
|
|
FAQs about Deep Sand Beds & Substrate Size
Related Articles: Deep Sand Beds,
Marine Substrates, Live Sand,
Biological Filtration, Biominerals
in Seawater,
Understanding Calcium & Alkalinity, Nitrates
in Marine Aquariums, Related FAQs:
DSBs 1, DSBs 2,
DSBs 3, DSBs 4,
DSBs 5, DSBs 6,
DSBs 7, & FAQs on:
Rationale/Use,
Dangers, Physical Make-Up,
Biological Make-Up, Location,
Depth, Conversion to/from,
Maintenance/Replacing/Adding
To, & Live Sand FAQs, FAQs
2, Live Sand 3,
Identification, Selection/DIY,
Systems/Placement, Biota, Maintenance,
& Marine Substrates,
Mud Filtration 1, Live
Sand,
Plenums, Nitrates
in Marine Aquariums,
Refugium Substrates/DSBs, |
The bigger the better... but no minimum, matching value... Just too
many other factors to place in a string of variables in such an
equation... foods, feeding, lighting... chemistry... temperature.. |
Big Tanks Need Big DSBs – 06/30/07 Hello, <<Hi There>>
My main display tank is around 900-gallons. <<Neat!>> My
Nitrates have shot up lately, to 50+. <<Not so neat…>> I have
set up a 7-inch deep DSB in my refugium tank. It is 23-inches x
16-inches in surface area, with the other half of the refugium live
rock. <<This is a start, but you need much more here for this
large and likely well-stocked system>> Is this a big enough DSB
for my system or should I have more? <<If you have the capacity,
definitely go larger>> I do have another 50-gallon tank connected
to the system, which I could also use if I have to. <<Indeed do
this, and add another if you have the space for it. You could even
use plastic trash cans/storage containers for this purpose. The more
the better in my opinion. As an example… I have a somewhat smaller
system with a 375-gallon display. I have 1,000 lbs of sugar-fine
Aragonite in the display and another 300 lbs of this material in a
55-gallon in-line dedicated vegetable refugium. I’m a firm believer
in the DSB methodology>> My clown trigger is getting some white
spot although my other fish are fine, probably stress from the
nitrates. <<Possibly, yes>> How long does a DSB take to have
any effect? <<A DSB should start providing “some” benefit fairly
quickly (say about a week), but will take a bit of time (weeks to
months) to realize its full potential (can be helped along by
obtaining/adding a few cups of substrate from fellow hobbyists/your
LFS). Though with the small DSB (in relation to tank size) you have
now, you may not notice much improvement other than a possible
slowing/stabilization of Nitrates…if that>> I have ordered
another skimmer (Bubble King) so that will help as well.
<<Beautiful skimmers…but, is your current skimmer not doing its
job?…or maybe simply not “big” enough?>> I'm doing 105-gallon
water changes once a week as that is about as fast as I can make my
water. <<Unless this system is “very much” overstocked I would
think this to be sufficient…the answer to your Nitrate issues is
likely to be found elsewhere>> I have recently started using
Ozone, can this cause Nitrates? <<Not that I am aware… Randy
Holmes-Farley has written some excellent pieces about Ozone usage
(and so much more) in the hobby; do have a look on Reef Central at
his archived articles in the Reef Chemistry forum>> Have to ask.
<<Understood>> One more thing, should I also get an Aqua Medic
nr5000 nitrate reducer to help things along? <<This could prove
beneficial. But these Nitrate reduction units seem too “fiddly” to
me…would much rather put my stock in a large DSB>> All the big
systems around here are using them but they do cost, an additional
mV control and probe is needed. <<Yes, pricey bits of gear>> I
will do anything for my fish so if you recommend them then I will
have to part with the cash. <<Mmm, perhaps as a “last-ditch”
effort… Add as large a DSB (even multiple containers re) as you can
and see how things proceed…I would even consider putting a
macroalgae (Chaetomorpha gets my vote for its “user-friendliness”)
in the vessels over the DSB for some additional organics
removal…with all lighted on a reverse-daylight schedule. I would
also add Poly-Filter to your filter flow-path or in a large canister
filter to pull down those Nitrates>> Oh well, I enjoy it so much.
<<Indeed>> Thanks for the help again. <<Quite welcome…hope you
find it useful>> When I see people in shops struggling for
information, I just pass them a bit of paper with your website on
it, boy do they thank me when they see me next. <<Ahh!…a strong
endorsement indeed, and is redeeming to know>> Kind Regards,
James <<James, I would be most interested to hear how you
proceed/things progress…please do send me an update if you find the
time. Eric Russell>> | 
|
DSB - Minimum DSB Height, Minimum Water Height, and Natural Sunlight.
4/6/07 Hi guys, it's Jason here from Makati, Philippines. <Hi
Jason, Mich here in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania.> The city
here is eerily quiet because it's a religious holiday over here today.
<Religious holiday here today also, but is always quiet.> I'm still
thinking and re-designing my refuge. <It is good to plan
as much as possible.> The things I do know is that I definitely want
a DSB, some Chaeto, and that I want my tank to be displayed (not just
another sump in the dark). <OK.> I've been reading thru your
FAQ's and have been trying to find what the minimum depth for a DSB
should be before it starts to lose effect. It seems that 5" of all
sugar fine sand is deep enough. No longer going to use a layer of
crushed coral. Perhaps just some pieces here and there. <Sounds
good.> Also, what is the minimum water column height you
suggest? Would this be 5 inches as well? <No, does not need not be
this deep. You need enough to keep the surface of the sand wet.>
The current design I'm thinking about is the minimum DSB with a minimum
water column length, with but have a longer length, perhaps 36" ..
<Ok.> I also wanted to place this refuge in front of my window where
it gets strong natural light in the morning. Is this advisable/ok? Do
I run any risk of algae blooms? <Lot of variables here, but may be
OK. Natural sunlight is commonly used in many large aquariums.>
Hope you guys are doing great! <Doing fine, thank you! -Mich>
Jason DSB size 1/2 Tank volume enough for NNR? YES!!! 1/2/07
I have a question about creating a DSB. <I'll take a shot at it!
