
|
|
FAQs about
Overflows, Bulkheads/Through-puts, Holes vs. Boxes... Plumbing
Related Articles: Overflow Box Arrangements,
Plumbing Marine Systems by Bob Fenner,
Myth of the One Inch Beast
(Why Relying on One Inch Overflows... or Overflow! Is foolhardy)
by Scott Vallembois, The Flowrates
through various Bulkheads (In relation to overflow
drains) by Scott Vallembois,
Plumbing
Return Manifolds, Refugiums,
Related FAQs: Overflows 1,
Overflows 2, Overflows 3,
Overflows 4, & FAQs
on: Rationale/Use,
Sizing, Through-Hull Fittings,
Hang-On Selection,
Troubleshooting/Repair...
Marine Plumbing 1, Marine Plumbing 2,
Marine Plumbing 3, Marine Plumbing
4, Marine Plumbing 5,
Marine Plumbing 6, Plumbing 7,
Plumbing 8, Plumbing 9,
Plumbing 10, Plumbing 11,
Plumbing 12, Plumbing 13,
Plumbing 14,
Plumbing 15, Plumbing
16,
Plumbing 17, Plumbing 18,
Holes & Drilling, Durso Standpipes,
Make Up Water Systems,
Pumps, Plumbing,
Circulation,
Sumps, Refugiums, Marine
Circulation 2,
Gear Selection for Circulation,
Pump Problems, Fish-Only
Marine Set-ups,
Fish-Only Marine Systems 2, FOWLR/Fish
and Invertebrate Systems, Reef Systems,
Coldwater Systems, Small Systems,
Large Systems, Water Changes, Surge
Devices, | 
Honu says: Drains can't be practically too large, or numerous...
|
PVC Flow Rates -- 11/16/2009
What is a safe flow rate (gph) for 1", 1.5" and 2" PVC pipe? I am
wanting to find out just how large a pipe I need for water returning to
sump from tank.. It seems many try to force to much water down a small
opening which can lead to problems.
<Is true, the combination of typically under-powered factory
configurations and a general lack of understanding definitely lends to
this.>
Thanks for the help.
Jeff
<Safe flow rates are typically quoted as follows: 1" - 350 gph, 1.5" -
975 gph, and 2" - 1350 gph... All are approximate. Have a read through
here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/BulkheadFloRateArt.htm -JustinN>
Plumbing For The
Returns/Plumbing 10/22/09
Good Morning,
<Hello Daniel>
I have recently toyed with the idea of moving the return pipe outlets
from their normal position near the surface of the water in the display
tank to somewhere near the bottom. I want to be able to push water up
from the bottom, rather than push water down from the top. Is there
anything wrong with moving the return outlets to the bottom of the tank?
<Yes, in the event of a power failure or pump shut off, a siphon will
occur attempting to drain your tank into your sump. Check valves can be
used, but I'm not real comfortable with using them, over time they can
stick.>
Thank you for your time, I appreciate it!
<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Daniel
Re Plumbing For The
Returns/Plumbing 10/22/09
Hello Salty Dog!
<Hi Daniel>
To prevent the tank from being drained, I'd have those little holes at
the top of the plumbing for breaking the siphon. Shouldn't that take
care of the problem?
<At that depth, you likely will have enough head pressure in the line
where you would have water shooting out of those little holes. The
siphon breaking holes work well for just below surface applications.
Water will flow where the least resistance is.>
Thank you,
<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Daniel
|
Marine plumbing, its a
nightmare!! 6/17/09
Hi guys and gals, first I just want to say how great this site is. I
found this place when I first started out keeping fish, it's been a
great help:)
<Thank you, great to hear!>
I currently have 4 tanks, 2 tropical and 2 marine (I'm attempting to
merge the marine tanks into one). I'm having a pig of a week what with
the general crap going on in the world, cut-backs at work and to top it
off I was greeted home Monday by whitespot in my Reef setup.
<Uh oh.>
I'm taking your advice Bob after reading through many posts on the site
and going fallow (lots of fun... i don't think!). Anyway, that's not what
this is about, my real problem is the plumbing on my new tank. This is
the first time I've attempted to build my own tank and even after
reading your many listings on the subject for months now I still get a
headache just thinking about it. I thought I'd done the hardest part of
the job just drilling the glass... was I wrong or what!?
<Drilling is intimidating, but fairly easy.>
Anyway, to the point, I've got one 1 1/2" drain pipe which tee's under
the main tank and goes to my holding tank and sump (ball valves are
fitted either side of the tee in order to control the flow). My holding
tank has two 3/4" pipes that drop down into the sump where I have a Rio
pump supposedly pushing 3500Lph back to the tank (I plan on replacing
this shortly:)) also through 3/4" (the pump is recommended at a maximum
head of 3meters.) I'm having loads of trouble trying to quiet down the
drain pipe, I've tried just about everything I can think of and all the
fixes I can find both on your site and the web in general (the only
thing I haven't tried is the Durso fix because of the lack of space in
the weir and I think it would just empty the weir quicker than new water
could fall back into its place).
If anyone could give me any info it'd be much appreciated, have I simply
got this completely wrong and it'll never work in which case do I have
to go back to the drawing board?
<Two things come to mind. First, if you have just a straight pipe in the
overflow you are going to have noise. You do need to fabricate some sort
of "standpipe", whether it be Durso, Stockman or a creation of your own.
With just an open pipe you will keep getting gurgling and sucking
noises. The other thing to look at is the valves on the drain line. Any
restriction at all drastically reduces the flow capacity, even if you
have two outlets such as this you may not be getting what a 1.5" line
can actually flow.
This too can lead to quite a bit of noise.>
Cheers in advance, Dave (UK)
<Hope this helps you troubleshoot this, Scott V.>
Diagram included:
Main tank 72"x24"x24"
Sump 43"x15"(h)x12"(w)
Holding tank 12"x12"x24"
Weir 10"x20"x 21"/22" split in half (drain and return)
|
 |
Tank Set Up, Return Pump and
more 6/15/09
Hello Crew,
<Hello Henk.>
I am setting up a new tank, and am having it made according to following
dimensions:
47.2*27.6*27.6 (120cm*70cm*70cm), about 150 gallon.
I chose for these dimensions because I will have a 10cm (4 inch) wooden
trim at the bottom of the display tank, and a trim of about 5cm (2inch)
on the top.
The bottom trim is meant to cover most part of the Deep Sand Bed in the
display tank.
There will be an internal overflow box in the center at the back of the
tank, with two standpipes of 2 inches.
The sump will be divided into 4 parts, with one part where the water
enters, second compartment with skimmer and Ca reactor, third part
actual sump with the return pump, and a fourth part will be a refugium
with DSB and macro algae. The refugium will be fed with water directly
coming from the display tank, with a means to control the water flow.
Water from this refugium will then flow over into the part where the
return pump is located.
<Just do be sure to run this restriction off of a T, allowing anything
that is restricted by the valve to still continue on from the overflow
line to other parts of the sump.>
I am planning to start out with some of the easier LPS, but would like
over time to focus on SPS.
Now, for my questions... Regarding the return pump, I read on your site
the determining factor for the size of the pump is the flow the overflow
can handle, and I have not been able to find how much flow two 2 inch
standpipes will be able to handle safely (and preferably without too
much noise)?
<A single 2" internal diameter line will handle 1350 gph or so without
issues....this does assume there are no horizontal runs in the overflow
plumbing.>
Here in Beijing, the German Messner pond pumps are quite popular with
reef keepers (seems to be the most widely used import return pump here),
but I have not really been able to find any information on European or
American message boards or websites regarding the use of these pumps in
marine settings, so I am wondering whether or not these pumps are a good
choice. I am not sure if you have heard of people using these pumps as
return pumps?
<I have never used one, but these are submersible pumps, therefore no
"saltwater seal" needed. You will be fine with one of these.>
As for the return into the display tank, I have the option for choosing
either 2 or 4 returns, is 4 always better than 2?
<Not always, it can be too large/too many, diffuse flow too much.>
I plan to supplement circulation with 2 Tunze 6105 stream pumps and a
multicontroller.
<Nice!>
I am just wondering if I choose 4 returns all located at the back of the
tank, won't I have too much laminar flow, compared to when I would
choose two returns pointed towards the sides of the tank, where the
Tunze pumps will be located?
<Oh, no, just place them in the back. You can use PVC 45 deg elbows or a
product called LocLine to direct the flow from each output.>
I am currently considering a return pump of about 2100gph. I assume
there won't be much loss, the return pump only would need to pump about
5 feet up in a straight line, before either being divided over 2 or 4
returns.
<The loss is surprising, I would go with four 1/2" or two 3/4" returns
for the flow you will end up with.>
Would you advise more flow through the sump, since the overflow might be
able to handle more?
<No, this is plenty. Other issues arise, such as noise and micro bubble
problems with too much flow through the sump.>
Finally, as to the lighting, if I want to keep my options open to have
clams and grow SPS in the tank and not only at the top third of the
tank.
Will two 150W metal halides suffice for a tank with this depth, or
should I go for the 250W lights?
<250s if you want to be able to set stuff wherever you want.>
I have been reading and learning plenty from your website, and I hope I
could run the above questions by you, since it is my first marine tank
and people here in Beijing seem to implement a method of reefkeeping
quite different from what is advocated on your website (usually with
non-flood safe overflows, apparently no DSB tanks here at all, and heavy
in-sump mechanical filtering with filter padding).
<Heee, too many people here too!>
Henk Naert
<Scott V.>
Drains & Returns 6/1/09
Hello,
<John.>
I recently burned out my Danner HY-Drive, from what I have read I might
be using a pipe that's too small and over worked the pump.
<Not likely, it would have to be extremely small/restrictive.>
I have a 180 AGA with corner overflows. I am uncertain as to the
Bulkhead sizes for the drain and return. I am using 3/4 inch return
lines, my pump is in the sump and runs up to a tee splitting the 3/4
pipe to the two corner's. I am thinking that I should increase this to
1" so not to burn out my new pump. But I do not want to have too-much
pressure where the drains can't keep up.
<Is the problem. Your drains are only going to handle 600 gph combined,
one single 3/4" line can easily handle that. I would size the new pump
accordingly.>
Currently I have 1" drain pipes. These drop below the tank and turn 90
degrees running parallel with the tank and then drop 90 degree's to my
sump. Some times I get air in there, would it be helpful to increase the
drains to 1 1/2 inch ?
<Not really, the bulkhead is going to act as the choke point, dictate
the flow capacity.>
Also, would it be beneficial for the drains to run at a 45 degree angle
to the sump as to permit air to travel up and not get stuck in a
straight run?
<Yep, tis the problem with the air. Horizontal runs can be a pain. Run
it with 45s if you can.>
But again, I am not certain as to the bulkhead sizes on this tank (it
was pre-drilled reef ready when I bought it), I am assuming that this
would limit me on the pipe size as well.
<It does, your sizes listed above are correct.>
Best Regards,
John
<Scott V.>
Re: Drains & Returns 6/2/09
Hello Scott,
<John.>
Thank you very much for the reply.
<Welcome.>
I am confused still, it's clear that I should have the drains run on a
45 - I'll do this. But what is the best PVC dimension to use with this
set up? Again, currently I have 1inch drains and 3/4 inch supply. Do you
recommend that I increase these dimensions (if so to what please) or
should I keep them as is?
<Keep them as is, there is no benefit to upsizing here.>
I appreciate your help !
<Welcome.>
Regards,
John
Return PVC Pipe INSIDE the Overflow Pipe? Ala JamesG 4/27/09
Plumbing
Hey there Guys! Hope all is well where you are.
<I'm in lousy Michigan and all is fine.>
I'm setting up my second marine-tank, which will be a shallow tank - 14"
high x 48" x 48".
Because the tank will be viewable from all 4 sides, I plan to put my
overflows in center area, instead of the back of the tank. I will have 2
overflows, one acting as a backup for the other.
<Good idea.>
I want the returns to feed in the center of the tank, but don't want to
drill additional holes. So I was thinking of placing the return line
inside the overflow. I tried searching your FAQ's but there's so much to
go thru!
One thing I'm not sure of is how to handle my piping. If I place my
return inside the overflow, then eventually I will have to separate the
two pipes, but not exactly sure how to do this.
If you have any tips I should follow, I would love to hear them - or
even if this is not a good idea at all (should I drill an additional 2
holes for the returns?
<Yes, drill the additional two holes, is better to have separate
lines/bulkheads for each function.>
Many thanks for your input!
<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Jason
Return PVC Pipe INSIDE the Overflow Pipe? 4/27/09
Plumbing, ala ScottV
Hey there Guys! Hope all is well where you are.
<I'm in lousy Michigan and all is fine.>
I'm setting up my second marine-tank, which will be a shallow tank - 14"
high x 48" x 48".
Because the tank will be viewable from all 4 sides, I plan to put my
overflows in center area, instead of the back of the tank. I will have 2
overflows, one acting as a backup for the other.
<Good idea.>
I want the returns to feed in the center of the tank, but don't want to
drill additional holes. So I was thinking of placing the return line
inside the overflow. I tried searching your FAQ's but there's so much to
go thru!
One thing I'm not sure of is how to handle my piping. If I place my
return inside the overflow, then eventually I will have to separate the
two pipes, but not exactly sure how to do this.
If you have any tips I should follow, I would love to hear them - or
even if this is not a good idea at all (should I drill an additional 2
holes for the returns?
<Yes, drill the additional two holes, is better to have separate
lines/bulkheads for each function.>
Many thanks for your input!
<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Jason
<<Sorry guys, I can't help but to chime in here, this is too good! What
you propose is very doable. What you will need is something called a
pipe grommet, UniSeals being the main ones used in aquarium
applications. This would allow you to run the return pipe into the
overflow pipe. Now to the real issue with this. You will need a big
overflow pipe to do this with!
Just a little educated guesstimating here on my part: let's say you go
with a 1" return line. Put that inside a 1.5" line an you will have very
little overflow capacity. Inside a 2" more of course, but IF you really
wanted to do this I would not with any less than a 3" overflow line and
no more than a 1" return. I would be comfortable (have never actually
done this) estimating 1000gph+ out of the overflow line. This falls
right in line with the flow through a 1" return. Now the other downside,
you have no real redundancy with this system! Just my .02, Scott V.>>
ATTN Scott V re: Return PVC Pipe INSIDE the Overflow Pipe?
4/27/09
Thanks guys for the responses.
<Ah, welcome.>
My plan is definitely to use a large overflow - 3", with a 1" return.
<Good.>
Scott, you mentioned that there is no redundancy ... I plan on having
two overflows, isn't redundancy taken care of here, or are you referring
to something else?
<This would be the redundancy, ideally with the flow limited to what one
overflow can handle (well, really under what one can handle).
Regards,
Jason
<Have fun.>
Return PVC Pipe INSIDE the Overflow Pipe? 4/28/09
Scott, I guess I'm not with the program here. I've looked at Uniseals,
and from what I've read/saw, they just take the place of a bulkhead
fitting, relying on pressure from the pipe being inserted to force a
seal on the edge of the bulkhead hole, and, that sounds scary to me.
<This is exactly how they work and actually do so extremely well,
especially when it comes to curved applications such as going into a
pipe.
It is all about the hole size, the things are very precisely made to
seal on a pipe of X diameter into a hole of Y diameter....all specified
by the manufacturer.>
So I'm visualizing placing (example only) a 1" pipe inside a 3" pipe
with the proper Uniseal (3" to 1") at each end. If this is the case, how
does water flow down through the larger pipe if the Uniseal supporting
the 1"
pipe is blocking the flow?
<Well, the Uniseal will go into the side of the larger pipe, leaving the
ends of the larger pipe open to be plumbed as usual. It of course does
use up considerable space inside the large pipe to run the smaller one
through it, that is why I really would not consider it with less than a
3" line.>
Enlighten me, perhaps my brain has passed away and I'm in need of
assisted living.
<Geez, I know I am getting close nowadays!>
James
<Let me know what you think of the idea. It is actually something I have
thought about and theorized for years, and yet have never actually
tried.
Scott V.>
Re: Return PVC Pipe INSIDE
the Overflow Pipe? – 4/29/09
Hello Scott,
<Hey James.>
James finally woke up from the induced coma, do feel better now.
<I have not had such an awaking yet today!>
I'm now seeing how this application works, I think....A horizontal tube
is placed in the outer pipe to deliver tank water to the sump.
