|
| |
|
FAQs about Wet-Dry, Trickle Filter DIY,
Modification/Conversion
Related Articles:
Trickle Filters, pt. 1
By Bob Goemans,
Physical Filtration, Denitrification/Denitrifiers,
Nitrates and Marine Systems,
Related FAQs: Wet Dries 1, Wet Dries 2,
Wet-Dries
3, Wet Dries 4,
Selection,
Set-Up, Pumps,
Plumbing Issues,
Bio-Balls
FAQs, Bio-Ball, Wet-Dry Media 2,Other
Filter/Media/Elements (other than bio-balls),
Operation/Maintenance/Repair...
Biological Filtration, Biofiltration
2, Fluidized Beds, Ammonia,
Nitrites, Nitrates, Phosphates, Denitrification/Denitrifiers,
|
 |
|
Re: fighting conch, algal contr., and wet-dry conv. to live
sump 9/10/08 Thanks for your prompt response. I
re-read some of the algae FAQs as per your suggestion and will continue
to follow the recommendations outlined (monitor nutrient control,
adequate circulation/aeration, regular RO water changes and
filtration/skimmer cleaning, macroalgae cultivation, proper
illumination/replacement of lamps, etc.). In your reply, you recommended
against adding blue leg hermits, but didn't indicate why. <Am "just"
not a fan of using such in general... Even the genera of "reef safe"
(generally) ones can be "too picky"> Would you please elaborate
further? <Please read here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marine/maintenance/maintindex.htm the third
tray down> In my reading of your BGA/Cyano article, you mentioned
that in regards to biological controls of BGA, certain hermit crabs do
consume BGA. <Yes... some Calcinus and Clibanarius species
particularly can, not always...> Is it the other fish/inverts that
present the problem? <Can, yes...> As far as a "clean up crew",
what would you recommend, based on my existing livestock? <Read the
above citation> I noticed you recommended Zebrasoma tangs and Mithrax
crabs (which I currently have), among others, in some of the FAQs.
<Yes... appropriate application... in some settings> On a related
theme, I've read a number of the emails in the WWM sump FAQ. I'm
intrigued about the discussion as to converting a wet/dry filter into a
sump/refugium for housing live rock and/or macroalgae, but at the same
time I'm a bit leery about making modifications and not doing it right.
Attached with this email is a photo of my commercially bought wet/dry
filter. You can see that the water enters from above through 2 diffusers
(not sure if this is the correct term), pours through a filter pad over
a drip tray, past the bio-media balls, then across another sponge into
the second chamber that houses an in-sump Berlin skimmer, and finally
pumped back into the main tank. Is there a way to keep the mod.s simple?
<Mmm, yes...> Is it as easy as removing the bio-media and putting
live rock in its place? <Virtually, actually, yes... Better to have
"more space" for other items... but a DSB can be fitted under/with the
LR> You can see in the photo that the water level in the wet/dry is
about 35-40% full...do I raise the water level so the rock would be
completely submerged? <Yes, this is best> Should the diffusers
and/or drip tray be removed and be replaced with something else?
<These can remain; remove the pad> You'd indicated that lighting for
a sump containing live rock and/or macroalgae is beneficial. If the
filter tray is still there, is there any problem with lighting from the
side (instead of from above) that clamps onto the side of the cabinet?
<Mmm, no problem... though/but it would be better if there was another
separate area to house the algae> I presume from reading some of the
prior posts that the LR in the sump can be lit with a simple one-bulb
fixture from a home store. Any bulb wattage minimum? <Mmm, tens of
watts will do most all that can be here> I also worry that residue
from the live rock could clog up the pump that sends water back to the
main tank. <Should be screened in a fashion> You can see in the
photo that even now, there's residue that's gotten past the pad and
second sponge and has settled at the bottom of the sump and in/around
the skimmer. <This will surely pass. I would ignore this mulm> On
another note, the skimmer rarely froths over the edge into the
cup/receptacle, but a good amount of "pasty gunk" - forgive my lack of
scientific terminology - accumulates along the inside of the cylinder on
which the cup sits. Any thoughts? <Your RedOx is likely low... put
in other words, your water quality is mal-influencing this skimmers
function... and it may need adjustment... to raise the water level w/in
the contact chamber...> Is Red Sea Berlin brand skimmer any good, or
if not, what would you suggest? <Is low to middling in
functionality> Sorry for the numerous questions that are all over the
place. I'm trying to get as much direction as possible in advance by
reading prior articles and WWM posts, but much of the info isn't
specific enough for me to be comfortable making these changes, and still
I feel like I'm a little in over my head. <No worries> Maybe it
might be easier to just plant a few Halimeda bushes in the main tank?
<Mmm, worth trying, but a "whole different kettle o' fish" compared
with the conversion of your wet-dry. I DO encourage you to go forward
with this> I have 120W total (four 30W bulbs) of 50/50 lighting in a
125G, is this adequate? <... For?> Thanks again for your
patience. <And you for your earnest involvement. BobF>
|
 |
Swapping Sump with Sump/Refug. 6/25/08
Hey all,
<Hello Chad.>
I have a 55 gal. main tank with an 8Gal sump that houses my skimmer, heater pump
and I'm upgrading to a 20 Gal Sump/Refugium. The Refugium is smaller than I
wanted (12x10), but I figure something is better than nothing.
<It is, this is a decent size refugium to fit under the typical 55 gal. stand.>
The main reason I wanted to add this was to grow some macro algae in a DSB to
control some diatom issues I was having in the main tank, but since then the
diatoms have pretty much disappeared.
<The refugium will still be of great benefit.>
So here's my questions. I'm ready to swap the two and was wondering if my
process sounds OK. I'll probably empty the contents of the existing sump into
the new sump/fug, add the DSB (4" oolitic or fine aragonite) with some clean
dead Fiji rock fragments then top it off with new saltwater to get to the
operating level that I want, seed it with some sand from the main tank, then do
a small water change with the remaining new saltwater and turn everything back
on. Alternately I could just fill the new sump/fug with clean salt water and
pitch the old sump water. Should I expect any spikes in ammonia/nitrites?
<Be prepared, you may. I would expect nothing of great concern, just be ready
with water changes if needed.>
Should I be ready to do another water change in the next few days or will the 2
week schedule be OK?
<Your regular regimen should be sufficient. Just test your levels for the first
couple days and be prepared for a water change if need be.>
I figure I'm not really adding/removing any live material, but I will be
changing out the filter sponge separating the return pump, which I typically
clean every couple of weeks anyway.
<Cleaning it at least once a week will further contribute to better water
quality.>
Next when can I add some Chaetomorpha, Nassarius snails and pods?
<Right away if you like, I prefer to wait a week or two myself.>
I'm also not sure my LFS has Chaeto, and I don't want to use Caulerpa after
reading about it. Can I order it online without many problems?
<Yes, Chaeto is easy to come by online. Do also check your local clubs, many
people give this stuff away by the fistful.>
How much wattage would you recommend for a small 'fuge like this?
<I personally like at least 65W of PowerCompact bulbs. The reason being that you
do not want light to be the limiting factor of the macroalgae growth, nutrients
in your tank should be for the maximum benefit. Some do use less light with
success though, there is no one correct way.>
Finally, I'd like to keep the old sump and possibly plumb it in as a 2nd
refugium that I could shut off from the main tank and use as a quarantine when
adding new fish. Any idea how I would plumb something like this?
<Many, it depends on the tanks relative orientation. Remember that gravity will
dictate where the water flows. If the tank is above the sump it will need to be
gravity fed from the tank or pump fed from the sump and then have a gravity
return to the sump.>
Would I plumb it directly from the tank overflow then pump it back into the
Sump/Refugium or try to pump it out of Sump/Refugium after the skimmer somehow.
I'd probably try to grow a mangrove tree in that, would there be issues with a
quarantined fish and possibly medication with a mangrove?
<Yes, some will, do not do this. A quarantine tank is best kept entirely
separate and dedicated to this purpose.>
Thanks for your great site and all your help,
Chad
<Welcome, thank you, Scott V.>
|
Wet Dry Refugium
Combo 4/13/08
I have a 135 gallon Acrylic tank with at least 1+ lbs of live rock
to every gallon. Although my tank was moved when I moved to my new house
5 years ago, in total time it's been up for over 8 years. I run a wet
dry filter, with a protein skimmer, and I have a UV system as well. The
tank has about 3 inches of crushed coral and no sand, and I do 25%+
water changes every two weeks. I have never cleaned the bio balls, but
they never really got dirty either (visually anyway).
<Okay, things/approaches to marine tanks have changed a bit in regards
to bioballs, substrate and the use of UV (for some), but if it is
working…>
My tank has fish and corals, along with anemones that keep splitting
into more and more (currently I have six).
<A good sign of water quality and husbandry.>
I have a 60 gallon tank that I plan to make into a wet dry / refugium
combo for this tank replacing the current wet dry only system. My
questions are around this new refugium, so I need some direction and
advice.
<The refugium is a very worthwhile addition.>
Do I need the bio balls at all, or should I make the refugium part even
larger instead ?
<Personally, I would ditch the bioballs, you have plenty of live rock to
take over.>
My plan was to move all the bio balls and put them into
the first chamber of the new refugium, where approximately 70% of them
would be under water at all times. Can I move all the bio balls at one
time from one unit to the new one, or will I have issues ?
<Moving them all at once will be fine, you should not need them anyhow.>
If I can move them all at once does it matter which ones were in the air
and which were under the water, and what is the correct ratio for above
and
below water (if it matters) ?
<If your tank was relying solely on bioballs for biofiltration it would
matter somewhat. You do want the bioballs to generally be exposed to
air, this is the strength of their use, increased available oxygen. For
your system there will be little difference.>
What do you recommend for in the refugium part, as I've heard everything
from Mud to live sand, mangroves to only algae, live rock to none, and
to add things like hermit crabs and shrimp ?
<Hmm, sand, a fine aragonite, preferably a DSB is my choice and
recommendation. The addition of live rock is fine, as well as a
macroalgae. Mangroves look nice, but grow slowly and provide little
nutrient export compared to Caulerpa or Chaetomorpha.>
The light I'm using came with my reef 60 gallon tank, so it has day and
actinic lamps. Can these be used for the refugium or do I need different
bulbs ?
<They can be used, although you will get more bang for your buck
replacing at least the actinics for daylight bulbs, preferably in the
6500K range for algae growth.>
My intent is to light the refugium on an opposite schedule from the main
tank unless that doesn't benefit me at all ?
<It does help quite a bit towards stabilizing PH through the night.>
If there are no real benefits I will light it on the same schedule as my
tanks.
Does it matter if the bio balls get direct light on them from the
compacts, or should I be blocking the light from direct contact ?
<Blocking the light will prevent algae growth on the bioballs.>
Lastly, when it's all swapped out the same day, my intent was to
immediately do my water change throwing out the water that runs over the
refugium. My thought being it would be better for my tank. Am I right or
doesn't it matter ?
<Little difference, the system will all be tied together anyhow.>
I've attached an example of what my setup will look like, but unlike the
picture some of my bio balls will be above the water unless you tell me
otherwise.
<As they should be, I would ditch the bioballs. Your setup looks fine.>
Thanks in advance for all the help, as I really appreciate it.
<You’re welcome, thank you.>
I know a lot about salt water tanks through the knowledge I've gained
over the years, but my success is due to asking questions. I know enough
about the refugium to be dangerous, hence my questions above.