Graham here.> My system is a 220 gal FOWLR. Currently have wet/dry,
Coralife protein skimmer and UV sterilizer. Tank also has about a 150
lbs of live rock that I put in about 2 years ago. <OK...> I am
considering adding a DSB, but do not want to put the sand in the main
tank. If I use a separate tank, does the floor area need to be the same
as the main tank? For example, my main tank is 2" X 6" of floor
area. Will a DSB in a smaller tank still work? Like maybe a 2' X 3'
tank with 6" of sand in it....will that work? My purpose for this is
NNR. <The setup you describe sounds quite adequate, as it is roughly
1/2 the volume of your display. Here's a good read for you:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/dsbsize.htm (And it can be found by
typing "DSB SIZE" in the google search tool). Tip: Using this tool
shortens the time it takes for you to get answers you need.> Thanks
in advance for the help. <You're welcome, as long as I helped!>
Scott <-Graham T.> Re: Switching to a larger tank & DSB
q's 1/03/07 Graham, Thanks for the
prompt reply. <Welcome.> I have read the article in
question about DSB setup and just wanted a little clarification. I
would like to setup the DSB in the refugium 4"-5" deep of sugar fine
sand and use the same sand except 1" or less for the display. The
reasoning for this in the display is that I have used larger grained
sands before and know how easily detritus gets built up in the gaps.
<Understood, though this size is still useful for it's beneficial
species hosting properties. > Also, my tank is going to be only 20"
tall and wanted to have as much area top to bottom as possible.
<I agree on this point.> I would like to accomplish both NNR and
food culturing in the refugium. It looked like the article was saying
one way or the other was better but I know I've seen them set up with
LR, algae, and the DSB all included. <Yup, but did you
see it work?> I just wanted to know the best route to take knowing
the tank style I'm working on is a FOWLR slowly working towards a reef
setup. <Not sure there really is a *best* route to take
here. With this sort of thing in my own setup, I trust myself to find a
way. Experiment with just the sand for NNR and add some LR later.
Remember your own stated goal: NNR, with a possible move toward reef
later.> For the sump/refugium setup, yes I am planning on getting a
20-30 gal (hopefully a 30 but we'll see) and using silicone to put in
acrylic baffles to split it into 3 sections. What would be the best way
to order the sections as far as water to the skimmer, fuge, and then
return or is there a better order of flow. <No, you have the idea I
usually find most profitable. Your skimmer removes organics that are
attracted to the surface tension between air and water. (Hence the
bubbles? I knew that Graham, where are you going with this?) Guess where
there's another mechanism similar to the protein-skimmer's interior? The
surface of your tank! Your surface skimmer should be feeding directly to
the protein skimmer for the most direct route to the organic-trapping
bubbles.> I have read about other people doing this but if you have
another suggestion any advice is appreciated. Do you have any thoughts
about my question on switching to the new tank and setting everything up
immediately? I'm not sure if I should set the refugium/sump up and
running with the display right away or let it cycle alone. <The
refugium isn't a separate system, and therefore won't need to be
"cycled" in the normal sense. You obviously will need to give it a
chance to "setup" before it does the job(s) you have in mind, but there
is no reason I can think of to cycle it. (BOB, interject if I'm
off-base.)> If I have to cycle the fuge/sump is it the same as
cycling a tank even though I would use new sand and cured rock or would
you suggest live sand for the fuge? Would that be the reason to cycle
it? Also have read different opinions about the use of live rock or not
in the refugium. Like I mentioned I am worried about recycling the tank
when I add in the fuge setup, new sand, and the new rock I am getting
even with keeping all the old water and LR. <I'm not sure why...
maybe I'm missing something, (or I'm just rushed on my lunch break ;)
but I see so reason to be worried about the cycle. Maybe you should
brush up on the cycling FAQs we have available here?> OK so maybe
it's more than a little clarification but I don't have any LFS that I
trust or anyone else with a marine setup that I talk to on a regular
basis. <There you go, now I'm blushing!> Thanks
again for the advice. <Again, you are welcome Jeremy. *BUT* do try
to read every bit of the FAQs here on a topic or a related topic before
"bugging" me. J/K, but there are some simple explanations to Protein
skimming and fuge setup here that will enlighten you.>
Jeremy <-Graham T.>
Creating a Deeper
sand Bed! 9/23/05 Hi Bob, <Hey there! Scott F. here
tonight!> Thanks for your speedy reply to all my questions in the
past. I find this site the most informative tool on the net (really I
do)! <Glad to hear that! We certainly enjoy bringing it to you!>
Anyways, to get going, I've been looking into making my sandbed a bit
deeper. I have a 100g reef with 150lbs of medium grit LS in the
1.0-2.0mm range at about on average, 3 inches deep. I made a mistake in
adding 20lbs of oolitic LS to it a couple of months ago, is this
harmful? <I don't see any real problems with that.> The reason
why I say, "on average 3 inches" is because I have this annoying maroon
clown that has been raised without an anemone, she likes to shimmy in
the sand causing a major disturbance in the bed. <An unavoidable
Clownfish behavior!> I have a BTA that she has been hosting in for
several months... but old habits are hard to break. My question is, I
would like to achieve a 6" bed. Is my grit too big? <Well, it is a
good size if you're looking at a 4"-6" sandbed depth, as this slightly
larger grain size does require a greater depth on the average than the
finer stuff to foster denitrification.> Also, if I go "deep", should
I get rid of the Clown (very beautiful, if she wasn't so pretty she'd be
out of there) so that the DSB would remain undisturbed? <A tough
call...It is best if the deeper (greater than the top inch or so) layers
are left undisturbed. If you really want to have an undisturbed DSB, the
Clown may need to be removed.> Right now I'm getting nitrogen gas
bubbles in the sediment... should I tamper? <I wouldn't tamper with
it, lest you disturb the very processes that you're trying to
encourage.> Do what you do best, Missy <Rock on,
Missy! I think you're on the right track here! Regards, Scott F.>
Question on DSBs 1/27/06 Hello Crew, <Jennica>
I've read your Reef Invertebrates book. The book and your website
appears to -very- strongly recommend using sugar-fine sand (e.g., like
CaribSea Aragamax sugar sand), but the reference chart at CaribSea (http://www.carib-sea.com/media/aquatic/reference.jpg)
gives these sizes only a "G" rating at best for use in deep sand
beds. Only the grains the next size step up earn the "E" rating. Do
you know why that is? <Mmm, nope> I'd really love to
pursue a DSB not just for the denitrification, but also for the
opportunity to watch interesting creepy crawly critters in action.
Regards, JJ <Do contact CaribSea here... and make known what
they say. Thanks. Bob Fenner> Re: Question on DSBs
1/31/06 Hello Crew, <Jennica> Per correspondence below, I
emailed CaribSea regarding their "Good" grading for the sugar-sized
Aragamax sand as opposed to "Excellent". This is their response:
"It was simply an oversight while creating the new catalog, and website.
It will be changed to excellent in the updated versions." Thought
you'd might like to know. Regards, Jennica <Ahh! Thank you
very much for this follow-up... Seems the folks putting the catalog
together made up a classification scheme but forgot to revisit and put
"real" (relatable prompts) in its place before sending to the printer.
