|
| |
|
FAQs on Calcium Reactors 2
Related Articles: Calcium, Understanding
Calcium & Alkalinity, Kalkwasser,
Calcium Reactors
Related FAQs: Calcium Reactors 1, Calcium
Reactors 3, Calcium Reactors 4,
Calcium Reactors 5,
& FAQs on Calcium Reactors: Rationale/Use,
Selection, Installation,
Operation, Media,
Measuring, Trouble-Shooting,
By Makes/Models, &
Calcium
and Alkalinity, & FAQs on: The Science of
Calcium & Alkalinity, Importance,
Measure, Sources,
Use of Additives, Troubleshooting/Fixing,
Products,
A stock small reactor from Knop.
|

|
Calcium Reactor Valve
Hi Bob,
<You got JasonC this time, howdy...>
I have a K2R Calcium Reactor that is currently being fed from my main display
tank via gravity flow. The effluent from the reactor flows into my sump, again,
via gravity flow through a 5/8" vinyl tube.
<ok>
The effluent recommendation from the manufacturer is around 100 ml/minute for my
300 gallon display tank. <A quick word here... these should both be adjusted
for your system - is different for everyone. Use the manufacturer's suggestions
as a baseline and test very frequently.> However, when I set the output valve
to give me this flow, it works for a few days and continues to clog. The flow
stops completely and requires that I open the valve fully and then reset the
flow rate every few days. <Not an uncommon problem at all, so much so that I
need to check the very same valve on this morning's maintenance march.>
Originally, I fed the calcium reactor from a tee off of a small powerhead
submerged at the top of my main tank, but this small amount of extra water flow
caused the water to go right through the reactor (as opposed to being
recirculated in the reactor via the reactor's circ pump...) <That doesn't
sound correct at all - perhaps a design flaw in the K2R? Water shouldn't be able
to flow out any faster than permitted by the outflow valve. Everything in the
reactor should continue to recirculate.> Because of this, I needed to adjust
the CO2 such that the output effluent was around 6.5 in order to get my
alkalinity up to 400. This achieved the correct alkalinity but caused excess CO2
in the main tank followed by hair and other algae problems. <This can be
addressed by letting the effluent run out into your skimmer... the foam
fractionation process will blow out the excess CO2.>
Is there a better way to plumb, place, adjust or feed the calcium reactor that
would cut down on output valve clogs and maintain the correct flow rate? <Hmmm...
is a good question. I've tried them all, and I prefer a dedicated pump over a
T-fitting in the return pump over a siphon feed. That being said, I just
received a new Knop reactor who's tubing is set up specifically for a siphon. In
addition, there are problems with T-fittings regarding line pressure. So... I'd
say that each solution depends most on your installation and manufacturer. I'm
going to try the siphon on this new reactor because the manufacturer is
recommending that I do it this way. I would suggest you do the same unless it
just isn't working at all. As for the clogging of the effluent valve, several
online retailers carry an external pinch valve which will accomplish the same
task, but won't get clogged by accumulating salts. You might want to give that a
try.>
Thanks!
Charles T. Spyropulos
<Cheers, J -- >
Re: Calcium Reactor
Yes, I've read the CalcFAQ on WWM.. . . quite a few times actually, quite
long and looks to be an oft discussed topic :-). <OK.>
Anyhow, I'm familiar enough with the concepts of the calc reactor. Just not sure
how it would tie in with a controller. <Ugg... Jim, this is discussed in that
FAQ. Did you really read it?> Aquadyne recommends that you set the calc
reactor drip rates, etc, and then set the controller to open the solenoid on the
CO2 bottle until the pH drops to 0.15 below your desired pH level. That would
mean setting the pH controller to about 8.05 (desired level is probably around
8.2). <Sounds fine to me.>
Now here are my issues/questions. I know the effluent out of the reactor will be
low in pH. What level should that be in a dual reactor using ARM media ? <Each
piece of hardware is different, and I'd say it is what it is. Get the reactor
running and test - this is the best way to get the right answer.> They
recommend 7.5, most other media types are around 6.5-6.8. <Yes, but what
would be best for your tank?> I have a dual reactor column both with ARM,
effluent of one gets pumped through bottom to top of another similar canister.
<Is pretty standard.>
Now that being the case, here is the tricky part. If you set the controller as
per mfg spec, that means you dose until you drop your pH to 8.05. That's fine
and dandy, but will that ever stop the reactor if you have a high turbulent sump
and skimmer? <I would think so - why wouldn't it stop the reactor.> As far
as I understand, the CO2 actually lowers pH, but if you work it out (similar to
degassing it) of the water, the pH will rise back up again. <What is more
accurate is to say - if you stop adding CO2 the acid/base reaction stops, the
calcium carbonate [acid] becomes normal tank water and the pH will rise up
again. Most modern reef systems don't have problems with excessive CO2... this
is also covered in that same FAQ.> And if the effluent is at 7.5 with the ARM
reactor, it's close enough that with heavy aeration, is the possibility that the
pH may never rise possible? <I think you misunderstand the nature of the
effluent from the reactor. It is calcium carbonate, an acid. This is only
related to the CO2 in that the CO2 was part of the acid/base reaction. Any CO2
in excess of what is in the calcium carbonate effluent [CO2 would be saturated
at this point] and this excess of CO2 would pull down the tank's pH further, and
this is what is typically discussed in association with calcium reactors. There
are some very simple tests to determine if this is a problem in your system -
also covered in that FAQ.> Will this open the possibility to inject too much
calcium and raise the alk level to levels that I may not want? <No, when the
CO2 supply is shut off, the acid/base reaction stops and the effluent becomes
normal tank water.>
Also, with the low point on the controller, presumably the calc reactor doesn't
run at all at night, since the pH will probably slowly creep below that level,
correct? <This is quite possible, yes.>
I've used a calcium reactor before, just not with this media and controller. . .
Thanks
<Well then you know... test 100 times - make one adjustment. Cheers, J --
>
Jim
Calcium Reactor
Ignore that last email. <too late.> I saw the powered solenoid on the
regulator a few minutes after that. <ok.>
Anyhow, now there are two methods to 'control' the reactor. Some advocate
measuring the affluent and controlling the solenoid to output a ph of 6.5-6.7.
<I would not recommend this method.> Others have the pH probe in the sump
and measure that way, but I'm not sure if you keep it there, whether the reactor
will actually work. <Yes it will... if you've read my FAQ, then you know that
the 'issue' here is that the low pH of the effluent of the reactor can drag the
pH of your tank down, and anything below 8.2 pH isn't really desirable in the
main display.> Isn't it possible for the reactor to keep running and raise
the alk quite high, but the pH never rises to stop the reactor from running ?
<Only if you set it up incorrectly. You should be able to adjust the
controller so that it will shut off the CO2 solenoid when the pH in the main
system goes too low.>
The main reason is that if you have a nice controller, why in the world would
you want the pH reading to be reading 6.5. You would want it to report on the
actual pH in the tank in the displays, rather than the effluent ? <I'm not
sure I follow...> Thanks, Jim
<Again, if you haven't, please read that URL... I do think it will answer
your questions. Cheers, J -- >
Re: Calcium Reactor
<Greetings, Jim, I've also read your other email, but there was some
input I wanted to add here... hope you don't mind.>
I just got a calcium reactor. I also have a controller (ph/Octo). Anyhow,
wondering what the best way to operate this reactor is. <Well, besides
following the basic directions, you should always have calcium, alkalinity, and
pH tests available and then run the reactor to match your tank.> It looks
like the manufacturer just advises setting it and running it constantly. <For
most intents and purposes, this is how it should run. Is how I run mine.> Is
this better, or should I hook it into my controller? <This will depend on how
the reactor impacts the tank.> However, it looks like the controller bases it
on a CO2 valve discharge. <The controller will 'base' it on anything you
want, where ever you put the probe.> If I do it that way, I guess I have to
get one of those, as you can't just run a reactor pump to turn on when the ph
values fall (The CO2 keeps discharging even though the water doesn't, right ?).
Any ideas? <Plenty.> Thanks, Jim
<I've got a URL I'd like you read... you will find many answers there:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/calcreactors.htm
Cheers, J -- >
RO Water Top off & Calcium Reactors
Bob,
<Steven Pro in this morning.>
I top off my tank with water directly from my RO unit on an automatic system
utilizing a solenoid. Do you have any advice on how to keep up with buffering as
adding it has created spikes due to the automatic replenishing of fresh water
and the fact that I only buffer weekly. Any advice.