<Heee, don’t we all!>
Sincerely,
Dierk
<Best regards, Scott V.>
Re: Wet Dry Refugium
Combo 4/17/08
My intent was for all my water flow to go through my refugium and
then back to the tank. However I see some people saying that's fine,
others saying no,
you want a very slow flow through the refugium.
<You do not want too slow, I feel the slow flow is an overrated
concept.>
Questions:
135 Gallon tank, and my refugium compartment is going to be 12 wide, 22"
long, and 17" high. If I have 4" of sand that leaves 13" of height for a
total of 15.53 gallons of water in this middle section. What flow do I
want through the refugium?
<Anything from a few hundred GPH to a thousand at most will work fine.
On a tank this size I would personally choose in the upper end of this
range if all your sump flow is going to pass through.>
Do I have too much water over the sand (13" too deep) ?
<No, the more water volume the better. The DSB is helpful too!>
Thanks for the help.
Dierk
<Welcome, Scott V.>
Re: Wet Dry Refugium Combo 4/19/08
You are so helpful and I sooooo appreciate
it.
<It is such a pleasure to help out.>
I won't say last question, because that rarely
if ever happens. Per your advice the BIO Balls are going to be history. Instead
I was going to put a bunch of small pieces of live rock in the first chamber
where the tank water will enter. My questions are: Is it a good idea to fill the
first chamber with small pieces of live rock, or is it better to leave the first
chamber empty ?
<Ideally the first chamber will house a protein
skimmer and mechanical filtration, if any is used. Live rock in the sump is a
good idea, but you do want to make sure it does not accumulate detritus in the
same manner as the bioballs.>
If I dump water directly into the first chamber
thus causing air bubbles upon entry, does it matter if the bubbles end up all
over the live rock ?
<Not really.>
As the live rock will all be under water my fear
is it causing some kind of outbreak due to the oxygen bubble accumulation.
<Not with live rock, although other inhabitants
may have issues.>
My main tank lights are on approximately 10
hours a day. Does this mean the refugium should have it's lights on the other 14
hours every day?
<14 hours is acceptable for macroalgae.>
What do you recommend the best way is to rinse
the new refugium tank now that I used fish tank sealant to hold my compartment
dividers in place?
<Outside under the hose will be fine.>
I've heard cold water fill-up 3 times quickly
makes it safe for the fish, I've heard use warm water and leave it over night,
and I've been told rinse it once and I'm done... I just realized that I've
neglected to mention that I'm doing the refugium as part of my overall goal of
making my water changes really easy and maybe less frequent then weekly.
<No art here, just rinse the tank out. Not
really even an absolute necessity, just an extra precaution. The sump/refugium
will make water changes less stressful to the tank inhabitants. For water change
frequency you should stick to weekly. You may be able to cut back and maintain
the same water quality you have had, but sticking to your current regimen will
only increase your success.>
All my water will go from the tank to the
refugium, the refugium will dump into a 50 gallon Rubbermaid container, and then
from the container back up into the tank. Moving forward water changes will
simply involve swapping out the Rubbermaid container for this tank. This
obviously changes my tank size up an additional 45 gallons from what it is today
(to approx 180 gallons).
<A welcome addition of water volume to any
system.>
Does that make the refugium too small now or is
there no difference ?
<I am not really following you as far as
refugium size.>
Lastly, I was thinking about merging another 100
gallon tank into this mix as well. As I think this would exceed the 1000 gallons
an hour through the refugium, I will probably have to start up another refugium
for the second tank and then dump both refugiums into the same Rubbermaid
container.
<This could work, or a single, larger refugium.>
Would I need the second refugium or should the
one still handle it ?
<Depends on the size of the refugium for the
volume that will travel through it.>
Do you see any issues with my plan of merging
the tanks?
<No, not with a common sump at the bottom of the
gravity flow chain.>
Outside of problem in one tank becomes problem
in two.
<A possibility, with good husbandry this will
not be an issue.>
As always thank you for all your GREAT help with
this, and have a great weekend.
<Welcome, you have a great weekend also.>
Sincerely, Dierk
<Best regards, Scott V.>
|
|
 |
Wet/dry Refugium Conversion
11/28/07
Hello Crew,
<Hello Peter, Scott V. here.>
Of course I have to start out by thanking you in advance for your great site. I
currently have 250 gallon FOWLR tank with a drilled overflow (filled w/ bio
balls), wet/dry filter, protein skimmer and UV light. Nitrates normal range is
20 to 40. I would like convert this filtration system to a refugium. I do not
have enough room under my tank for both the wet/dry and refugium. I found a good
deal on a refugium identical to the CPR Aquafuge Pro, seems the only difference
is that it is less expensive and larger approximately 45 gallon capacity. I’m
thinking of filling with ecosystem’s miracle mud and anything else you can
suggest. The first chamber would house a protein skimmer.
The bio load consists of a Clown trigger 2 ˝ inches, Humu Humu trigger 2 inches,
2 inch purple tang, 3 small under inch damsels, 4 inch regal tang and a 2 foot
ribbon eel. All very healthy. Will be adding more.
My questions are:
1. Will I have problems with biological filtration in the beginning? Also, once
broken in will this type of setup be efficient for my size tank or would you
suggest something different.
<You shouldn’t with sufficient live rock in your tank. Your bioload is fairly
low for your sized tank (your fish are relatively small). If this concerns you,
remove the bioballs in stages, giving a few days in between. I think the setup
you are considering would be great, again assuming you have sufficient live
rock.>
2. I do have a lifeguard fluidized bed filter not currently in use that I can
use. Should I hook that up to my wet/dry now to build a bacteria colony and then
transfer it to the fuge when I install it.
<I wouldn’t, should not be necessary.>
3. Do you think miracle mud is the way to go with this type of setup or would
you suggest something other than miracle mud.
<I would personally use a fine (oolitic) aragonite sand in the range of 5-6” to
assist lowering the nitrate. >
4. Next the protein skimmer. I have read that a smaller skimmer can be used on
setups like this. Is this true? I was thinking about getting the Aqua Medic
Turboflotor 1000. It looks like a descent skimmer for the money. Do you think a
different skimmer would work better with this setup?
<It can help decrease the load on the skimmer. However, I would actually
consider a larger skimmer on this system, you will have a significant load on it
as your fish grow. Look at ASM, Aqua C or EuroReef.>
5. What type of lighting – size/ watts is appropriate for this set up?
<Assuming you are growing Caulerpa or Chaetomorpha I would look at a 55/65 watt
power compact in the 6000K range. Some use much less light here, but I don’t
like the light to be the limiting factor for the algae growth. Some people use
more, even to the extent of halides.>
6. Lastly with a refugium should I continue to use the uv light?
<I wouldn’t, they are of little use in my opinion.>
Sorry for the long winded email. I do appreciate any information you can supply
me with.
Thanks Again,
Peter
<No problem, it is easier to have one email with many questions to see the whole
picture. Sounds like a worth while project. Welcome and good luck with it, Scott
V.>
Re: Wet/dry refugium conversion 12/2/07
Hello again,
<Hello Peter.>
Thank you Scott for your speedy response. I have just a few more follow up
question to my 1st email.
<OK>
1. What if I don't have a sufficient amount of live rock? Will the refugium be
able to handle my growing bio load as I add more fish. With little live rock
would a matured fluidized bed filter help?
<The filter will help if you do not have sufficient live rock for your
biofiltration. The only concern is their tendency to accumulate detritus,
increasing nitrate levels. This is more of a reef concern than FOWLR. You should
see more growth in your macro algae as the stocking level and size of your fish
increase.>
2. How will having a refugium and no wet/dry affect my oxygen levels?
<Very little. You will still have the overflow itself, first chamber with your
protein skimmer and surface area of your refugium to provide gas exchange; as
well as CO2/oxygen infusion use by your macro.>
3. Just for clarification. You wrote if I was concerned to remove bio balls in
stages. Are you saying remove in stages, then when it is completely empty remove
wet/dry and install fuge? I can't have both running at the same time unless I
have the fuge outside the cabinet while this process takes place.
<You can put some of the bioballs in the refugium or first chamber and remove
them in stages if you wish. They will not be acting as wet/dry but will still
provide some biofiltration. Again, with sufficient rock they should not be of
any concern, especially if you choose to employ the fluidized bed.>
4. I currently have a return pump in my wet/dry that is 1300gph. Will I be able
to use this as the return pump in the fuge?
<Yes, with proper intake screening. Just keep in mind that this is where
evaporation will show if you do not have an automated top off system.>
Once again thank you for your help it is much appreciated!
Peter
<You’re welcome, have fun, Scott V.>
Re: BTA & Candy Cane Coral Concerns –
09/19/07
Hi Mich,
<Hi Jackie>
Thanks for making me feel more comfortable with my situation.
<Glad I could help.>
I have one last question for you. I have always wanted a refugium. It is
difficult to turn a sump into a refugium?
<Not at all. There is plenty of info on our website. Please read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/refugium.htm
And many related links in blue such as these:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/refugdesignfaqs.htm
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/refugdesfaq2.htm
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/RefugDesFAQ3.htm
Can even be as simple as something like this, which is not part of the sump but
hangs on the back:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/hagenrefugart.htm >
Thanks,
Jackie
<You're quite welcome Jackie, Good luck, hope this helps. Mich>
Filter Question 9/5/07
I have a 120 Gallon Tenecor Tank that came with a wet/dry trickle filter. I
have about 75-80 lbs of live rock and about 2-3 inches of livesand. I have a
mixture of fish and Invertebrates currently, with very little coral. The Tank
has 4) 96w quad SmartPaq (SunPaq). It came with a Berlin skimmer, plumbed from
the wet/dry filter (I get a full cup every 1-2 wks). The unit has been running
for about a year, I do my water changes and regular maint. I cannot seem to keep
my Algae under control. I get a brownish red powder and a dark green algae. I
have been reading thru your FAQ's and I am confused over a couple of things. 1.
Should I convert the wet/dry to a sump?
<You can, but it is not going to get rid of the algae. That is a separate issue
to address.>
If so, what are the proper steps ?
<Remove a few bio-balls each week until you have none.>
2. I have a Fluval 304, that was on another tank. Would it be beneficial to
plumb it into my Tenecor tank?
<It would be beneficial to use this and use Chemi-Pure in the filter. This
would help much in removing dissolved waste which is leading to your algae
problem. Do read here on algae control.
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/algaeconMar.htm James (Salty Dog)>
Wet-Dry Conversion...and Fun With Flow Rates!
6/24/07
Hi WWM crew,
<Hey there! Scott F. in today>
First let me say that I love the site.
<Glad to hear that! We certainly enjoying working on it!>
Tank specifics- 46 Gallon Bowfront, 192Watts 50/50 lighting, Pro Clear Aquatics
Pro 75 Gallon Wet/Dry, QuietOne
3000 (approx. 500 GPH at tank height) pumping through an SCWD to either back
corner of the tank, Hydor Koralia 3 (850 GPH - a lot of circulation for this
tank, I know) pumping water from the back center to the front center of the bow,
small mini powerhead blowing in the back for a little extra circulation, inline
heater.
<Sounds nice>
Substrate- 1 3/4" crushed coral topped with 1/2" AragAlive
Livestock- 80+ pounds of live rock, assorted snails and hermits, 1 Emerald crab,
2 Peppermint Shrimp, 1 Abalone, 1 Lettuce Nudibranch, 1 Tongan Conch, 1 Purple
Firefish - 2 1/2", 3 Blue Chromis - 1" to 1 1/2" each, 1 Black Blenny - 3", 1
Royal Gramma - 1 1/2", and 1 Hi Fin Red Banded Goby (has come out to be seen
only once since being added to tank).