Bob Fenner>
DSB layered sizes - 2/21/2006
Hey guys, First I want to thank you all for the great information on the
site. It is truly invaluable. I have a question regarding a DSB in a 24
gallon nano tank. I have used a 4-8" DSB in my 75 gallon reef tank for
over a year (I know that's a big difference, the current has done lots
of shaping). I used Aragamax "Select Grade", and the nitrates are
undetectable. Needless to say I am very happy with it. So this is my
question, I am starting up a 24 gallon AquaPod (I hope these ones don't
crack!) at work to keep part of my reef with me all day. My LFS does not
carry the Aragamax "Select Grade" that I used for my first DSB. They do
have the "Special Grade" which is still pretty fine, but not sugar fine.
They advertise the Special Grade as 1-1.7mm. Is this Ok to use, or
should I wait until I can get the true "oolitic" size? <I would use
either... the one on hand is fine> I was thinking that I could put
down 3" of the "Special", and then maybe 1" on top of that using the
"Select" I have some select left over). I can also get a "super fine"
0.2 to 1.22 mm, I was worried that may be too small. What do you think?
Thanks, Jeremy <If mixed, will mix... Bob Fenner>
Small Refugium DSB - 07/26/06 I made a 5 gallon refugium that
sits behind my main tank, a ten gallon, with the goals of nutrient
export, pod production, pH stability and increased water volume.
<<Excellent>> I was planning on putting Chaetomorpha, live rock
rubble, and some sand in this refugium and running it on a reverse
photoperiod. <<Okay>> My question is would I see any benefits
from a deep sand bed in this size refugium (the sand area's footprint
would be 5"X15") or would I be better of with a shallow sand bed and
more water volume? <<Everything is relative my friend...considering
the small size of the display, this particular DSB could indeed provide
some benefit>> Thanks a lot for any help you can give me. Eli
<<Is my pleasure to assist. Regards, EricR>> DSB Size/Depth -
08/29/06 Hi again, <<Hello>> I am trying to add a DSB
for my 125 FOWLR due to a persistent nitrate problem. <<Ok>> I
do have sand in the main display at present but due to the home
improvements done by my fish on a regular basis the SB is 2-3" in some
spots and much less in most others. (Apparently they don't understand
the benefits and keep moving it around when I try to fix it.)
<<Ha!...indeed>> Be that as it may, how big of a sump/refugium and
how deep of a SB would be an appropriate remote DSB? <<In my
opinion...As large a vessel as you can practically employ, with a
"minimum" 6-inches of sugar-fine aragonite>> I also have close to
200lbs of LR in the system. Thanks again for all your help. Mordy
<<Regards, EricR>> DSB Materials - More Questions
>Marina, >>Hello Dan. >Assuming the mineral analysis from the
quarry shows acceptable levels of undesirable compounds, I'm going to
try the limestone, but I'll have to screen it once to get the desired
maximum particle size, then again to screen out the pieces that are too
small. What should my max and min particle size goals be? >>I've
actually seen DSBs with rather large particles (one DSB which was
working *very* well had fine gravel sized particles - over 3mm), as well
as those that could only be called silt. I wouldn't worry too much
about screening out small sizes, let water movement handle that, nor
large except for aesthetics. 1mm-3mm is what I'd call "standard",
though I can't say it's written in stone (no pun intended). >Of
course, I plan to wash it thoroughly, soak it in clean water with
frequent changes until the pH is stable at 9.0 or less (according to
WWM) before slowly introducing it into the aquarium. Dan >>You're
on the right track, and unless the limestone is heavily occluded with
other materials, doubtful if it's being quarried (I assume for
building), then I suspect it should come back with pretty good
results. Marina
- DSB Grain Size - Hi Guys, I
have a quick question about substrate selection for a DSB. I plan on
putting 5+ inches into a 125G aquarium. I see that there are two sugar
fine substrates from CaribSea . Their standard oolitic sand has grain
sizes of 0.2 to 1.22mm. They also have a more expensive oolitic
“select” with grain sizes of 0.5 to 1.02mm. Is there a difference in
performance that justifies the difference in price? <I'm not aware of
one, but would think the higher price is just due to extra processing.>
I don’t want to spend more than I have to, but I don’t want to cause
myself grief over a few bucks either. <Think you'll do just fine with
the standard oolitic sand.> Thanks for your help and keep up the
good work. Larry <Cheers, J -- > Deep Sand bed questions -
1/23/04 Thank you for your great web site and great book! <Thanks
for purchasing the book and reading here> My question is, if I use 8
inches of Carib sea Tahitian moon black sand in my main tank will I get
the benefits of a live DSB, or is the sand just too coarse to get an NNR
effect? <Nope. Will be fine> Will I end up with a big mess because of
trapped detritus in this sand? <Just use a baster to put the detritus in
circulation before a water change> I don't have to use the sand if it is
going to cause problems, I just really like the look of a dark
substrate. <No worries> I also have a refugium that has the capacity to
put as much as 1ft of Carib sea Aragamax sugar fine sand in it. The
refugium is 4ftL 2ft wide and 20 inches tall. Is there a point of
diminishing returns when it comes to sand beds? <Possible but not much
scientific evidence to prove such as of yet. I hear Bob Toonen is
working on some science and sandbed stuff. Look for it soon> Is it best
to have the sand base as deep as possible or is there a limit where you
start going in the wrong direction. <As stated above but you could
look/see here for all kinds of information on DSBs:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/deepsandbeds.htm> Also, before this tank
there is another tank that will hold a mud/algae refugium that is the
same dimensions. How deep should the mud be? <3-5 inches> Is there a
point of diminishing returns with mud as well? I believe same as above>
I am also going to be using live rock, protein skimming, a calcium
reactor, a sump sponge that I rinse out daily, and a canister carbon
filter that I turn on from time to time when needed. The water will flow
through the sump in this order, first to the protein skimmer, then
through a sump sponge to a chamber with the carbon filter, then into the
mud/algae refugium, then into the deep sand bed refugium, then into a
tank with the calcium reactor, then back to the main tank. I put the
carbon and sump sponge before the refugiums because I don't want to
filter out any beneficial organisms. <Exactly> I figure If I am cycling
all the water in my tank 10 times an hour they should still be able to
have an effect on water clarity where they are. Let me know if I am
wrong in this thinking. A Final question, my tank is a 140 gallon 48.5 x
24.5 x 28.5., My lighting is 2 250 watt halide bulbs, one 10,000k one
65,000k <You mean to say 6500K> and 4 95 watt compact florescent 03
actinics. Given that I will have a 8 inch DSB the light penetration of
the water will now be 20.5in instead of 27in. The lights are suspended
1ft above the open air tank. <Too high. I would keep them around 6-8
inches if possible> In this tank I will want to keep anemones, corals,
clams etc.. I would list the species but I haven't decided just yet.