<Yes.>
What me thinks of the idea...I'm always paranoid for leaks, but if the
sump was placed under this "manifold", I guess a safety redundancy is
present as far as leakage goes if that should ever occur.
<A good idea to place the whole deal over the sump. The Uniseals seem
like quite a bit to trust but do work surprisingly well.>
It also appears that one could have two drains at two different levels.
Would I do it? I think I'd like to see this system in operation first
and/or talk to some one that actually uses this method of water
delivery/return.
<Me too. Once all the dust settles here I may try it.>
Cheers,
James
<Talk again soon, Scott V.>
Plumbing Conundrum 2/24/09 Hi Crew, <Hello Peter>
Thanks for a great site and all the help I have had in the past.
<You're welcome.> I have the following issue: I have 4 holes
drilled on the back of my tank at the top (52x18x24). I have Two
1 1/4" holes on the left side & Two 1inch" holes drilled on the
right hand side of tank. Im not sure which option to go for, or
even if any would be wrong 1. Should I have inlets through both
1 inch holes & outlets through both 1 1/4 (Opposite ends) <No,
the 1 1/4" drains/outlets are for water returning to the sump.>
2. Inlet, outlet next to each other at each end (Inlet: one 1 inch &
one 1 1/4. Outlet: one 1inch & one 1 1/4) 3. As the holes are
slightly different heights, I had the idea that if I set up, Two 1
inch inlets with one 1 1/4 outlet. Then the other outlet has a
90% bend on, angled to a slight tilt, would this reduce gurgle, as I
can imagine more air than water going down my pipes. <The two 1
1/4" lines will be drains to the sump. The upper left outlet (photo
1) is designed to allow you to set the water level in the tank by
rotating the elbow either up or down. The one inch lines (photo 2)
are return lines from the pump to the tank. They can also be
adjusted where you may want one shooting across the surface or just
below, and the other pointing down at a slight angle, or you may
even want to attach a spray tube to one of the outlets. For a much
better insight on aquarium plumbing, do read here and related
articles and FAQ's.
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/plumbingmarart.htm> Thanks for all
your help <You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)> Peter |
 |
Aaaahhhh.....insane with bulkheads and holes...2/8/09 Dear
Mr Fenner or Calfo or both : ] <Hello Jay, Scott V. with you this go
round.> I must first thank you for the huge amount of money I'm going
to save from the months...and I do mean months I've spent enjoying
reading over WWM!!! <Wow, great! Thank you.> What you do for
hobby newbies like myself is priceless!!! Now if I may, I have a
question re plumbing, more specifically bulkhead/holes. I will be
setting up a 75 gallon "light" reef tank! Probably heard that before
right...hehe. <Thought that before!> I've decided on everything
but the plumbing. The fun part huh?! I'm going to utilize a sump and I'm
aware of the constant issues with these so called reef ready tanks, so I
plan on having one custom made. Mainly to accommodate appropriate flow
for the inhabitants. Plus I want a Starphire glass front. This is where
I go nuts! Each time I think I know how I wanna go about it I read
something else and second guess my original idea....here's what I'm
thinking, I need your most valued opinion before I make my move!
<Okay.> I'm thinking I want each drain hole to be able to quietly
handle 600gph {so I can keep powerheads out of the water even without
the closed loop}. Also be able to handle a closed loop I'll use later on
down the road. I figure that'll give roughly 1200gph and would suffice
until maybe I could bump it to around 1500 with the later installation
of the CL.?.?. I think I want to have 4 holes drilled, 2 on the bottom
of both sides. At first it'll be one as a main drain to the sump, one as
a slow flow drain to the fuge, the two other holes as returns!
<Sure, but do just make the drain to the refugium a full flow
throughput, with a tee off to the refugium that you can adjust.>
After everything gets settled and things start maturing I will eliminate
one of the returns or drains and utilize this hole for the external pump
I run the closed loop I eventually plan to install {do you think its
better to install this with the initial setup?}. <It is far easier
to do it at the start.> The other return/drain I'll still use or just
simply "cap", if they can be capped<? <Yep, simply a bulkhead and a
PVC plug.> So in your opinion what size bulkheads/holes should I
utilize to achieve the flow needed? <Two 1.5” bulkheads will achieve
the flow for the overflow, but leave no redundancy. I would either opt
for 3-4 1.5” or 2-3 2” for the overflow. 1.5” likely for the closed loop
intake/return.> I know I can taper them down as needed and it is best
to go too big rather than too small but with all the bulkhead size to
hole size ratios it gets confusing. So I'm asking,... if it was your 75
gallon, what would you do? <Three 2” throughputs for the overflow.>
Reminds me of that bracelet "what would Jesus do" well they should make
one for aquarists, "what would Bob/Anthony do." *Not trying to be
blasphemous* <Hmmmm, no. It is just what works.> Sorry for the
length of this query but one more question. Do you find it more
beneficial to plumb a separate refugium to the same sump with its own
little return pump or section off part of the sump as the fuge?
<Better/easier IMO to just run it off the main return. If you want a
separate refugium, just have it overflow into the sump return.> Sorry
for the vague question there, "fuged" either way is fine with me but the
thought of figuring out extra plumbing for a separate fuge makes me a
little nauseated, so any simplified instruction on how to do so would be
fabulous!!! <Just overflow it to the sump to link them together.>
I'm sure I speak for others as well as myself when I say thank you and
WWM for what you do for the saltwater community. <Well thank you!>
If this isn't Bob, can you tell him to post more pics of his diving
adventures soon ; ]. Thanks a million! <It is not Bob, but I know he
has been working hard posting many of his dive pics, archiving them on
WWM for all to see.><<A continuous, and joyous process. RMF>> Jay
<Welcome, Scott V.> Re: Aaaahhhh.....insane with bulkheads
and holes... and pb [R2] 2/13/09 Hello, to whomever I
have at the other end this mornin' ! <Hello, Scott V. with you
again.> I am sending this email again, I want to apologize if you
received the first follow up email but I sent it Monday, and I've had a
few problems with others getting my emails this week. So I figure I'll
give it another go in case you never received it! Thanks and sorry!
<Ah, no problems, did not see the other one, but this one is here!>
Hello Scott, thank you for your speedy reply!! <Welcome.> I think
I do but let me make sure I got this. First off, I did mean that I would
taper it down through the plumbing with an adjustable tee, I realize it
probably didn't sound that way ;]. I was wondering which way you thought
was more beneficial, making the fuge part of the sump or its own tank?
<Six in one, half a dozen in the other. Whichever suits your situation
the best. Bigger is the game, if you can fit more with a combo unit,
great. If you can fit two separate tanks, fine.> Ok, I'm assuming {uh
oh} by redundancy you meant that 2 1.5" bulkheads would do 1200gph but
leave room for nothing else? <Exactly, in the neighborhood of 1500
gph for two 1.5" lines....the redundancy pertains to having an extra or
two should one line fail, get plugged.> With 3 2" bulkheads for the
overflow, 2 for the sump and 1 for the fuge and the 1.5" bulkhead for
the CL would I need 3 3" holes and 1 2 3/8" hole? <For most schedule
40 bulkheads these are the sizes.> Could I get away with 2 2" bhs and
2 1.5" bhs with all I'm trying to do? <Yes, a 2" gravity fed drain
can handle the 1200 gph, two will leave you the redundancy.> Where is
the best place to have the holes drilled, bottom, sides, back? <Up
to your tastes, I personally like it through the back to allow for a
smaller overflow box. Most tanks in the size range you are looking at
cannot be drilled through the bottom due to the use of tempered bottoms,
if you want this do be sure to order it done from the factory.> I
don't think I really like the thought of being able to see the
throughputs or holes. I was going to utilize Durso style standpipes when
the plan was for the bottom. Do these type pipes need to be the same
diameter as the bulkhead? <Yes, though some advocate for using even
larger diameter piping for the standpipe. The argument is it is quieter.
Bunk. The same diameter standpipe is fine.> Sorry for all the
questions but I want to get this right the first time! <No problem.>
Could I incorporate the closed loop from the sump with all the drainage
that'll be coming through there with a nice submersible pump in the
return section or should I use the 1.5" bulkhead for the closed loop
through an external pump? <The latter is how you will want to plumb
a closed loop. You can run all your flow through the sump, but too much
gets hard to manage in regards to microbubbles and noise.> I don't
need any return holes I reckon because I can just run the return/closed
loop up the back of tank right? <Yes.> Depending on your answer
to the last question, what size pump and plumbing should I use, I look
to utilize 6 tees or movable elbows rather in the tank for about 250gph
each one to get roughly 1500gph and <1500 gph through six 1/2"
outputs would work fine.> I've read somewhere to keep the pvc the
same size as the outlets on the pumps, is that true? <A good rule of
thumb, until the point you get to the actual outlets. Then choke them
down to your output size, I would use the 1/2" here.> Would I need to
use smaller pipe for the ring around the top of the tank or the elbows?
<Not the ring, but on the outputs themselves....a pump this size is
going to have a 1"-1.5" output.> There would be about 4-5 feet of
head. Is that an answerable question ;]? <Oh yes!> Thank you once
again! If WWM and all the volunteers didn't exist neither would my
little slice of the ocean!!! Thanks again... <Welcome, and thank
you!> A future happy reefer! <Ahh, good. Do look at a product
named LocLine for your outputs. It is cheap and makes adjusting your
returns very easy.> Please help with plumbing question
11/24/08 This afternoon I ordered a 180-gallon acrylic
72x24x24 reef tank with two overflow boxes that are about 11" away from
the side wall. I would really appreciate help with the following
three questions. <Sure.> 1. Is it better to have the holes for the
return pipes drilled in the middle of the tank on the back wall/top
ledge, in-between the overflows OR on the back wall/top ledge but more
towards the right and left sides of the tank, somewhere in between that
11" on the sides? <Really makes no difference. Between return
adjustability (do look at LocLine for this) and any supplemental flow,
you will be able to direct the flow to where it needs to be.> 2. What
size do you recommend for the drain hole in each overflow and what size
for the return hole, which I am going to have come through the overflow
box. Right now I told them 1.5" for the drain <Good for a reliable
750gph per gravity fed. Do double up what you need for your flow to get
redundancy.> and 1" for the return... but it is not too late to
change that. <1� will work, but consider ¾� (it can always be reduced
down). 700-800 through a ¾� gives you a good dynamic flow to work with
and there are many more products out there for directing that flow
available in ¾ vs. 1�.> 3. Do you recommend that I use two small
return pumps or one big return pump? <You could do either. I would
just run one in this system, with another on hand for a backup, can be a
tank saver.> Thank you so much! <Welcome, have fun, Scott V.>
Re: Please help with plumbing question 11/24/08 Ok, I will
downsize the returns to 3/4". Regarding the drains do you think 1.5"
would more noisy than 1"?? <Not if done correctly. You will want to
have an elbow with the open end pointing down or some other system to
keep the opening in the line underwater. On that note you will also
need to aspirate the line where it turns to go down to prevent a siphon,
the most common noise issue with overflows.> Also, do you think it is
better to have the two drains connect and go into the sump as one, or is
it better to have them go into the sump individually. <Leave them
individual for true redundancy.> Thanks again. <Welcome, Scott V.>
Another Noisy Plumbing Question... – 10/08/08 Hi,
<<Hello>> I have read through just about everything that has to
do with noise of plumbing overflows but my situation is a little
different. <<Okay>> I attached pictures to help you visualize
what I am doing. <<I see these…thank you>> Tank is 135 gallon
with a 2' bulkhead and drain and 1' return spray bar (specs per my
Quiet One 4000 return pump). <<Okay…so about 900 – 1000 gph
(depending on exact model…”HH” or otherwise) before headloss. The 2”
drain should be able to handle this…though it is maxed out (if you
take siphoning/safety in to consideration) at around 1100gph so you
are close to capacity re. Probably part of your issue>> Sump is a
29 gallon Rubbermaid tub. <<Kind of small for “processing” that
much flow…and another factor with the noise>> My design is based
on the fact that water will always level itself in two different
points...Out of my 2” bulkhead I have a 90* going up, then to a Tee
where I split it off on the side, then to a 90* going down to the
sump. <<Yes I see…and very similar to the design of my own
bulkhead drains, except rather than “raising” the water lever
outside the tank and the releasing it to the sump as you have done,
my design comes straight out and then turns down with a short run of
vertical pipe at the apex of the downward bend (3-way tee
w/90-degree sweep) to allow aspirating of the drain>> I have a 2”
ball valve half way between the sump and the bulkhead for
maintenance reasons. <<This will cause some restriction/loss of
flow rate>> I then drip into a filter pad for mechanical and then
bio media. It is then pumped back into the tank via a spray bar with
a siphon break hole in case I lose power. <<Risky… What if the
hole clogs? Better to position the return (and drain) such that the
sump will hold all transient water volume without having to rely on
a siphon break>> As expected my drain is extremely loud, not only
with water rushing but the common gurgle too. <<I have no doubt>>
I have tried putting on a cap and drilling a small hole (started
with a #60 bit) and many combinations of hole sizes. <<Not enough
in and by itself…needs tubing run down in to the drain to release
entrained air from the rushing water. And even then, this is no
panacea…sometimes you have to either position the sump in a remote
location (like a basement, if possible), or more easily done…reduce
the amount of water flow going through the sump>> It was
interesting to see the water in the sump raise and lower according
to the hole size but it did little for noise. <<Indeed>> I
then tried using the airline tubing in the drain trick, again to no
avail. <<This much water and this size drain likely needs
something larger in diameter than airline tubing. Gather a
collection of caps and drill for and utilize different diameters of
tubing…the “length” of tubing slipped down the drain also affects
the outcome. There’s no set recipe for success…it just takes some
time and experimentation to find the tubing diameter and length
combo that produces the best result>> With just a small hole in
the cap the noise is a little better however the level fluctuates
and the noise is quiet then gets loud then quiet and loud, etc.
<<Yes…is surging because the drain is starved for air>> Also, I
found that with just a small hole it is possible for my system to
create a siphon and drain super fast through the 2” drain. <<Mmm,
indeed…and always dangerous to push a gravity drain to the point
that it creates a siphon. And though not the case in this particular
instance…this is generally what is happening when hobbyists tell of
flowing the maximum volumes as depicted by most of the “drain size
calculators” about>> My return pump obviously cannot keep up with
a siphoned 2” pipe. <<It can once the water level reaches the
bulkhead and is able to draw air…though the sump probably doesn’t
have that kind of capacity, nor do I think you want the “working”
water level in the tank to be this low based on the position of the
bulkhead in the pictures. One option here is to add an upturned ell
fitting to bulkhead on the inside of the tank. You can cut one end
to set/control the working water height of the tank, and though not
especially necessary, you can even cut notches/teeth in to the drain
to help keep critter out. Doing this should allow the working water
height fall to the point where air can enter the drain yet keep the
water at a reasonable height in the tank as well as keeping the
extra volume from overflowing the sump>> Therefore, if a siphon
was created it would drain all the water down to the bulkhead until
air was introduced, <<Exactly>> this would overflow my sump
big time and leave me with a pool of water on the floor. <<Not
the desired result…>> If I drilled enough holes in the cap that
would break any siphon that may happen, the level in the sump was
too low and the noise was still loud. <<Agreed…back to
experimenting with different diameters and lengths of tubing>>
Right now I have the system running with no cap and the Tee is open
to the air. This makes the level in my sump too low, <<A few
things working against you here, not the least of which is a sump
that I consider too small for the pump/flow rate your are utilizing.
Aside from allowing the turbulence from the drain more room to
“smooth out”…a larger sump would allow a higher working water height
because of the increased transient water volume>> the level in
the tank too high, <<I think the upturned bend immediately after
the bulkhead is creating enough backpressure/resistance in the drain
to allow the pump to overwhelm it. You can easily test this by
installing a gate-valve on the output side of the pump and “cranking
the flow back” to see what happens. This is also a good way to
determine the “optimum” flow rate for your drain configuration>>
and the noise very loud but at least I don't have to worry about a
siphon starting in the drain. There has to be a way to make this
thing quiet and introduce enough air into the drain so a siphon will
not be created. Any ideas? <<Yes… Merely installing a 2” bulkhead
and pipe doesn’t mean you can always flow 1000+ gallons through
it…the “configuration” of the plumbing has a large effect on the
efficacy of the drain. The more I think about it the more I think
your plumbing configuration is a mismatch for the pump you are
using. I’d bet that if you were to reduce the flow by half that your
problems would be greatly reduced if not alleviated altogether.