<This is really not a good idea. While it maybe convenient, it is always best
to hold and aerate any demineralized water for 24 hours. This maximized
dissolved oxygen and off gases excess CO2. It is the CO2 that is messing around
with your alkalinity.>
I also was considering purchasing a calcium reactor from Lifereef. Have you
heard of their products. Any comments.
<Have not used there products. Do solicit comments form other hobbyists on
the message boards. I know of two very friendly boards; ours at http://wetwebfotos.com/talk/index.jsp
and a friend's at http://www.thesea.org/forum/default.asp You may also wish to
inquire at both reefs.org and ReefCentral.>
Thanks, Liz
<You are welcome. -Steven Pro>
Calcium Reactor Questions
Sorry to bother you again today, promise my last question.
<no worries>
A friend of mine is upgrading his Reef to a nice 180+. he is going with a
calcium reactor, and has peaked my interest. I read your site but have a
question. He has been told that even with a calcium reactor he will still need
to drip Kalkwasser.
<arguable, but I personally agree that there is great benefits to this>
I thought the whole point of getting the reactor was to be able to stop this
time consuming practice.
<nope... but that is a common misconception among American aquarists.
Europeans have known/promoted Calc Reactors as Alkalinity boosters (carbonates)
not calcium boosters, although they do some of both. Even Daniel Knop of Knop
reactors has said that Kalkwasser supplementation is helpful to reactors (among
other things, it indirectly supports alkalinity while providing free calcium).
And Kalkwasser is not time-consuming at all.. you just haven't been shown an
effective application. Please do review my comments in the WWM archives on
dosing with Kalk slurries (easy mix with cold water, dosed at night in one fast
shot at measures that spike pH not more than .1-.2 This was detailed at length
in my book as well http://www.wetwebmedia.com/bkcoralprop.htm>
What are your thoughts. I guess one more question should we go with single or
dual chamber reactors. Our feeling is the dual systems are more efficient.
<The duals are MUCH more efficient and I strongly recommend that second
chamber for pH stability among other things.>
Thanks Larry
<best regards, Anthony Calfo>
John Guest SpeedFit fitting
<Greetings... >
Hello friends, I'm curious if any of you are familiar with this John Guest
SpeedFit fitting? <I am. It is a brand name and unique type of fitting for
small tubing that does not require a collet or retaining nut - hence the name,
speed-fit.> I have a calcium reactor and was looking into changing out my
ETSS skimmer for an AquaC EV-120, and noticed this fitting called the John
Guest. <Is just a place to plug the effluent [output] tubing of the reactor
into the skimmer. You could as easily use this for an ozone input. The large
quantity of air in the skimmer would help blow off the excess CO2.> I also
have seen an item called a calcium reactor pressure adapter to fit the John
Guest fitting. <I am not familiar with this piece/part.> How does all this
work? What is the difference in these items versus using an inline pump or
gravity fed line to the reactor? <The way you feed the reactor shouldn't
affect the passage through a JG SpeedFit fitting. As an aside, I'm on the side
of inline plumbing or a dedicated pump to feed the reactor. I'm not a fan of
siphons for this purpose.> I'm just guessing that is what this is, a type of
method to feed aquarium water to your reactor. <see the above comments - let
me know if it's not clear.> Any information on these items would help me a
lot in choosing the right skimmer. Thanks, Paul
<Well - this SpeedFit connection should not be the single reason you buy a
new skimmer. The presence of this fitting doesn't make a calcium reactor work
better or worse... it's just a way of dealing with excess C02 if that is a
problem for you, and in fact it may never be. I'm a big fan of the AquaC line of
skimmers and believe you would be quite pleased with the results - JG SpeedFit
or not. Cheers, J -- >
Skimmers & Calcium Reactors
I am in the process of setting up a 180 reef tank and need to get a new
skimmer. The skimmer I currently have makes use of an external air pump and
bubble stone, which I don't think will be anywhere near good enough for my new
system. After reading through all your FAQ's and articles on skimmers, I've
narrowed it down to 2 choices, the ETSS Evolution 750 ($344 w/pump) and the
Berlin Classic ($169 w/pump). It seems that both of these skimmers will handle
my tank easily, and from what I have read both do a good job. Is the extra $175
for the ETSS really worth it?
<I would not recommend either. There are far better choices, namely Euro-Reef
and Aqua-C.>
Am I correct that both these skimmers will work GREAT with my 180?
<I would say marginal.>
Are there any maintenance issues that should effect my decision?
<The Euro-Reef is incredibly easy to clean.>
The same goes for calcium reactors. There are many good ones out there, all with
good reviews, but there is a $70 price difference on the 2 that I am leaning
towards, the Knop C ($249) and the K2R ($419). Any preference for the 180g?
<Both come with Eheim pumps. The K2R is a good bit larger, capable of holding
more media, which means it will go longer before needing opened and added to.
Either will serve you well.>
Any advice is greatly appreciated. Will
<You are welcome. -Steven Pro>
Re: Calcium Reactors in Australia (and expensive chillers!)
Hi Bob,
I have placed an order for the Dupla reactor and now keenly await its arrival.
A piece of information that I thought you might find of interest and perhaps
Diana as well. I asked the supplier of the reactor about the availability of
Korallith media. He informed me that he had tried to access it but Australian
quarantine forbids its importation (do not know on what basis, now making
further enquiries). Could not see how it Ca reactor media would pose a risk, but
our country has some pretty tight restrictions.
<Me neither... will forward to Di and Ralf and Daniel in Germany>
I have another question for you, this time about chillers. I am planning to
install a chiller on my tank before this summer season. Our average maximum
temps for about half of the year sit at around 35oC. Not the ideal climate to
live in for a mini-reef enthusiast. In the past I have air-conditioned the room
but relying on an air conditioner (on a timer) for 14 hours a day 6 months a
year is a bit much. With a chiller I should be able to reduce this significantly
to just the hottest part of the day and the middle summer months. Having the two
units together when we are away is also a better fail safe.
<Sounds like a good plan>
I have been trying to do some research on brands but have been able to find out
little about the models available in Australia. My options in Australia are
- Teco Chiller/ RA680 will cool 800L by 10 degrees C below ambient room temp.
Cost $2020 complete with thermostat. Italian Made (I think).
<Yes, a good unit>
- Sfiligoi Chiller Big Flite will cool 750L by 15 degrees C below ambient room
temp. Cost $2100 complete with thermostat. Italian Made.
<Also an allegedly well-made unit>
- Resun 0.6 hp chiller will cool 750L by 12 degrees C below ambient room temp.
Cost not sure but assuming $1800-$2000 complete with thermostat. Asian Made.
<Don't know about this product>
- Aquasonic Aqualogic chiller 1/3 hp will cool 700L by 7-8oC below ambient room
temp. Cost approximately $2000 complete with thermostat.
<Yikes... even with the improvement recently in the Austr. dollar?>
All units come with a 12 month guarantee.
My question is which one??????
My system holds about 700 litre and has Halide lighting (another source of
heat). My preference at this stage is for the Sfiligoi Chiller Big Flite due to
its cost vs. cooling capacity. These units are normally $2600 but the agent in
Australia has a winter special at the moment for $2100. The components in
contact with water in this unit is 316 stainless steel which I am told is
completely safe for marine aquaria (not sure about this anti-corrosion claim).
The Teco which would be my second choice at this stage has platinum (I think)
components but has a less cooling capacity than the Big Flite.
<I agree with your choices>
I have not been able to find much information on any of these brands apart from
manufacturer specifications that all claim their unit is the biggest and best
for aquarium use (how could they claim anything else?). Teco are common in
Australia and apparently reliable. I have been told by one dealer that Resun
were junk (he is selling other brand of course). I think Aqua medic may have a
brand available but the cost is much higher than all the other units and only
have same cooling capacity.
So I am at a loss as to which one? It is a lot of cash to shell out but given
our climate, the value of my livestock and the expense of running an air
conditioner and fan which is only a stop gap measure (tank still goes up and
down by 3 degrees in summer 25.5-28.5oC) and if the timer or air conditioner
ever failed (real possibility) I would lose the whole tank. I tried a couple of
DIY projects using an old freezer and then a fridge both were ineffective.
<Agreed... not worth the time, trouble in your sort of setting (draw down,
volume, type of system>
However I don't want to buy a brand that is junk or will die within a couple of
years. Which brand do you suggest? Is the Big Flite any good. I look forward to
your comments. It is really fantastic that you make your experience available to
fellow hobbyists. Much appreciated.