<Then I would go with two 400W MH's if possible or some mixture if it is
financially possible> Should I go with the 250 watt halides or the 175
watt. The fixtures are very expensive so I want to go with the choice
that offers the greatest latitude. <then 250s it is> The substrate will
be black as well as the back of the aquarium, which I know absorbs allot
of light. <~Paul> Thank You, Greg Kirton
DSB and
light cycle ?? 3/13/04 I would like an expert opinion
please. Thought you folks might lead me in the right direction.
<Adam here today, and I will certainly try!> I am planning a 400
gallon mix reef/fish tank 96x30x36 tall. I would like a fair amount of
fish with plenty of open space for swimming. For circulation I am
planning a Amp Master 3000 for return and 4 Tunze streams to get me in
that 10-20 times turnover zone or greater. With that much water
movement and the fair amount of fish waste produced can I still use the
fine sugar grain sand bed in the display? I am afraid I will have a
sand storm if I really turn up the Tunze streams and my other concern is
that the DSB will not keep up the fish waste pollution. I have heard of
DSB failure due to overstocking with fish. I do not plan to over stock,
but plan to have a fair amount of fish. Need your opinion if a refugium
based DSB would be best in my situation. I also plan to do 10 gallon
weekly water changes and use a Euro-reef 12-2 skimmer. If I have the
room I wanted to run reverse lighting Gracilaria/Chaetomorpha fuges too.
<You could still use the fine sand, but you may have to finesse the
current devices so that they don't blow directly onto the sand. You
will also have to secure them well so that they can't be redirected by
coming lose or being dislodged by snails or other inverts. A healthy,
very alive sandbed should handle any reasonable bioload, particularly
with the other methods you plan on employing. A remote sand
bed/refugium is worth considering, but you will have to be very
conscious of detritus accumulation in the display. If you have a fine
DSB in the display, brittle stars and sea cucumbers will do a lot of
that work for you. FWIW, I would aim closer to 10% weekly water changes
rather than 10 gallon!> If I went to a refugium DSB how big of an
area do you think I would need for good nitrate reduction for this size
tank? Also.....if I go refugium DSB what specific grade sand and depth
would work best in the display tank. I want to produce a lot of
copepods/amphipods somewhere in the system for my fishes with medium
course sand like CaribSea special reef. Could this be accomplished with
a 1/2 or less med-course sand in the display? Need your suggestions
please. <Ironically, I have found that CaribSea's "special grade reef
sand" is the least reef tank suitable sand they produce, and is only
useful for aesthetics. Use a coarser substrate (crushed coral or Puka
shells) to encourage pod populations and finer (oolitic, Southdown,
sugar fine) for nitrate reduction. Each of these must be
managed. DSB's must be kept "lively", and caution must be used that
coarse substrates don't accumulate detritus. A remote DSB 1/3-1/2 the
area of the display should be adequate for nitrate reduction and should
provide plenty of growing space for macroalgae.> For lighting I was
contemplating 6 hr on-off cycles. I live near the desert in CA and
could keep my lights off during the hottest part of the day with this
cycle. I have heard of people do this with fish ok....but is it ok
with corals too. <I would suggest that you have some light on
throughout the entire photoperiod. You could reserve your most intense
lighting for a few hours in the morning and a few hours in the evening
to ameliorate heat issues.> That's all for now. Thanks!<Best
Regards. Adam> DSB Hi all! Another question here!
After doing some searching I can't seem to find an answer. In my 46
gallon bowfront I have 24lbs. of CaribSea Live aragonite. After reading
your site I wish I didn't. However I did so that's it. What I'm
wondering is if I wanted to do a DSB of 3" should I layer some fine sand
above it or go with a larger size, CaribSea 1-2mm. ? Would this cause
more problems? Thanx again for all the help! Eileen :)<I prefer the
1-2mm CaribSea, but that is just my personal preference, good luck,
IanB> Mistakes, Or Innovations? Hello everyone, I love
the info. you all have been providing, it has saved me from making
mistakes, thanks. <We're very happy to be of help to you! Scott F. at
the keyboard today> I have been reading DSB FAQ's for the last two
days and I now have a couple of Q's of my own. I think I should have
visited your site sooner in regards to this subject. I don't know why I
didn't, brain fart :). Hopefully it will be less flatulent in the
future:). <I won't touch that one...I could. But I won't! >
Anyways, I bought and placed Carib Sea Aragonite ( I think it was Sea
Floor Special) in my new 125 gal. corner show tank. It didn't have the
particle size on the bag any where but it looked to be no more than 1mm
in size. I know it isn't sugar fine or oolitic. It does have many other
smaller sized particles in it ranging from what looks to be sugar fine
all the way up to 1mm. I was under the understanding that a range in
sand size (from sugar size to 1mm) was good to have because the
different critters that will eventually be in their need different
sizes. Each species needing a particular size in order to survive. So if
there is a range in sand size the DSB will be able to support a large
diversity of species. True? <I believe that it will> Then I read,
after placing this sand in to the tank, the DSB FAQ's on this web site
and sugar fine seems to be the size that best be suited for a DSB and
particle sizes shouldn't be mixed. <Well, there is a lot of thought
and controversy on this matter. Yes, an all oolithic sugar-fine
aragonite is ideal, but mixing grades of smaller-grain sands is also
useful, IMO. I've done this in deep sand beds before with great results.
However, you don't want to mix grades that are too dissimilar, as this
can result in lots of compaction and channeling, potentially reducing
the efficiency of the bed. Finer grades are useful for assisting with
buffering and releasing bio-minerals into the water.> I had also
added live sand samples to help seed my current sand bed from reputable
LFS's. Since my sand bed is already mixed should I go ahead and fill it
with the same material I have started with or should I fill the
remaining 2" ( I'm going for a 5" DSB) with sugar fine sand to increase
its numbers in the DSB? <I'd continue with the same material at this
point.> Next Q. I know that certain sand sifters eat DSB critters, I
understand why this is bad and I'm not going to use them, but I have
also herd that when sand sifters are sifting they are also destroying
the tubes/burrows, that these DSB animals make. In doing so, they are
restricting good water flow through the DSB that aids in the
denitrification process and filtration and that this destruction is not
a good thing. The DSB should be left undisturbed by all except for the
DSB animals and only they should do the sifting. Yes, No? <I would
say an unqualified yes. I believe that you don't want animals that are
too aggressive in their sandbed movements. Even in regular maintenance,
the hobbyist should not disturb anything but the top layer of sand, IMO>
My 125 gal came with two wet/dry filters attached in the overflow box.