Another option is to change the plumbing configuration and see how
that works with the existing pump. My recommendation would be to
change the upward bending 90-deg ell to point downward and use
another 90-deg ell inside the tank to control the working water
height from within…and you may still need to aspirate the drain to
help with noise so you might want to consider a fitting like mine
over the plain 90-deg ell fitting. Or it may come down to a
combination of several/all suggestions to get where you want to be.
Lots to consider for sure…feel free to write back if you want to
break it down and discuss further>> Thanks a million! Dan
<<Happy to share. EricR>> |

 |
Re: Another Noisy Plumbing Question... – 10/14/08 Thanks
for your reply. <<Quite welcome…I hope the information proved
helpful>> I re-plumbed the drain to the following... Angled the
drain going down and raised the part where it starts to angle to go
into the sump. This helped with the fluctuating levels. <<Very
good>> I then experimented with hole sizes and air tubes in the
drain. This is what I ended up with... (3) 1/8" holes and a hole big
enough to fit 2 common size air line tubes that extend roughly 1'
into the drain. Doing all the above made it pretty quiet,
<<Sometimes just takes a bit of trial-and-error>> I then put
fiberglass insulation around the tube and then foam pipe insulation
around that. <<Ah yes…another useful strategy for quieting noisy
hard plumbing>> The tank is also getting a canopy hood that I am
building to cover the top which will quiet any surface splashing.
Finally, we are going to put a fabric skirt around the metal stand
that will cover the sump and hopefully further absorb noise.
<<Indeed… My own system is built in to a wall, which does much to
“muffle” the operational noises. Sounds like you have it under
control…excellent!>> My next question for you is stocking the
tank. I leave on business trips for a week fairly often so I want
the bio-load pretty low; my wife will feed while I am gone but not
clean :) <<I see… You may want to consider making up pre-measured
packets of food for this purpose to make things easier for her and
safer for the tank>> Right now I have a Lab Electric Yellow
Cichlid and a Hypostomus plecostomus. I am thinking about giving the
Plec to a friend since they are a huge bio-load and get big. My main
fish I want to be either a Jack Dempsey or a Green Terror. I cannot
decide on which one though, what is your opinion? <<Both reach
about the same adult size, but for the mixed tank you have planned I
would probably choose the temperament of the Jack Dempsey over that
of the Green Terror>> The rest of the fish will be 5 Silver
Dollars, a Senegal Bichir, Acei cichlid, and my yellow lab. I know
the Acei and yellow lab may not be a good mix with the JD or GT but
the footprint of the tank is pretty big and 5 silver dollars for
distraction will help too. Do you think that would be ok?
<<Though not a peaceful mix it does seem reasonable, for this 135g
tank>> If not, can you recommend some acceptable colorful
replacements for the Acei and Yellow Lab? <<I must admit that
Cichlid compatibility/stocking (am more a saltwater kinda guy) is
not my forte…I would recommend you write back and ask for Chuck or
Neale to get some excellent and more specific advice re>> With
these 9 fish in my 135 gallon I would think the bio-load and keeping
Nitrates under 20ppm would be pretty mediocre, do you? <<Perhaps
not as much as you think. These will be fairly large and messy
feeders…much will depend on the efficacy of your filtration system>>
Can you guess on my expected water change routine once full grown?
<<I would suggest a minimum of 25% bi-weekly to start…water testing
will determine if this needs to be increased>> Thanks for all the
help! Dan <<Happy to share. EricR>> |
Thanks! Silencing pb overflows 10/8/08 Just wanted to
say thanks for your wisdom regarding silencing Durso overflows. After I
moved my sump to the basement, the overflow rumble was very noticeable.
By adding two ¼" ID airlines into the Durso head, each about 2' below
the top of the water, the overflow is now silent except for the
waterfall into the box. <Glad you found what you needed!> Much
thanks! <Cheers, Mich> Plumbing Options/Overflow
9/19/08 Hi crew- <Hello Jim> Many thanks for such a
high value resource/community! <Thank you!> I recently had to move
my 75g reef tank to install some floors. To do so, I purchased an
extra drilled 75g, plumbed it inline in my basement next to my sump, and
the job went relatively smoothly. Now, I am ready to move things
back, and here is my dilemma... The old tank is a reef ready system
with a corner overflow and custom pipe/float system which works well
(and is absolutely silent). The temp tank is NOT reef ready, but was
well drilled (one IN and two drains, all with nice bulkheads, 1.5", etc)
- nice... I have been trying to figure out how to make this temp tank
work, since I'd like to buy back the corner overflow space (given the
fact that a 75 isn't all that large). <Okay, I hear you!> I
haven't been able to find much on how to configure the drains so that
they will operate SILENTLY (my sole requirement). On the outside of the
tank, the drain plumbing already has an upwards facing T with some
removable pipes that serve to vent the system. I have found that they
gurgle a bit. I am SURE it must be possible to address this, but am not
entirely sure how to do so. Here is my plan: cover the vents with
caps that have small holes with airline tubing with valves on them, then
adjust until silent. <If the noise is coming from the airlines there
is a simple solution, not so simple to explain in text, but I will try.
Take a 1-2” length of PVC pipe and put a cap on both ends. Next, on one
end, drill a hole just large enough to slip your airline into. Then on
the other end drill the same sized hole and slip another piece of the
tubing in there. This acts as a muffler, much the same as used in cars.
It sounds idiotically simple, but it does work very well.> Will this
plan *completely* address the noise issue while also responding well to
any possible fluctuations in pump output? <The above will fix any
noise issues with the airline. If you are getting noise from the drains
themselves, you need something inside the tank to keep the drain from
being open to the air in the room. Something as simple as a PVC elbow in
the bulkhead, with the open end facing down into the water. Pump
fluctuations should not make a difference in anything but the water
level.> I have a Poseidon PS3 one floor (and ~45 feet) away from my
display system. If it will NOT completely address the noise issue, do
you have any alternate suggestions for how to configure this drilled
tank (or should I just use my reef-ready tank with the corner overflow)?
<Try the above, run from the “reef ready”!> many thanks! Jim Gray
<Welcome, Scott V.> Re: Plumbing Options/Overflow, noise
f' 9/22/08 Thanks for the tips- <Very welcome.>
I have a follow-on question- <Okay.> I am finding that I have some
noise by introducing air via airline hose. The noise is primarily in the
plumbing and in my sump. I can add some pipe insulation around the
flexible hose the noise is coming from, and I can probably live with the
noise in my sump (but I'd rather do it the RIGHT way). <Pipe
insulation does help. If it is the turbulence within the pipe itself, a
rubberized undercoating (spray or roll on) on the pipe will help this
too. Also just anchoring/attaching the line to the stand or wall will
cut down on this noise. With a properly set up overflow, this line noise
is typically all that is heard.> I am presuming that I'd really
rather go full siphon, if possible (this would be the quietest
situation, right - no turbulence at all?), but either of my drain hoses
running full siphon beat out my pump. By that, I mean that the tank will
drain down to bottom of an elbow in one of my drains. I am thinking of
adding a valve inline to my main return and trimming it back a little
until I can run it at full siphon, keeping the other return dry, as a
pure emergency line. Doing this seems a little fragile (as does this
whole system, to be honest). I guess it presumes that my pump output
will be relatively constant (which I suppose it should be) and that I
have an emergency drain (which I do). <This will not work, you have
made half my point for me here! The problem is twofold. First, the
siphon will inherently change or fail. The pump output changes (clogged
or dirty) or the overflow line has buildup inside, maybe becomes clogged
altogether. The pump fails or slows and you end up with a maddening
flushing noise, the overflow line has the slightest issue and water is
on the floor. The second problem with this “overflow overclocking” is
the idea of a safety drain. If this safety drain relies on a siphon it
assumes the siphon will start. Many times it will not. If the safety
drain is gravity fed it will not keep up with the flow from the full
siphon drain if the first overflow fails. Take a 1.5” bulkhead. It will
flow 750 gravity fed, over 1200 siphon fed. This is quite a margin to
account for.> At any rate - does this sound like a good idea?
<Nope, not in my house.> What do others with this problem do?
<Take the steps mentioned above to cut down on the pipe noise.>
thanks- Jim <Welcome, Scott V.> Re: Plumbing
Options/Overflow 9/23/08 Ok - I will try to make this my
last question on this topic - appreciate your help/patience! <Heee,
no problem.> Turns out that the noise in the sump (or pipes) is NOT
going to palatable. <Does your drain line(s) run under the water in
the sump?> The sump is right under our bedroom, and the air traveling
through the line and into the sump was not subtle (not a good night's
sleep, unf). So, I am going to have to work a little harder to solve
this problem... Let's start at the beginning- I actually have 1"
bulkheads (sorry for the previous misinformation). <Quite a
difference, plan on 300 gph per quietly/safely. The volume through these
is likely the culprit, a 1” bulkhead makes little if any noise with the
correct amount of flow through it.> Each of them exits to a T,
pointing up to provide a vent, then they elbow down. I have been
experimenting with capping those vents and drilling various size and
numbers of holes for airline tubing. <You should, 3/16” inner
diameter at the most for the flow that will work through these.> This
clearly helps a lot... This supports the gravity fed approach, but
forces me to introduce air into the lines, which is noisy in the
plumbing and upon exit in the sump. <To a point.> I am (just like
everyone else, right?) looking for a silent, safe solution to getting
water from my tank to my sump (which is, again, in my basement, on the
other side of my house). <Yes, this is what most want.> My
previous solution worked pretty well on this front - I had a reef ready
system which had a custom standpipe that someone had worked up - it had
a large pipe that slid over the stand pipe, and had a Styrofoam top on
it, such that it would rise and open more holes as the water rose. It
worked very well - was completely silent and (I believe) operated at
full siphon. <Sounds like the case.> There was a backup pipe in
the same chamber in case it needed it. There was also a valve beneath it
to adjust the output. I guess this is similar to what I was thinking of
doing, perhaps you are saying that my previous system was fragile/risky.
<It was, a modicum of luck here.> May well have been - but it did run
well for 2 years without any issues. Key question: Is there any
way that I can rig a reliable system that will not have air in the
lines? <One siphon line to two gravity fed emergency drains, but this
really should not be necessary. Even then you will be tuning here and
there.> Not having air in the lines appears to be required for a
quiet system, unless I am missing something (entirely possible).
<Hmm, no, we have covered the bases between the two emails. It does
sound to me you either need a larger drain or less flow. Otherwise
soundproofing or the siphon, the choice is yours.> thanks- Jim
<Welcome, Scott V.> Re: Plumbing Options/Overflow 9/24/08
Hi Scott- <<Hello again Jim.>> <snip> Key question: Is there
any way that I can rig a reliable system that will not have air in the
lines? <One siphon line to two gravity fed emergency drains, but this
really should not be necessary. Even then you will be tuning here and
there.> Not having air in the lines appears to be required for a
quiet system, unless I am missing something (entirely possible).
<Hmm, no, we have covered the bases between the two emails. It does
sound to me you either need a larger drain or less flow. Otherwise
soundproofing or the siphon, the choice is yours.> </snip> This
been very helpful! Based on our conversation (and the many things I
have been reading lately), I have decided to implement the following
system- 1) add a gate valve to one of my returns and run it at
siphon, tweaking/constraining it a fair amount to match the output of my
pump note: did that already and it works well - easy to adjust and
totally silent 2) use the second return as emergency only, elbow tube
pointing up, gravity fed (cap to minimize noise, but with several wide
airline hoses to allow sufficient air). note: I am doing this
because you indicated that the siphon might not start (which I did not
know - what will happen if it doesn't?) <<It very well may not.>>
3) given your cautions, and for safety's sake, I will add a float valve
that shuts off my return pump if the water level in the main system gets
too high. 4) I will probably add (at some point) an internal overflow
so that the water level in my tank is constant and I am skimming off of
the surface. I believe this combination of steps solves the problem
and meets my requirements: 1) totally silent (once I fix the fact
that some air is leaking through the stem of my gate valve) 2) safe
(once I add the float valve shutoff switch) 3) no additional
draining/drilling required 4) don't have to reduce system flow (hard
to believe I am getting too much turnover with so much head!) I would
much rather solve this by dialing back my overflow, not dialing back my
pump's output... I know this isn't quite what you are recommending,
but I believe it to be the solution that best meets my (growing) set of
requirements, based on our conversation. <<All I can do is educate
you on from my experience, the end choice is yours. This sounds like a
unique solution that is workable.>> thanks again for your help!
Jim Gray <<Welcome, have fun with this, Scott V.>>
New Nano reef, total > 100 gal.s, overall set-up! 7/24/08
Hi, <Hello there> Please could you have a look at some
questions I have for a NANO tank plan. <Sure> I was looking at
the various NANO tanks people have and how nice they look (better
than my 120 gal). <Can> So I was thinking of creating one
myself (I already have a 120 gal from the last 2 years). I am
still in the design phase. <Good> However, I designed for a
RDSB and sump of almost the same size as the display tank. <All
right> The tank size is 50 G The RDSB (below the tank) is 23
gal Sump is 35 gal My tank, sump and RDSB specs Inches
RDSB (12") sump Display Length 24 18 28 Width
18 24 24 Depth. 12 18 18 Vol in gal 22.4
34 52 108 Vol in liter 85 127 198 411
Questions 1. Is this big DSB going to give me a super advantage
or should I reduce the RDSB? <I'd leave as is... really, the
bigger the better> 2. Is it good to take a direct feed from the
RDSB to the return pump location? <Is fine> 3. Will the return
pump (standard powerhead) kill all the plankton? <No. Most all
"passes through" alive> 4. I plan to use one Hydor koralia-3
propeller pump on one side and the sump return on the other side
facing the Koralia and a siphon that fires OUT of the tank (down to
the sump)? <Mmm... a siphon? Not a drain?> The siphon should
fire in around every 10 seconds for 2-5 seconds duration taking
approx 10-15 liters with it. Will this work for circulation?
<Mmm... I would NOT do this. What if the siphon should fail? Where
will all the water in play go? On the floor?> 5. Plan to go bare
bottom as I have a RDSB. Will use egg-crate or acrylic boxes drilled
for water flow to lay the foundation for the live rock. Will this
have problems? <Can be done... depending on the needs, desires of
your main system livestock...> Plan to use 60 pounds in the
display. 6. Sump will have carbon and skimmer. 7. Will a 1/4th
HP chiller be too much for this volume? (I have one in spare and can
use it) <Likely will provide sufficient draw-down here> 8.
Lights I plan will be Compact Florescent for 12-14 hours and MH will
be only for 2-4 hours. Something like this
(http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=3578+3733+12779&pcatid=12779)
9. Tank theme is Zoanthid / Palythoa garden with LOTS of feather
duster worms and SPRINKLING of mushrooms and ONE cup coral
"Turbinaria peltata
<http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&client=pub-4522959445250520&cof=FORI
D:1%3BGL:1%3BLBGC:336699%3BBGC:%2399c9ff%3BLC:%230000ff%3BVLC:%23663399%
3BGFNT:%230000ff%3BGIMP:%230000ff%3BDIV:%23336699%3B&domains=www.WetWebM
edia.com&sitesearch=www.WetWebMedia.com&oe=ISO-8859-1&sa=X&oi=spell&resn
um=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Turbinaria+peltata&spell=1> ". 10. Fish
would be a shoal (5-7) of blue or green Chromis, 1 Purple Fire fish,
1 Psychedelic Mandarin. 11. Inverts would be 2 skunk cleaner
shrimps, 1 Pom-Pom Crab, Snails, Blue Linckia (don't ask why but
this works for me rather than a Fromia or any other sea star) have
had this Linckia almost a year now. <Might I ask: What do you
attribute your success to with this genus/species?> Cheers
Ranjith <Other than the "siphon" this set-up sounds fine. I would
read on WWM re overflows:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm Peruse the first few
trays... Bob Fenner>Re:
New Nano reef... plumbing/circ., and Linckia fdg.