Cheers
Paul Grundy
<Paul, do try the various chatforums in your part of the world, get a take on
the actual experiences of end-users/consumers. Ours: http://wetwebfotos.com/talk/
won't likely have folks with experience with these makes/models, but worth a
try. Bob Fenner>
[SDMAS] Calcium Reactor Workshop Signup (Southern California)
<Thanks much John. Will post on WWM. Hope to see you soon. Bob Fenner>
CALCIUM REACTOR WORKSHOP
Now is the time!! Please sign up for the workshop if you plan on building a
reactor!
On July 20 at John Foster's house in the Hollywood Hills, MASLAC and SCMAS will
host a calcium reactor building workshop followed by a BBQ. You do not need to
build a reactor to attend. You can feel free to be an observer or just come for
the BBQ! One word of caution: If you do plan on building a reactor someday, DO
IT NOW. We are getting great prices, there will be many people there to help
those that want it, and we will have all the pieces cut and purchased for you.
To do this on your own "someday" will likely be harder and cost more!!
If you can't make the workshop but would like to make a reactor, sign up and pay
so I can buy your parts and we will work out assembly at another time. I will
only be buying the parts once.
The Complete reactor (everything except CO2 tank and reg) will cost $110 (there
maybe a slight refund if parts come in cheaper) (clear water filter cylinder
$22, Mag 3 pump $40, misc. plumbing and supplies $48)
Plus for those who need it:
A special deal on the CO2 tank, regulator, solenoid and needle valve $154 (5lb
tank $69, Regulator Combo $85)
If you get both you have a complete setup ready to turn on when you get home!!
Operating instructions will be included.
To sign up:
1. E-mail me now drjohnf@att.net stating what you are buying, or that you will
be an observer only.
2. By June 28th send me a check for the amount of your purchase. Send to:
John Foster
2801 Pelham Place
Los Angeles, CA 90068
Attn: Calcium Reactor
Thanks, a map to my house is attached and a schematic of the completed reactor
is attached.
If you are using mapquest, it will show you the correct location but give you a
terrible route from Beachwood Drive. Use my map from Beachwood to my house.
John Foster
Calcium Reactor Media
hi bob,
<Howdy>
hope you're doing well. all is fine in my set-up, though started wondering abt.
my calc reactor, recently -- I have an Aquamedic calc reactor (large, for up to
250 gallon tanks), still using the original media it came with. I've been using
it for abt. 7 months. when do you think is the best time to replace the media?
abt. 6 mo.? is Korallith a brand you'd recommend? thanks!
<Mmm, I wouldn't "just" change out the media on a timely basis...
that is, just for the sake of it... I trust you're testing for calcium and
alkalinity. I would switch or augment the media when these become limited.
Brands, products do vary quite a bit. I encourage you to check with actual
end-users, like through chatforums (ours: http://wetwebfotos.com/talk/) and
experiment with a few yourself to see what gets you where you want to go with
the least cost, most ease. Bob Fenner, whose wife does distribute Knop Products
in N. America., just a timely admission>
- Javier
Calcium reactor FOWLR
Is running a calcium reactor for a fish only tank (with liverock) a bad idea
? What are the drawbacks ?
<No. The benefits, high, stable pH, calcium and alkalinity are tangible for
all living marine systems>
I know it is almost a pre-req for reef tanks with the calcium that they draw,
but is there any downside if you don't have a large user of calcium ? I'm mainly
interested in using it to control ph/alk, rather than dosing/buffering. Thanks
<Not really downsides other than upfront costs of acquiring the gear. If your
situation (checked by water testing) doesn't call for much adjustment other than
regular maintenance (as in gravel vacuuming, water changes... you might get by
w/o... Stocking rates, feeding, use/non-use of live rock... many other factors
might contribute to yes/no question of reasonableness of calcium reactor
use/augmentation. Bob Fenner>
Jim
Re: Calcium Reactor Brands In Australia
Thanks Bob,
I would be interested in what Di could find out about shipping Knop products to
Australia. Our weak dollar against your U.S dollar though may be a killer on
that option.
<I understand... was visiting QLD a good part of 3/02... a bargain.>
Warranties are the only other concern although if it is run by an Eheim pump
that should not be a major problem as there are many Eheim dealers in Australia.
<Great products>
Have previously checked out the DIY projects at Oz reef. This to is an option,
however, I live in a small outback town and accessing all of the bits and pieces
can be problematic and at the end of
the day the Dupla reactor would only be about $150 more for something that is
compact and guaranteed to work (some home projects do not always go the way you
first planned). The Dupla model here is $490AUD and the matching regulator is
$180.
<That IS a bargain... as you likely know, Dupla's line is NOT cheap at
all...>
I look forward to hearing what Di can come up with
Cheers
Paul Grundy
<Real good. Will cc her here as well. Bob Fenner>
Calcium Reactor Brands In Australia
Hi Bob,
I am in the market for a calcium reactor after being convinced by all of the
material that I have read (mostly on your site). I have a 700L reef system which
has been running now for three years and I am tired of pouring endless dollars
into buffers and calcium additives. I have had good results with these additives
(I use the SeaChem range), but the cost and frequent dosing is becoming a real
drawback.
<Am in total agreement, understanding here>
The tank is jam packed with live rock and is host to a couple of Centropyge
dwarf angels (coral beauty and bicolor), a regal tang, a yellow Hawaiian tang
(boy are they hard to come by and expensive in Australia), a cardinal and a trio
of Chromis damsels. In terms of corals I have a range of soft corals such as
various mushrooms, leathers etc, as well as some hard corals such as Lobophyllia,
divisas and E. jardinei. I have been running a plenum on the system now for two
years with notable improvements to stock growth and quality. My calc is approx
400ppm and hardness of 1.5-2.5 meq/l ( I constantly battle with keeping it up).
<Sounds very nice... excepting the low dKH>
In Australia the range of calc reactors is very limited and most LFS's now
little about there use. The only models that I have been able to find are an
Aquamedic closed system reactor, Korallin C 1501 reactor (most expensive in Aus
and available by mail order) and a Dupla reactor (both the Aquamedic and Dupla
are the same price). I am really at a loss as to which one would best suit my
system. I do not have many hard corals but hope to move into this area down the
track when the reactor is up and running well. My thoughts after looking at the
units is that the Dupla may be to small, but I guess this may depend on the way
it is run and the biological load in the tank. My preference at this stage would
be the Aquamedic model. It has a reasonable sized reactor chamber and it is
reasonably priced. However, I have not been able to find out very much about any
of these reactors and would like to make a informed purchasing decision even if
it means buying a dearer model. I have not been able to find anyone that
supplies Knop products in Australia.
Which reactor would you recommend and do either of the three brands have
particular short comings that I should be aware of?
<Of the three, I'd go with the Dupla... but am interested in finding out what
might be involved in "casting your net" a bit further, maybe having a
Knop unit (the new one with the Eheim hobby pump inside the reactor chamber is
my fave choice for your size, type system). Will cc Di (distributor for Daniel
and Ralf Schmidt in N. America) and ask that she follow up with ideas on
tariffs, shipping costs to Australia>
I am also another ozone convertee. Put an ozone unit on the tank 12 months ago
with a Redox controller and things have never looked back.
<Good move>
Ditched my U.V sterilizer as it seemed to do very little, compared to the ozone
I could not see much benefit when faced with continuing bulb and sterilizer
maintenance. 6 months later surprise, surprise not having the sterilizer on has
made no difference to the well being of the tank.
Thanks for your most informative site, I look forward to your reply.
Paul Grundy
<Thanks for writing. Do also consider the DIY route (Know of "Oz
Reef" site?: http://www.ozreef.org/). Do make it known how your efforts go
at securing and installing the reactor. Bob Fenner>
Re: Calcium Reactors in Australia
Hi Diana and Bob,
thank you for your help and the information. I think on this occasion will have
to give the Knop Model a miss on a cost basis as our exchange rate would put the
units value in excess of $1000AUD.
Add to this, gas and regulator costs and the price is getting pretty hefty. On
this occasion I will go with the Dupla model (on your advice between the
Aquamedic, Korallin C 1501 and Dupla models) as the $495 AUD price tag is pretty
attractive and it should be a quality unit (powered with an Eheim pump) that is
complete, just needing gas and a regulator.
<It is a very good unit... and deal! I am amazed at the cost/availability...
Dupla sells for big money here in the States>
Diana, I am interested in some Korallith media. Leave it with me, when I am
organized I will certainly
get back to your with an order. Bob, the Dupla model is supplied with one batch
of Dupla reactor media, will this do for starters, before changing over to
Korallith (which I intend to do anyway)? I figure if
the Dupla media is adequate it will suffice for the first couple of months until
the whole system is sorted.
<Should work out fine>
Many thanks for your time and help. Will keep you informed as to how it works
out.