They are filled with bio balls, should I replace these all together and
put carbon filter pads in their place? My new tank has only been running
for 4 or 5 days. <Personally, I'd dump the bioballs altogether, and
let the sand bed and live rock do the "filtering" in your tank> My
sump is a plastic barrel cut in 1/2 and holds 40 gal. The reason for its
addition was because we could not get the pump to stop leaking at the
threaded pipe attachments. We were going to add a sump any way. We
needed something that would keep the leak contained and it was the best
option from what we had to choose from. <A great improve move, IMO!>
I know it isn't the most desirable shape but it's what we have to work
with for the time being. I wanted to put a DSB made up of sugar fine
sand in the sump. I was thinking of attaching PVC to the inlet hose and
have the PVC go all of the way around the inside of the barrel with
little holes in it pointed towards the sand. Would this diffuse the
water enough so that it wouldn't destroy the DSB? <It probably will.
I'm afraid that you'll have to experiment with this. You can always dial
down the flow if too disruptive> Would it provide enough current to
prevent dead spots or any other harmful scenarios? If this is a good
idea, should I place the pvc on top of the sand or just enough above it
for adequate (non-destructive) circulation? <I think it will work.
I'd place the return just above for maximum efficiency> Almost done:)
I have seen some F/O and reef tanks with a little macro algae
purposefully planted in there. Some looked like grass the other was
green and broad leafed. It looked really nice but should it be done? Or,
should all algae's be kept in the fuge? <Your call. As long as you
can manage the growth of the macroalgae, and as long as they don't
overrun other sessile life forms, there is no reason not to include
macroalgae in the display.> Last one, I have rinsed my sand with tap
water, I had no other type to use, will the sand in my tank now be
leaching tap water chemicals in to my tank? <I suppose that it's
possible, but I wouldn't lose sleep over this> I also have some LR in
a 50 gal soon to be F/O that had been setting in fresh water from the
tap for 2 mo. It was dead at the time and bleached. I don't know why I
didn't think of this before, duh, but are they now leaching these tap
elements back in to my salt tank? <Again, probably not a problem>
There is a lot of emerald green micro algae on them, the snails aren't
eating it. I am going to add a fuge in to the system with macro algae,
will this eventually remedy the problem, if there is one, with the
element leaching. Or will the micro algae growing on it now use up these
elements? <Well, it will grow as long as there is "fuel" to use for
it's growth.> Sorry, I need to buy Phos., ALK., and Calcium test so I
can't tell now if that is what is happening. Ammonia:0, Nitrate:0,
Nitrite:0, PH: 8.3, Specific gravity: 1.023, temp. 78-80F DSB 5". Or
should I just remove these pieces of LR, they are coloring up nicely
now, red, purple, lots of green. <I'd leave it in there at this
point> Ok I'm done, so are my hands. Thank you for your time.
Shauna <My pleasure, Shauna. Feel free to write any time if you have
more questions. Regards, Scott F> Re: Deep sand beds 4/2/04
Adam, Thank you for the quick response. I am planning on a glass top to
hopefully keep the firefish in the tank. <Ahhh.... Wise choice. Do
keep in mind that this will greatly reduce light transmission into the
tank.> In your response on different size sand you said one tank
should be fine and the other tank also fine I believe. Did you mean to
use sugar size <1mm oolithic in one and say a 1-2 mm slightly larger
grain in the other? <Ooops! I mis-typed. I meant one should be fine
(oolitic/sugar fine) and one coarse (Puka shells, crushed coral,
3-5mm). The 1-2mm grain size products (like CARIBSEA "special grade
reef sand") don't support any useful life besides bacteria. Critters
can burrow into fine sand or live in the spaces in very coarse sand, but
nothing does well in the in-between grain sizes.> Also if I did skip
the firefish would 2 clown gobies pair up as they are hermaphroditic or
would they have to be purchased as a mated pair? Thanks again Walt
<It is always better to purchase a pair if possible to be sure of their
compatibility. Your retailer may be willing to put two together to see
if they get along. Spawning of clown gobies is very common in captivity
and their partnership/social behavior makes them a very delightful
choice. Best Regards. Adam>
Remote DSB Hello crew at
WWM, <Hi there! Scott F. with you today!> I’m a marine newbie…my
tank is about 4 months old now…I’m thinking of adding a sump to my 55g
reef/fish tank. The biggest tank I could fit in my cabinet would be
something like a standard 10g tank but about ¾ of the standard height…so
I would probably have around a 5-7 gallon sump. I would like to add a
4-5” DSB in it. Is that enough area (volume) for NNR for my 55g tank
(around 35-45g of actual water). <I think that, if you set up the
sandbed with a fine oolithic aragonite product, it can have a very
positive effect!> Tank setup… 55g All-Glass Tank 75lbs base
rock (pretty much live now) 2 lbs live rock 220 watts Compact
Fluorescent (110w 10k, 110w Actinic) Red Sea Prizm Protein Skimmer
(this skimmer really sucks) CSL 9 watt UV sterilizer Magnum 350
deluxe filter 2 PowerSweep powerheads 2 False Perculas 1 Yellow
Tang 1 Yellowtail Damsel 1 Dwarf Lion 1 Coral Banded Shrimp
3 Emerald Crabs around 9 Astrea Snails around 12 Blue-leg Hermit
Crabs 1 pretty much bleached ???? anemone mushroom corals
button polyps Pumping Xenia One Torch Coral Branch – 2 stems
One Hammer Coral Branch – 2 stems Coralline Algae is just beginning
to encrust rock and glass… Thank You, Ronald Leguidleguid <I'd
go for it, Ronald! Even a small sandbed can have some very beneficial
results! It is certainly worth the effort! Good luck! Regards, Scott F>
How Much Sand and Filtration for a 1300 Litre Tank? Hi Guys,
<< and gals, although not here right now >> I'll be as quick as I
can. I do really have to ask these questions as you are the only people
I will listen to. The LFS are no help. My 1300 litre main tank and 500
litre sump have just been delivered. << Excellent >> 1) I have
read all the DSB FAQs but need a little clarification. I have bought
some aragonite 1mm - 2mm size as I couldn't get sugar fine size (I'm in
South Africa). << I don't like sugar size, so I think you got what you
want. >> My aim would be for natural nitrate reduction. Do I add a 5-6
inch deep sand bed to the main tank or to the sump and how deep in the
sump if so? << I like about 4 inches in the main tank, and in the sump.