7/25/08 Hi Bob, I had planned the siphon to try and give
some bit of a wave effect. <Ahh! I see...> I presume, if a
surge in is good due to moving water, a surge out should also be
good as it moves water out. <Agreed... but/and a further
cautionary remark... such devices are fraught with inherent
dangers... at the very least one should plan on overflows.... where
the water might actually end up... Better to do a bunch of reading
re various "Surge Systems"... Perhaps a beginning read here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/surgesysf.htm and the linked files
above... Or better, a search on the Net with the term: "Bruce
Carlson Surge System" to start with> Would it be fine if I have
an emergency overflow hole above the siphon pipe? <This would
definitely set my mind to greater ease> The sump will be deep
enough to take the load incase the pump fails and all the water till
the siphon pipe opening flows down. <Good!> The advantage
being no salt crepe near the lights and electrical. The sump does
not need light and will be covered and can be cleaned at intervals
to maintain salinity. <Very good to understand that you are aware
of all this> Would I be totally off my mind if I tried to run the
skimmer from the output of the tank surge?? <Mmm, I would NOT do
this... Best to situate the skimmer in a part of the sump that will
be constant volume, have its own pump...> At a very basic level,
would it provide enough flow to be able to skim? <No> Could
you tell me what plumbing part I can use to siphon from the display?
<Mmmm.... I'd rather not. Please understand, what "we" discuss here
is posted, viewed by many folks going forward... I do not want to
either encourage you or be seen to be encouraging siphoning as such
a mechanism... IS fraught with danger, again, I assure you. Most
easy example... what happens if the "higher" safety overflow becomes
occluded, the sump overfills the tank?> A bulkhead would not be
helpful as the inside part does not have a facility to attach a tube
or the 90 degree elbow. <Again... I would fashion or buy the
parts to make one of a few types of proven surge systems instead.
Though these too often include a siphon mechanism/trigger, they are
more reliable> Regarding the Linckia, I feed it fresh minced fish
(marine origin) or prepared food (dried krill, minced fish, Cyclops
eeze, Nori, shelled prawns, ocean nutrition (nano coral food)
blended and frozen in small cubes. Feeding method is to wedge the
food in a flat rock structure and then actually pick him up and put
him on the food so his mouth cavity is directly on it. He does not
find food if it is near him sometimes so I put him on the food.
<Thank you for this> Surprisingly I have seen Fromia stars waste
away and not accept food. <Me too. There are other important
sources of mortality than nutrition> Ps: Initially he demolished
my population of small squirts (that's what they looked like)
Cheers Ranjith <Ahh! You likely have very healthy systems if
you're able to sustain Ascidians. Cheers! BobF>
Re: New Nano reef (follow-up), pb... overflows/siphons... vs. good
old gravity 07/28/2008 > Hi Bob, > thank you very
much for all the input. Before I start, Please do not consider
this as an obstinate chap :) I have used a CSD for a few months
and have seen various silly mistakes culminate into mini floods and
electrically displeasing experiences ;-) <Mmm... dangerous...
good to see you have a balanced nature> I understand that a
siphon is dangerous from the display tank. And I fully advise
anyone reading this faq (if it is posted) to understand the many
possibilities of the display overflowing. <Thank you for this>
Having said that, my question is, do we not face the same problem in
the standard CSD? <Mmm... depending on design...> To provide
for emergency overflow we have overflow holes at higher levels.
In case of tank overflows, we provide for safety overflows higher
than the regular live ones. <Good ideas> My question is, this
is the same problem we would face in an overflow from the tank or a
CSD. So, why is this different? Please Please consider this as a
genuine question as I want to have thought of these issues than have
a bomb on my hands. <Mmm, splitting hairs as the saying goes in
the west... but again, all matters... to degrees... relying on
siphons of any sort vs. plain gravity is more "risky"> Also,
Would you be able to suggest any colourful, peaceful and active fish
to replace the chromis? a school or 2 individual fish(es) are fine.
The wife says chromis are dull fishes and cant argue with her as she
is the daytime caretaker of the tank and inhabitants :) Cheers
And Thanks Again Ranjith <... I'd let your fingers do the
walking, through WWM re... BobF>
Re: New Nano reef -
coincidence 07/28/2008 Hi Bob. Below you referred me to a
page in WWM. http://wetwebmedia.com/surgesysf.htm It only
contains mails I exchanged with you before for my previous tank
setup :) Cheers Ranjith <Heeee! Sorry re. Much more to
come... B> |
Bonding Acrylic to Glass 7/17/08
HI there, <Hello.> Hope you’re having a good day. I wanted to know
what’s the best thing to glue acrylic to glass? I have a glass aquarium
and I want to build external coast-to-coast on it using acrylic. Can you
please help me? <You could use a two part epoxy gel such as 5 min
epoxy, although I would not. For an external overflow do consider using
glass and silicone, this will make a much more reliable bond to keep
water off your floor!> Thanks Ghazni <Welcome, Scott V.>
Re: Had enough noise...Need help!!! Reading 06/14/08
Thanks very much for your quick response, hmmm... I'm quite surprise you
never heard of Clear for Life tanks, maybe this is just a popular brand
here locally in So Calif (LA). <Rich is gone evidently... I have
heard of this make... not nearly as popular as Tru-vu/Aquaplex or
SeaClear/Tradewind in Ca...> I'm not really good on posting pictures
in the computer but I guess I will just give you a measurement... the
chamber is sort of like a triangular in shape that measure (picture a
pyramid shape w/ flat tops and not pointed) the top is 6 1/2" and the
bottom is 10 1/2" , the two sides are of equal measurements of 5 1/2". I
did not follow any instructions, I kinda do it my self (own design) put
like 12 holes around the pipe and that was it... I just want to start
the tank and then start shopping around for a good standpipe, that's
when I ran into your website .... actually thru Wet Web Media... if you
search Clear for Life in there you will probably track down this brand.
I will cc them in in this email so that maybe they can also give you a
better description on what I'm talking about... they are very good
advisers for hobbyist like me. <Good> Hi Crew: I'm emailing Mr
Richard Durso regarding my tank's overflow noise issue, I'm in desperate
quest for help on my standpipe as it is creating a lot of noise, they
are not familiar with Clear for Life tanks so I am hoping that if you
can give us an extra hand on explaining how this tank is set up, you see
I'm a regular at your site and this tank is often mentioned on some of
the topic...so again pls help. Thank you all. In quest for peace,
Jun <... aspirating such pipes is covered over and over on the site:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm scroll down to Plumbing and
read. Bob Fenner>
Sealing Bottom Bulkheads 6/5/08 Hi guys... great website,
fantastic resource! <Hello Chris, thank you!> I am in the process
of cleaning/rebuilding and re-plumbing an 80 gallon acrylic hex. The
previous owner had three holes drilled into the bottom for a canister
filter and air lines, which I plan to reuse. <OK> My
question/concern/greatest fear is sealing these bulkheads properly. My
local aquatic store sold me the appropriate bulkheads to replace the old
ones, and I carefully scraped all of the old silicone that was used to
seal the original ones. I wasn't able to get the surface as smooth as
new acrylic, but I feel I got the holes to an acceptable level of
smoothness for a proper seal. <Your leak test will tell you.> I
used a liberal amount of silicone grease on the gaskets of the new
bulkheads, and have leak tested them to ensure they are leak free. They
appear to be fine so far. I hand-tightened the nut on the bulkhead just
enough to ensure a good seal without deforming the gasket. <Perfect.
The silicone grease is very handy for preventing gasket chafing or
binding while tightening the bulkheads.> My question is... is this
the appropriate solution for long-term safety? <Yes.> I feel that
I have done an adequate job of sealing it up, but I am mostly concerned
about leak-free longevity. The tank is still empty, so now is the time
for me to make changes if I'm going to. Is there something else I
can/should do? <Some advocate for the use of silicone (not grease) to
seal up bulkheads. I personally use the exact method you describe above.
You are far more likely to tear the tank down for dozens of reasons well
before a bulkhead leak will be of concern. Have fun, Scott V.>
.:|Chris|:.
Re: sealing bottom bulkheads in 80 gal acrylic hex
6/5/08 Thanks SO much
for the speedy reply and for laying my fears to rest! <Ahh, very
welcome.> I wish you all much continued success! <Thank you, I do
wish you the same!! Scott V.>
125 Plumbing Question/Overflows 6/1/08 Hello, <Ryan.>
Just had a quick question regarding plumbing a 125 gallon aquarium. I
was planning on drilling 2 2" overflows out the back with the use of a
threaded strainer on the inside. I had noticed that some folks will have
the screens on the inside tilted slightly to the side as to ease the
water into them, is this an effective technique in your opinion?
<This keeps the line from being open to the atmosphere, reducing the
noise you will hear from inside the line. Doing this will require a
siphon break somewhere or you will inevitably have slurping noises.>
Also I was curious if the size being 2" would help to reduce the noise
generated by such overflows? <It will, depending on the flow through
the overflows.> From reading on your site I had gathered that having
overflow pipe that is too large is much better then too small.
<Yes.> Should I build the pipe on the outside of the aquarium to be
designed somewhat like a Durso standpipe in order to reduce noise as
well? <No need if you have the strainer angled somewhat down into the
water, you will just simply need to aspirate the line to prevent
siphoning.> I plan on having a 30 gallon fuge sit next to the
aquarium at a slightly elevated level as to allow me to pump water into
it, and then let gravity take care of the return. I was going to drill
the back of that 30 and plumb it with a 1" overflow, would you consider
that too small? <Depends again on flow through it. For my money, run
one of the tank drains into the refugium, let gravity do all the work
for you/lose a pump! One thing about doing this is you will want to make
the refugium drain the same diameter as the drain running into it. That
way you know the refugium can drain anything that can be drained into
it.> Would you recommend I add another for redundancy? <It does
not hurt to have an extra for redundancy. > Noise is the main factor
due to tank placement. Any suggestions would be fantastic, thank you
very much. <You are on the right track. Your basic design will be
fine, a bit of tweaking with the plumbing itself once setup will give
you quite flow with these large lines (a good idea too).> Ryan
<Have fun, Scott V.>
Bulkhead And Non-Standard Hole Size Question – 04/22/08 Hi
Crew, <<Howdy, Paul>> I'm going to try and make this issue
short and sweet because I know how busy all of you are. <<Ah, no
worries mate>> I couldn't find this issue when searching through
the site. <<Mmm, well…guess there will be one after this [grin]>>
I am setting up my new 110g tank but I have one problem. The tank
has a 1" overflow hole drilled in the bottom of the tank that was
used for a wet/dry. Only 1 hole and it was previously capped off
with a bulkhead/pvc/cap. <<I see>> It was covered with LS so
it was not being used. I had to cut off the bulkhead in order to
move the tank out of the stand because there was 5 inches of pipe
hanging down. Now that I have the tank set up I am going to cap off
the hole. I was going to do the same thing as the previous owner by
using a bulkhead. <<Hmm…do you want to keep this hole/have the
hole available for use at a later time? If not, maybe a glass
“patch” silicone over the hole would serve better. A double layer of
inexpensive 3/16” float glass from your local Lowe’s/Home
Depot/Hardware Store will do the trick (they will even cut it for
you). Just cut a pair of patches to overlap two-inches beyond the
perimeter of the hole…center the first patch and secure to the
bottom glass of the tank with silicone (apply enough silicone to
fill-out/adhere the entire surface of the patch)…next, apply a thin
layer of silicone over the entire surface of the first patch and
then lay/secure the second patch on top of this (use a small weight
to hold all in place). The resulting “laminated” 3/8-inch patch will
be quite strong and water-tight…and nothing will be sticking out the
bottom of the tank to interfere with the stand and equipment below>>
To my amazement, the hole opening is 1.5". The old bulkhead barely
fits in the hole and is also 1.5". <<Can be found...though
generally not from an “aquatics” source>> As you can probably see
I can't find a 1" bulkhead that will fit into a 1.5" hole. <<Will
probably take a little searching of industrial fittings, but they
are out there. A good place to start is USPlastics.com>> They all
require at least 1 5/8. <<Most of those available from hobby
sources, yes (or even a 1 ¾” hole>>> I tried to enlarge the hole
using 50 grit sandpaper. <<Mmm…save your strength>> After 2
hours I didn't feel like I was getting anywhere and I was extremely
tired. <<Indeed>> I'm looking for options. <<A Dremel tool
and a diamond-grit bit>> I thought about buying a 4"x4" square of
glass and silicone it, keep grinding away to enlarge the hole, or
maybe you know of a 1" bulkhead that will fit into a 1.5" hole. Any
thoughts on the best solution? <<All three are viable
options…but the glass patch (as I outlined) would be the easiest and
“cleanest” fix, in my opinion>> The hole will be covered with LS
when the tank is up and running. Thanks as always. Your input is
invaluable. Paul <<Always happy to share. EricR>>
Re: Bulkhead And Non-Standard Hole Size Question - 04/22/08
Thank You for your response. <<Quite welcome>> I was thinking
the glass patch would be the best solution as well but I wasn't sure
if I was going to run into any structural problems using a thinner
piece of glass with all the weight on top. <<Easy enough to
“build-up” the patch to match the thickness of the glass on the
tank’s bottom>> I can get glass pieces from a local glass store.
Would it be better to get 1 piece of 3/8 or is having 2 pieces
siliconed together stronger. <<The single piece of thicker glass
will work…but a laminated patch “will be” stronger/more durable>>
I will definitely go the glass patch route though. <<Excellent
choice>> Thank You. Paul Kelly <<A pleasure to assist. Eric
Russell>> |
Overflow/Plumbing Question, follow-up to ScottV ayer 4/21/08
Dear Crew, <Hello Andy.> I was skimming today's FAQs and saw the
post from the guy who was building his in-wall setup, and Scott V warned
him against the use of check-valves. <I surely did.> I employ a
check-valve, so I was curious as to background of Scott's warning and
did some searching. <Great, an opportunity to learn! Many answers
are here for those who look.> Well, one thing lead to another, and I
am now researching overflow boxes, see why this hobby costs so much
money? <Heee, it sure can, and fast.> You start looking for one
thing, and the next minute you're interested in 7 other things. So,
stepping back a bit: I have an old-school Oceanic 110 gallon display
that is not reef ready. I employ one overflow box that came with my
Pisces 500 wet-dry filter 20 years ago. <Wow!> I believe the bulkhead is
1.25". Accumulated air is removed through the use of a small airline
siphon tube/check-valve at the top of the overflow box that drains into
my sump. Water from the overflow box feeds my sump using flexible
tubing, and runs into a DIY square arrangement of PVC piping (4 x 1/2"
pipes connected with 4 elbows) in which I've drilled holes (bottom
and sides), which squirts water onto my bio balls (I know, I know--old
school, but I have 0 ppm nitrates and the tank has been running for 1
year--someday I'll get around to removing them and replacing with LR
because I stupidly placed one of my two heaters under the bio balls and
can't get it out to adjust). <If it’s not broke…> In its original
form, this unit had a sprayer arm, and the water pressure caused this
arm to rotate around and spray the bio balls. I lost this sprayer arm
when I was out of the hobby for a bit, so I had to design a replacement.
Anyway, after passing through my sump, the water returns using a Little
Giant 4-MDQX-SC (1325 gph). The pump returns water via a 4-foot 1 1/4"
I.D. PVC pipe (at 4' head, I figure I have just under 1200 gph possible,
but I realize my return is limited by the 1 1/4" overflow). <Yes, to
less then 500 gph.> I've added a ball-valve to regulate flow--the
pump is capable of returning much more water than can be drained.
<Good, you will need it!> The top of this pipe is topped with a 180*
elbow. To the return side of this elbow, I've added a check-valve to
keep my sump from flooding in the event of a power loss/pump failure.
After the check valve is a 20" (placed vertically) PVC pipe with several
large holes drilled in it for water dispersal throughout the tank. (I
hope you can picture this arrangement in your head). <Oh yes.> So,
I was able to find articles/FAQs regarding check valves, but most of the
warnings seem to be aimed at those people who have tanks with holes
drilled in the bottom/low in the tank. <The warning applies to all
tanks. There must be sufficient sump space for the transit volume
without the check valve since it can undoubtedly fail when needed the
most. The short of it is you cannot count on these valves to serve their
one purpose, so why use them?> I do see, however, that because of the
way in which I've chosen to return water (i.e., 20" vertical PVC
pipe), I could face a flooding problem if the power were to go out and
my check valve failed. <This poses the potential to siphon out quite
a bit of water.> Thus, I think I would be better off changing the
configuration to a horizontal drilled PVC pipe near the top of my tank.