<A very nice mix of fishes for this sized aquarium!>
Water - Ammonia is 0, Nitrite is 0, Nitrate is around 20, Salinity is 1.023, and
pH is 8.4
<Sounds fine...Could work on that nitrate level, though...Perhaps yanking the
biomedia in the wet-dry would help..>
I am planning to add a Flame Angel, but I was wondering if the tank could handle
a mated pair.
<Hmm...I would be a bit hesitant to place a Flame Angel- let alone, two of
them-in an aquarium of this size, and with this type of population. These fishes
need a bit more room, IMO- and can be a bit aggressive in close quarters.
Perhaps one (and I said "one") of the "Dwarf Dwarf" Angels, like C. fisheri,
would be more appropriate.>
I know you have to keep the dwarf angels separated in anything less than a 70
but was not sure if that applied to mates.
<Even with a mated pair, in this aquarium, it's more of an issue of physical
space.>
Other than perhaps starting to grow a few small coral frags I am not planning
any other livestock changes. The livestock (except for snails and crabs) was all
recently placed after adding 36 pounds of live rock and re-cycling the tank.
<Sounds like a plan. Note that your coral frags may be nipped at by the
Angelfish..>
Wet dry info -
http://www.proclearaquatics.com/Instructions/Pro%2075/Pro%2075%20fig-2%201-28-05.pdf
After reading a lot about replacing the BioBalls to deal with the Nitrate
problem I am very interested in doing so, but I do not want to simply remove
them. My plan is to take out the trays and balls (I would remove 1/3 of the
balls each week) and place an acrylic baffle to block the bottom opening between
chamber 2 and 3.
<That's fine.>
here are overflow holes already drilled at the top of chamber 2 which would turn
chamber 2 into a constant height chamber like chamber 1 which holds the skimmer.
I have a couple of questions about this setup:
1. The Wet/Dry is rated for 300 GPH so I know I am already pushing more water
through than is intended although I have not seen any problems. Do you think
this is a problem and would removing the trickle mechanism and replacing it with
a refugium make it better?
<No need to blast water through a sump. Honestly, I like a slow flow through the
sump. This low flow allows more contact time for nutrient laden system water to
work through the skimmer and/or any chemical filtration media that you have in
the sump.>
2. I know refugiums are supposed to have a much slower flow rate than the 500
GPH the pump will be cycling through the sump, will this be a problem?
<I'd slow it down all around. Remember, the references to "flow rates" (ie;
20x-40x/ hour) that you hear so much about in reef keeping really refer to
circulation rate within the display itself, not through the sump. GO slow
through the sump/refugium.>
3. Do I need to add some kind of baffle in chamber 3 (i.e. to prevent bubbles
from entering the pump) or can the overflow spill directly into the chamber and
on top of the pump?
<You'll have to see, but a baffle of some sort is probably going to be needed.>
4.If the refugium will work, what should I place in it- add a lamp and fill it
with some kind of macroalgae? Fill the bottom with a deep bed of live sand or
crushed live rock with or w/o a light? Sand bed with some creatures? Mud setup?
<If it were me, I'd keep it really simple and just float some Chaetomorpha
macroalgae in there and run a cheap compact fluorescent fixture (that you can
get from any hardware store) over the section containing the macroalgae. Run the
light on a "reverse" schedule from your main display, harvest the Chaetomorpha
regularly, and you'll acheive a nice pH stability and nutrient export. This
macroalgae has a great reputation for being a nice place for amphipods and other
creatures to live and multiply within its fronds- another bonus!>
I also just bought a chiller (no air conditioning to keep the fish cool), it
supports a flow rate of only 100-160 GPH so my plan was to run a small pump in
chamber 1 (under the skimmer column) with 1/2" flexible pipe running into the
chiller and back into the sump. Does this seem reasonable?
<Yes. A dedicated chiller pump is always a nice idea. Use a ball valve so that
you can dial down the flow from the pump if necessary to achieve a proper
cooling benefit.>
Would the added circulation as a result in chamber 1 improve the operation of
the protein skimmer?
<Well, this is not really "circulation". You're pulling out water from tis
section, running it through the chiller, then returning it to the display,
right?>
Pulling water down in the chamber rather than having it immediately flow into
chamber 2.
Thanks so much for the advice.
Samuel
<Glad to be of service! Good luck! Regards, Scott F.> Heater in CPR BakPak 2r+ Return 2/27/07
Hello!
<Hi>
First off, let me join the scores of others that have complimented you on your
site.
<Thanks.>
I have read the FAQ's for hours but am unable to find an answer to this
question. As I have grown up being told there are no dumb questions, I'll ask
it. . . <Fire away.>
Do you see any problem, either with skimmer efficiency, overflow, overheating,
etc. with putting my submersible heater in the return chamber o my CPR BakPak
skimmer?
Thanks for taking the time to help with this question, and for all the kernels
of wisdom I have gleaned from reading the FAQ's.
-Kris
<Have seen this done and seems to work fine. It does make me a little nervous
though, if the skimmer pump dies could be big problems.>
<Chris>
Cramped in space...and time... not a
Hemingway pastiche! Skimmer fitting 2/12/07
Hey Crew,
<Adam>
You guys rock, I have been able to be very successful in having marine
aquariums the last 4 years with no outbreaks and ich, etc.. Who would
ever guess a quarantine tank would save so many lives...??!??
<Yay! You and I at least...>
I have this sump in my 120 GL FOWLR and Shrimp/Snails/Hermit/Star Fish
tank.
http://www.seatrademarine.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=PCA75&Category_Code=PCA
We just bought a really cute small, Yellow Eye Kole Tang which is
doing well in our old tank, a 30 gallon, that has a aqua c remora
skimmer which we use for our quarantine tank. I am very PRO skimmer BTW.
<Mmm...>
we currently have about 80 lbs of live rock and are going to add
another 40 when we introduce our new tangs (hoping to get a chevron or
another one with Kole (not same sub-species) to separate/differentiate
the current territories.
<Are conspecifics in HI...>
We have approx 20 hermits, 10 snails, 2 cleaner shrimp, 1 dwarf angel
and 1 false eye puffer .. so a small bioload..
We do not have a skimmer yet, and with the 2nd compartment of the sump
being only 10x10 we are going to probably get a EV-120 with the intake
positioned directly underneath the bioballs..
<Good choice>
I will extend tube the pump for the ev120 under the bioballs chamber and
cut a hole for the tubing to go through the sponge divider (small hole)
This then would drain through the return valve via skimmer into the same
2nd compartment which the skimmer would share with our mag 7 pump, which
would be positioned sideways in remaining 5' area.
<Okay>
The sump's 2nd compartment is 10x10 and the ev120 is 8.5 w x 4.75
pressed flat against bio-ball compartment, then the sideways mag 7 pump
5 x 3.8 with our water heater in there as well.. pretty tight fight but
it will work.
the background info is done, now the questions.
1. Should I 86 the bio-balls?
<I would, yes>
I do not plan on having any other inverts than current stock and they
are doing great.. The bio-balls clean stuff up and I don't think it
would "hurt". We do 10-20% water changes 1 or 2 times a month.. Only
algae we are getting is a little green hair algae on a few spots in the
very fine (less than 1 inch) sand at the bottom of the tank. I have dual
overflows pre-drilled and 2 pumps aerating water positioned at the top
left and bottom left front of the tank (fish love to swim in the
current.)
<Nice to have the redundancy>
2. If you think I should remove them, what should I put there?
<Mmm, nothing if you'd like... some rock, other calcareous media...?>
The skimmer is too tall 18' and the drains drain directly on top of
them.. (see intake in picture... right on top) BTW: 2 overflows = 2
drains which are T into 1 for that connection.
3. Do you think the skimmer is even worth it even though it is getting
pre-filtered water and sits very close to the return pump?
<Oh yes... very worthwhile. Wait to you see the gunk it removes, your
improved water quality, the improvement to the vitality of your
livestock>
You don't think this may get extra microbubbles with the EV-120 and be
very undesirable?
<Not likely to be an issue here>
(bubbles drive me nuts)
4. Or should we bite the bullet and buy a different retail sump with
more room.... would you recommend one (not the one you get a 10%
kickback for recommending! ;) JUST KIDDING)
<Heeeee! We don't "do" kickbacks>
I think this should work as long as the EV 120 Extension tubes do not
make the skimmer less efficient...
<Marginally>
Let me know what you think, you guys have always helped me well in the
past and I owe you guys big time!
-Adam
<I'd make this addition, improvement. BobF> |
|
 |
Wet Dry mod. - 1/18/07
I really appreciate the insight into the situation. Thank you.
<Anytime, Jason. Is what we're here for.>
On another note this came to me. As I said, I have a wet/dry filter with most of
the bio balls removed from it as to stay away from any nitrate spikes or
anything like that. I'd like to get rid of the rest. Should I gradually replace
the balls with live rock in the sump in their stead? I mean the only place for
the rock would be directly in the path of the drip plate of the filter.
<Can the drip plate be removed, to access an area that is always submersed? If
so, then this is certainly a good idea.>
I just take notice of many saying if you plan on keeping a reef not to use a
wet/dry unless you remove the plastic media. What are your thoughts?
<My thoughts are that you're already aware of the potential downfall of bioballs
in a reef aquarium, indicated by the fact that you've already removed a large
portion. The downfall of the wet/dry media stems from people not maintaining and
rinsing their bioballs (in discarded tank water, of course!) regularly, which I
get the impression you are doing. All will likely be fine if you continue your
current path, though you may end up finding more benefit from the live rock
addition. Hope this helps you! -JustinN>
Refugium Add on / Conversion - 11/02/06
Hello,
<Hi there>
I have a Wet Dry filter now on an 80 gal tank with 50lbs of live rock. ( I know
I need to add 30 lbs more and have my old hair ridden stuff in a tank hopefully
re-curing now) I have recently set up the system after replacing the frame of
the tank which had broken. I had, in the past, a huge problem with hair
algae. In efforts to not repeat this, I have read a lot about the benefits of a
refugium to help consume the nitrates that feed the evil hair algae. My sump is
a wet dry with a 12 x 12 chamber dedicated to bio balls and another 12 x 12
chamber that houses the pump and protein skimmer. I have a hang on the back
overflow system with one 1" drain line as the tank is not "reef ready".
<Heard, seen this... responded as such>
I have no desire to place a filter in the room outside of the tank area and have
about 15 x 12 footprint left under the tank that can house a fuge. I could do
one of three things...
1) get a hang on the back refugium, but these seem costly and only hold about 6
gallons. I am also concerned that the 40lbs additional weight is not good for
the frame of the glass aquarium and reaching the thing for maintenance will
require a ladder.
<Agreed>
2) Move my skimmer and pump to a separate vessel next to the wet dry and
convert the wet dry to a refugium. If I do this, I would gain the 12x 12 area
that currently houses the pump and skimmer as a fuge area and would have to
eliminate 50% of the bio balls as they would be submerged. I could have it
about 10 inches deep before I would risk overflow issues in a power
outage. This seems good, but the flow rate would not be controlled through the
refugium very well since the this controls the total flow rate of my system.