Cheers
Paul Grundy
<Thanks Paul. Keep us informed as to how all works out. Bob Fenner>
Reactor and pH
I forgot to mention that I have 5-6 inch of Sugar size Aragamax, which
should all solve my low PH problem, but like I said after the addition of second
chamber and adding Kalkwasser it has been low 7.8 night, and 8.0 day.
<ahhh...my apologies! Reading mail too fast today. Looking back I see your
mention indeed. Thank you>
A friend recommended to do weekly water change and addition of B-Ionic. will
this solve my problem with low PH?
<the liquid two-part should not be necessary, quite frankly. Lets try a
simple experiment with a sample of aquarium water to address any question or
concern about lingering carbonic acid/off-gassing CO2/oxygen saturation. Test
the pH (and O2 if you like) of a fresh sample of water and then again after 12
hours of aeration. If the pH rises more than a little (0.2+) then we do indeed
have a problem with off gassing the CO2 (perhaps not too much CO2 just a need
for better off-gassing). I have strong reservations about using excessive buffer
or two-part supplements in addition to the reactor for fear of skewing the Ca/ALK
dynamic. Kindly, Anthony>
pH and Lime Reactor, second chamber
Hi WWM Crew
I had problem of low Ph, I had the same problem I been using K2R and added
another canister of K2R with CaribSea aragonite to hopefully
increase my PH to 8.1 but it has been 7.8-8.0, ideally the PH should be 8.2-8.4
am I correct.
<agreed or even a whisker higher>
Recently I also been adding Kalkwasser to the fresh water for evaporation, but
has not change, LFS recommends adding super DKH to increase PH, I'm afraid it
might messed up the Ca/Alk biomineralization.
<partly agreed, although I like using Kalkwasser with the reactor...many
benefits to it>
I don't think I'm over injecting CO2 since it has been at 3psi, which the
manufacturer recommendation, effluent output is at 6.8 of PH, DKH is 3.5, Ca at
450 ppm, oxygen saturation at 420, could this be an indication of not injecting
enough co2 to increase PH, but DKH/Ca is fine and don't want to make it worst.
My SPS are flourishing fine. Bi-weekly water change of 15%.
<no worries my friend... a very simple and incredibly effective solution lies
in adding a second inline chamber of Aragonitic material after the primary
reactor. Does wonders for the systems and will probably temper the weak pH you
are experiencing. Not hard to DIY either...many plans on the net abroad. Best
regards, Anthony>
Calcium reactor output
Dear Crew, The first thing to do is thank you for such an informative site,
I've spent many hours getting good information. Here's my question, I run a 65
imperial gallon reef tank, overflowing with Fijian live rock, good skimming with
metal halides and marine actinics, I have a good mixture of hard and soft corals
along with dwarf angels and 1 Flagfin all of the tank readings are good, ph at
8.2 during photoperiod ammonia and nitrate are 0, phosphate at 0, I use ROWAphos
in an external canister filter to capture phosphates which then feeds through a
UV sterilizer before going into my chiller unit, water temp is constant at 78f,
I use ozone in my skimmer which is controlled to give Redox at 350 I also have a
Knop model c reactor which I fill with CaribSea arm media, (great stuff) I
changed the media about 6 weeks ago since then I can't get the dKH to go above
7degrees (German) and the calcium is at 370, prior to this media change I was
running at dKH 11.2 and calcium was at 470, my co2 bubble count is 13 a minute
and effluent is at 6 drops per minute, the CaribSea packing states that a
reactor ph of 7.5 is sufficient whereas the Knop site states that a reactor ph
of 6.5 will give the best results, any ideas guys? Many thanks Paul
<Sounds like a very nice system... I encourage you to either experiment with
lowering the pH effluent to about 6.8 or going back or switching reactor media
to return to higher dKH and calcium concentrations. I do want to admit to the
fact that my wife (Diana) distributes Knop Products in North America. Bob
Fenner>
Calcium Reactor
Dear Bob & Co.,
In my quest for the ultimate 135 gal Reef system I have decided to upgrade my
hardware to include a calcium reactor. However as we hobbyists know, cost can
spin out of control. To save money I bought an unused reactor that looks to be a
K2R knock-off (DIY). In a side by side comparison, physically they look exact.
To compliment the reactor I purchased a Pinpoint Ph controller, a M-3 regulator
with solenoid, and a 5lb CO2 canister. My problem is that with the purchase of
the reactor, I am without manuals. After reading your Q&A sections on CRs, I
quickly learned that the CO2 bubble rate should drop the PH of the water in the
reactor to 6.8, while keeping a PH of above 8.0 in the main tank...My question
is with the use of the solenoid and controller. Assuming I adjust my bubble rate
to reach this 6.8 PH value in the reactor, then put the monitor in the sump to
measure the display tank PH. Do I set the PH controller to shut off the solenoid
when the tank PH drops below 8?
<Could, yes>
Do I control tank PH through the flow rate from the reactor?
<In a manner of speaking, yes... Please see below>
I'm a little confused regarding parameters and how to control them using the
reactor, solenoid and PH controller. Do I plug the solenoid into the high limit
or low limit on the controller? Can you please enlighten me?
<You could. Best to go very slow here... in establishing the use of your
reactor and system together. DO keep a log book of your initial chemical
measures (esp. pH, calcium and alkalinity), your adjustments to your drip rate,
pH of effluent, bubble-counter... And determine what's "about right"
per your gear, the reactant (media you're melting down), and biota. You will
soon know what works here. Bob Fenner>
Sincerely,
Dennis
DSB and reactor media
Hi, Mr. Calfo, Here I am again. The following questions is bothering me a
lot.
<No worries, my friend...>
1. Why is it a bad idea to mix some larger coarser grade sand into a 6+ inches
DSB?
<Various grains of sand permit or deny diffusive action (osmosis, saturation
or diffusion, etc). So a bed of coarse sand only will allow better penetration
of oxygen rich water (which you do not want for efficient denitrification) by
virtue of the large angular shapes of the sand media and the larger spaces
between grains. It also traps more detritus but does encourage more amphipods.
Fine sand, on the contrary encourages more microfauna (bacteria, tiny worms,
copepods) and is better suited for the establishment of a larger colony (because
of the increased surface area of the smaller grain sized) of denitrifying
bacteria. When all is said and done... we don't need course sand for amphipods
because they will grow anywhere else easily (live rock, sump, refugium) and the
trapping of detritus can be a nightmare to keep up with and in the typically
poor current displays of so many aquarists
leads to the crash of a sand bed unfairly blamed on DSB methodology. You want
sugar fine sand if you are gunning for denitrification and it really needs to be
as deep as possible (solid 3" minimum but over 5" is much better)>
2. I just bought some calcium reactor media by Dupla. The media looks like some
crushed coral and shells, and I am sure they are. I have also checked out the
calcium reactor media by CaribSea, and it too looks like crushed coral, but it
is claimed to be aragonite. Why???
<Not all shell/calcareous media is aragonite. About 20% of the beaches in the
Caribbean are said to be composed of aragonite... the rest are calcite. Just a
different form of calcium carbonate but a big difference nonetheless. I have
seen some studies about reactor media... not the least of which are reports from
the notable aquarist/author/manufacturer Daniel Knop. Avoid shell and crushed
coral at all costs. They are least effective and most likely to impart
undesirable elements. Champion Lighting and Supply have an excellent bulk
calcium reactor media that is outstanding. Do look into it. Let them know I
suggested it if you like.>
3. Since aragonite and crushed coral look so much alike, how can we tell one
from the other by their appearances? Is aragonite crushed SPS coral?
<We aquarists cannot tell visually. It is a molecular difference. The notable
advantage is that it dissolves easily and at a higher pH. Calcite is tough to
dissolve. We must trust the word and reputation of the vendor along with the
experience of fellow aquarists. Many of my friends swear by the bulk media at
Champion.>
Sorry to bother you. Thank you for your time.
<No bother my friend, always a pleasure.>
Sincerely Samuel
Calcium reactor
Bob:
<Steven Pro this morning.>
Recently I set up a large calcium reactor on my relatively small 60 gal. reef
tank. After running the reactor initially (day and night), the tank
"crashed" and most of the inverts such as snails, starfish, shrimp,
etc., died.
<Sorry to hear it. Have you identified the reason behind the crash?>
The die off caused an obvious water problem with the level of organic material
from the decaying animals. Subsequently, an algae, or what I thought was an
algae bloom occurred. I am more apt to say that the reddish brown, small stringy
(1-2 mm long) material (that has coated the live rock and corals) are
dinoflagellates, although I have never had an outbreak before. I scrubbed some
of the rock, and although some came off, it left the rock a rusty color.