>> A DSB in the sump only may be sufficient as I only have 3 Tangs,
Niger trigger, Coris wrasse and a blue ringed angel plus LR and no
corals. << Actually the more corals you have, the less sand you need,
as the corals are helping to filter the water. >> They are all around
4-5 inches at the moment. I don't plan on adding anymore fish. In my
300 litre tank which is there current home my nitrate ranges from 0 to
10. 2) Is it better to add 2 x Turboflotor 1000 or 1 x Turboflotor
5000 shortly? AquaMedic is all that's available here? << Sorry, I'm not
familiar with them. Basically the more filtration and the more water
motion the better. >> 3) If I put a glass cover on top of the tank to
stop dust, evaporation etc. would it not stop oxygen getting in and gas
exchange? << Yes, and no. A glass cover isn't bad, unless it is like
a tight seal and doesn't allow gas exchange. A better idea is a glass
shield right under the bulbs, but not all the way across the tank. >>
4) I have read sump FAQs as well, but do I add bioballs and those round
ceramic things to begin with, or just more LR? << I would stay away from
bioballs, and just go with more live rock. >> Thanks so much. I've
just been reading the "Goodbye to Powerheads" article so I'm away to
build a water return manifold. My fish are going to love me for
this. I don't know how people can swap their fish around, I have gotten
so attached to mine. << Me too, good luck. >> Kind Regards, James.
<< Blundell >> What substrate size should I use in my DSB?
Found your site. Read the FAQ's. Still confused, don't want to make
mistake! Am setting up 110X tank for reef community. Propose 100-150
lbs Fiji. LR My concern is the live sand bed, which everyone seems to
have slightly different opinion on. I intend to do a DSB but want it
varied enough to be safe and yet support both small and somewhat larger
micro-crustacean populations. Would I be correct in using @ 60%
Nature's Ocean Aragonite Live Sand (.05-1.0 mm), 20% Medium Grade (1.0
to 2.0mm) such as CaribSea Seaflor Aragonite, and 20% Coarse grade
(2.0-4.0 mm) crushed coral? These recommendations come from Dr. Shimek
and Jonathan Lowrie, with the addendum that large populations of diverse
infauna are a must. << I really don't think substrate size matters much,
but would rather have a mix than a constant particulate
size. Therefore, I like what you are proposing to use. >> If this is
incorrect I would love to know BEFORE I invest in more sand. I already
have 80 Lbs of the Nature's Ocean Live Sand. Please help! I want my
"critters" safe and happy. << I think this would work well, no worries
here, as long as you like the looks of those substrates. >> MommaKat
<< Blundell >> Skimmers and DSBs Hi Guys,<Hi James,
MikeD in Florida here> Two quick questions.<Sounds easy enough> For
my new 1650 litre system of 7 marine fish and LR<400 US gallons? I'm
seriously envious, with my largest being a 1200 litre tank> only,
would it be better to buy 2xturboflotor1000 or 1 x turboflotor5000
shorty? Here in South Africa AquaMedic is the only skimmers available
and the 2 options come out at the same price.<if the cost is the
same, I believe I'd go with the two as the likelihood of both going
kaput at the same time is slim, thus when you eventually do have a
problem, you're not under so much pressure to make instant repairs and
the negative impact will be less> Also, should I put a DSB in the
main tank or will one in the sump be enough?<That largely depends on
your sense of esthetics and the type fish that you are keeping. Wrasses
that bury at night, for example have been known to commit suicide diving
into a bare bottom, and likewise many puffers bury at night.> If so,
how deep a substrate in the main tank?<I run about 6" in my 1200 liter
tank, but by living near the sea, rely on large marine snails and fish
safe crabs to keep it from becoming a detritus trap.> Many Thanks
again,<You're more than welcome.> James. Set-up DSB -
7/14/03 Anthony or other crew members: <a treat tonight... you
get me and several of my multiple personalities: one is a professional
wrestler interestingly enough> I continue to be grateful to you & Bob
& the entire crew for all that you do for this great hobby. <friends
and fellow hobbyists like you are the inspiration. We thank you in
kind!> I read the FAQs everyday. I love your new book-gave it 5 stars
on Amazon. <wow... gracias! Such feedback on Amazon and abroad really
is a big help to other browsers/buyers... and certainly to the authors
<G>> One piece of advice I liked was related to the importance of
supporting the LFS. I have access to 2 very conscientious & helpful ones
here in the Salt Lake City area (Mountain Shadow Marine in Centerville
and The Aquarium in Sandy). <ahhh, yes... I know Randy as MSM and
like him very well! Will look forward to meeting the other folks in
time> I always respect a merchant who won't sell you something he
doesn't think you're ready for. <agreed... it helps the customer,
long-term business and the hobby at large. Kudos to them> I am
working with both of these to expand from my current 80G FOWLR. I have
convinced my wife that this is a good middle-aged expensive hobby-safer
than a Harley and cheaper than an antique fire engine (maybe not by
much). Anyway, she gets a new floor and I get a new tank (not near the
new floor). <all good and agreed :) > In 2 weeks I will set up a
180G FOWLR circulating with the 80G (eventually to become a reef) and a
44G upstream refugium. I have already paid for the All-Glass pre-drilled
180G. Water will be pumped out of drilled hole in the back of the 180 &
split between the 80 & 44, then returned by gravity to the 180. There
will also be a 48X20X18 sump under the 180. This will contain a DSB &
algae and a Euro-Reef CS8-2 skimmer (with ozone). It will be lit by
power compacts as recommended by Randy at MSM. <fine set-up/plans>
Eventual stock: 80G: 1 ocellaris clown, 1 dusky Jawfish, 1 flame
angel, 1 Royal Gramma, 1 canary wrasse, 1 yellow tang, 4 cleaner shrimp
180G: 1 Foxface Rabbitfish, 1 purple tang, 1 bird wrasse, 1 Lemonpeel
angel, 1 majestic angel (5", already in QT, active, eating voraciously,
was thriving at LFS for 6 weeks), and possibly a snowflake eel. No
shrimp. Questions: 1. Does this grouping seem reasonable? <yep>
2. I want the 44G refugium to be a 'pod farm. I love watching Mysis,
'pods, tiny brittle stars & other creatures. What DSB substrate is best
to get the greatest variety? Per your book, different sized produce
different critters. Could I make half of it sugar fine and the other
half a bit larger? <no mixing of substrates... and for the larger
micro-crustaceans... they will favor media above the substrate after
all. For natural: Chaetomorpha spaghetti/wire algae (or another like
mass)... or artificial... course polyester pads (like pond filter pads
or dish scrubbies)... superb pod condos> 3. With DSB in the sump,
refugium and 80G display (for Jawfish), do I need any substrate in the
180? <not for NNR> I know that bird wrasses do not bury themselves
& there will be plenty of LR for hiding in. <agreed> 4. I
currently have a Remora Pro on my 80G-should I leave it there for
additional skimming beyond the CS8-2? <yes, please... and alternate
cleanings with other unit to help maintain uninterrupted skimmate
production> 5. Which would be better, ozone or UV (or both)? <I
have little or no use for UV on a display tank... but find many benefits
to ozone and a Redox meter on such aquaria> Thanks, Steve Allen.