<One way... better than 1)>
3) I could add a refugium next to my wet dry and leave the wet dry as is. This
way I could pump water from the wet dry to the fuge tank and gravity drain it
back to the sump. This leaves my other filter intact and lets me control the
flow to the refugium. This seems well and good, but I am having trouble finding
a 12X12X12 vessel that I can cut a drain hole in. Should I have one made from
acrylic ($$), or can I use a opaque plastic trash can?
<Either one can/will work>
The later is obviously cheaper, but would the white plastic sides cause a
problem with light or heat?
<Nope... a bit more algae growth on lighter colored surfaces, but no big deal. I
would go with these choices in the opposite order of their ranking... The third
is best... along with removing the bio-balls from the extant wet-dry. Bob
Fenner>
I suppose I'd like advice on which of the three solutions is best. All of them
only about 6 gallons on an 80 gallon tank, but I know some is better than none.
as well as any advise on
Regards
Russell
Wet/Dry Conversion 10/12/06
Want fish and coral mix. <Ok>
I have a 75 gallon tank with 70 lbs of live rock along with live sand.
If I remove the bio balls from the wet/dry can I just go with the live rock in
the display? If you say I should put rock in the sump, can I just put more rock
in the display tank and if so, how much more???
Thanks
<As long as you remove the bio-ball slowly to allow the LR to assume their role
you should be fine. As far as having enough LR it depends, if it is fairly
porous you should be fine, if dense I would add maybe 10 more pounds if you have
room for it. Can be added to either the tank or wet/dry as long as it is
submerged.>
<Chris>
Wet Dry, bio-media - 2/21/2006
Hey Bob & WWM crew,
From: Johnny The Nubie
You guys are great and I learned a lot in the past month, But a little
confused about The removing of the bio Ball thing. Yes, I've been looking
through about 150 FAQ'S if not more and I get a little piece of the answer or
you refer them back to the FAQ'S which still have trouble finding the right
answer { which you should or you would be repeating yourself a hundred times a
day and I am a believer in doing your homework}.
<Ah, good>
But I really need some direct answer's to a few questions and would really
appreciate it if you would help. Here it goes, I have a 90 gallon reef ready
tank [will do fish / live rock first ] waiting for the stand [ being made,
should have it tomorrow] I have 100 pounds of sand waiting, 60 lbs dead / 40 lbs
live. I have 45 pounds of base rock and plan on ordering 45/50 of live rock from
Walt smith. I'm using RO/DI water [90 gallons in containers that has been ageing
for two weeks with power heads and air stone in each].
I have a pro clear 150 wet and dry filter [bio balls] with built in
skimmer. should I leave the bio balls in while I cure my rock or just take them
out from the beginning and put some of the live rock in it's place in the [which
will be a sump] wet/dry, and cure the whole tank like that.
<Up to you. I'd leave out from the get-go>
do I need to put a light underneath if I put live rock instead of bio balls?
<I would, yes>
should I take out the plastic grating and let the rock sit on the bottom of the
wet/dry or sit the rock on the grating?
<Either way>
The guy at my LFS also sold me a phos reactor with a can of Phosban [150g ] do
I need to use this for phosphates or should I use it with different media like
carbon or something else?
<... up to you>
should I hook the phos reactor up at start up of my tank or wait a while and
with what media? I have more questions But don't want to take up too much of
your time, you guy's/girl's are loaded up as it is with this stuff.
<Set up w/o and run for a while...>
I really appreciate all you do for us newbie's and advance fish keeper's
and I'm hooked on your site!!
Thanks for all / any help you can give
John
<More fun to come! Bob Fenner>
Wet-dry to refugium conversion 5/28/06
Is it possible to convert a wet/dry trickle filter (the ones with bio balls)
to a refugium without doing plumbing or drilling?
<Yes>
I have been reading for hours on your site, I can't seem to find a picture or
drawing of my filter.
Thank you for such information,
Julie
<An "over the side" intake (that will have to be primed/filled with water) can
be fitted to an external pump intake, or a submersible pump used to return water
to the main tank... The "compartmentalization of the insides", choices of
components, lay-out are up to you. Bob Fenner>
- Refugium vs. wet dry filter 6/25/06 -
Good Morning! <Good morning.> Thank you for providing all this wonderful
information. This site and your books have saved me a lot of headache. However,
despite all of the reading I have done I still have a question I can not seem to
find a clear answer on. I currently have a 30 gal reef and fish tank set up in
our small apartment. I currently have the system running on a12 gal trickle/
bioball sump (wet/ dry filter/ (Pro Clear Aquatic System). The tank has been
running for about two years now and every thing is in check except the
nitrate. I have decided to put in a refugium to help solve this problem in
addition to all the other benefits the refugium seems to offer. To make a long
story short, instead of drilling and changing the sump to convert (Husband did
not like that idea, and I am going to pick my battles) I ordered a 12 gal
refugium. Do you think I should keep the wet dry running along with the refugium
or do you think the refugium is enough? <If you have room, I'd keep them both
running until the refugium is really kicking, otherwise you may go some time
without biological filtration.> If I kept both should I have the tank water run
into the wet/dry first or the refugium? <Probably wet/dry first.>
Thank,
Carrie
<Cheers, J -- >
Filters...Wet/Dry To Ecosystem 8/3/06
Greetings and thanks for all of the great info.
<You're welcome, Paul.>
After an exhaustive search I am unable to find any info on this question. I have
a 90 Gallon tank with appropriately sized wet/dry filter (my mistake) with
skimmer and I can not
seem to get my nitrates down, currently 20ppm. I am changing 20 percent of the
water every two weeks. Inhabitants include Hepatus Tang, 6 Green
Chromis, Lawnmower Blenny, Royal Gramma, Cleaner Shrimp and False Perc Clown.
Mushrooms, Xenia, Green Starbursts round out the crowd which all seem
to be doing well presently. I have 90 lbs live rock and a shallow sand bed.
When I started this venture I intended FOWLR but now want to establish a reef.
Tell me if this plan sounds ok. I intend to remove the wet/dry using
the bioballs from it in the Ecosystem filter in place of the ones that it comes
with.
<No need to do this. Would not use any bioballs in the Ecosystem. See comment
below.>
I will have new water premixed to replace the content of the wet dry taken out
at the change. At this point the skimmer will obliviously be
gone also. Am I likely to have an ammonia problem with this approach?
<Should not.>
Am I missing something that will harm my friends?
<If you have no live rock, then you should use the old bio-balls until the
Ecosystem gets seeded, then I'd remove them.>
I have read that an undersized skimmer is appropriate to use with this system
and I am considering an Aqua C Remora.
<Would be a good choice. You may also consider one of the Ecosystems with built
in protein skimming.>
Your hard work on this site is greatly appreciated.
<Thank you, James (Salty Dog)>
Paul Powell
-Wet dry to Refugium- 8/28/06
Hi there;
< Evening>
New to this site and have been looking into changing my wet/dry over to a
refugium. I have a 75 gallon tank with about a 20 gallon sump which houses the
bio balls (I know get rid of them) and a protein skimmer.
<You do not "have " to remove them, depending on your bioload and maintenance
regimen of water changes, a wet dry can be a very good filter, just becomes a
nitrate factory and most tanks have that issue as it is :)>
I have two options that I am looking at here.
Option one is to take a 20 Gallon long tank, have the overflow from the main
tank drain into a compartment with live rock, then baffle the tank from there to
allow the water to flow into the DSB and fauna area then pump back to the main
tank. I am concerned about this method though because I will have to really slow
down the return volume to the main tank to allow the water "dwell" time in the
fuge. I thought that a slower water turnover back to the main tank would affect
the dissolved oxygen level of the main tank and affect the health of my corals,
or would this be a mute point because of the "oxygen" added by the fuge to the
water?
<This method works, and while the flow isn't conducive to tons of copepods and
other micro fauna going crazy in the higher flow; It will certainly work. If
you want an all in one option this works, and works well, Vie seen a rate of
flow at 500gph through an 18" long sump setup similar, and it runs my friends
reef and puffer tank which both share a sump just fine. Your concern for
oxygenation is unfounded as well if your skimmer is decent. a good skimmer will
saturate your return water with oxygen and is one of the best gas exchange areas
for its total footprint.>
Option two is to keep the current sump in place which houses the wet/dry and add
another 10 gallon tank under the stand and make that into the refugium. If I go
this route I would split the overflow from the main tank have an open flow to
the sump (wet/dry) and a valve on the flow to the refugium so that I can control
the water turnover in the fuge. I will run the return of the fuge back to the
sump with the wet dry, for return back to the tank.
<This is the method described here on WWM, and one that I know works very well,
I think if you can make it leak proof and ensure you know the max GPH you plan
to use in the refugium is enough to keep the wet dry siphon working if it uses
an overflow type box, or a reliable tank driller to cut you an overflow hole in
the tank. It will guarantee your flow is higher through the sump, and can be
fine tuned in the refugium. Use a t inside down, to ensure that your flow isn't
totally bypassing your refugium and you should be a very happy aquarist.>
I really would like to go with option one but my concern is the rate of water
return to the main tank being too slow.
Can you please let me know which you think would work best.
Thanks for your help and you guys have a great site here.
<You do as well, I hope that helped.>
<Justin>
Wet/Dry Conversion - 09/29/06
I have been reading the articles on WetWebMedia about removing the bio-balls
for wet-dry filters.
<<Okay>>
I'm in the process of removing mine and replacing the space with live rock.
<<Cool>>
The water runs over the live rock; will this work or should all the live rock be
under water?
<<Mmm, I would place the live rock in the bottom of the filter where it remains
submerged...use the spray/drip tower for chemical media (carbon/Poly-Filter
pads)>>
Right now I have the wet dry area split into two parts (side by side). One half
bio-balls the other half live rock. My aquarium has been setup for only 4
weeks.
<<This tank is still cycling? You can go ahead and remove/replace all the
plastic media now...no need to do this in stages as you would on an
established/stocked system>>
29 gallon aquarium
20 lbs of live rock in aquarium (I will be adding more)
8 lbs of live rock in the wet/dry filter
Protein skimmer
Water changes over in the aquarium about 12 times an hour.
Thanks,
Jackie
<<Regards, EricR>>
Should I switch my Wet/Dry with a Refugium? 9/19/06
Bob,
<Chris>
I just want to start out by telling you how helpful your website is,
I visit it on a regular basis to keep up on all things
saltwater. My question is in regards to setting up a refugium. My
current filtration includes a Top Fathom Protein Skimmer TF110A and
a Jebo Wet/Dry filter that measures 24x12 (it doesn't have the
filter balls it has what looks like strips of shredded paper). I
recently downgraded from a 150 gallon tank to a 54 gallon corner
tank and haven't had any major problems except that I am have a
hard time keeping the nitrates where they need to be. My question
to you would be would you get rid of the wet/dry and have a refugium
only would or would you have both running.
<If only one choice, the refugium, if two, both>
I really like the idea of the refugium being a place that natural
food can grow and flow into my display tank for all of the fish and
coral and just wanted to check with you to see what you thought the
best option would be. Also in regards to the contents of the
refugium. I was thinking about placing a large quantity of small
pieces of liverock, live sand, and several types of plants for
filtration purposes. Is this what you would use or do you have
other suggestions. Lastly what type of lighting would you use and
would you have it on 24/7 or an opposite cycle of the display
tank. Thanks a million
Chris Johnson
<You're sure to enjoy yourself, and gain by reading here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm
the fourth "paragraph" down... articles and accumulated FAQs files
on... Refugiums. Bob Fenner>
Wet/dries for 300g+ commercial installation 1/24/04
I work in the aquarium svc business, at this point mostly with 4' & 6'
glass fish-only aquariums using wet/dries, and decorated with coral
skeletons/shells & artificial decorations. We
generally make our own wet/dries from 20 & 29 gallon aquariums
using PVC, eggcrate & bio-balls. We have had good
success using one Mag 5 or similar pump per standard overflow (All-Glass
"Reef Ready"
tanks) and with a sump capacity that is about 20% of the size of the tank (so
that evaporation doesn't become much of an issue).