<A smart move.> The only thing that concerns me about this is that I
will lose some of the mid/low level water movement that the vertical PVC
pipe provides now, although I think I do have plenty of flow (2
Koralia 3s at each side of the top of my tank pointed down (about 30*
angle) and 2 MaxiJet 1200s about 10" from the bottom at each side).
<Directing the supplemental flow will account for the loss of flow in
these areas. We are talking about relatively low flow to begin with from
the return in regards to your total picture.> So, the next thing to
which my research lead me to was that I really should have two overflow
boxes for redundancy. <This is best.> This is a valid concern, as
I had a near disaster the other night when some detritus clogged my
airline siphon, which allowed air to build up in the top of the overflow
box that almost broke the overflow siphon. <A common reality with
these boxes.> Do you have any suggestions as to a quality overflow
box to complement my existing overflow box? <The loaded question of
the day!> I was looking at the Cpr Aquatic CS90 (up to 125 gallons)
and CS100 (up to 200 gallons). <If you have the wherewithal to tear
down your system for a half hour or so, do consider drilling through the
back of your tank for an overflow. This is far and away the most
reliable way to do this. Not only is this much more reliable, but YOU
choose the bulkhead size, hence the flow. For an example please visit:
http://www.momsfishsupply.com/drilling_video.html This is a (goofy)
video on the basics of drilling a tank (and linked to the site on which
I sell my overflows, FYI). If you are not in the mindset to tear down
your tank or drill it, the hang on the back siphons like the one you
have been using is your option. It is a good idea to have redundant
overflows with any type, but is advisable with these in particular. The
CPR overflows are nice, but I am partial to the types that use siphon
tubes rather than the entire body. This keeps the water velocity in the
siphon higher and will pass many of the bubbles right on through rather
then accumulating them, which will break the siphon.> My system
includes a 30 gallon refugium, a 5 gallon (guess) sump, and about 95-100
lbs of live rock--don't know where that puts me in terms of total system
volume. <Me neither, perhaps back in the 110 gallon range once the
rock volume is accounted for.> Thank you so much for your help!
Andy <Welcome, I hope this does help you decide. Regards, Scott V.>
Re: Overflow/Plumbing Question 4/21/08 Thanks Scott.
<Welcome.> I don't think I'm ready to tear down my tank. I recently
had back surgery--water changes are about all I can stand at this point.
Unfortunately, my wife is neither the DIY type nor totally supportive of
my obsessions . . .er . . .hobby. <Believe me I understand both the
obsession and not tearing down the tank! It was worth mentioning.> I
saw the siphon-tube type overflows for much less than the CPR (at
drfosterandsmith) and just assumed there was a reason (i.e.
quality/efficiency/reliability) they are $65 less than the CPR. <The
quality of the CPR units is second to none, I just personally favor the
tube types for the reasons mentioned before.> Thanks again. The link
you sent was cool, by the way. Andy <Ahh, thank you. Best regards,
Scott V.> Re:
Overflow/Plumbing Question 4/23/08 Scott, A few last questions
if you don't mind. <No problem.> For a redundant overflow box for
my tank (knowing what I already have), what size do you recommend? There
is an Eshopps PF-800 single intake (800 gph) for up to 125 gallon tank,
the Eshopps PF-1000 dual intake (900 gph) for up to 200 gallon tank, and
I found one on eBay made by CFL Aquatics that is a dual intake 1200 gph
model. Do I need a dual intake, or can I get by with a single intake 800
gph? <A dual intake would be better for redundancy’s sake even within
the one box.> One thing I'm a bit worried about in sizing this up is
this--will adding a second overflow necessarily increase the volume of
water that flows into my sump, or is it only that my system is now
capable of delivering more flow to my sump (is this just a question of
what goes in can only do so as fast as it goes out?). <You are
increasing your flow capability. If you do not increase your sump return
output you will not increase the actual flow.> My reason for asking
is, if one overflow box fails and your pump is putting water back in the
tank faster than your redundant box is capable of handling, what happens
(I know the answer)? <Yep, water on the floor. The idea of
redundancy it to flow what each box can handle should the other box
fail.> I guess my question really is, how do you know that your
return flow is never more than what any one of your boxes can handle?
<Pump ratings and knowing what your boxes will actually flow (not what
the manufacturer claims) is a fair estimate. The only surefire way is to
try each box one at a time to actually see if it can handle it. This can
be pain, but you only have to do it once.> I do intend to purchase a
level controller that will kill my pump in the event the tank starts to
overflow. <This is really not needed with overflows setup as
discussed above, but an interesting idea towards an extra safety check.>
Thanks again! Andy <Welcome, Scott V.>
Drain and Return Layout 3/31/08 Hello everyone at WWM!! Thank
for all the time you guys give to the community of Aquarium
enthusiasts! <Welcome, thank you for noticing!> Now here's my
question. I am in the planning stages of a 125 GL aquarium with a 70
GL DIY sump. I have attached a picture of the way I am planning
to drill the tank. There will be two drains and two returns. The
drains will be 1.5 inch bulkheads with a Durso standpipe deal. The
returns will be 1 inch and will have each have a Rio Hyperflow 26
pump flowing through them. The head is about 4 feet so I'm assuming
I'll get about 1,100-1,200 GPH through each return line. <Hmm,
the drains will not handle this. A 1.5” drain is good for a little
more than 750 gph safely.> I'm thinking I'll have about 2,200-
2,400 GPH total flow in the tank. Are two 1.5" bulkheads for the
drains good enough? <No, you will need to add one more (even then
you will be borderline) or step up to 2” drains.> I have been
trying to find the ratings for bulkheads in GPH but nobody really
has a clear cut rating system. <Yes, this is a matter of
experience, first hand testing, or reading from those who do know!
There will be such a guide out soon!> Can the 1 inch return
bulkheads handle this amount of water (1,100-1,200 GPH) flowing
through them? Or should I go bigger? <1” is fine for this flow
as a return, you can step up to 1 ¼” for this if you wish.>
Another problem I'm having is regarding the drains and their
placement in the tank. In the included diagram (if you can even
understand it, sorry about my novice graphic skills) <Your
diagram is fine, a view from the top.> there is a different
position for each of the drains. The placement on the left side of
the tank would be my ideal location to drill, because it would free
up more aquascaping possibilities, but in planning this I'm worried
about dead spots that would be caused by placing it there The 2
black lines coming from each of the returns indicate the expected
flow of water). There will be about two inches of no-man's land
around the perimeter of the tank, except for the back if I decide to
put the overflow box in that area. The other less desirable location
for the overflows is on the right hand side of the diagram. I'm
thinking that by moving the overflow closer to the front of the tank
it will give better circulation, because the water would flow into a
corner and "bounce" into other directions, but hey, I'm not an
expert, so that's why I'm asking you guys :-D This position isn't my
fave because it would force me to place rocks to cover the overflow
more in-line with the rocks covering the returns creating a sort of
"wall of rocks" look. This isn't that desirable to me as I'm going
for that whole underwater canyon feeling with the mound of rock in
the front-middle of the tank and the other two mounds closer to the
back at the left and right. But if placing the overflows closer to
the front of the tank will make everything happier than I'm not
opposed to it. Your feedback is appreciated!! Sorry for taking up so
much of your time!! <Not at all! I would put the overflows
towards the back to get them out of the way. You will not have the
dead spots you mentioned with sufficient circulation in the tank.
Make the outputs on your returns adjustable to control where the
flow goes. My concern is the size and number of the drains, as
mentioned above. Scott V.> -Art Perez | 
|
Tank Setup Update 2/27/08 Hello Crew and Bob <Hello Brian,
Scott V. with you today.> I'm writing you today not to ask questions
but to give you a update on my new reef tank ;) <OK> Thanks to
Scott V and Mike at www.glass-holes.com I have put together the perfect
reef setup. I ordered a 1500g overflow box kit which came with the
diamond bit and all accessories needed for the overflow including a cool
glass-holes.com tee shirt and some hard candies. Thanks Scott and
Mike <I am happy to hear everything worked out well.> So here's my
tank setup we'll see how perfect it is as of today. Cycling the
aquarium started 2-21-08 so its 5 days old.. 55 lbs of live rock from
Dr Foster and Smith "Nice stuff by the way" 70 lbs of sand bed. It’s
about 5 inches deep. The sump actually overflows into the refuge...My
idea but with Scott V helping me with this idea .Thanks again Scott, it
works perfect. <Good to hear.> 2 DIY refuge's 1 has 6 inches of
sand other has 4 inches of refuge mud I plan on growing macro after the
cycle is completed.. No light over refuge as of yet. And then 2
Mag drive 12 pumps returning water through Vinyl Tubing 3/4" so total
I'm pumping roughly 1400 gph total I'm thinking? <I would like to
state for other’s sake that I would not typically recommend this much
pump on two 1 ½” bulkheads. Yours is a situation that allowed it with
your particular plumbing combination and head pressure.> Lighting is
the Nova Extreme T-5 Fixtures w/Lunar Lights total watts is 216 I
plan on just LPS tank at the moment.. My skimmer is junk Skimmer
I'm ordering from Scott V he just doesn't know it yet ;) <Heee, I do
now!> Tank specs as of tonight 2-26-08 , 5:00 pm Water is RO
Water change 10 gal weekly Sal 1.024 <I would raise this a bit to
1.025-1.026.> Temp 80 PH 8.2 Amm 0 ppm Nitrite 0 ppm
Nitrate 5.0 ppm Alk 3.0 Cal 100 I'm ignoring Alk and Cal
readings above only because it’s a new tank! I added a 2 part
calcium/Alk called C-balance tonight rechecking numbers tomorrow hoping
these numbers will balance (Alk 2.5 Cal 420). <Yes, do supplement to
get these numbers up.> I'm guessing these numbers are good for the
tank being 5 days old That's about all I can think of tonight I hope
I didn't leave anything out. With all this finally done I owe many
people like WWM Crew and Bob Fenner for this Web site as I am an
everyday reader a BIG THANK YOU for everything you guys/gals do!
<<This is what makes all the time, daily... worthwhile. RMF>>
>:((((-< Brian Coble, Wisconsin <You are welcome Brian, I am glad
we could help. Thank you for all the kind words and the update on your
system. Scott V., in sunny California.>
Dual Overflow Question 12/23/07 WWM Crew, <Rob> Great work,
you guys are awesome. <The guys and gals here at Wet Web Media strive
to do our best.> I am building a 20H sump for a 50 gal tank. Head
height is about 5 feet. I read through the FAQ's and found some great
simple plans, and they call for a single CPR CS-50 overflow and a Mag-5
return pump. I plan on using 2 CPR CS50s overflows, per Bob F's
recommendation. Should I plumb them together or drain them separately to
the refugium? <Separately, Teeing them together will give you
problems.> If I plumb them separately will I need a bigger return
pump? Do not know what pump you have now. Generally, it is best to
choose a pump with a gph slightly higher than the total drain volume. In
your case, with both overflows working, will be close to 600gph. You can
always throttle down the return on the pump with a ball valve.>
Thanks for all you do, I am a huge fan of your site. <You're welcome,
and have a good day. James (Salty Dog)> Rob.
Overflow Issues…Sluggish Drain Lines – 09/30/07 I just recently
moved and set up my 125 Gal. tank with a 29 Gal. refugium. <<Neat>>
About a week after having it all run smoothly, the tank has started
overflowing. <<Uh-oh>> I have two Durso Standpipes on opposite
corners of the tank using 1" piping. The two overflows were joined at a
T-fitting, which led to a ball valve, then a 45 degree coupling at the
end, which is about 3-4 inches below the top of the water line of the
overflow section of the refugium/sump. <<Mmm, I see…having the two
drain outlets conjoin at the “ T “ reduces the overall drain capacity of
the pair as you have reduced all to a “single” one-inch drain from that
point on>> I have a Pentair Quiet One 3000 (780 GPH) running the
return line on 3/4" piping. After it started overflowing the tank
yesterday, I re-plumbed the overflow to allow both lines to run
independently into the sump at about the same depth in the sump.
<<Ah, good>> This didn't seem to have much effect. <<Hmm…something
else must be amiss. After subsequent head-loss, I would expect the flow
rate of your stated pump to be fine for the two 1” drains (figure a
maximum of 300gph per drain)>> So, I tried to silicone the vent holes
on the top of the end caps, which kept the overflow from draining at
all. <<Yes, an escape route for the entrained air is a necessity. You
might even try some experimentation with inserting differing lengths of
rigid tubing in to these vent holes to see if you can find where the air
is trapped/building and thus most efficiently expelled/released,
allowing more water down the drain>> So, I gradually enlarged the
vent holes. I noticed that one end (the end that is closest to the
overflow section of the sump and flows nearly straight downward into
it.) has a smaller vent hole, and drains at a much slower rate than the
other end. <<Hmm, sounds like maybe the designer of the system was
trying to “balance” the flow rates between the two drains…which would
only be possible by limiting the flow in one, thus reducing the overall
rate even further (less than the 600gph max stated earlier)>> Could I
have a snail impeding the flow that severely on that one end? <<Is a
possibility, yes>> And if so, how do I convince it to get out?
<<It will likely require disassembly of the standpipe or “poking” it out
with some type of flexible instrument (semi-rigid plastic tubing)>>
Or is it more likely that my plumbing skills really suck? <<Hard to
say without more information on your plumbing configuration. But try
removing the standpipes and see how the tank drains…if you’re lucky, any
re-engineering may just be limited to these>> Any suggestions you
have are greatly appreciated. <<It may well be that your plumbing
design/configuration limits the drain capacity of these outlets more
than realized. Once you determine there are no blockages (snails) in the
lines, install a gate-valve on the output side of the pump and adjust
the to where the drains can handle the flow and see if this is
suitable…a flow of only a few hundred gallons per hour through the
refugium should still be fine>> Thank you, Jules (Portland,
Oregon) <<Happy to share. EricR (Columbia, SC)>> <Bigger drain
lines... RMF> Plumbing
Apprehension…Plumbing A Siphon Overflow – 09/25/07 Dear Sirs and
Ladies, <<No need to me quite so formal mate…Eric here>> Having
some problems determining the "right" setup for my 46g acrylic bowfront.
Currently I have an Amiracle overflow dumping straight into a wet/dry
via corrugated 1.25" hose, returned via an Aquaclear 70 (400gph max).
<<Ah yes, a very typical setup>> I intend to turn the wet/dry into a
sump and add a separate refugium. <<Excellent (this is sounding
familiar…I think we have traded thoughts before>> My first question
is regarding the overflow. I have read here on WWM that two overflows
are always suggested regardless of tank size in case of a
clogged/plugged overflow. <<Yes indeed, this redundancy can/will pay
big…eventually>> Is this still the current thought? <<It is>>
If I need two overflows can I simply use a model such as the CPR CS102
with dual 1" bulkheads rather than two separate (and bulky) units?
<<Certainly…as long as you only provide as much flow as recommended for
one 1”-bulkhead…i.e. – 300gph My second series of questions regards
plumbing. <<Shoot>> Assuming one overflow: It's my understanding
that the overflow will feed to a tee and that from one end of the tee it
shall flow directly to the sump, from the other end of the tee I will
use a gate-valve (to limit flow) and then to the refugium. <<Sounds
good>> The refugium will feed the pump chamber of the sump. <<Is
best…allows the most refugium biota to make it to the tank rather than
being caught up in the skimmer/other ancillary filtration>> The Sump
will feed back to the tank obviously. <<Obviously>> Is hard
plumbing still recommended? <<If you are familiar/comfortable working
with such, yes. It proves the least resistance to water flow due to its
smooth interior…if installed correctly. But…if you have a lot of turns
or are just not comfortable working with the hard-pipe...then by all
means plumb with flexible tubing, or better yet, flexible PVC>> I
have a 1" bulkhead on my overflow, can someone give me a detailed
example of the plumbing pieces I will need to complete such a circuit (I
am not a plumber by any means, but I am handy, just need a little help)?
<<Mmm, not without a detailed and “to scale” diagram of your system. But
honestly, it is not all that difficult. The materials are not
expensive…purchase an assortment of 1” ells (45- and 90- degree), tee
fittings, a 10’ length of 1” pipe, and whatever else you think you might
need…oh yeah, don’t forget the pipe cleaner and solvent. Then start
building…if you make a mistake, no worries…start again and keep doing so
until you have it just the way you like it. It really isn’t a big deal>>
If I am to use two overflows how will this complicate the plumbing?