<thanks kindly my friend... be chatting soon. Anthony> A Few
Questions, Cont'd By the way, in reviewing my email to you, I
noticed some ambiguity in one of my questions... <I'm sure it was
unintentional! ;) > "Asked differently, what surface area and depth
(i.e. volume) of sand would be good for the 125-gal main display?
Smaller would be better when considering space available." <I wish a
magic formula existed which would indicate a specific amount of sand
needed, but too many variables exist. The amount of denitrifying
bacteria increases with volume of sand AND proper food source. The food
source here is directly correlated with whatever livestock you may add
to the mix. Simply put: You'll need to construct your sand bed based on
what you'd like to keep. In a reef, keeping the bio-load light is a key
to success. If you're planning on 1+ pounds of live rock per gallon, a
huge DSB isn't necessary, and it sure isn't pretty to most. A smaller,
remote DSB offers lots of options and serves it's purpose.> What I
meant was, what volume of sand (DSB) in the sump is recommended to
support the 125-gallon main display. <If you're going to use the
Ecosystem system, the only way you'll be able to run a deep sand bed is
in a refugium. With a 125 Gallon display, a 20-40 gallon refugium with
a 4-6 inch DSB will work well and help to support a beautiful
reef. Good luck! Ryan> DSB Grain size (11-21-03) A
question about optimal grain size for a DSB - I am starting a 90g reef,
with 20g sump and 45g refugium - I plan for 6-8" DSB for both the tank
and fuge - would you use grain size ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 mm called
"sugar" sand, or 0.5-1.2 mm called "Select" - the select is more
expensive. This is a lot of sand - around 450 lbs.<I would go with the
sugar sand if it saves you money. I don't really see any advantages in
going with the "select". There are a lot of people using Southdown play
ground sand from Home Depot and having good results also. I would do a
search on this at our site: www.wetwebmedia.com. Cody> Thanks
John DSB Grain Size II (11-22-03) Thanks very much. <No
problem!> Southdown is not available here. I tried to get some, but with
shipping it would cost MORE than the "expensive" sand. I may try
using local natural ocean sand, after screening it and washing it.
Our local ocean temp is only 6-8 degrees Celsius - so of course most of
the flora and fauna would not survive at reef temperatures. Any comments
here?<If you use the ocean sand rinse, rinse, and rinse some more! There
might be something on this at our site, www.wetwebmedia.com. Good luck,
Cody.> Sorting Out A Sandbed Situation... My current
tank is a 55 gallon reef. The tank is about 1 1/2 yrs. old and is
experiencing a major algae/ red slime outbreak. I am about 99% sure this
is due to the nutrient sink I have created with my 2 - 2.5 inch mixed
size sand bed. As luck would have it I will be flooring the room that it
sits in and replacing it with a new tank, stand and larger sump/
refugium. I have plenty of new Southdown (real cheap here in NJ) as well
as the Florida live sand and (mixed sizes) and aragonite from the
existing tank. I was going to use a DSB but after talking to Jason at
AquaC and reading a lot of posts, it seems as though they are starting
to fall out of favor. <Well, there has been a lot of talk on the
hobbyist boards of late regarding the alleged downsides of deep sand
beds. While much research remains to be done on this topic, I think the
benefits of DSBs outweigh any negatives. I get the feeling that a lot of
the negative stuff is put out by people who have had bad experiences due
to lapses in husbandry, improper installation of the sand bed, and other
potential miscues...The DSB concept is quite valid, IMO> The way I
see it I have several choices: A) 1" Southdown in display with 1"
existing live sand in dedicated 8g 'fuge. B) 4" Southdown in display
with 1" existing live sand in dedicated 8g fuge. C) 1" existing sand
in both display and fuge. D) 1" Southdown in display with 4-5"
existing live sand in dedicated 8g fuge. I am leaning towards C since
I like the look of Southdown Sand and the flexibility of taking the fuge
offline if I want to change to shallow bed, or mud at a later time. I am
starting to think that the most important thing is macro for nutrient
export regardless what bed I use. <Well, one thing that I feel pretty
strongly about is that you need to go 1/2 inch or less, or 3 inches or
more. My thinking is that 1 inch is too shallow to foster
denitrification, but too deep to be fully aerobic, which is a potential
recipe for long term problems. If you're inclined to go this route,
better to use a sprinkling of sand in the display, and a 3 inch plus bed
in the sump...Modified Plan "D"> I am looking for any thoughts or
suggestions you guys might have. I would just like to get it right this
time around. <You're on the right track!> Thanx as always, Ken
<My pleasure Ken...It's good to get feedback from lots of sources here.
I would take anyone's suggestions (including mine) with a grain of salt,
taking into account basic husbandry concepts, an plan your system in a
manner that works best for you! Good luck! Regards, Scott F>
Sandbed Stuff Thanks Scott F. <You're welcome!> I meant to
say option D. Anyways, what about 3-4" Southdown in the display with
4-5" of the existing mixed size live sand /cc for the fuge.
<Ahh...sounds good to me> Denitrification in the main tank with pod
production in the refugium. Would I need to clean/rinse the existing
sand before adding it to the fuge. Would I need to add a specific
detritivore kit? I currently have 3 brittle stars. <Personally, I
would not "clean" the sand, for fear of eliminating more potentially
beneficial life forms. I'd limit additions of detritivores to the
existing brittle stars, and maybe some worms. Again- I'd be hesitant to
add any creatures that could be too disruptive. Possibly contrary to
popular thought, but I don't think that lots of "sand stirring" is
either necessary or desirable, especially in a well-maintained tank>
The existing sand bed is loaded with spaghetti worms and bristle worms
that I can salvage. I was thinking of adding 2 small cukes, about a
dozen Nassarius snails and about 2 dozen of the smaller red leg Mexican
hermits to new Southdown in the display. <That seems fine to
me...Again, I wouldn't disrupt the bed too much, even in the display>
Also saving some of the existing sand in nylon bags and using it to
seed the display, or is just adding it to the fuge sufficient for
biological activity? Any thought or comments are greatly appreciated.