<All sounds quite appropriate.>
We're preparing to handle sales and maintenance of 300-600 gallon
acrylic systems, and I'd like your input on a couple of things:
a) Should we still stick with 20% size wet/dries? It appears that our competition
is using smaller ones (re: less expensive), but we haven't maintained
any of the systems they installed so we're not sure how well this
works.
<I would consider 20% a minimum. My greatest concern would be that
the sump can handle the volume of water that will flow into it if a pump
stops. As a general rule, I suggest the largest sump that is
practical.>
b) Can you recommend a source of inexpensive rigid-sided rectangular tanks (made
from plastic?) that we might use instead of glass aquariums to construct the
wet/dries? If we stay with our current wet/dry design and just enlarge
it, in most installations we will probably be looking to make
wet/dries with dimensions similar to 75 & 125 gallon
aquariums. (Anticipating that in some
installations the wet/dries will still need to fit under the tank in a stand.)
<Several types of water holding vessels come to mind, including fiberglass,
acrylic aquariums, polyethylene tanks (often used in the back of
trucks). An internet search using key words like "water
tank" combined with poly, polyethylene, fiberglass, etc., should yield a
good starting point of hits.>
c) Any input you can provide concerning the various acrylic tank makers would be
helpful.
<I can't really be of much help here in terms of specifics. The
"big boys" of the industry (Tenecor, Sea-Clear, etc.) haven't gotten
there by chance. Just stick with well known
companies. FWIW, your acrylic tank supplier is a great place to check
with for sumps. Adam>
- DIY Wet/Dry -
Hello Crew!
I just recently found your site and have been having a great time surfing
through it. I am having trouble finding an answer to my questions
though.
I am a BIG advocate to DIY and I am planning to build my own acrylic aquarium,
it will be 6' X 2' X 2' or 2.5' high. Which comes to 180 to 220
gallons. Building the tank itself isn't the problem though, since I
have worked with acrylic before, just not in building aquariums.
I want to also build my own wet/dry system and that is where I have the
questions.
I don't have any place for a sump, since I also built the stand myself (I can't
seem to stop building [smile] ) out of oak and I made so my 75 gallon sits
below. I'm thinking of making a built in system, perhaps like the
commercial versions? I'm considering actually hanging it on the
outside of the tank to save room, since I am also going to build a custom
background out of foam, epoxy, and sand (I did this in a 175 I had to sell when
I moved).
How much bio-media do I actually need and are some systems better than others?
<No preset amount - perhaps as much as you can fit - there is no ideal design
for a wet/dry that I am aware of.> For example, would I be better off with a
series of bio-wheels (I've got an idea how to make these as well, hah, hah)
instead of bio-balls? <Probably six of one, half a dozen of the other - no
clear advantage of one over the other.> If so, how much would be needed?
<As much as possible.> I have several ideas on HOW to do it, I just don't
know how MUCH I will need! <Go nuts.>
Obviously you need some details. It will be freshwater system with
Cichlids, mostly Africans. <Wet/dry may not be your best option then -
wet/dry filters are very, very efficient at producing nitrates... potentially
more than will allow your fish to stay healthy. You might want to consider other
filtration options.> I also already happen to have a Rio 2500 sub pump, which
I hope will be big enough, as well as several Penguin 1100 powerheads as well. I
am trying to figure out the most efficient and easy to maintain system as
possible. <Might be efficient, but perhaps not easy - I see a lot of water
changes in your future.> That is why I wish to utilize a trickle system.
<Consider perhaps something where the bio-media that you choose is submerged
100% of the time, skip the wet/dry action.>
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, thank you, <Well... if you
figuratively pay yourself for your time, you may find you could have just bought
all the right pieces off the shelf... am always alarmed by folks who want to
build their own tanks - do not skimp on materials or figure that one thickness
less than what is recommended will do. More than all that - good luck.>
Jim
<Cheers, J -- >
Live Rock vs. Bio Balls in wet/dry filter - The full Grok
Dear Bob & Crew,
<Scott F. your Crew member tonight!>
I'm hoping that you'd be able to shed some light on the highly debated issue of what filter material works best in a wet/dry filter. My system is 175 gallons with about 2" - 3" of fine grain (sugar-sized)
aragonite sand, some live rock, but it's mostly a fish tank. I use a sump with a twin pump Euro-Reef skimmer (with ozone). Tank turns over about 9X per hour.
Live Rock - The live rock proponents say to ditch bio balls and fill your wet/dry chamber with live rock fragments because bio balls create nitrate. I'm thinking, well duh, of course bio balls create nitrate as the natural result of the biological filtration process. They say that the bacteria growing inside the rock consumes nitrate. Does this only happen when the rock is submerged, or will this also be true in the oxygen rich air/water
exchange area of the wet dry? If only when submerged, would it be beneficial to ONLY pack the submerged portion of the wet dry with rock?
<Personally, I am of the opinion that denitrification will generally take place at a more significant level in rock that is submerged. For this reason, I'd use live rock as a filter adjunct in either a submerged area of my sump, or just in the display itself. I have always been a big fan of ditching all media in a "trickle filter", and just letting the live rock and sand in the display or an attached refugium do the work. Then, the sump is simply the "nerve center" of your water processing system, functioning as a place for chemical filtration media, the skimmer, etc.>
Bio Balls - The bio ball proponents site the ball's superior surface area thereby it's greater capacity for supporting bacteria makes it superior. That the only reason balls create more nitrate (if in fact they do) is because of its superior ability to process ammonia and nitrite.
<Essentially- they are so efficient at fostering bacteria that process ammonia and nitrite that the bacteria which break down nitrate simply cannot multiply fast enough to keep up>
Further, at least monthly water changes need to be performed anyway to replenish nutrients, so nitrate shouldnšt really be an issue if you keep up with your water changes.
<Nitrate can certainly be managed with frequent small water changes, use of aggressive protein skimming, chemical filtration media, etc., but natural denitrification processes are your best friend, IMO. That's one of the reasons why deep sand beds are a very popular method to help accomplish this>
What I'd like to know is: Which is more efficient at converting wastes, balls or rocks?
<Both are efficient, but live rock has an advantage, IMO, in that it is more flexible in the ways that you can utilize it...>
Will using LR in the sump lower nitrates (lower or no nitrates being preferable all things being equal)?
<It can assist in lowering nitrates..>
Any other benefits of using natural filtration media like LR (does is help buffer water for instance)? Which would you guys use and why? Is the benefit worth the conversion from balls to rock frags?
<As above, I'd be more open to the idea of going without media, and just using live rock in the display, along with a good bed of live sand...Talk about easy...And very natural!>
As always, I much appreciate your thoughts and advice!
J.D. Hill
<Hope that my thoughts are of interest to you, and that they inspire you to research this topic more thoroughly. Good luck! Regards, Scott F>
Wet Dry Conversion
>>>Greetings, Jim here<<<
First off.. great site!!! very informative. I have 180G tank, wet/dry/just
purchased the AquaC Ev240..yeah!! approx 75lb LR, small fish bioload,
Condy,
polyps (not growing). I have read to remove bioballs (nitrate factory) and foam
blocks. but here is my concern. If I remove the bio-balls it's like Niagara
falls
in the room. It's been mentioned to add sand & LR rubble to sump (how
much?),<<<That's up to you, there is no minimum or maximum but enough to dampen
the sound of the water at least<<<< wouldn't adding more live rock to main tank
do the same? <<<not if you're trying to reduce noise in the sump>>> why grow
macro algae
in sump if it can be grown in tank? (aesthetics?). <<<Pretty much, also some
species are invasive and can take over a tank<<< If I do put
sand/LR in sump,
lights on 24/7 or dark? <<<no lights needed unless you are growing macros<<<
Should I remove drip plate and extend return with PVC
w/T fitting down under sump water level so it doesn't crash down and stir up
sand? If so, what about gas exchange now? I can baffle the sump so sand
doesn't return to pump returns/skimmer. my goal is zero nitrates-efficient <<<I
would go with the baffle idea<<<
filtration/skimming b/c I want to move to corals eventually. I have read pages
upon pages
but all these little things keep popping up? I already wish I knew then what I
know now (i.e.. LFS setup). I want to do everything right for perfect
water/less maintenance...love the hobby. thanks for your help.. and this great
site!
>>>Best of luck,
Jim<<<
Converting a wet dry filter into a refugium
I am in the process of planning out a 75 gallon tank for a reef set-up. I
had it set up at one point, but moved and never got to completing the
stocking. Here I am starting from the beginning again. my question is as
follows. I have a 25 gallon wet-dry trickle filter system with bio-balls.
The system is split into 2 partitions. The overflow from the tank goes to
the filter into a drip tray with pre-filter media. Then drips into bio-ball
chamber. Then flows into 2nd partition to be pumped back into tank. What I
wanted to do was remove the bio balls. Replace the bio balls with live
bio-rock and make the first chamber into a mini refugium. Does this make
sense. << Yes, this is very common, and I encourage you to do it. >> In doing
this do I keep the drip tray to drip directly onto rock? << Either way. >>
Do I keep the pre-filter media? << I would probably take it out, since I don't
know what it is. >> I would keep the 2nd partition for the
return piece to place the skimmer. Any help is greatly appreciated. << Removing
the drip tray helps because then you can put lights on your refugium for macro
algae. Good luck. >>
Thank You
<< Blundell >>
Wet Dry Filter Conversion (Bob's go)
I am in the process of planning out a 75 gallon tank for a reef set-up. I
had it set up at one point, but moved and never got to completing the
stocking. Here I am starting from the beginning again. my question is as
follows. I have a 25 gallon wet-dry trickle filter system with bio-balls.
The system is split into 2 partitions. The overflow from the tank goes to
the filter into a drip tray with pre-filter media. Then drips into bio-ball
chamber. Then flows into 2nd partition to be pumped back into tank. What I
wanted to do was remove the bio balls. Replace the bio balls with live
bio-rock and make the first chamber into a mini refugium. Does this make
sense. In doing this do I keep the drip tray to drip directly onto rock?
<Keep the rock submersed, that is, underwater. Using the drip tray is fine
otherwise>
Do I keep the pre-filter media?
<No, give it the heave-ho>
I would keep the 2nd partition for the
return piece to place the skimmer. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank You
<Glad to proffer my opinion. Bob Fenner>
- Wet/Dry Conversion -
I am in the process of planning out a 75 gallon tank for a reef set-up. I
had it set up at one point, but moved and never got to completing the
stocking. Here I am starting from the beginning again. my question is as
follows. I have a 25 gallon wet-dry trickle filter system with bio-balls. The
system is split into 2 partitions. The overflow from the tank goes to the
filter into a drip tray with pre-filter media. Then drips into bio-ball
chamber. Then
flows into 2nd partition to be pumped back into tank. What I wanted to do was
remove the bio balls. Replace the bio balls with live bio-rock and make the
first chamber into a mini refugium. Does this make sense. <Sure.> In doing this
do I keep the drip tray to drip directly onto rock? <Probably, but you want to
make certain the rock is completely submerged, otherwise you'll still have a
wet/dry filter with a different type of media.> Do I keep the pre-filter media?