The corals in the tank survived the alleged pH crash from the reactor
set-up (although this "crash" is unconfirmed since I electronically
monitor the pH),
<I do not understand this statement. If you monitor the pH electronically,
then you should be able to confirm the pH drop which caused the tank crash.>
but none of them look very good since I added the reactor and this
bloom occurred. My pH normally is between 7.9 (night) and 8.1. I am working to
increase it.
<Work harder. A pH below 8.2 is unacceptable for corals and is a sign of poor
husbandry practices.>
Of course, I have shut off the reactor until I can resolve this problem.
<Always best to have all of your water parameters in line before starting a
reactor and then monitor very closely for the first few weeks.>
1-2 weeks after this bloom, I started the reactor again (slowly and while
monitoring the tank closely). I then did a 25% water change in the tank. The
next day after the water change, the bloom came back even stronger (I measured
phosphates at 0 in the R/O water used). At the same time I kept the reactor
running 24 hours. Could this bloom be caused (or supported) by the reactor
material I am using.
<Possibly by contaminants in the media and by excess CO2 in water.>
I am using Carib Sea aragonite in the reactor, and not the more expensive
reactor material. Could some leachates in this material cause or support this
bloom?
<Possibly>
My protein skimmer is skimming like crazy a very dark skimmate even after the
25% water change. It is strange but somehow I feel this may be related to the
aragonite used in the reactor, based on how the bloom came back even stronger
after the water change, but while the reactor was still running. Could this
substrate have leached toxic substances that could have killed the inverts, or
is this reaching?
<Sounds like reaching to me.>
The phosphate levels in the tank measure 0 from the most recent test.
<Test kits only measure inorganic phosphate, not organic phosphate, so there
could be phosphate that is undetected by your kit.>
Tim
<I would turn off the reactor for now. Get everything squared away and then
reattempt its use. -Steven Pro>
Calcium Reactor Follow-up II
Steven:
Here is my response to what I thought were your close to patronizing
comments. I would prefer an opinion from Bob, not a critique of what I may have
done to cause this problem.
<Bob is in Australia and is unavailable.>
You seem to assume that I don't have the years of experience needed for
maintaining a healthy tank. Allow me to correct you, I have kept tanks for about
25 years now. Not all saltwater of course. This was an unusual occurrence
because I recently changed my philosophy about calcium additions and purchased a
calcium reactor. This is likely the cause of the problem. I electronically
"monitor" the pH, not control it. And guess what, I don't get up at 3
am to read the pH monitor!
Because I have such admirable husbandry techniques (chuckle) I have never
experienced the effects of a dramatic shift in pH on tank inhabitants.
<No need to get up at 3:00 AM. Your pH is lowest first thing in the morning
and highest right before the lights go out. Looking at the tank and meter before
leaving for work and before going to bed would give you a good picture of what
is going on.>
A pH below 8.2 in a reef aquarium is not "a sign of poor husbandry" as
you say.
<Yes it is.>
"We want to keep the pH of the reef aquarium water at about 8.1 to
8.4"-Dana Riddle, The Captive Reef
"pH 8.15 to 8.4"-John Tullock, Natural Reef Aquariums
"The generally accepted range for pH is 8.2-8.4 in reef
aquariums."-Eric Borneman, Aquarium Corals
"In reef aquariums, the ideal pH does not fall below 8.2, nor climb above
8.5"-Delbeek & Sprung, The Reef Aquarium: Volume I>
All reef aquariums will have fluctuating pH readings, I don't care if
you sleep under your tank and spend every waking hour doing water changes, etc.,
it is natural to have a range.
<Yes, a range that does not drop below 8.2.>
Of course the target range is above 7.9, but you are taking this out of context.
<If you agree, why are you being so defensive?>
The pH likely dropped because of the addition of CO2 in a relatively short
period of time, which in turn caused a drastic drop (remember, pH is measured on
a logarithmic scale, Steve) which adversely affected the inhabitants.
<Husbandry is more than just wiping the glass and doing water changes. It
incorporates many other aspects, one of which is the proper use of various
devices, like your calcium reactor.>
The pH drop I assume could have wiped out some inverts and this in turn released
organic acids into the water, along with other bad stuff, causing the algae
bloom.
<Yes, quite right.>
The reactor is in fact too efficient and should be used on a larger tank.
<The size of the reactor does not matter much in this situation. Larger
reactors only allow you to go longer before having to fill the media chamber.
Your problem probably lies in an overdose of CO2, which can just as easily
happen in a small reactor, maybe more so.>
But, because the "crash" occurred several days after the reactor was
added to the system, it is the likely cause of the problem.
<Not really the cause, but the instrument.>
Steve--allow me to give you some advice. Soften your approach and try to be less
critical, more constructive and helpful. Provide your opinion, and don't be too
dogmatic. Don't automatically assume (as noted by the tone of your responses;
this has not been the first email you responded to for Bob), that the person you
are speaking to knows less than you about reef systems. No one has experienced
every problem ever encountered. Talk to the person, not down to them. I have
spent years with this hobby and have had many successful reef systems. You are
not going to teach someone with my experience about understanding the science
behind this hobby. So please, learn from this advice. Problems will always be
present, in every reef system. I'm sure you're a nice guy, it just doesn't
always come through in the tone of your email. Tim
<Tone is hard to discern in the written word. We answer 30-50 emails per day
and tend to be brief in our answers. Being brief is not necessarily being
dogmatic. It is the nature of the forum. -Steven Pro>
Calcium Reactor Follow-up III
pH now at 8.29 (after dripping in 5 gal. of Kalkwasser)
dKH at 12
Calcium at 450 ppm
Corals look great; algae bloom subsiding, no problems, mate.
<Good to hear!>
Lesson learned: go slow when installing a new calcium reactor, especially in a
smaller system. It's these minor set-backs that build experience. Hopefully, my
future experience with calcium reactors will be positive. TD
<It is not an uncommon occurrence. Jason wrote a nice, simple piece on
calcium reactors, http://www.wetwebmedia.com/calcreactors.htm. The most
pertinent section is as follows, "So what is my baseline? Where should I
start? - I would start with the manufacturer’s directions. Most that I’ve
read come with a recommendation for a bubble rate from the CO2 and a drip rate
for the effluent. I would personally divide these in half and start from there.
For the first week, you should test your tank and the effluent several times a
day. Once you become more familiar with the equipment, and the affects of the
various adjustments that can be made, you can test a little less. I still keep
on a regular test schedule to make sure everything is within normal
tolerances." Good luck, Steven Pro>
Calcium Reactor....
Hi Bob,
I have an under-sized Knop Calc reactor for my new 300 gallon reef tank. I used
to use it on a 135 tank. I want to purchase a new reactor. On your WetWebMedia
site you indicate that Knop and K2R reactors will be supplanted. New models or
better manufacturer?? I would like to get a reactor soon, but want to get the
right one as they are costly.
<Don't know re the status of K2R, but Knop has just come up with a new
model... and they do have larger sizes already. I would look to the "next
size up". Bob Fenner>
Thank you for your time.
--- Dave Mart
Calcium Reactor Placement
Hey there Bob,
Hope your day is going well. Had a question about calc reactor setup (I have an
Aquamedic closed system, note to self btw, fittings have to be tight or you'll
be leaking all over the place -- a lesson learned the hard way).
<Yes... I like this company's skimmers much more...>
I have no sump; seeing that this might be a problem for getting the effluent
back into the tank, I purchased a Rio 800 to draw water out of the tank and into
the reactor, which is below the tank. that's fine, except that the effluent
doesn't get enough pressure to get back up the few feet into my tank (if I hold
the effluent line lower by a foot, it starts working).
<Hmm>
I think I have two options: 1.) find a ridiculous stand to place my reactor
beside my tank, so that the effluent doesn't have to pump as high or
2.) upgrade to a Rio 1100 or 1400. I'd rather do the second, but I wonder if
this would cause too much water pressure into the reactor.
<Me too and no, should be fine>
would this affect performance in any way, if the effluent still drips out fairly
slowly?
<Measure effluent pH... and concentrations of calcium, alkaline reserve... ad
adjust valving, CO2 respectively>
I know calc reactors aren't meant to be run this way (I haven't read anywhere
about setting up calc reactors like I do); does it make a difference? thanks
bob!