Thanx, ken <Well, Ken, I'd be inclined to just place it in the
refugium. Sure, you can seed the refugium by keeping it in bags, but in
my experience, such procedures don't seem to be necessary. Just dump it
in! BTW, for a lot of killer information on DSBs and refugia, trust me
and get a copy of Anthony and Bob's "Reef Invertebrates" book- exactly
what you're looking for...Makes a great holiday gift! Good luck!
Regards, Scott F> Sugar sized sand? I have been
researching how much it is going to cost me to put a 6" DSB in my 55g,
and I am having a little bit of trouble figuring out what I need to
get. All of the LFSs around here, in SE Wisconsin, have pretty high
prices compared to the places online so I'm probably going to be
ordering my sand online. My issue is this: I am looking for sugar size
sand, and most sands that I have seen on websites list their size in
mm. I have seen mixes with sizes of .18mm-1.2mm and 1mm-4mm. What size
in mm would you recommend/consider to be sugar size? Thanks- Luke
<Hi Luke, shipping sand may also become quite expensive, 6in is good,
4-5in would work as well. It has been a while since i last tried to
measure sugar, but if you stay under 2mm you should be in good
shape. This is a pretty popular topic, lots of FAQs
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/dsbfaqs.htm> Re: sandbed
question Hello again, I have a couple of follow-up questions.
1. For future reference, when you have a sandbed in a separate sump is
there a certain size that is appropriate for a 100gal tank? <Mmm,
well, the bigger the better... no less than a fifth the volume of the
main tank...> Do suggest adding one of those sand starter kits like
the one from inland aquatics that has the worms and other stuff?
<Generally not... enough critters come in/on the live rock to adequately
inoculate the new substrate> Do you have to feed the sandbed since it
is separate, because I thought the worms and other stuff in the live
sand eat the detritus. Do you add sand sifters? <No to both... enough
food of different sorts will find its way there... and almost never a
need for sand sifters> 2. For now, do you know if those fluidized
filters actually work and if they are a benefit? <Do work... but
almost never needed... You don't want to overdrive nitrification... such
technology (FB) is for high and variably bio-loaded systems... like
wholesalers, aquaculture facilities... Bob Fenner> Thanks again,
Brett DSB OR Expensive Protein Skimmer Hello Bob
<Hello Antoine> I have a 280gal FOWLR Tank 60x30x30 with a 11"
Vlamingi Tang, 7" Red Coris Wrasse, 6" Twin Spot Wrasse, 5" Pink Tail
Trigger, 16" Snowflake EEL, 12" Golden Tail EEL, and a newly acquired
18" Leopard Moray. Now what I'm in the process of doing is removing the
Snowflake and Golden Tail EEL to a 75 gal tank. I think that I will
trade my Pink Tail Trigger in at the LFS for a miniatus grouper or
Formosa wrasse since he is always being harassed by the Vlamingi tang.
<Okay> Now since I acquired the Leopard moray I'm putting a strain on
my filtration system. Water parameters have moved up Ammonia .1ppm,
Nitrite.2ppm and Nitrate up to 60ppm. <Yikes... I would forestall
feeding till there was/is no ammonia or nitrite period> Everything
was at zero except for the Nitrate being around 35ppm. I'm thinking that
this is probably going on because of the undersized skimmer. I ordered
and now have in possession another Turboflotor 1000 that I was going to
use on my new 75 gal but now I'm wondering if I should send it back and
get a Euro-Reef CS8-2 (requires less adjustment correct) for the 280 gal
or just add a 20 gal sump DSB with about 6 inches of fine sand which
would be a cheaper way to control my water parameters and use the
turbo-flotor on the 75 gal. <I would get the bigger, better skimmer
for your larger system for sure> My goal is control denitrification
and have to do less maintenance. I thought about a refugium but this
would require me to cut the Caulerpa back all the time and worry about
it dying on me causing a possible disaster. <Not a huge concern>
The original Turboflotor did great until I added the leopard moray and I
know as he grows that he will put a greater strain on my system. I just
don't know if the DSB will do as just a good of a job as the $400.00
Skimmer. <Not... you would need a couple hundred gallon DSB to "do
about the same good"> Another thing is before I only had a half of
cup full of dark skimmate in my collection cup per week and now its
every three days so I know I'm pushing the skimmer to its limit. I have
always done maintenance on the skimmer, weekly water changes, run
activated carbon, Chemipure and every so often PolyFilter pads. There is
also 200lbs of rock in the tank that I think is enough and still allow
the fish to have plenty of room to swim around. <Much to consider.
Bob Fenner> DSB (and nitrates) Question 8/18/05 Good
Morning Crew! <Andrew> I've got a question, which might not have
a simple answer (What does in this hobby? )..... <Don't know... and
am afraid to expand on...> My question lies in the necessary size of
a remote DSB in relation to the "primary" tank for Nitrate
control. I've read every (And there are a LOT) query regarding DSBs on
this board, and the info in the Reef Inverts book by Anthony, and Bob,
but I'm still not sure I've gotten what I'm looking for. I'm in the
process of moving my tank, and will be setting up a 72G bowfront tank,
with a 20G sump, and (roughly) a 4.5G HOB CPR Aquafuge for Pod
production/Macroalgae. If I don't go nuts on stocking levels, would a
5-6" DSB in the Sump (Probably 2/3's DSB, partitioned for water inlet
from tank, and the Eheim 1260 return pump) and Refuge be able to control
my Nitrates at or very close to Zero? <Mmm, will definitely help...
only practice can tell how much> If you need any further information
regarding additional circulation, filtration, etc, let me know. I just
hesitate to add the DSB to the display tank as a 72G primary Aquarium
isn't particularly huge, and I'm not very fond of the 5-6" sand bed
look, <Me neither...> but if it's necessary, function will prevail
over form. I realize a lot has to do with maintenance, stocking
levels, etc. but is there an effective "rule-of-thumb" ratio of
Nitrate-consuming sump/'fuge size to aquarium size? <Not as far as
I'm aware, or concerned... the bigger the better... but no minimum,
matching value... Just too many other factors to place in a string of
variables in such an equation... foods, feeding, lighting...
chemistry... temperature...> (I have this really bad feeling you're
going to say there are too many variables to tell) <Heeeee! It may
well be time for you to join our Crew, start answering queries...>
I'd just prefer to add the DSB from scratch, instead of stressing the
heck out of the livestock by adding it later should it not be adequate.
<Will be fine... I say, go ahead!> Thanks for your help with the
question, and for the amazing amount of help and information you
provide! -Andy <Glad to share. Bob Fenner>
|
|