<Would be better for the refugium if it were to get raw water, so no to the
prefilter.> I would keep the 2nd partition for the return piece to place the
skimmer. Any help is greatly appreciated. <Consider also the possibility of
just using another, smaller tank and just toss the entire wet/dry... their
design is such that they don't always convert well to other uses.>
Thank You
<Cheers, J -- >
Converting a wet/dry into a refugium
Hello,
Excuse me if the following seems to be as though I don't know what I am
talking about. I currently have a 55 gallon fish only tank that contains 2
filters that hang off the back. I also have a 75 gallon tank. This is
where my questions are coming in. This tank is a standard 75 gallon with 1
corner built in overflow box. Under the tank (in the stand) is a filter.
This is where I may sound as though I don't know what I am talking about.
The overflow tank uses gravity to bring water into this clear rectangular
filter. It drains into the first part of the filter, into a drip tray.
This then drips onto bio balls. This then flows into another portion of the
tank which fills with the water, and is then pumped into the tank. My
question are as follows. What type of system is this. << It is a sump, and this
type is a wet/dry filter, getting its name from the bioballs which are wet and
dry. >> Is this a refugium,
is it a sump? Is this a practical set up? << I don't really think so. I think
they are quite outdated. I would take out the bioballs and fill that area with
sand and algae, making it into a refugium. >> If I am to connect a skimmer
where would it go? << Probably right where the water is coming into this filter,
before the sand and algae, and before it gets pumped back up. >> I am looking
into making this a reef tank and would like
to know what I need to get this started. Thank you in advance for your
help. << There is a ton of info on refugiums in the Invert book by Calfo and
Fenner. Also, try searching for refugiums online and I'm sure you can see lots
of pics of people doing this exact thing. Good luck! >>
Best Regards,
Jason
<< Blundell >>
Wet Dry?
Hi, your web site is great! First I have a wet dry filter with Bio balls on a
75 gallon reef tank. My nitrates are around 30 and from reading some of your
articles I guess I should take out the balls slowly. But what should I put in
there, Live rock or nothing?
<You have come to the correct conclusion... I would encourage you to remove the
bio balls. This space can be left empty or you could add live rock if you wish,
just keep it all submerged.>
If live rock should be in there should a light be on it all day or say 12 hours.
I have about 70 pounds of live rock in the tank now.
<You have plenty of rock in your display to support the tank. If you do choose
to add some to the sump, I would recommend 12-16 hrs of light on a schedule
opposite that of your display. Electricity is cheaper at night and lighting the
what will now be a refugium opposite the main tank helps stabilize pH.>
Two more questions: Do denitrator reducers work? I was thinking about getting
the coil one but heard they plug up.
<Removing the bio balls should solve your nitrate problem. Denitrators do work,
but they are fussy to maintain.>
Also how much should a protein skimmer produce in a day? Thank you much. <Just
the right amount! Seriously though, it is hard to say. It depends on the
skimmer, the stocking level of the tank and other factors. On my 92 gal tank, I
have a Euro-Reef cs6-2 skimmer that produces about a pint of dark chunky
skimmate and a thick build up in the neck every three or four days. HTH. Best
regards. AdamC>
Converting a wet/dry into a refugium
I need to get some fast advice on my current situation/problem. I
have
a 75-US gal FOWLR (only 40 lbs of live rock, currently) and wanted to
add a sump/refugium to the system. My current system is a drilled
tank
with an overflow to a Tidepool wet/dry w/ BioWheel. I was planning to
overflow the wet/dry to a 10-gal sump w/ refugium and miracle mud
(that's the biggest that will fit under the tank and it does have to go
under, can't go over) and then use the existing pump that is in the
wet/dry to get the water back up to the main tank just by simply moving
the pump into the end chamber of the 10-gal sump. Well, after looking
at the diagrams of how my overflow box works that I purchased to bridge
the wet/dry to the sump, I realized that the one that I bought won't
work b/c it won't reach to the operating water line of the wet/dry. So,
how do I get water from my wet/dry to the sump tank? Or can I convert
the wet/dry open area into a refugium? << Yes, it is very common. Many
people remove the bioballs and just fill that area with live rock and macro
algae. Then add a light on top of it, and you are done. >> I
would rather have the 10-gal
sump b/c it has more volume of water than the wet/dry (which only has
about 5 gal in the open area at operating level). If I can't use the
10-gal sump, then do I need to put dividers into the wet/dry? << Most wet
dry have dividers in them already, but if not, then yes you would want to do so
to prevent sand and debris from getting into the pump. >> I
would
think that if it was used open without any dividers, the miracle mudwould be stirred up too much. Any help on this would be a tremendous
help! << Well with live rock in there I wouldn't worry about the mud
stirring up. You can always use a drip plate, which I think most
wet/dry's come with. >>
<< Blundell >>
Wet/Dry question 3/22/05
Okay, about a month ago I bought a 90 gallon tank from a guy who had it up and running for about 3 years. He has a wet/dry filter attached and protein skimmer. The wet/dry filter has the bio balls and I've been checking all my levels since moving it and they are all great except the nitrates! Sky high!!! Surprise, surprise!
<This is quite a classic situation!>
Plus starting to get the brown algae and red algae problems. From your site, I've been reading that the bio balls are the problem. So, if I want to go the route that's less maintenance as far as water changes go...... how do I get rid of the bio balls and what do I do instead? Do you get rid of them slowly or yank them all out and then put whatever else in there?? I'm willing to do whatever, but am overwhelmed with all what I'm reading and need some personal direction. Any information would be absolutely wonderful!! Oh, by the way, its a fish only tank. Thanks so
much! Kim
<You will need to replace the biological filtration somehow. My suggestion would be with live rock. After the live rock is cycled and added to the tank, you can begin removing the bioballs at a rate of about 20% per week until they are gone. This will give the live rock time to "pick up the slack". Maintaining alkalinity and calcium at normal levels will also help control the algae, especially in the presence of live rock. Good luck!
AdamC.>
Wet/Dry Filter question follow up 3/30/05
Oh, one more question. How do I tell how much live rock I need?
<The general rule is 1-2lb per gallon of tank volume, but I prefer to say about 1/3 of the volume. Better quality rock like Kaelini or Marshall Islands is more porous (so you need less) than Fiji or Caribbean.>
Just what will fit in the wet/dry filter? And, my wet/dry has three compartments. Do they all get rock? Or, just where the bioballs go?? Sorry, and thanks!!
<I would actually put the rock in the display rather than in the sump. It doesn't matter where in the system the rock is placed, it will function the same, so you might as well get the
aesthetic benefit of having it in the tank. The wet/dry can be converted to an empty sump, refugium, etc. Best Regards!
AdamC.>
Knocking Out Nitrates!
Hi there WWM Crew.
<Hey there! Scott F. here today!>
Hope you don't mind, but I have a question, despite reading so many of the articles concerning wet/dry filters.
<That's what the site is all about! Ask away!>
I have a 55 gallon tank, with an A-Miracle hang-on wet/dry trickle filter. I'm also using a Whisper dual cartridge filter with carbon. The tank has about 20 lbs of live rock, and the inhabitants (Red Coris Wrasse, Coral Beauty, Algae Blenny, Sebae Clown and a Yellow Tang, with a few snails and a Feather Duster, with some paintbrush macro-algae) all seem to be doing quite
well.
<Good to hear!>
I see so many references to the wet/dry filters producing nitrates, but my nitrates are about 20 ppm and have been at that level for about 6 months. My local fish store tested the water for phosphates and told me nothing to
worry about. Yet, I keep getting green algae blooms and I'm going crazy trying to clean the tank every week or so.
<Well, wet/dry filters excel at removing ammonia and nitrite, but they do little to keep up with and reduce nitrate, the "end product" of biological filtration. Nitrates and phosphates are a big source of nuisance algae blooms. In a tank with established nutrient export systems (i.e. deep sand beds, etc.), you should
achieve nearly undetectable levels of nitrate.>
Lighting is a total of 260 watts (2 x 55 watt blue actinics, one 50/50 40 watt, and 2x 55 watt 10000k bulbs). Initially, I was keeping the lights on about 10 - 12 hours per day. For the past couple of months, I have been keeping them on no more than 6 -8 hours per day, and still, green algae all over.
<Well, light in and of itself is not the cause of nuisance algae. Light and available nutrients are the contributors.>
Would it help to clean the bio balls at this stage (the wet/dry has been up and running well over a year.
<I'd consider ditching the bioballs all together, and just relying on a deep sand bed, live rock, chemical filtration media, (activated carbon/Poly Filter) aggressive protein skimming, quality source water, and frequent small water changes to do the job.>
The built in skimmer rarely works.
<A reliable, productive skimmer really helps. It is your first line of defense against accumulations of dissolved organics. Do consider upgrading to a skimmer that really does the job.>
I use at least 2 filter pads at all times, and I either change one and rinse the other every week, or rinse both weekly.
<Good practice.>
Still green algae blooms. What if I remove the bio balls entirely, and replace them with a good amount of activated carbon?
<I wouldn't use carbon "in place of" bioballs. Rather; I'd use it in addition to any other filtration media/method.>
Would I be better off removing the wet/dry entirely and going with a canister filter and better skimmer?
<Just a better skimmer!>
Or can I simply help solve the problem by pre-treating new water when I do my weekly 10 - 15 % changes, by using a phosphate remover before adding the new water to the tank?
<These are definitely helpful practices, but should be used in conjunction with other techniques.>
Thanks so much for your help. I'm pulling my hair out with this, and I really don't want to go bald (I'm running out of time).
<Hang in there! Try some of the ideas that I outlined here. Do a little research here on the WWM site and you'll find a wealth of information on this topic! Good luck! Regards, Scott F.>
Thank you so much for the comments. So far, the Urchin is doing a good job!
It's been in for a little over 24 hrs. and about 1/4 of the cup is full.
<Ah, good>
Please recommend which container(s) I should be considering so I can at least keep my eyes open for a 'good deal'.
<Most anything of size... even "totes" made of polyethylene... these are mentioned over and over on WWM>
Although I don't believe I can trade mine in, I could always put it up for sale on 'craigslist' or
something like that. In fact, that's where I got the Urchin for $95. Quite a savings, I thought.
<Yes>
I appreciate your responses so much. I know you must have a ton of email everyday from people like me
<Luckily not too much... a small part of one percent of the tens of thousands of people who peruse the site write in>
and I feel very fortunate that you have so kindly taken the time to respond to my questions. I will try not to take up
any more of your time unless absolutely necessary!
<No worries. I look forward to this interaction. Bob Fenner>
Conversion of Wet/dry Trickle Filter into a Refugium and Sump
Gentlemen Greetings again - and Thank You. Its amazing how much progress I have made reading the FAQs/articles and
following your advice (My fiancée thinks I am genius).
<Perhaps you are>
As I mentioned previously, I am setting up a 60 gallon FOWLR with 75lbs of Live Rock and 60lbs of Live Sand. I will be using a EuroReef CS1 skimmer,
a Rena Filstar XP2 canister filter (chemical & mechanical) and a sump/refugium with a DSB. I will not have a DSB in my main tank because
I believe with only 60 gallons I will be to taking too much space from the fish and live rock (Don't laugh!). I will be using about 1-2 inches of Live
Sand in the main (an article in FAMA stated that most denitrification occurs in the
first couple of inches - my goal here is aesthetic) Water will come into the refugium/sump from the main tank using an overflow box and a drip plate
in the wet dry. My goal of having the refugium with a DSB is mainly nitrate reduction.