<Mmm, not an unusual arrangement here... would use a sump... oh, see you
mention this below>
- Javier, who should have invested in a sump (and a stand with enough room to
fit it)
<Be chatting, Bob Fenner>
pH/Reactor Advice II
Hi Steve:
It turns out that the brand new pH test kit that I bought with an expiration
date of 2005 was defective! I mean this kit was brand spanking new. Absolutely
amazing. My pH was most likely around 8.1 all along knowing what I know now. It
is now around 8.2 mornings/8.4 evenings because I started to add buffer to
correct my false low pH before I figured out what was going on. There's a lesson
there for me and anyone else reading this. Just by coincidence, FFExpress is
having a sale on pH meters -- very cheap compared to $1,500 in livestock. Sorry
to bother you, and elated to know that my tank is doing much, much better than I
first feared.
<No bother at all. Glad to hear things are OK. Do remember to get the
reagents to calibrate the pH meter if you get one.>
As for the Ca reactor, I need to play with it some more to get a better handle
how it performs and its sensitivity. It's only been two weeks. I was just trying
to see if I could get any additional input from you while trying to dial it in.
<Now rereading your first query, you seem to be pretty close at 20 bubbles
per minute. A little more tinkering and you should be set.>
I will never use the Chemi-clean again. Felt very funny/leery using it the first
time because it goes against everything you guys preach. Cyanobacteria came back
anyways, probably because I only used a half dose of the stuff originally.
Either that or the stuff is snake oil.
<Probably the half dosage. Most of these Cyano killers are erythromycin and
it will kill Cyanobacteria as well as some other things and turn your tank a
funky color a lot of times. But does nothing to stop it from coming back
later.>
Very small bloom right now. Will try to correct with reduced lighting, water
changes, good feeding practices, perhaps macro-algae...
<A good course of action except for the reduced lighting. Your corals need
their light.>
Thanks again for your ear and your wonderful service. Jim
<Do not hesitate to write again. -Steven Pro>
Calcium reactor FAQ
Here's my final augment for now. Got jammed down by some stuff here at the
house, but back in action. I'll make the changes to the online version. I'll
whip out my bio today during lunch and forward that along. Enjoy.
<Hey, you shcumby, where's the boeuf? No attachment here! Bob F>
Cheers.
Helps to actually attach the attachment
It's already going this way today...
<Wunderbar. Will fashion a cover ltr. to Sue.S today and off it goes to FAMA
(Fenner's Aquarium Magazine in America) and future stardom and bucks for you.
Bob F><<Ran in FAMA, as well as posted on WWM... RMF>>
Calc Reactors
Hi Bob,
<Author/friend Anthony Calfo in your service>
I met you a couple of years ago at a marine conference in Ann Arbor, Mi. (Weber
Inn).
<Hmmmm...perhaps I'll have the same pleasure. I'm one of the speakers this
year (March 23rd) same place and conference>
You may remember the conference by a gentleman exclaiming the benefits of magic
mud. Never bought into that idea.
<I agree essentially>
You did mention to me that you highly recommended a calcium reactor.
<very much agreed! In fact, I like a second media chamber in-line to boost
the pH of the effluent, etc>
Well now a couple of years later I am looking into the idea. Before I purchase
one though, I thought I would seek out the advice of an expert. I am looking at
the Knop C and Precision Marine 422. Any thoughts on which one you might prefer?
<merits to both indeed and fans of both abound. I personally don't have a
strong brand preference.>
Thanks in advance for any info,
<if you haven't done so already, please read over the new bit from WWM crew
member Jason C. at http://www.wetwebmedia.com/calcreactors.htm
>
Brian V. Grant
<kind regards, Anthony Calfo>
Alkalinity and pH Control
Bob:
<Steven today.>
Recently I purchased a large calcium reactor secondhand from a local marine
store (MTC Pro-Cal). I set it up on my 58 gal. reef (small in size compared to
the reactor's capabilities!). I had it running for a couple days with very low
input into the tank in order to avoid a sharp change in pH. However, within a
couple days I noticed that most of my soft corals had closed up, with one torch
coral looking like the tips had been burnt off! I also noticed a dead shrimp and
some snails that were not moving, starfish with holes (lesions) in them, and
mucus sloughing off the corals. My purple Montipora bleached out in a day. I am
afraid I have done irreparable damage to the tank inhabitants. The catch is, I
cannot determine the exact cause. The fish have not been affected. I did a
partial water change with little improvement to the inhabitants.
At the same time that I started the reactor I also added a product called
"Stop Parasite", because of an Ich outbreak. The manufacturer says
this product is completely safe for reef aquariums, and it can be added directly
to the aquarium. I only added one dose (less than 1 teaspoon) and stopped
because of the reaction of the corals. [By the way, would a UV sterilizer be the
best method for eradicating Ich?] I placed activated carbon back into the sump.
In any case, because these two things occurred simultaneously, I am having
difficulty assessing which one caused the problem.
I have a pH monitor on the tank. I noticed the pH range to be between 7.9-8.2
(could have been a time I didn't noticed a dramatic drop, but I have been adding
more buffer in the hope to preclude a swing in pH). I just measured the
alkalinity in the tank and it seems to be good (4.0 meq/L or 11.2 dKH). Could a
dramatic increase in alkalinity cause this type of reaction of the
invertebrates? The alkalinity in the tank before I set up the reactor was around
2.0 - 2.5 meq/L. As a note, I haven't calibrated the pH meter since I bought it
(I know, a bonehead move). I will do so shortly.
<Your information about pH is completely useless when measuring with an
uncalibrated machine. It is utterly impossible for me to say if the readings are
accurate, significantly lower, or higher than the numbers you gave.>
Do you know anything about this "Stop Parasite" product that is
supposed to be so safe in reef systems? Aside from purchasing a UV sterilizer
(another expensive purchase), I have tried unsuccessfully to get rid of Ich in
my tank. Could a dramatic swing in alkalinity cause an "acid-like"
reaction where the corals and other invertebrates appear "burned"?
<I do not know which caused the problems in your tank. Whenever first hooking
up a calcium reactor it is imperative that you watch the calcium, alkalinity,
and pH very closely for the first several weeks until you have the unit dialed
in correctly. Secondly, I would not use any Ich medication on a reef tank. It is
much better to quarantine all new arrivals prior to putting them into your main
display. Unless, the Ich broke out and you have not added any new fish for
several months. Then you may have even more problems.>
Thanks for your response. Tim
<With more and accurate information, perhaps I can be of more assistance.
-Steven Pro>
Calcium Reactor Supplementation?
hey bob,
still fiddling around with my calc reactor; random, perhaps silly question. if
ph only below 7 is acidic, above 7 is basic, does that mean the effluent ph has
to be below 7 to be dissolving the media in the calc reactor?
<Mmm, actually no... the pH only needs be below the pH of the substrate being
"melted"... However, I believe what you may be asking is best
responded to as: there is an ideal pH for rates of dissolution that doesn't
waste CO2, provides about right resultant pH, alkalinity, biomineral
content...>
i have an AquaMedic, and would like to keep my effluent closer to 7-7.1, so that
my ph is higher than just 7.9-8.0. will i still get substantial benefits at this
effluent ph?
<Yes... as you will find>
thanks. (FYI: I'm still using the hydrocarbonate included with the unit).
thanks!
Javier
<A good idea... I would use some Kalkwasser (calcium hydroxide) and calcium
chloride in most applications/types of set-ups as well. Bob Fenner>
Calcium Reactor FAQ
Hmm... was able to "hack into" my network at home and scarf this
document, which I then massaged during lunch. You may think it doesn't need the
editors touch, but I do.
Let me know what you think.
<You tell me: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/calcreactors.htm
have placed on WWM, listed on "what's new", and put in marine index
under set-up. Be chatting. Bob F>
J --
Re: Calcium Reactor FAQ
Sorry for my exuberance. Is my first 'published' aquarium/pet-fish work, tis
all...
<Umm, please do take a few pix and send all into FAMA... ASAP... PLEASE! I
will help with whatever aspects you'd like.>
Uhh, sure, will be happy to post it all over creation.
J --
<Have you sent it in yet? What's the slowdown? Bob F>
Re: Calcium Reactor FAQ
I'm sorry - you did read that before you posted it, yes? I'm just always
worried that somehow I didn't get the message across clearly enough. I just know
you - happy to have the contribution. ;-)
<Did read through, changed the tense of some preterites... not meaning... the
pc. is fine as is.>
I supposed I just like to know if I'm talking crap. Enough said. Now, on to that
next article.
<Yes, my attitude, direction as well.>
J --
<B -->
Re: Calcium Reactor FAQ
I'm not home yet to take the pictures...
Perhaps I should also become a FAMA member at the same time, yes?