<<Hmm, no complicating at all…feed one to the sump and the other to the
refugium. Straight shot…no “tee fitting” required>> I assume I would
simply plumb one of the overflows directly to the sump rather than use a
second tee. <<Ah yes!>> Thanks for any help, it is greatly
appreciated. <<Happy to share. Eric Russell>>
Sump/Overflow Question…Best Way To Temper Flow? – 09/01/07 Good
morning all, <<Greetings Daryl…evening now>> Thank you again for
the world of info on your website. <<A collaborative effort…we hope
you find it useful>> I hope this finds you well. <<Doing fine,
thank you>> I recently moved my 55-gallon FOWLR to a 75-gallon
aquarium with an overflow. In the 55 I was using a canister filter and
skimmer; the 75 is my first venture with a sump. <<A worthwhile
change/upgrade>> I am currently using my CPR hang-on skimmer with the
75, planning on eventually using a skimmer in the sump instead. <<Ah
good…perhaps one from my current fave, Euro-Reef>> The sump is a
Megaflow 2, which is sized for a 75-gallon aquarium; my return pump is
rated at 950 gal/hr. Sump intake is through a 1 1/4" hose and is output
through a 3/4" hose connected to the pump (not split). My question is
this: The volume of water coming into the sump tends to overflow the
prefilter pad daily; I rinse or change the pad, which quiets things down
for awhile, but in about 24 hours I am back to overflowing the pad.
<<Perhaps a coarser pad would not clog to quickly>> The water in the
overflow bubble chamber is approximately 3/4" above the prefilter tray,
which seems (to me) a bit much. <<Why, what problem is this
causing?>> What is the best way to lessen the water coming in to the
sump? <<Reduce the volume of water being pumped up to the tank>>
Am I better off installing a valve on the intake to lessen the flow into
the sump, or would I be better off splitting the return to the tank?
<<Don’t place a valve on the drain line, but rather, install a
“gate-valve” on the “output” side of the pump to temper flow as needed>>
My guess is that splitting the return would be a better option, as I
would also increase water movement with a second output, but I would
very much appreciate your opinion. <<You can split the return if you
wish…but do still install the valve for best “control” of the flow
rate>> Thank you in advance for all your help. <<Happy to assist>>
All good wishes, Daryl <<And to you in kind. EricR>>
Re: Sump/Overflow Question…Best Way To Temper Flow? – 09/03/07
Sorry to bother again...very quick follow up: <<Hey Daryl! No bother
mate>> I have a check-valve on the output of my pump. <<Is a
mistake to use/rely on these devices in my opinion. Much better to
design/install plumbing such that the sump will handle all transient
water volume. The check-valve imparts significant resistance requiring a
larger pump (and associated cost/energy consumption) than normal, and
will most assuredly fail at some point>> If I install a gate-valve,
should it go inline before or after the check valve? I would assume the
gate-valve would come first, followed by the check-valve... <<This
might be fine (If you are determined to keep the check-valve). Though
depending on the size/type of valve and how much you need to reduce
flow, you may find that the valve stops all flow before the desired rate
is reached if the gate-valve is installed first. This is probably of
little concern, but a bit of experimentation will tell>> Thank you
again, and all good wishes, Daryl <<Happy to help. EricR>>
Connecting Overflow PVC with Silicone Only? 5/20/07
Hello Crew! Jason here from Manila. Hope all is well with you.
<Yes my friend, thank you> I've read on your FAQs how you support
using silicone (vs. cement) on threaded PVC fittings, as you can easily
pull it out when you wish. <Yes... make a nice, cushioned seat...>
I have PVC going out of my overflow bulkheads, that I would like to use
Silicone (vs. cement) as I will have an extremely difficult time
removing it if the pieces are cemented together. <Yes... have to be
cut, replaced if solvented...> I am not able to get threaded
fittings, unless I make my tubing bulky with extra PVC pieces (which I
do not want to do if I can help it). So I have slip PVC pieces. Can
silicone provide a proper seal on slip PVC pieces? <Mmm, no... too
likely these joints will pull apart> I am not running any pumps thru
these. The water running thru here is from my overflow, into my
sump. Hope you guys can help! Jason <Perhaps looking for,
using "unions" (a type of re-joinable PVC fitting) will work out better
for you here. Bob Fenner>
Pump For 72 Gal Bow Front? -
03/27/06 Hello Crew. <<Howdy Steve>> I just purchased an
All-Glass 72 gal bow front that will be used for a FOWLR set up.
<<cool>> The tank came with the predrilled MegaFlow Overflow.
<<Mmm...is hardly “mega”>> The overflow has a 1-inch drain, ¾-inch
return, and max flow rate of 600 gph. <<More like half that
actually. You “might” get the drain to flow close to the 600gph rating,
but not without much fiddling/tuning/modification of the plumbing to
handle the associated surge and noise issues>> I am shopping for a
return pump to be used in the sump of my wet/dry, and I am currently
looking at these brands: 1) Eheim Hobby Pump 1260 @634 gph or Eheim
1262 @898 gph 2) Mag Drive 7 @700 gph or Mag 9.5 @950 gph 3)
Quiet One 3000 @780 gph Which pump would you recommend in terms of
durability, ease of maintenance, and quietness? <<The Eheim...hands
down the best of the three. And do plumb with a gate-valve between the
pump and the return to moderate flow as necessary>> Are there other
brands that I should consider? <<You could, but not necessary in my
opinion>> Any assistance that you can provide is greatly
appreciated. Thanks for such a great site. Keep up the good work.
Steve <<Thank you for your participation. Regards, EricR>>
Re: Pump for 72 Gal Bow Front? - 03/27/06 Eric, <<Steve>>
Thank you for your recommendation on the pump. <<Quite welcome>>
Can a gate-valve be used if I wanted to use flexible tubing for the
return? <<It can...you will need to thread barb-fittings in to the
threaded valve to accommodate the flexible tubing...or...get a valve
with slip-fittings and use "flexible" PVC...a much better alternative to
the vinyl tubing in my opinion>> Or will I need to plumb the return
with pvc? <<Not necessary as stated>> What can I do to address
the surge and noise issues that you refer to? <<Mostly a matter of
experimentation and trial and error my friend. Adjusting run
lengths/angles/bends, aspirating, terminating above/below the
water-line, etc., etc.... Do read through our info on plumbing marine
systems>> Thanks, Steve <<Be chatting, EricR>>
Combine Closed-Loop Intake and Sump Drain In Horizontal Overflow?
03/26/07 Hello, <<Howdy>> I want to first say I think
your site is great and it has helped me a lot in planning my first reef
tank. <<Glad it has been of use>> I do have a question though
that has been somewhat answered but only in general terms. <<Ok>>
I am hoping if I give you some specific details you can tell me if a
closed-loop intake in my overflow will work quietly. <<Mmmm...I’ll
see what I can do>> I have a horizontal overflow that is 16 inches
long and 4 inches on each side and 4 inches deep. It will be mounted in
the middle of my 50-gallon (36x15x20). This will give me 24 inches of
linear overflow. <<Agreed>> It does have teeth cut into it; the
cuts are 3/8" wide and 1 1/4" deep. I know the teeth violate the
Calfo-principle but I had it made before I did all my reading here and
would still like to use it. <<Ha! No worries mate...am sure Anthony
will forgive...>> I was planning on putting 4-1" bulkheads in the
overflow. Two would be used to drain to the sump, one would do, but I
wanted some redundancy. <<Redundancy is always a good idea>> The
other two would be joined with a wye to a single 1" flex PVC and go to
the closed-loop pump, a Blueline 40 HD-X capable of 1270gph @ 0' head
(1" intake and output). Using a Mag-3 for the sump return, and the
Blueline for the closed-loop, I am figuring I will actually flow no more
than 1100 to 1200 gph. If I used down turned elbows on the drains, will
I able to drain this much water from the overflow and not suck in air or
have a lot of noise? <<I'm not sure how this configuration will
"balance out." The presence of the closed-loop intake in the skimmer
box will cause more water to be pushed/pulled in than you intend your
"sump" overflows to handle. And though the pump intake may be more
"aggressive" than the gravity drains, I think they will still "drain"
more water than you intend causing noise/bubble issues...and possibly
even "starving" the closed-loop pump which could lead to more
noise/bubble problems. I think it will be better if you don't try to
incorporate the loop intakes in to the overflow box. This configuration
would also recirculate much of the oily surface film through the loop,
rather than letting it go to the sump for the skimmer to remove. Since
the design of a true closed-loop precludes the tank draining in the
event of a power outage/pump failure, I recommend you drill/place the
throughputs for the closed-loop "outside" and below the horizontal
overflow box>> Should I just not bother trying this and just put two
bulkheads in the overflow and drill the other two below the overflow for
the CLS? <<Ahh, yes!...is what I would do>> Thanks WWM crew!
<<Happy to share. EricR>> SW pump, plumbing et al. wonderings
- 04/22/2006 Thanks for the great website. I've looked through
the FAQs but can't find the answer to my question so I apologize if
you've answered this before. I have a 215 gallon Oceanic FOWLR that I
eventually want to go reef. I want to switch to an external pump to
both increase turnover and reduce heat. I want to max out on the
turnover but I don't know how to figure out what that would be given my
outlet system. I have two built in overflow boxes in the rear corners
that have 1" bulkheads leading to the sump. What would be the max flow
rate external pump that I can purchase that won't pump in faster than it
can drain? <Mmm, depends on a few other factors... but I would shoot
for a pump that moves 5-600 gph... perhaps a bit more, at the head
difference you intend... and throttle the discharge down with
valving...> I currently have an internal pump but don't know what
GPH it is. It was a package deal so I am assuming it is the lowest I
could get away with. They also set it up with PVC extensions raising
the water level in the overflow boxes to lower waterfall noise. Will I
have to take these out to max out the system? <Mmm, no... once
again, depends on what particular livestock, arrangement of hard
decor...> I've had a persistent nitrate problem, will the increased
flow help to keep organics in suspension and increase their removal?
<Yes... one of a few general benefits> Thanks for any help you can
give. <Do give a/nother read through the Plumbing, Pump Selection...
sections linked here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm Bob Fenner> Re:
Overflow rates ... and... sump plumbing period - 04/19/06
Again thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. <Yikes...
if pertinent, pls include prev. corr. We have no way of easily tracing
who you were chatting with, about...> I have a 55 gal. reef that I
am setting up a 10 gal. refugium (small I know but necessary due to
space constraints, and I figure some is better than none). I have a
CPR overflow box that is rated at 600 Gph. It comes with a 1.250
bulkhead fitting. I want to use flex tubing for the drain line to
the Ref. What size pump should I use for the return? <... a "small
one"... Providing perhaps three to five times turn over maximum... a
need to be cautious here due to the small size of the sump itself... the
real possibility of it overflowing with transit volume should the pump
fail> Should I put in some kind of valve in order to help balance
the overflow with the return? <A good idea... though better if the
pump were "about right" w/o valving> Can I just install the overflow
w/1.250 flex tube and a clamp and run it to the refugium and then .625
or .750 flex from the pump back to the tank? Thanks. <Mmm, yes.
Over-the top... I do encourage you to read here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/refugium.htm Particularly the linked
files at top on Design, pumps/plumbing... Bob Fenner> Jay W. Thom
Standpipe plumbing, bubble-madness (and noise if you're really lucky!)
- 5/12/2006 Hi guys I need some serious help. I just
purchased a 75gal to replace a 75gal that was old and leaking. I got an
All-glass with the MegaFlow overflow already installed. <Hopefully
one with the larger through-put/holes> Ever since I installed it and
turned it on, I have been having a problem with air bubbles in the drain
line from the tank into my sump. Is there anything that can be done to
correct this? <... some> It is the standard 1 1/4" standpipe
with drilled aquarium bulkhead fitting, then it goes straight down to a
flexible pipe (pool hose stuff) and into a 20gal sump. <... have you
tried aspirating this line?> I have tried to raise the standpipe,
lower the pipe etc. I do not understand why the air is getting into the
drain line. <It is "entrained"...> Before I used the stand pipe,
I had a corner overflow, with bioballs, on the drain line I had a valve
and that regulated the flow so I would not empty the overflow. I have
tried this with the standpipe and it does not seem to work. when you
slow the flow, the water stacks up in the overflow. I am
at my wits end at this point and am very unhappy with the whole
MegaFlow/standpipe thing. It looks like it might be a great setup, but
mine just isn't working properly. any help would be greatly appreciated.
I have a Quiet one pump to supply water back to the tank, not sure what
the size is but I have not changed it from tank to tank.
Thanks, Chris <Mmm, this technique is described in various
places on WWM, but basically, inserting a length (to be determined... so
don't cut it just yet) of rigid or flexible "air-line" diameter
tubing... nominally 3/16" into the standpipe... and trying this at
different depths within the standpipe... should yield relief from the
"entrainment"... try this and see. Otherwise, do Google on/with WWM re
this issue, or read here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/bubtroubfaqs.htm and the linked files
above, where you lead yourself. Bob Fenner>
Overflow that would be sticking out of the bottom that the nut screws
now plumbing...? 6/29/06 Hello all, It is Gary Austin
again. I have a Perfecto 125gal. reef ready aquarium. I also just
received a new Lifereef sump and skimmer system. I was dry fitting the
sump, skimmer, and had one of the overflow packages in my living room
and noticed a small issue. I had the drain pipe in my hand with the
bulkhead fitting and nut. I have figured out how to install the
overflows in the tank but need some advice on connecting the hose/flex
tube to the overflow bulkhead. I was told that the threaded end
sticking out of the bottom that the nut screws onto should not have a
female connection used to hook up to the drain tube. I looked at the
bulkhead and appears that it is designed for a 1" pvc pipe to slide into
it. If I do this then I would have to glue a piece of 1" pipe then add
a fitting with a 1" hose barb end to connect to 1" flex tubing. The
3/4" returns are the same. Is this correct or can I screw a fitting
right onto the threaded end of the bulkhead to make my connection? !
<I would do this latter Gary... No sense, and I mean no sense in
reducing the not-so-reef-ready diameter by inserting pipe, using
flexible on this end when you can thread over it...> I would
prefer to use a female threaded connection in case I need to tear it
apart. Please let me know if I have this right or not? I hope this
makes sense as it is quite late and my eyes are failing me here. Thanks
a bunch and keep up the great work. <Take a bunch of deep breaths,
and don't cut/solvent anything until you're "calm"... Realize what your
options are. If there are threads on the discharge side, use a smear of
Silastic or Teflon Tape, and thread a female fitting over these. Bob
Fenner> Closed-Loop Plumbed Through Overflow? - 07/13/06
Friends at WWM, <<Greetings Scott>> What kind of problems would
you foresee running a closed-loop and a sump out of the same overflow
box? <<Hmm...would appreciate a bit more information to wholly
understand what you are attempting. You'll need to plumb each to its own
throughput/drain...you'll need to ensure the box can handle the volume
of water/won't starve the pumps...and then there's the noise such
flow/volume brings...>> Thanks, Scott <<Regards, EricR>>
SW plumbing, overflows mostly - 09/01/06 I am in the
process of setting up a new aquarium and wanted to run the set up by the
great team at WWM to see if there are any clear issues. < 20+ heads
are better than one! > My new tank should be 170 gallons measuring
60"x25"x25". It will have a 40" horizontal weir overflow with 4 1"
bulkheads. There will be 2 1" bulkheads for the return. I am looking to
set up a small sump tank under the cabinet to take in all the overflows
and run the skimmer. The water will then flow down to my basement using
a 2" PVC < You may want to consider multiple 2" lines. > <<And this
size through-puts/bulkheads... the one-inchers won't do here. RMF>>
to my main sump which will be larger and contain a refugium. I will then
use an Iwaki pump to return the water back up. < A MD-100RLT, I
presume! Great pumps. > I wanted to keep the skimmer on the first
floor because it's more convenient to clean but keep the rest in the
basement because of easy access to water. < Sounds great! The only
concern I would have is the ability for the single 2" line to handle the
flow from four 1" bulkheads. Simply doubling up should suffice. Good
luck! RichardB > <<Mmm, what's that formula for the surface area of a
circle? pi R squared.... do the math. Surprised? RMF>> A
Plethora of Plumbing Questions - 08/31/06 Hello, <<Howdy>>
I have a few questions regarding plumbing my 120 tank to my sump.