I would like to convert my wet dry to a refugium (for algae) using a DSB and a sump (to place my Euro Reef and heater). I will be using a
AMiracle Maxi-Reef 200 trickle down filter witch has a 12X12 sump area. I would like
my DSB to be where the bio balls were originally and I would like to place some Live
Rock there. My DSB and main tank sand will be CaribSea Fiji Pink Aragalive and m y
return pump will be external and attached to my sump.
My concerns are the following
1) Since the Wet Dry has a wall between the biological area and the sump (and a small opening) I would be restricting the flow of water to my skimmer and
return pump . Do I have reason for concern - any ideas?
<This wall can be modified... cut, drilled if this proves problematic.>
2) Even though I will be using the foam filter in the opening between the biological area and the sump I am concerned that sand will come
into contact with the skimmer and return pump. Any advice on this?
<Not likely an issue... again, a modification/dam can be inserted if need be>
3) Do I need a plenum for the DSB and if so what is the best type to use for this purpose?
<No need for a plenum>
4) Can I get away with a 4 inch DSB? I plan to use 65 lbs of LR in the main and 10lbs in the refugium - is this a good ratio? Any advice on a better way
of creating a DSB in the biological area?
<This will work>
5) Finally, as you have advised I am using a skimmer and powerheads for circulation for curing my Live Rock. Should I be also using a filter for
mechanical (foam) with chemical (carbon) or is it unnecessary?
<I would use these if you have them>
A couple of emails ago Bob blessed the general concept of my sump/refugium but I don't think I gave that much detail about the setup and some of my
perceived concerns.
Thanks again - My future fish also thank you.
<Thank you for sharing. Bob Fenner>
Modified Wet-Dry
Hello again, Bob.
Thank you for the quick response to my original email. The advice was well-taken and much appreciated. The Mag-Drive 7 works fine as you
predicted!
<Ah, good>
I have now purchased an AquaC Urchin w/MaxiJet 1200 pump. But it won't fit into my sump where the old protein skimmer existed. The area of the foot
where the pump housing attaches makes it just about an inch too wide. I have removed the last of the bio-balls out of the center chamber (there are
three chambers - the sump, the bio-ball area, and the return water area) which left only the plastic tray with filter media on top.
I completely removed the tray and filter media, and put the Urchin in there where it fit
easily. I don't think this should be a problem because I still have filter media in the bottom of the overflow in the display tank so in essence, the
water is still being filtered prior to going into the sump and protein skimmer.
Also, I added a small egg crate piece between the original sump area and the Urchin (that just fit into the grooves where the plastic tray
sat) and placed a small piece of filter on it. I've hung the bag of activated charcoal over the plastic that divides the first two chambers.
It's almost directly in front of where the drain hose from the overflow dumps into the sump so there's good water pressure there.
The lid to cover this area doesn't fit now though (Urchin is too tall) so I am going to have
to devise something to keep the water from evaporating too quickly. So, I was just wondering, do you think this setup work out okay?
<Hard to visualize (am still a bit sleepy), but a couple things... I take it the second chamber where the skimmer resides has a "wall" to keep the water depth constant... a good idea for function's sake... and do take care that the carbon filter bag is secure, lest it block the outgoing pipe. A top for the previous wet-dry can likely best be made by visiting a "plastic shop" (look in your Yellow Pages), searching through their scrap bin for a suitable piece of sheet, and cutting it (tape over the areas, draw the lines with a pen...) with simple hand and power tools. Bob Fenner> |
Re: Modified Wet-Dry
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the quick response. I guess it IS hard to imagine, so I've
attached a picture of the filter in its original form and will describe
how
it was, and how it is now.
<Ah, good>
It's hard to tell by the picture (because the white top cover is on it),
but
the acrylic divider separating chamber 1 and 2 only comes up as high as
the
bottom of the PVC pipe.
<Yes>
The 2nd chamber is the largest. It has two
removable trays - one holding up the bio-balls, the other holding the
filter
media.
The acrylic divider separating chamber 2 and 3 does not go all the
way to the BOTTOM of the sump.
<Yes... unfortunate... The first chamber, were it larger, would be
better to situate your skimmer (for constant water height mostly), or
the second chamber, if the overflow were at the TOP>
It ends at the top of that white sponge that
you see on the bottom. Basically, I've removed the skimmer, both trays,
all
media and the big white sponge - everything that wasn't glued
down. Now,
the only thing in chamber 1 is the bag of charcoal draped over the
divider
(about 2" away from the pipe opening); (I think if the bag should fall
off,
it will fall to the bottom of chamber 1).
<Okay>
The water in chamber 1 flows over
and through the charcoal bag and into chamber 2. Chamber 2 has the
Urchin
flush against the acrylic wall dividing the 2nd and 3rd chamber. But
the
Urchin towers over the top of the filter unit by about 5 ".
<This is okay>
The water in
chamber 2 comes approx half way up the length of the Urchin. Well past
the
MaxiJet.
<Do be "religious" re water volume in your system... to assure that this
level stays about such...>
The water from chamber 2 flows into chamber 3 through the bottom
where the acrylic divider ends (where the white sponge was). From
there,
gets returned to the display tank by the return pump. Clear as mud,
right?
<Not... is crystal clear now, thank you>
LOL. Am I correct in believing that it doesn't matter whether the
protein
skimmer is in the first or second chamber?
<Mmm, actually... would be better, as remarked, if it were in a part of
your sump that had constant, higher water height... as you'll find...
for skimmer function>
Thanks for the suggestion for a new cover. I know of a couple of
plastic
stores in the area so I'll check it out.
<Real good, and not to toss a sliding spanner into your works here, but
I do wish (and can conceive of this next...) we could go back, trade in
this modified wet-dry and start with another larger, more flexible
container...>
I appreciate all your help!
Best regards,
Diane
<Glad to share. Bob Fenner> |
|
 |
Wet Dry Filter Modification - 08/17/05
Dear Sirs,
<<No need to be so formal (and, a few "Madams" here as well)... EricR at your
service.>>
First time using and visiting your web site but it seems very informative.
<<Seems so to me too <G>.>>
I have a Life Reef LF2-300 Wet Dry Filtration System (Twin Towers), with Calcium
Reactor/C02 Monitored and Controlled, Protein Skimmer, 57 Watt UV Sterilizer and
External Canister Filter (For Carbon), used on a 180 Gallon Tank with Metal
Halide and fluorescent lighting. The tank currently has a 2" layer of coral
sand <<Mmm...would consider reducing this to less than 1", or increasing to more
than 4".>>, some...very little live rock and a dozen various small fish.
<<No idea what "various" might be...>>
I have come to the conclusion (visible brown algae) that I would like to modify
my Wet/Dry Filter due to nitrate concerns. I was wondering if it would be an
improvement to add LS about 4 inches to the bottom of the sump area and slowly
remove about half the bio balls in each tower over a few weeks?
<<Maybe, but you haven't given me much info to go on (actual fish load, nitrate
levels). Wet/Dry filters usually work very well for FO/FOWLR systems (rapid
response <higher oxygen levels> to increasing bio-load/over-feeding) where a
higher residual nitrate level is tolerated (around 20ppm).>>
The filter is 41 inches long and 13 inches wide. The sump area
below the towers looks like it would support about 3 to 4 inches of sand. I was
thinking that doing this might give me the best of both worlds, the ammonia to
nitrate efficiency of the wet dry, but tone it down a little with half the bio
balls, and also give me the de-nitrification benefits of the living sand to off
set the efficiency of the Wet/Dry.
<<Okay, think about that last sentence...all a bit self-defeating, don't you
think?>>
Could a set up using a moderate amount of bio balls in a wet dry with a 2" Coral
Sand substrate and ample living rock in the tank with a bed of LS in the sump of
the Wet/Dry work?
<<Mmm, if your nitrates are truly high in this system (30+ppm)...firstly, look
at your feeding habits, water flow, etc....if these are in alignment, I would
suggest adding the 4" sugar-fine sand substrate to the sump and removing ALL the
bio-balls (one tower one week, the second tower the next).>>
I know that I also need to improve my circulation, and increase my
water changes while watching the feeding amount.
<<Ah good...you already know then...>>
And I plan to increase the living rock content to an appropriate amount.
<<Be sure to maintain good water circulation "all around" the rock.>>
But I want to also fix my filter that I know believe has/will become a nitrate
factory.
<<Do consider my suggestions/food for thought...then "modify away" if you deem
necessary.>>
Your insight would be appreciated.
Regards,
James
Wet-dry to sump change 11/3/05
Hi WWM Crew. I have been looking through your site regarding the use of bioballs, and I have subsequently decided to get rid of mine due to super high nitrate levels that are not being controlled by water changes, but I have a few questions. I have a 110 gallon tall tank that is drilled with an overflow and wet-dry. There are 100 lbs of live sand in the tank as well as what has to be close to 100 or more lbs of live rock (but I am not completely sure, as I have accumulated it over the years). The live sand was put in approximately 1 month ago when I switched from a 75 gallon tank to the 110 (I think it is between 3-4 inches in depth, as it is a 110 tall).
The wet-dry contains bio-balls in the left compartment (intake from the tank), and the right compartment contains a CRAPPY JEBO skimmer that came with the tank as well as the return pump to the tank. I am getting a new, better skimmer--either an Aqua C EV 120 or a Euro-Reef CS6-2. I was told that the Euro-Reef is a better, easier to work with skimmer, but this will not fit in the right compartment of the sump with the return pump; the Aqua C would fit in this space (but is supposedly not as good of a skimmer and harder to adjust).
My question is this: Should I remove the bio-balls from the left sump compartment and replace them with the Euro-Reef skimmer, and then either add some live rock to this compartment or the right compartment with the return pump (or add no more live-rock, as there would likely not be a light on this)? or put the Aqua C skimmer in the right compartment with the return pump and replace the bio-balls with live rock in the left compartment (again, there would probably not be any light on the rock).
<Either will work. Am partial to using whichever compartment is easier to maintain a more or less constant water level in>
If it is a better idea to get the better skimmer and put it in the left compartment where the bio-balls currently are, will there be a problem if I add some live rock to this compartment around the skimmer?
<Likely not>
or would it be a problem to add the live rock to the compartment with the return pump (not sure if there will be a lot of crud from the live rock that would get sucked into the pump and returned into the tank, as it is an open compartment with no other barriers?)
Of note, the tank currently holds a snowflake eel (he's medium size and has grown VERY slowly over the past 7 years--gets fed once per week), ~4 in yellow tang, ~3 in blue tang, ~4-5 in maroon clown, ~3 in flame angel, a bubble tip anemone and some snails. I also plan to add 1-2 short spine urchins, a bunch of small hermits and
Nassarius snails for clean-up, and maybe 1-2 cleaner shrimp (from what I have read on your site and seen from my eel, I don't think he will eat these).
<Likely will in time>
Some of the snails have been dying, presumably from the high nitrates, and I don't want to lose the anemone, which is currently looking great. Given that you have much more experience than I do, please let me know what you would likely do. Thank you so much for your time and the great website.