<Too late... you already are. Bob "Repo Man" Fenner>
J --
Calcium Reactors
Hello to the WWM crew,
<Greetings Josie, JasonC here, your resident calcium reactor guinea pig.>
<Hey, and Di (the apparently generous) charged WWM for her ads cost for your
test gear... so get cracking!>
I am writing to ask about calcium reactors. I went through your web site and
found only Q&A about the subject. Now don't get me wrong there is much to
learn from reading them, but if you have no basic knowledge of how they work
(mechanics, the CO2, and how it uses it's media) the Q&A leaves a huge gap.
<Fair enough. Would you believe, I'm actually working right now on preparing
this type of documentation, having just installed a Knop type-C reactor. You are
absolutely correct about the information that isn't there, and I'm going to try
and fix that right quick.>
I am wondering if you have any information written about these devices besides
the Q&A? Do you know of a book or web site that would help me? Or could you
explain the process?
<I'm hoping to turn in my material for editing by the end of the week. Would
you like a sneak preview? As far as an explanation of the process, put your
chemistry hat on and I'll send you what I have done so far. Actually, it can be
a chemistry do-rag, I'm hoping to be able to explain chemistry to non-chemists.>
<To heckola with "previews"...; "We don't need no stinking
advert.s"; just post that sonofagun>
I feel like I am asking a lot here and I know how everyone on your site works so
hard. It's just that I have found no other site that explains the workings of
such equipment in a language I can understand. I need no quick response. :)
<Regardless, I'll try to be quick - inquiring minds want to know... oh,
that's someone else ;-) In any case, I will put some finishing touches on the
work that I have and send it on.>
Thanks in advance!
Josie
<You are quite welcome. Cheers, J -- >
<So, where is? Posted? Linkola? Bob F, not working hard for sure, but
long>
Re: Calcium Reactors
Sorry - replied this morning on the way out to work - do intend to just
re-read what I've written this evening and then send it on out. Don't want to be
dropping any direct objects or misspelling the word 'sense'. <Hey, aren't you
supposed to be sleeping?!>
Will get it all in, post haste!!!
<Ja-vul! (sound of whip-cracking), How's your dive, health, certification
program going? (sound of Oompah Loompahs in the background, churning chocolate).
See you soon. Bob F>
Re: Calcium Reactors
Hmm...
Well, signed up for the cert class. although it's not until late April - doesn't
feel like a squeeze does it?
<Yikes... are you doing the thou plus Britney Spears sit-ups daily?>
Anyway, that's set and feel comfortable with the whole thing - have actually
done the "dive to the bottom of the pool and put on all the gear"
routine before, and am perfectly comfortable.
<Good... this and your health are most important elements>
As for the health, with a brief allergy problem of the eyes hopefully behind me
[eyes swollen shut most of the day yesterday], I'm back at the morning mountain
hikes, and may be able to get in two a day once extended daylight permits. Do
feel well, though and am working on keeping it that way. Am working mostly on
diet now to drop a couple of extra pounds - which always helps.
<Let's not mention weight too much... Must need get taller or stop imbibing,
ingesting so much. Curse those delicious calories! Bob F>
Cheers.
J --
Calcium Reactor Woes
Hi there guys, whoever is helping today.
<Anthony here in your service... >
Here is my dilemma with my calcium reactor. I have a 45g reef tank, with 1 175w
metal halide, 2 28w actinics and one custom SeaLife PowerQuad with 96 watts,
which brings me to about 7 watts per gallon. I have some pieces of Acropora and
other hard coral, a few softies and 4 clams. I was getting tired of dosing part
a + b of whatever calcium so I bought a K2R reactor with Carib sea arm media.
After about 1 week I build a nice second reactor to bring the pH back up a
little before the effluent drips int a small container that overflows into my
sump. I keep my effluent at pH6.8 via controller. My dKH is way off the chart,
around 22dkh.
<whoa!>
In the effluent it was around 45 at first,
<Biggie-sized Whoa!>
Then I started to set the effluent to more flow instead of dripping it,
<hmmmm?>
and the effluent dKH came down to around 30, still no change in dKH in my tank.
<too much bled in at fist and unused>
Calcium in my tank does not seem to rise because of high dKH. It is only around
250 to 280 at best.
<indeed, the calc/alk ratio is skewed>
effluent calc is around 300 to 350. I am at a loss here and want to know what
else I could do. I don't want to dose anything, but I do dose calcium to keep
the levels up a bit.
My questions are, how do I get the dKH lower, I did water changes and top off
with ro/di water,
<Agreed... dilute the dKH with a large water change but follow up with a
slower drip through the reactors...any flow described as a stream rather than a
drip is too fast. Also, you may use Calcium Chloride (liquid calcium/turbo
calcium dry) briefly to get your calcium up to a more traditional level (after
the water change and drip adjustment...even 350-400 would eb great at this
point.>
but I don't know what else I could do. The system has been running for about 4
weeks and no improvement in calcium.
I have to say, my corals look great though, my clams seem happy, not me though,
I want the calc up to 450, the dKH to 12.
<simultaneous high end levels of calcium and alkalinity are not realistic for
most systems...in gross terms they can even be mutually exclusive (causing
crystalline precipitate "snowstorms" of which you are at dangerous
risk with your high dKH>
am I getting impatient too soon or are there any tricks.
<quite frankly, you either didn't get good directions with your reactor or
you didn't follow them. You streamed too much carbonate into your system and it
will take some serious dilution to get it down. Imagine if your dKH was 24 and
you did a 25% water change... even with demineralized water (dangerous!!!) you
would only bring it down to 18 dKH, and so on... It will take time and dilution.
The effluent water should exit at the rate of a drip and not a very fast one at
that>
Magnesium is around 1350. I know I can't keep the dKH that high for long, but I
don't know what else to do. I appreciate all your help and I am glad that Bob
has great friend that are willing to share their knowledge with us. Please tell
Bob I said hi and I am still waiting for him to come to Los Angeles to get his
free haircut (he knows what I am talking about, hahaha). And if you guys are in
town same offer to you, the least I can do.
<Wonderful<smile>...and thank you!>
By the way, I will probably go to Interzoo in may, since I have to go see my
parents and friends anyway, and that's where I grew up for 25 years, in Nurnberg.
My parents live about 2 minutes away from the convention centre. I hope to meet
you guys there, I'll owe you a few beers for all the good advice. SASCHA
<Bob, indeed will be going... but alas, Steve and I will be back here helping
to run the site. But not for a lack of gracious invitation by Bob. I will look
forward to sharing some food and intoxicating libations in LA with you. Kind
regards, Anthony>
Ph/alkalinity
Hello & (Thank You!) to the tag team answering Bobs fish tank e-mail
questions, many of us greatly appreciate this effort.
<Appreciate it... hehe, we're grateful that folks are tolerating it
<smile>. Seriously...thank you. Anthony>
My question is about Ph. I started running a calcium reactor about 8 weeks ago
and had the effluent ph set at 6.8 (after reading Bobs faq's on this topic). My
tank ph always hovered around 8.2, never below 8.0 or above 8.25.
<indeed... a nice piece of equipment and your pH needed to be a bit
higher>
I'm still wondering, after reading the stored FAQs on this topic, how I can
raise the ph to be in a more acceptable level. My dKH now, after refilling the
reactor with Carib sea ARM and some old coral skeletons on top is 20 dKH in the
tank.
<whoa!!! Please retest your alkalinity with another test kit. You are in a
very dire straight (no... not the band Dire Straights, although now I have
"Sultans of Swing" in my head which is not likely to leave anytime
soon) if this is even accurate! Natural seawater is 6-7 dKH, but most reefs fare
better at 7-10 dKH (Sprung/Delbeek) and SPS dominant tanks can even be a bit
higher (towards 12 dKH). You are in serious risk of precipitating free calcium
from the severe imbalance of carbonate in your system (like a reverse snowstorm
from the common crystalline carbonate precipitation from Kalkwasser abuse). If
this happens, you just might kill most of the living creatures in your tank
within 24 hours of a precipitous event. But do not make a knee jerk reaction
either... back off of the reactor (what is your bubble count on the effluent?)
and do some small but frequent water changes until you get down towards 12 dKH.
It isn't easy to maintain high free calcium concurrently, but at nearly 400 ppm
you have managed to do so and are at great risk for it>
I've slowed the drip rate from the reactor to bring this high dKH down.
<brother...this has to be monitored closely from go for the first couple of
weeks until you get it tweaked>
Calcium by the way is at 396. Before the Calc. reactor the DKH was always around
14 but the ph was 8.0-8.2.
<agreed...something had to be done with the pH>
The tank has been up and running 6 months and the specs are; 110 gal with 30
gals in the sump. The main tank has about 115 lbs of live rock and about 2"
of aragonite "sea floor" from Carib sea.