<<Alrighty>> I am setting this up as a FOWLR now, but planning for
the flow for a full reef later. <<Mmm, no reason your FOWLR
shouldn't have this benefit as well>> I have been reading WWM daily
to get a good idea of how to plan things, I just wanted to run this info
past you to see if all is good. <<Ok...let's see what you've got>>
I have a 120(48x24x24)gal tank, it will be built into the wall with a
utility room in the rear, so space is not a big issue. <<Cool!>>
I am going to have it drilled locally at a glass shop. I am going to
use two 1-1/4" bulkheads for drill-bit size reasons. I have 2 bulkheads
to be installed that are 1-1/4"ID. These will both feed the sump. I
plan on having them drilled aprox 5" from center to the top of the tank
(in the corners), and in the tank, use two 1-1/4" 90's with a threaded
strainer to skim the top. <<Ah, yes...this is very similar to my
drain/overflow configuration>> After coming out of the back of the
tank, I will use a reducer to go to 1-1/2" pipe. I know that it will
only flow the equivalent of the 1-1/4" flow bulkhead, but the 1-1/2"
pipe is more readily available <<Indeed>> -What is the flow of
each 1-1/4"? <<There are many things that can "revise" what is
essentially a laboratory environment/best possible scenario flow
calculation... The flow calculator on Reef Central says you can flow
920 gph through a 1.25" bulkhead drain...experience has taught me that
reality is about HALF the calculated rate. You can squeeze out more,
but for reasons of complexity/noise/hassle you will be better off adding
more throughputs if you need/desire more flow than this>> From the
reducer it will go into a T-wye for better flow movement, and will run
above the tank a few inches to be topped off with a cap on each
Over-Flow that will be drilled at the top to allow for air to vent.
<<You'll find inserting a length of tubing through the vent-hole in to
the pipe a short ways will be more efficient than the vent-hole alone>>
Then running down via a 1-1/2" pipe it will go into the sump via a 1
1/4" reducer. <<...?>> My sump lid is already drilled for the 1
1/4". <<Ah!...I see now>> Will this second size change hurt flow
at all? <<Will be a "slight" hindrance/increase in friction as the
water navigates the "bump in the road">> I plan on having 2 unions
installed and 2 gate valves. <<Unions are fine, but I wouldn't put
valves on the drain lines...too much flow restriction and chance for
blockage>> I will also allow for an additional T somewhere in there
for convenient water changes and maybe feeding a fuge later. <<Good
planning>> OK, with this said, here are a few of my questions:
-What do you think my total flow will be with the 2 1-1/4" bulkheads?
<<As outlined previously...about 900 gph or so, before things start to
become problematic>> -Do I need to go to 1-1/2" bulkheads? <<If
you want more flow than this, yes. But I see no reason to push more
water than this through your sump. You may want to consider additional
throughputs for a closed-loop for more water movement within the display
tank>> -Is converting to the 1-1/2" in the middle causing any flow
issues? <<No>> -Where in here should I put my UV?
<<Mmm...should not be plumbed in-line with the drain>> Should it
just get its feed from the sump and use a pump or add another T +
reducer to use gravity to feed the flow with a gate valve? <<Best
configured/flow regulated through a dedicated pump>> -Will the UV
just return to the sump? <<Up to you...can be plumbed to simply
recirculate in the sump if you wish...or can be plumbed from the sump to
the display>> It's a 15-watt (I know it's a little small but I'm
using it for now) will it do any good? <<Again, up to you...its
efficiency will depend greatly on how diligent you are about keeping the
lamp sleeve clean...but yes, will likely provide "some" benefit, though
these units are more trouble than they're worth in many cases...in my
humble opinion>> -I have an in sump skimmer, should be OK..??
<<No idea/not enough info, but if it came with the sump I have doubts as
to its quality/efficiency>> -Will running 45's instead of sweeping
90's matter for me? <<If true "sweeps"...no>> -My sump is
30x12x14T, is this big enough for this flow? <<Many variables to be
considered here (plumbing configuration, dynamic water levels, transient
water volume, etc., and not the least of which, your (your spouse's)
tolerance for noise), but generally speaking this should handle 900 gph
just fine>> I will start with the bio balls and evaluate later to
remove. -For now I would like to go with an in sump pump, maybe a
MAG, can I use just one pump and feed it up to a "T" with two over tank
feeds? <<You can>> -Or should I use two pumps???$$$$
<<A single pump suitably sized will serve fine. My advice would be to
"oversize" the pump slightly and install a gate-valve on the output side
to temper flow as needed. You'll appreciate the extra power/push once
the plumbing lines begin to restrict from the inevitable build-up of
bio-film>> -I would like to just use one, can I get enough flow to
turn the water over 10-15 times an hour? <<Not with two 1.25"
bulkhead drains...nor may you want to push this much water through the
sump...but at any rate, this much flow will require more or bigger
throughputs>> -If I use just one, what size would you recommend to
return lines before and after the "T"? <<Best to follow the
manufacturer's recommendations>> Or if, I use two with no "T" what
size line? Can I start with one pump and a "T" setup to save $$ and
change later to two later? <<Sure...changing to two pumps is not
necessary, though having the "built-in" redundancy is not a bad thing in
case of a pump failure>> -What size pump, in flow - do you recommend
for this setup? <<A Mag-12, with previously mentioned gate-valve
installed>> Which in-sump pump is best for low heat? <<The
MagDrive pump work well for me>> -Are gate- or ball-valves better
for me? <<Gate-valves...much easier to make fine adjustments>>
-Would this whole thing work better with an external pump? <<Either
can do the job...but a submersible pump is usually easier to employ>>
Whew!!!! Thanks so much for taking the time to help with my, I mean
our, Obsession!!! <<Indeed my friend...I'm happy to assist>>
Hopefully this all makes sense to you. <<Yes>> And sorry for all
the questions! <<No worries>> BTW, this is tank #4 in my house,
I'm finally growing up at 36, and getting away from the hang on filters.
Randy <<Good luck with your project, EricR...49 as of yesterday and
still not quite grown up>> 120 gallon tank drilling pipe setup
9/16/06 I currently have a 75 gallon reef aquarium. I bought a
120 gallon 6 foot long X 18 d X 21 tall aquarium that I want to have
drilled for sump X 2 and refugium X 1. If you think this is possible.
<Mmm... better to go with two good-sized overflows and use "Tees" and
valves for water distribution below> I was going to make a total
of six holes. Two holes would be for outtake and return from under the
tank wet/dry filter (it only has one intake hose), two holes for outtake
and return for under the tank sump holding rock, sand, and mangroves
(any other suggestions for what should be in this, such as mud, etc?)
<... posted on WWM. Read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm> and two holes for
outtake and return for above tank refugium containing rock, copepods,
amphipods, Chaetomorpha, etc. Where should I have these holes drilled
and how would you hook up the system (which hole goes to and returns
each system. <Also posted> I saw you mention something about
cages instead of an internal overflow, where can I get cages? <Such
thread on intake screens are available from online and not outfits like
MarineDepot.com and All Seas if you're a dealer> Do you have
pictures of a tank with cages instead of an internal overflow? I want
to avoid using power heads as well, Will the two returns from the
sump and filter be enough circulation? Any suggestions you can give me
that might make this better would be appreciated. Thanks Stephanie
<Keep reading my young friend... you're not quite "there." Bob Fenner>
Re: 120 gallon tank drilling pipe setup 9/17/06 Can
you send me the passage on the slender horizontal overflow, does anyone
make these for purchase? <... what? Please... keep reading. BobF>
Micro-Bubbles/Drain Line Plumbing - 10/14/06 I have a 215G
Oceanic Reef-Ready that came as is from the factory. I thought I did my
homework and then some when ordering this tank, but I have since learned
that the drains are inadequate for this size tank. <<A common enough
opinion/fact that you'd think the manufacturer would eventually "get
it">> Re-drilling this thing really is not an option at this point
so I need to make best with the situation that I have. <<Can be
done, yes>> I'm running 2 Mag-Drive 7's for my returns, I'm figuring
that I'm pushing about 700-800gph combined with the 2 pumps after
figuring in head pressure. <<This should pretty much "max out" the
1" drains>> I have two Vortec pumps to provide additional
circulation within the aquarium. <<Excellent>> The two 1" drains
are handling this with no real noise issues. <<Good...often this is
not the case>> The problem I'm having is with micro-bubbles, I'm not
sure if this would be related at all to the inadequate drains.
<<Could be/probably is...nowhere for the entrained air to go...>>
I'm doing a container with a container sump system using Rubbermaid
Totes. I figured that my problem was the result of not enough baffling,
but I have since read the opinion of one of your crew members that
micro-bubbles are not the result of the water returning from the drain,
instead they are only formed in pressurized situations. <<Hmm...>>
Is this fact, or just his opinion? <<I have no wish to second-guess
others of the Crew (especially without knowing the reasoning), but I
suspect both (opinion based on some fact). But that said, I don't agree
that micro-bubbles would only be present in "pressurized
situations." As with the case of venturi-style skimmers, the bubbles
can be the result of trapped air and water turbulence...in "my"
opinion. Maybe it comes down to the individual interpretations for
"micro-bubbles," but I have witnessed some very fine bubbles emitting
from drain lines over the years>> I poured a glass of water in my
tank and saw large bubbles near the surface and very fine bubbles deeper
in the tank, similar to the micro-bubbles that I have.
<<Indeed...much the same as what is happening in your drain lines>>
If it is true then my problem must lie within my plumbing work or the
pumps themselves. <<Bingo!>> I don't want to reconfigure my
baffling setup if I'm not getting rid of the source.
<<Hmm...well...supposedly the "baffling" should handle any bubble issues
(is why it is there), but excessive quantities of very small bubbles can
be very difficult to "baffle out." I agree with your stance to attach
the source of the bubbles>> I did the Vaseline test on all plumbing
connections and that didn't seem to help. <<Do be sure to clean the
joints of any residual Vaseline to preclude possible deterioration of
the plastic from the petroleum elements (Bob "cringes" at the use of
this product). It's likely the problem stems from the fact you have the
drains pretty much at their maximum potential. "Noise" isn't the only
problem associated with overloaded drains. I think your problem is
entrained air due to the amount of water you're pushing through these 1"
drains...aspirating the drains may provide relief. This involves
inserting small-diameter tubing at the highest point in the line to
allow trapped air a route of escape. The exact diameter and length of
insertion requires a bit of experimentation>> I have two 30G totes
as my main sumps, linked together through bulkheads. One was going to
be a refugium. I'm now thinking that perhaps I should now use the
refugium tote to provide additional room for dealing with the
micro-bubbles so I can have more containers and hence more baffling.
<<Mmm, I like the idea of the refugium. I would look to aspirating the
drain lines...you could also try using just one return pump to reduce
flow in the drains (would still be plenty of flow through the
sump/refugium in my opinion>> I also seem to have what appears to be
a bunch of fine particles in my saltwater, like dust in the air, only
seen when turning the lights off and shining a light through the tank
from one side and viewing from another. <<Hmm, do you have a fine
substrate? Bioturbators? I wouldn't be concerned>> I'm sure after
all the work I have been doing in an attempt to rid myself of the
bubbles I have introduced a good bit of dust into the tank. The tank
was filled with purified water, so the source is not my source
water. But I'm not sure if this can be related in anyway to
micro-bubble formation, or if everyone who did the same thing would see
it in their tanks as well. Can you tell me what would be the best way
in using a sump system such as this to filter out these fine particles?
<<Some folks use filter socks on their returns. I am not a fan of these
as they trap detritus (obviously) and require constant
maintenance/attention to keep them clean/become a source of decaying
organics. Personally, I wouldn't bother/worry about some particulates
in the water>> I have already drained this tank once, and it would
take a lot to have to do so again. <<I see no reason to drain the
tank>> Please let me know any input you can provide for my
situation. <<Have done so...>> I hope this post is coherent; I
have been up late trying to work this thing out. but I'm determined to
do so. <<No doubt you will>> Thanks, Kevin <<Regards,
EricR>> Plumbing/Overflow And Pump Size 10/6/06 Hello,
<Hello Wayne> I am setting up a 35 gallon marine tank with a 20g
sump. My question is what size overflow should I use since the tank is
not drilled. I was planning on connecting a 1/10 hp chiller to the sump
with the return to the main tank. The chiller recommends a flow of
200-300 gph with 5/8in tube fittings. Would a CS50 overflow box be o.k.
or should I go with the CS90. Also, what pump flow would you recommend.
<First, I would recommend nothing lower than a 400gph pump. You will
lose some gph through the chiller and the return line. A flow control
can always be put on the pump outlet to regulate flow. The CS50 is only
rated at 300gph flow rate, so I'd go with the CS90. For additional info
on subject, read here and linked files above. http://www.wetwebmedia.com/plumbingmarart.htm>
Thanks in advance. <You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)> Wayne
Re: New Predator Tank Stocking, actually plumbing/overflow Advice
10/29/06 Thanks for all your advice Bob, where can I send your
Christmas present?? <Mmm, the Red Cross?> On the comments about
my 'emergency drain' on my smaller tank. I think perhaps you misread
what I was getting at. I already have a corner overflow with a drain
out the bottom of my tank to my sump. My water level in my overflow
remains at approximately 3" during normal operation. I am thinking of
putting my emergency drain within the overflow compartment perhaps about
5" from the bottom of the overflow on the back or side of the glass. If
there was a power failure... Simply my pump would not continue to fill
my tank and tank water would lower to the level of my overflow draining
out the bottom drain. It wouldn't have any effect on the emergency
bulkhead drain. The only instance in which the emergency bulkhead would
come into play would be if the strainer on the primary bulkhead drain
would become clogged thus allowing the overflow water to rise beyond 5"
and then the water would have the same drainage capacity as my primary
overflow. <Ah, I see now> Correct? Two 1 1/4" drains on a 90
gallon tank should be sufficient since my primary drain already easily
handles the tank flow? <Yes> On my 200gallon tank, which is
becoming the predator tank I described below, I only have the one drain
and my pump that would be rated at 1,775gph overflows the overflow and
raises the tank water and runs my sump dry. Thank god I did a trial run
on freshwater and nothing else is in the tank. I've emptied my
freshwater and someone's coming out on Friday to drill a second 1 1/2"
drain on this tank. <I'd have multiple... oh, I see this addressed
below> I'm wondering though, If my existing drain is not sufficient
to handle the water flow, adding a second drain would handle the water
inflow... But if either one of them becomes clogged... My sump will run
dry. I was so paranoid of my 200 gallon tank overflowing and flooding
my developed basement... I made it virtually impossible to overflow my
tank... Pretty much in every instance my sump will run dry long before
my tank overflows. Is it better to add as second hole within the
existing overflow several inches up the back of it? <I'd keep at the
same level.> Should I possibly add another overflow box within the
tank and add a third drain? i.e. one overflow contains two drains and
the other overflow contains one drain? <Yes> 3 drains total and
obviously the highest positioned drain serving as my emergency drain?
Dave <A good plan. BobF> Marine Plumbing,
drains/overflows... 10/24/06 Hey there, I mailed you
quite a while with a question on waterproofing a homemade sump. Thanks
for the advice you gave me, it worked out well if you remember.. I was
thinking about getting my sump rhino lined.. yes it sounds dumb now).
<Actually... polyethylene... just expensive in HI> Anyway, I was
hopping you would be able to give me a little more of that great advice.
I did lots of searching on your site but its a little hard to find the
right search words.. all the wrong topics keep coming up. So, the
problem... I currently have a 240gal 24x24x96 tank. My drain lines
cannot handle the amount of water my pump is putting into the tank.
<... not unusual a situation> I have two 1.5" drains with Durso
style standpipes in the overflow boxes. The pump is the SUPER quiet
sequence dart. The pump is pushing water up through about 6 feet of
head, which according to the pumps flow charts should be giving me
somewhere near 2400gph. Now a 1.5" drain should give me 60gpm right ?