~Jocelyn Blake
<Welcome. Bob Fenner>
Converting A Wet/Dry - 01/02/06
I know that you get this all the time but here goes...you folks are to be
commended on your insight and help that you provide to amateurs like me.
<<Yeah, but we still like to hear it <grin>. But seriously, we're here because
we want to be here...to help...to make a difference...>>
I realize I am probably being redundant but here goes, I have a Coralife 75
Wet/Dry system on a 65 gallon tank.
<<Mmm...can't find any info on this...only thing close I found is a Pro Clear
Aquatics Pro Series 75 Wet Dry Filter like this one:
http://www.petco.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=946230&cm_ven=lnk&cm_cat=82&cm_pla=946230&cm_ite=946230&SiteID=rhg4V7cAWWM-S0gU8kvgc4SrDgRMn1Dkaw&CMReferringUrl=&CMReferringUrl=
>>
It is divided into 3 compartments and I was thinking about converting it into a
sump.
<<Ok>>
I realize I will have to upgrade the present skimmer that came with the system,
that is a given, but my question is would I put the rock into the center
section?
<<Should work fine, yes.>>
My tank is over 8 years old and is not drilled and not reef ready by today's
standards. It has a catch basin in the tank that pulls to an outside catch tank
that is then fed down into the wet/dry.
<<Ah, the standard siphon overflow...>>
Also would it be better to get an outside pump to pull the water back into the
tank?
<<Not sure I follow...but a submersible pump in the last compartment of the sump
to "pump water TO the tank" is a good/reliable method.>>
I realize that I will have to move the heater down into the lower area and since
this is an 8+ year old system would it really be cheaper to take another tack?
<<Cheaper?...I doubt it.>>
If so, what? You folks are way cool in the advise that you give and if there is
something that I missed in your notes please feel free to point me in that
direction.
<<If you haven't been here there should be some info about converting your
filter to a sump: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/wetdryfaqs.htm And
more good info here as well: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/sumprffiltfaqs.htm Be
sure to follow the indices in blue at the top of the pages.>>
Carol
<<Regards, EricR>>
Trickle filters
I have a trickle filter set-up on my 72 gallon tank. My nitrates are always high and I have read several articles about how these filters are notorious for this. What do I do now that I have invested in this expensive set-up?
<If you have enough liverock (approximately 70 pounds) and you have a medium fish load (not groupers, lionfish, eels or other big messy eaters) you can slowly remove the wet/dry media.>
Should I add some live rock to the sump?
<That would be helpful.>
Thank you, Mark
<There is much more written on this subject at our website www.WetWebMedia.com -Steven Pro>
Help! (Tossed the nitrate generating mechanical media in the wet dry...)
bob, Steve, Anthony, Jason!, little error just made, I had discussed my nitrates
with you guys (mainly Anthony and Steve), I have a well stocked 130g tank,160
pounds of live rockiness tang, queen angel, blue tang, red Coris
wrasse, lionfish (all 4 inchers), Picasso trigger, tomato clown (2 inchers) and a
snowflake eel (7 inch), I have a good skimmer, and a wet/dry, the tank is around
8 months old, all fine except for the nitrates, I mentioned that I had a large
floss on top of the bio balls in the sump which I was told never to
change not by you guys), Steve mentioned he didn't like having this in the main
section of the wet/dry, in the first tray I have floss which I change
regularly, and rotate weekly a phosphate pad and carbon, I just did a 20g water
change, and removed the floss I had over the balls, now my tank is a milky
cloud, an obvious bacteria bloom which I kind of was hoping wouldn't happen, you
thoughts on what to expect now?, should I worry?, anything I should prepare
for?, thanks guys, I appreciate it.....riot....
<This too shall clear... as a matter of fact, what is going on is a sort of "changing of the guard" and your system will be cleaner, and much less nitrate-plagued soon... I'd just do your regular maintenance and wait. Bob Fenner>
Re: help! (Wet dry to sump to refugium to?)
thanks bob, if in my situation, what would you do as for filtration?, keep the
main tray with floss and carbons, and leave the bio balls in the main
section?, remove the bio balls and replace with something else?, I highly
respect your opinions, your site is the best on the net, hands down.....
<I would remove the bio-balls and any other wet-dry or mechanical media here... and convert this "box" to a sump... in the way of a refugium if you have the interest. Please read here: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/refugium.htm and the associated FAQs files (there's a bunch!). Bob Fenner>
Wet Dry Nitrate Factories?
Hello Bob,
I need some education regarding wet dry filters being nitrate factories
but first the setup...
140 gal FOWLR with wet dry filter
Aquaclear skimmer
~100 LBS live rock
Inhabitants are an Emperor angel, Maroon Clown, Pacific Blue Tang, Convict
Tang, Sailfin Tang, Scissortail Goby, Lawnmower Blenny, 2 neon gobies, plus
some number of red tip hermits and turbo snails. This tank has been running
for about a year. For maintenance I do a 20 gallon water change every 2 - 3
weeks and change the filter fiber, clean the skimmer etc. while doing the
water change. My nitrate levels have always remained well below 10 ppm (I
use the FasTest kit which has a lowest reading of 10ppm.)
<Good maintenance, live rock... careful feeding...>
>From what I have read from various sources, I should be pulling out my bio
balls because the huge amounts of aerobic nitrifying bacteria growing on bio
balls should be cranking out nitrate like crazy given the load on this tank.
I'm struggling with this concept since it has always been my belief that
the number of bacteria present is dependent on how much ammonia/nitrite is
being produced.
<One principal factor... as is a relative availability of aerobic, hypoxic, anaerobic space... detritus, circulation, types of foods...>
If this is the case how would a wet dry system produce more
nitrate than other types of filtration?
<"Driving" the "forward" reaction of nitrification over its reciprocal complement (denitrification)... you may well have a relatively uncommon situation of "good" mix of livestock, feeding, upkeep, live rock, substrate... If you're satisfied with the under 10 ppm. nitrate readings in such a FOWLR system (I would be), then I wouldn't change much>
Is it really just a maintenance
issue of detritus collecting on the bioballs over time?
<These possibly, and other major to minor inputs>
If you could either
explain to me or point me to any information (books, articles, etc.)
explaining how a wet dry filter can produce more nitrate than other filter
systems I would greatly appreciate it?
<... perhaps better to encourage you to do experiments... increasing the feeding, trying more frequent water changes... The energetics of the reaction series that yield more/less nitrate accumulation are straightforward... if there is more source material (ammonia, nitrite), less aerobic activity and/or more anaerobic digestion... the equation/balance of accumulated metabolites will/does shift from higher/lower. Do you want specific reference as in articles on biological filtration? What books, magazines do you have access to? I will take a look at what matches in our references. Bob Fenner>
Thanks in advance,
Richard
Wet Dry filter design, service in ornamental aquatics, old friends
Hi Bob, I used to work for you a few years back, as did countless thousands,
at one time or another.
<Good to hear from you Ron>
I worked at Wet Pets 1 and Wet Pets 2 when it was
going. My company is called Aquatic Environments,
<Ahh, a good name... the original intended for Wet Pets...>
I live in Minneapolis,
Minnesota now and have a few questions if you have a minute. ( By the way- I
promote your books 100%) I have designed and build 5 of my own style wet dry
filters. I know you tend to like the live rock methods but I can't get the
people here to buy them.
<Interesting>
SO - you did a lot of testing back in the day - with
anaerobic chambers on wet dry filters, can you share with me how to make them
really work. I know you did it,
<My designs were really only those of George Smit... the originator of
Miniriffes... as bought over and re-made by the Eyas' (Andy and family) (Intl. Seaboard) in the
mid-eighties... largish sumps with about 3/4 of the space dedicated to rubble (a
few inches) over about #5 (1/16" nominal) coral sand (of a few inches in
turn)... their real "trick" is not having much livestock, feeding,
flow (3, 4 turns per hour) through them>
and my very own is working somewhat. Please
help me if you possibly can. I have a service group and a custom acrylic
manufacture shop.
<Congratulations!>
I am trying to scratch out a living as you used to do. I am
very proud to have been able to work for you back before your celeb status.
<Ha! Am glad we have found each other... that you have pursued your dream,
involvement in our interests.>
Thanks Bob !!!!
Ron Smith
<Be chatting, Bob Fenner>
Wet Dry filter design, service in ornamental aquatics, old friends
That was the fastest reply I have ever received !!! Thanks, I take it that I
should forego the experimenting stages and try to keep the specimens in my
charge healthy by the most proven and ( by your guidance) time tested manner.
<Mmm, not so fast... Do keep an open mind (always)... there may well be a
"better mouse/nitrogenous waste trap">
WATER CHANGES. Thanks again Bob, great to chat again. Yes the Twin Cities are
keeping the industry alive and well. There is about 5 of us that are
"real"
players, the rest are out on the horizon.
<And hopefully leading, inspiring those others to better themselves. Hope to
run into you "on the road". Bob Fenner>
Thanks again,
Ron
Wet/Dry
Gentleman, Thanks for all your help in the past!
Just built a sump/wet-dry for my fish only system. I have a 75 gallon (Corner
Over-flow) fish only system. Equipment: LifeGuard Quite One 700 gal/hr external
main pump, a Supreme MagDrive 9.5B in sump pump powering an ETSS Revolution 500
protein skimmer, a Coralife turbo twist 3X UV, 2 Ebo-Jager 125 watt heaters and
2 power sweep 228 power heads for in tank circulation. My previous sump was only
7 gallons and I couldn't stop micro bubbles from entering my tank, so I built a
new one, about 20 gallons (24x11x18) I have the skimmer dumping into the bio
chamber followed by an over-under-over baffle system trying to eliminate micro
bubbles. Seems to be doing a good job, much better than the smaller sump,
however I did not permanently glue the baffles to the sides and bottom of the
sump. Wanted to ensure my design worked first. I used small blocks of 1 inch by
1 inch plexi as guides so I could slide the baffles in and out as I please,
making adjustment before I go permanent so I wouldn't have to start from
scratch. However, as I had thought, the flow is still making it around the
baffles on either side and I believe some bubbles are making it back into the
main tank this way. Hoping that if I do glue them permanent this should
eliminate my micro bubble problem.
I just wanted to get your opinion on my baffle dimensions. Both "over"
baffles are 5 inches in height from the bottom of the sump and the
"under" baffle is 3 inches from the bottom of the sump. There are 2
inches between each baffle. This leaves 2 inches for the water to flow down to
get under the "under" baffle with 3 inches of clearance from the
bottom. The bottom of my bio tower is at 6 inches from the bottom of the sump. I
don't mind making the over baffles higher and raising the overall height of my
water lever and cover a few bio balls. In addition I have my main pump opened
full throttle, but I did put an elbow fitting so as to draw water from the
bottom of the sump. This has without question inhibited the flow rate of the
pump back into the main tank. Does this arrangement sound correct. Or should the
first "over baffle be higher than the second. I am considering making it 7
inches instead of 5, or should both be the same height? If so, should they both
be at 7 inches or maybe higher?
Any suggestions?? Thanks John, Cape Cod
<Hi John, I do have some suggestions. The idea is to slow the flow down
enough in your sump and provide *downward* movement of your water at a slow
speed, so the bubbles are allowed to rise to the surface as the water moves
down, then reverse the direction and make the water rise, leaving more bubbles
while it drops again. Some sumps use sponges to help eliminate bubbles as well.
The space in between the baffles should be the same distance as the space at the
top and bottom of the baffles making the water flow |