considering him?
Thanks
>>>Hello Jay,
P. annularis is not a beginner's angel number one. Number two, your tank is much
too small to accommodate one for any significant period of time. If you can't
find a dwarf angel that you like...well I'm worried about you quite frankly Jay.
:)
Consider C. acanthops or C. argi. Both are attractive, very small and VERY
hardy. The only caveat being that they are rather aggressive, but this usually
isn't a problem if they are added last. Just don't keep them with very shy fish.
Good Luck
Jim<<<
A Debate Over Angels
Hey Jim, you're worried about me? lol. That wasn't necessary man. Besides,
everyone has different likings to things, to each their own. Second, I'm not a beginner and my tank has been setup for over two years and I've had fish for
over 13 years. And you might want to check your research regarding marine angels because NO angel is a beginner fish Jim. And Bob Fenner gave the annularis
a (1) rating. Thanks for your help anyway though bud.
>>>Now Jay, I was just funnin' ya buddy. :) To each his own indeed. Having said that, no I actually don't need to check my research, I AM the research. I've been doing this for 20 years or so and have been keeping marine angels of many types all the while, and in my types of situations. My remarks are ALWAYS based in empirical data, not second hand info or unreliable accounts on the web or elsewhere. This is also why I'm already aware of P. annularis' tank requirements - look Ma, no
Google!
Number two - hardiness among angels is usually a relative thing compared to other genera, but they do range from EXTREMELY hardy, to quite delicate. You're also quite wrong that NO angel is a beginner fish. C. argi is as hardy as marine fish come, practically a damsel disguised as an angel, and so is C. acanthops. Both are small and easily
accommodated by most hobbyists. For a hobbyist with a bit more experience and space? We have Holocanthus passer - you need to hang it on a clothesline to kill it. P.
maculosus isn't far behind. As long as the keeper can
manage the eventual size of the fish, and the aggression level, and has done enough research to know at least how large of
[a] tank he needs, he should do just fine, even if he is a relative beginner.
P. annularis ranks somewhere below P. imperator as a juvenile, although slightly older sub-adults often do quite well once acclimated. Scott Michael gives it a 3 on a scale of 1-5, and based on my experience I concur with his assessment where young juveniles are concerned.
Good Luck, Jim<<<
Angels - part 3
I disagree, I don't think ANY angel should be used as a beginner fish. They
need a good 3 or more months of good, established water. And as far as the tank size, common, it doesn't have to be as strict as your making it sound as
long as you keep up with water changes and remove it before it outgrows the tank
(if full size may be too big for tank). We're talking fish here not mammals (Orcas or dolphins). When someone purchases a dog, should they be saying
that they're apartment is too small to accommodate it then (running, freedom, space, etc.) so they shouldn't buy it? lol. As long as you give your animal,
whatever it may be, a good, happy, healthy, spacious home, I don't see a problem
with it. Unfortunate you couldn't be of assistance, but thank you anyway :-)
>>>'sigh'
You can disagree Jay, and you can be wrong. You've just done both. You can't assign an arbitrary period of time and say "this is how long this or that fish needs" You need a stable system (not "established water") for ANY marine organism. This has NOTHING to do with how experienced the keeper is. Even a smart beginner makes sure his tank is stable before adding fish. Sure you can cycle a tank with certain fish, even an argi angel, but that doesn't mean it's wise. Angels are NOT by
their very nature "a certain way" as a taxonomic group. They vary, many are delicate, a few are quite hardy. Some are huge, some are quite small. You cannot generalize, unless of course you lack sufficient experience with the genera involved to make an educated statement on the subject. Also, obviously you can keep a fish in a smaller tank as long as you remove it before it grows too big. By that logic you can keep a
Queensland grouper on a 10 gallon tank. I assume the tank in question is for long term use, and that is the only safe thing to do lacking further information on your needs.
C. argi or C. acanthops are as much a beginner fish as any other. You can argue that NO marine fish is a beginner fish as well. C. argi is as hardy as most damsels, but then again I've only been keeping them for 20 years so I'm just a
youngan.
Disagreeing is one thing, disagreeing without empirical data to back it up is quite another. If you think you know too much to be in need of this type of advice, by all means refrain from asking it.
Peace
Jim<<< FWIW, RMF agrees with both/all views here>>
Annularis Angel, James' go
Hey crew, on the last question I forgot to mention in previous email: How
do
you feel about putting an annularis angel in a 65g FOWLR setup? He will be
one of only about three other smaller fish, I really can't seem to find any
angels I like that don't outgrow my tank and he's the smallest so I'm really
considering him? <I've search a few sites and the Annularis (Blue Ringed Angel)
can attain a length of 12'. They are considered hardy as far as the angel
family. Myself, I would prefer the Blue Girdled Angel. They would fair a little
better in a 65. Your tank size is slightly below borderline for any of these
angels as they will grow. James (Salty Dog)>
Thanks <<This is a VERY POOR choice IMO... James, see WWM, the web, references
re. RMF>>
Blue Ringed Angel
Hey Jim, blue- girdled angel? That's received a (3) rating and a "difficult maintenance" from everywhere I have researched. So, that angel is HARD to
keep and dies often and mysteriously within a month or two. Why would I take my chances on something that has a poor and dismal survival rating. Are you
sure you're knowledgeable about this particular thing and you should be replying
to emails? And next time try to be a little more professional.
<Jay, I probably was in err suggesting that to you. My basis for that lies with
other people and myself who have kept them. Together we felt they were not that difficult to keep
as far as angels go. No angel is easy to keep. But also keep in mind that all other parameters have to be strictly maintained. That is a 125 or larger, pristine water quality along with 10% water changes and an excellent diet. The tank also needs to be loaded with live rock and been set up at least six months. I'm wrong in suggesting that since I don't know your experience or skill level. Most newbies (if you are one) generally will not go through the work necessary to maintain this fish and therefore the fish would probably rate a three on a one to four level. I do try my best to give
professional, informative and safe suggestions in my responses. But since I am human, the chance for error can exist. My apologies, and you should stick with the Blue Ringed Angel or a Koran which I would rate at a two level in degree of difficulty. James (Salty Dog)>
Bad advice
Bob,
Probably wrong, but I based this on my having kept a couple of Blue Girdled and on advice from a few site who sell these type angels.
<Mmm, well, this is what you should do... and folks' experiences do vary... I assure you though... as re |