<see other posts or write back but a 2" substrate is problematic in the
long run... not deep enough for anoxic activity (denitrification) but too deep
for aerobic activity. The rule is 1/2 inch or less or three inches or more...
never in between>
In the sump I have ~ 30 gals of water with ~ 15 lbs live rock, 20 lbs of a pre
packaged live sand and 3lbs of Red Gracilaria,) "Tang Heaven"
algae.
<cool>
I run a Turbo flotor 1000 Multi and inject ozone for an ORP in the main tank of
340 - 400.
<nice...and reasonable>
I change 5 gals of water every week that is aged using RO water and Tropic Marin
salt mix.
<hmmmm perhaps the source of your original low pH problems: did you aerate
the R/O water for 12-24 hours before buffering it (mixed completely) and then
later salting it. If not, you wasted buffers in the salt mix by not off-gassing
or neutralizing carbonic acid from R/O water... and your 2" sand bed is
hardly a significant buffer>
I add 10mg of Seachem iodide every other day
<very good>
The livestock in the tank is; 2 juvenile false perc clowns, 2 fire fish, 2
juvenile Heniochus, 1 juvenile Hippo tang (2"), 1 yellow tang(2"), 1
small bubble tip Anenome, 1 serpent star, 1 long spined urchin and 2 nice sized
corals; elegance and hammer. with 3 small frags of Acro.
The water parameters are: ammon=0, nitrite=0, nitrate is non detectable using
Fastest, 0 phosphates, dKH =20, Calcium= 396, Temp 77 degrees.
<I'm not a high temp fan... but you could come up a bit higher...78-82F>
I feel as though the alkalinity is sufficient enough to hold my ph to a desired
level but getting it the desired level is the problem for me.
<yes...above comments>
I always feel I'm too generous with the food but the fish go nuts, acting as
though they are starving to death. Only one looks thin, a "heiney" but
not sickly.
<honestly...feed small portions freq and as much as you can without causing
nuisance algae and nitrates>
the poly filter I have around the over flow pipe shows no sign of excess food
and is changed weekly. Sorry for the length of this e-mail but I wanted to give
you the full picture so you be well informed before offering your much respected
advice. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
<you have your work cut out for you, my friend. Anthony>
And Steve's Reply to the above question...
Hello & (Thank You!) to the tag team answering Bobs fish tank e-mail
questions, many of us greatly appreciate this effort.
My question is about Ph. I started running a calcium reactor about 8 weeks ago
and had the effluent ph set at 6.8 (after reading Bobs faq's on this topic). My
tank ph always hovered around 8.2, never below 8.0 or above 8.25. I'm still
wondering, after reading the stored FAQs on this topic, how I can raise the ph
to be in a more acceptable level. My dKH now, after refilling the reactor with
Carib sea ARM and some old coral skeletons on top is 20 dKH in the tank.
<This is pretty high, about twice as high as it should be.>
I've slowed the drip rate from the reactor to bring this high dKH down. Calcium
by the way is at 396. Before the Calc. reactor the DKH was always around 14 but
the ph was 8.0-8.2.
The tank has been up and running 6 months and the specs are; 110 gal with 30
gals in the sump. The main tank has about 115 lbs of live rock and about 2"
of aragonite "sea floor" from Carib sea. In the sump I have ~ 30 gals
of water with ~ 15 lbs live rock, 20 lbs of a pre packaged live sand and 3lbs of
Red Gracilaria,) "Tang Heaven" algae. I run a Turbo flotor
1000 Multi and inject ozone for an ORP in the main tank of 340 - 400. I change 5
gals of water every week that is aged using RO water and Tropic Marin salt mix.
I add 10mg of Seachem iodide every other day
The livestock in the tank is; 2 juvenile false perc clowns, 2 fire fish, 2
juvenile Heniochus, 1 juvenile Hippo tang (2"), 1 yellow tang(2"), 1
small bubble tip Anenome, 1 serpent star, 1 long spined urchin and 2 nice sized
corals; elegance and hammer. with 3 small frags of Acro.
The water parameters are: ammon=0, nitrite=0, nitrate is non detectable using
Fastest, 0 phosphates, dKH =20, Calcium= 396, Temp 77 degrees.
I feel as though the alkalinity is sufficient enough to hold my ph to a desired
level but getting it the desired level is the problem for me.
I always feel I'm too generous with the food but the fish go nuts, acting as
though they are starving to death. Only one looks thin, a "heiney" but
not sickly. the poly filter I have around the over flow pipe shows no sign of
excess food and is changed weekly. Sorry for the length of this e-mail but I
wanted to give you the full picture so you be well informed before offering your
much respected advice. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
<It is not unusual for people to experience lower pH levels when using
calcium reactors due to excess carbon dioxide in the display tank. Dial your
reactor back to allow your alkalinity to come down to an acceptable level. At
the same time, add calcium only products to keep your calcium level when it is.
You are going to have to monitor your conditions closely. Once you have both
where you want them, slowly increase the CO2 to maintain these levels.
Hopefully, then you will no longer have excess CO2 in your display. Also, look
up the excellent writings of Craig Bingman on the topics of calcium, alkalinity,
reactors, and Kalkwasser. -Steven Pro>
New Calcium Reactor
Bob,
<You reached Steven Pro today.>
I just set up a MARS DIY calcium reactor with a Ph controller. It's been up for
48 hours and my KH has shot up to 15. 13 yesterday 15 today. The calcium has
always been low, less than 300, and does not seem to be climbing like I was
hoping it should/would. The controller starts the CO2 at a Ph of 6.60, inside
the reactor, and brings it down to 6.35 before shutting off. Will the calcium
and KH come into line over time with the reactor or should I give it some
additive assistance? And, how are the proper levels maintained with the reactor?
<It is best to have your alkalinity and calcium levels at the proper levels
or in the proper proportions to one another and then maintain them with the
calcium reactor.>
What would you recommend for the settings on the controller? The tank is 135
gal, lightly stocked with a drip rate of 2gph from the reactor.
<You are going to have to play around with the reactor settings and closely
monitor the pH, calcium, and alkalinity until you have everything properly
adjusted. -Steven Pro>
As always any assistance is appreciated. Thanks, Jim
Calcium Reactor Plumbing
Hi Bob
Thank you for your previous help and hoping that you can assist me again. I have searched the web about calcium reactors and have enlightened myself to
some degree, but I still have a very basic question. How do you plumb these
out of a sump? Branch it off of a T from your return? Separate whole
drilled for CA Reactor pump? Please help and thank you in advance.
Mike
<The best arrangement in my opinion and experience is simply to arrange
plumbing "over the side" of the sump for both the intake and return of
the reactor... all real units are equipped with their own pumping/circulation
mechanism. Bob Fenner>
Calcium reactor and aquarium pH
Dear Mr. Fenner,
I have gone through the FAQ's of wetwebmedia and could not find and answer to my
specific problem.
<Okay... not surprising... many lifetimes more material to be
placed>
I have a 75 gal reef with LPS, soft, and a SPS coral and a few fish and other
inverts. I installed a Korallin 1501 calcium reactor a few months ago. With a
rate of 16 bubbles per minute and a effluent rate of 40 drops/min my effluent pH
is 6.35 and my tank has stabilized with an alkalinity of 3.28-3.35 and calcium
420. My pH has lowered however and runs at 8.15 during the day and reaches a low
of 7.89 at night (previously it was 8.3 during the day). I have noticed that my
tank substrate aragonite) has been dissolving and I have recently replaced
several pounds of it. I am not using any other Ca/alkalinity additives. The
animals seem to be doing well and growing.
<The most important criterion>
Do I need to worry about the pH and its swings?
<Not much... would be nice, better if feeder stock melted more readily... all
else being equal... and pH was higher, in-tank substrate not going away so
quickly...>
Should I try to push up my alkalinity and if so how? Will increasing bubble
& effluent rate further depress the pH? Should I use some sort of additive?
<I would first try simple additions of baking soda... a teaspoon per ten
gallons... about once a week, blended in with system water, poured about the
surface>
Want do you recommend for Ca reactor substrate? I am using Super Calc Gold now
and previously Korallith with similar results?
<Would keep experimenting... your reactor may improve by some tweaking... are
you able to show, accumulate some gas in the upper part of the contact chamber?
Perhaps by tilting the unit? Mmm, there are better designs.>
Thank you for your response. Your web site has been extremely helpful for the
last few years since I started reef keeping.
<Ah, glad to hear my efforts are of service. Bob Fenner>
Sean
| |
|