<Mmm, no... not in the real world> (I got that on your site with
another person you helped out) Then two 1.5" drains should give me 120
gpm or 7200gph. Now considering that my pump is pumping out at around
2400gph I know I have a design flaw. Even if the pump had no head its
max output is rated at 3600 gph which is still way under what my
overflows should be able to do. So here it goes, ill start with the left
side overflow and run you down the pipes. The standpipes drains
about 1" below the waterline. The water then falls down about 20" to the
bulkhead. Under the tank I have a union placed right up against the
bottom of the bulkhead. After the union the water falls 6" down to a
45elbow then travels 6" horizontally to another 45elbow, through a
bulkhead with another 45elbow sending the water falling 15" or so to a
submerged output. I'm going to be putting a micron bag on this line. The
submerging keeps it nice and quiet. <Yes> The overflow on
the right is identical until you get past the union on the underside of
the tank. After that union the water drops about 6" to a 45elbow then
about 8" horizontally to another 45elbow sending it (still horizontally)
to a tee. The tee has unions on both side and 45elbows going into two
bulkheads for the two separate chambers of my wet/dry. To do something
about the noise and the velocity of water tearing the blue filter pad to
shreds) I have two small bowls that sit on the wet/dries blue filter,
the bulkheads output are submerged in these bowls about 2". <Good
technique> So to sum it up, the left side has two bulkheads,
one union and three 45elbows to a submerged output. The right side has 3
bulkheads( two are on separate lines after the tee) four 45elbows ( two
on separate lines after the tee) three unions, and one tee, going into a
submerged output ( really didn't mean for this to start sounding like a
riddle hehe). All the plumbing is in 1.5" and I though that maybe the
air holes at the top of the standpipes weren't big enough. <Mmmm...>
So I took the tops off and let the noise all out. It still nearly
overflowed my tank. Could it be that my standpipes need more head
pressure to deliver more flow? <No/pe> should I try to lower
them? <Won't help much... not appreciably> Or could it be that
having both my lines submerged has left the air nowhere to go but up
making it hard for water to go down? I don't know but, Am hopping you
do. <No more hopping/hoping...> The last time you gave me
advice you mentioned you have a home on the big island. <Yes, in
Holualoa... on the 180... just down from K. Komo market> I hope you
weren't there for the quake and your house is ok. anyway... hoping for
some good advice over on Oahu.. take care <Thank you... What you
"really" need are more and or larger overflows... two, make that three
2" inside diameter... the rest of the plumbing configuration detailed is
fine... not contributing to your lack of flow potential... Either
re-drilling the tank and re-doing the plumbing or changing the delivered
water to the main tank (a smaller pump, diverting part of the flow... a
restriction valve...) are your easy alternatives. A hui ho! Bob Fenner
in Thailand> Mahalo nui loa -Chris
R2: Hard
Plumbing...Soft Plumbing...Pump Intakes...Bulkheads - 10/20/06
Hi Eric, <<Hello Ken>> Thanks again. <<Always welcome>>
Few more questions if it is ok? <<Sure>> What do you suggest
that I use from my 1" bulkhead return to my sump in terms of piping or
tubing. The bulkhead is pretty much right on top of the sump. Do I use
PVC straight down, or angle it somewhat, or tubing. <<I would use
rigid PVC straight in to the sump with a 45-degree ell on the end
positioned just below the water's surface. The ell helps to clear
bubbles so they aren't trying to go back up the pipe/creating resistance
like a "straight-in shot" would>> I am asking the question based on
what may be the quietest with the standpipe in the tank.
<<Understood>> I thought I read somewhere that straight down was not
the best option. <<Thus the reason for the ell/for placing the
output below the surface>> When I fill the tank with water the first
time and run the system to check for leaks: A) Can I keep this water
and go with it or do I need to change it due to new tank, tubing,
piping, etc. <<Should be fine to "keep">> I was wondering if
there is anything that could be bad for the live rock or livestock once
I stock the tank? <<Mmm...be sure to follow proper cycling protocol
for newly established systems>> B) How long can I run the system
without lighting (except room lighting) without putting anything into
the tank? <<Theoretically speaking...indefinitely...but I like to
put light on my rock while curing/cycling the tank, and let the natural
algae progression take its course>> I was wondering if I would get
algae if I ran it for a couple of three days with nothing in it, as I am
not sure what day I am getting my rock. <<No matter...will happen
eventually>> I used to use Reef Crystals many years ago when I had a
reef tank. Is this still good? <<Will be fine>> My tank is 90
gallons with a Marine Technical Concepts HSA-1000 skimmer, and their
Pro-Cal calcium reactor, Maristar HQI (2x250 watts) and T5 (2x54 watts),
and two Tunze Turbelle Stream 6000's with controller. How many pounds
of live rock do I need? <<I like to go with a "bit less" than most
would suggest for reasons of aesthetics/giving the organisms room to
move around/grow. I would start with about 60lbs of a premium rock and
make adjustments as need from there>> Is it 1.5 lbs per gallon or
less than that? <<A useless measurement in my opinion...to many
variables (weight of the rock, type system/ancillary equipment employed,
species/type animals, etc.)>> It is supposed to be Fiji.
<<Should be fine...though some regard this rock as "bargain" rock>>
It is from LFS and it is as cured as you are going to see from a store.
<<I would still expect/allow for this in your tank...albeit likely
diminished>> I will also use the packaged live sand too (for
aesthetics mostly), maybe about 3/4" or so (depth ok?). <<Yes>>
Is the Carib-Sea live sand or the Nature's Ocean a better choice?
<<Waste of money in my opinion...use dry aragonite and let the rock seed
the sand>> Is there a certain grain size that I should be using, and
do I have to put this under the rock or can I put the rock in the tank
first, and then the sand up to it? <<A mix of grades from sugar-size
to 2mm is fine...and yes, for stability placing the rock on the tank
bottom and then adding the sand works fine>> I think I used up my
quota of questions. Thank you so much for your help. <<No worries
mate...we're here to help>> Regards, Ken <<Be
chatting. Eric Russell>> Hard Plumbing... Soft Plumbing...
Pump Intakes... Bulkheads - 10/19/06 Hi Eric, <<Hello Ken>>
Thanks for the response. <<Quite welcome>> In between I sent you
my email and saw your response I had discovered the world of flexible
PVC. <<Ah...>> I used this with PVC glue. <<Yep>> I used
3/4" and 1" for my two pumps. I did a smooth curve (not a loop).
<<Excellent>> It probably took 15" -18" to make the smooth curve. I
would imagine that this should be ok? <<Will be fine>> Does this
stuff definitely hold? <<If you installed it correctly, yes...is as
strong or stronger than schedule-40 PVC hard pipe>> I also put a
union on the suction side. Is this ok? <<Yes...and a good idea to
facilitate maintenance of the pump>> I figure that in case I ever
have to take the pump out this would be the simplest. <<Indeed>>
I would imagine that I should put a ball valve somewhere on the
discharge side. What do you think? <<I agree, but not a
ball-valve...instead install a "gate-valve" as this will give you a much
finer control of the flow. You should also consider placing a union
between the pump-discharge and the gate-valve for the same reason you
placed one on the intake side of the pump>> I know some people would
say put a valve on both ends of the pump due to sump drainage if the
pump is removed but I could always take some PVC pipe and a 90 degree
elbow and some more pipe and put it higher than the water line. <<If
this is your "return pump" it should not be an issue as you should have
the sump plumbed in such a way as to hold all the transient water when
the pump is off. Thus, once you turn off the pump and allow the tank to
drain down, water from the drain line/pump intake line wouldn't be a
problem>> I am trying to keep as many "add-ons" out of my plumbing.
<<Always good>> Of course I need to lose some gph anyway since the
pump is rated at 790 GPH at 5-feet of head and the tank can only handle
600 GPH. <<No worries, the gate-valve will allow any final
adjustment if necessary...and I think you will find that 600 GPH will be
too much for the single 1" drain to handle easily>> One more
question about the standpipe with the Mega Flow. <<Okay>> Is
this noisy? <<Usually, yes...you will probably want to consider a
modification. Do a Google search re "Durso Standpipe" or "Stockman
Standpipe"...I think both offer "kits" for these now>> I was curious
why I read about people switching to the Durso standpipe. Do you have
any ideas on this? <<Indeed...most hobbyists find the "stock"
standpipes supplied by the tank manufacturers to be about as inadequate
as the throughputs themselves>> Also, is there a trick to "tuning"
either of these standpipes? <<Should be listed on the respective
websites, but generally, aspirating the drains sometimes proves
helpful>> Oh yea, and I did replace the two bulkheads that came with
the tank. <<Ah, very good>> Thanks a lot. Regards, Ken
<<Pleased to share, EricR>>
Overflows and returns 11/16/06 First off, I want to thank
you for all your help. This is truly a great website to help hobbyists
like me. I am trying to plumb a new tank and had a question about
combining lines. My tank has 2 1" returns and 2 1.5" drains. I wanted to
know if I can T the 2 returns with a 1.5" PVC pipe <Can> and T
the 2 drains into a 1.5" PVC pipe <This I would not do... better by
far to run both 1 1/2" lines down independently to the sump> so that
I have one PVC pipe draining into my sump and one return pump. I know
you usually want to T 2 smaller sizes into a larger sized PVC pipe but
since my returns are only 1" I wanted to know if I could T the 2 1.5"
drains with a 1.5" PVC. <I would not... too much likelihood of
restricting the flow to too large a degree. Bob Fenner>
70 gallon plumbing 9/20/05 Hi Bob! Do you think that
two 3/4 inch bulkhead overflows will be enough to handle the output
from a 3100 Rio pump that puts out 900 gal per hour? <Ah, no> Do
you have any bad advice for making a sump out of Rubbermaid containers?
<... posted on WWM... Bob Fenner> Thank you for any input!
-Steve Balogh Re: Tank/Sump/Plumbing 3/3/06
James, thanks for the response and I apologize for the poor
grammar. After looking at the sump diagram on OzReef.org, I have a few
final questions about the sump: I'm going to use two bulkheads for
my return lines, using LocLine and flare nozzles to replace my
powerheads. Should I connect each return to a separate pump, or would I
be better off using one powerful pump to power both returns? <I like the
idea of two separate pumps. The "T" connector will reduce the flow of
both pumps close to 10%.> If one pump is used, how powerful should it be
and will I get equal pressure in both returns (using a t/y connector)?
(mag drive, 55 gallon, 4 foot head max). <Here is a link to some flow
calculators so you can select the correct pump. http://www.reefcentral.com/calc/hlc2.php>
How large should my drain and return bulkheads be for this size of an
aquarium? I'm assuming the return bulkheads should be smaller in
diameter than the drain? Would it be safer to install two drains, or
would I be alright with one large drain? <One drain will work and pipe
sizes can also be determined in the above link. Look on the left
sidebar for different calculators.> Do issues generally arise in the
ability of the pumps to drain the sump as fast as the drain line fills
it, or in the ability of the drain lines to fill the sump fast enough to
keep the pump(s) from running dry? I want to use vinyl tubing instead of
PVC to connect the sump and the display tank. <Obviously we don't want a
pump that is capable of pumping more water than the sump can
receive. This info can be found on the link also.> Do the return
and drain bulkheads have to be on an equal plane against the back of the
tank? I plan to place them high up on the tank. <I would put them on a
equal plane. You have to protect yourself in the event of a power
failure so you don't overflow your sump and putting the drains/returns
too low will cause this. You may want to consider check valves on the
returns to prevent a siphon should this occur, but if your sump is sized
properly this shouldn't happen.> Thank you once again. Sorry about
the relentless e-mails, but your help is and has been invaluable to me.
<Understand. James (Salty Dog)>
CPR BakPak to overflow conversion 03/9/06 Hello, <Hi
Craig.> I am wondering what your thoughts are on plumbing my CPR
BakPak to a new refugium I would like to add to my tank. I am thinking
I can plumb a stand pipe though the bottom of the BakPak which would
flow to a newly placed refugium tank and plumb a return line back into
the display tank. Have you heard of anyone else doing this? Are there
any obvious reasons why I would not want to do this? It seems to me that
I can save a good chunk of money by using what I already have laying
around. <Seems to me like very little water would be processed through
the skimmer itself rendering the skimmer close to useless. Other
problem is what if your return pump in the refugium quits...how much
water are we going to pump into the refugium before the CPR pump starts
cavitating from lack of water. I'd think about it my friend. James
(Salty Dog)> Thank you! -Craig
Overflow Noise -
03/04/06 Greetings crew- <<Hello Penny>> I have emailed
in the past, and received a very informative response, so here I go
again. <<Hopefully I will live up to your expectations.>> I have
read FAQs until my eyes hurt; posted questions on all the forums I'm a
member of; asked friends...done all I could before I decided to bug you
guys. <<Not "bugging" us, really.>> Here's my
problem: the water overflowing from my main tank into my sump/fuge is
very very loud. <<A common problem.>> I finally got all the
other noises under control and I just can't figure out how to get this
one down. <<Let's see if I can help.>> My setup: I
have a 105 gallon Oceanic (does this make a difference?) with a single
overflow. <<Depends...how much water are you trying to push through
this?>> The over flow uses a 1.5" tube. The water flows through the
Durso standpipe setup that was provided with the tank into the sump.
<<Ah yes, the standpipe is 1.5" but I believe the bulkhead/drain are
only 1".>> Here's where the noise happens. It sounds like Niagara
Falls. Then it flows into the 'fuge section, and finally into the
return section. We were using a CA3000 pump, but at 1000gph, were told
this was too much. <<Indeed>> We replaced it with a Mag7, which
solved the problem we were having with the flushing/burping sound.
<<Mmm, still might be too much...depending on head height, you may find
a Mag5 will solve your problem.>> The water is returned to the tank
through a .75" tube/pipe. (All 'soft' plumbing). If you need more
information on my setup, please let me know. Any thoughts on this?
<<Plenty...I think you are still trying to push too much water through
that single 1" overflow, I recommend you try to turn no more than
300/350 gph through your sump. Believe me, it will make a
difference. If you need more flow than this in your tank; and you do,
use a larger pump to plumb a closed-loop for the system.>> Thanks in
advance for your help! -Penny <<Regards, EricR>>
Overflow Capacity/Plumbing Questions.... Hi Guys, <Hi.>
I've read through all the Marine Plumbing and circulation FAQs, but I
just wanted to get your opinion(s) on the setup that I am contemplating.
I'm going to set up a 55 gallon acrylic (36x18x20) to house LPS and SPS,
in addition there will be a 40-55 gallon sump located in the stand. I
was thinking about having two 1 1/2" holes in the bottom of the overflow
box as well as two 3/4 inch returns between the two. The overflows would
drain directly down to my sump/skimmer and would then be pumped back up
to a closed manifold via two separate in sump pumps (for redundancy). Do
you think this system could handle a flow rate of the roughly 1500gph?
<Yes.> Could it handle more? <The plumbing could... not sure
what would happen in the tank.> What would you do if this were your
own system? <Get a larger tank... the more space you have, the
easier it is to keep in balance, pull off things like high circulation
systems. In a small tank you run the risk of having such turbulent flow
that water will slosh all over the place. Certainly will make it hard to
keep a sand substrate in place on the bottom. Otherwise, your plan for
redundancy and increasing the drain size is all sound.> Thanks in
advance for any and all responses. Josh <Cheers, J -- >
125 plumbing Hello to all. I will soon be plumbing my 125 RR
AGA and have a question. The tank has the standard 2 overflows w/ 1" and
.75" bulkheads in each overflow. I am planning on using both 1" and 1 -
.75" bulkheads for the drains to the sump. I will use valves to adjust
the flow to the sump. <Why would you want to do this? No need for
it.> Then use the other .75" bulkhead for the return. My return pump
is a Mag 18 and will be plumbed to a manifold running along the top back
of the tank feeding 3 outlets. Does this sound reasonable? <I would
put a valve on the pump in the event the pump puts more water into the
tank than the drains can provide.> James (Salty Dog)> Plumbing and
Stuff Hey crew, My brother is on his way up from Southern
Cali bringing me my brand new 135G glass tank. 72"X18"X24". I am gonna
make it a FOWLR predator tank: 200 lbs. of Florida crushed coral
substrate, is that too much? <Try it and see... should be thin or
rather deep... see WWM re> 80 lbs. of Caribbean Live Rock from Drs.
F&S Home made 40G sump w/balls EV180 w/ Mag 7 Soooo, I was
planning on using a Gen-X PCX-40 rated at 1190GPH w/22' max head for the
return pump. I will only be at about 5' of head. I contacted the
company who I bought the tank from and they said the bottom pane is
tempered and the sides aren't. The tank is a complete virgin with no
holes. I know it is a no no to drill tempered but, is it
impossible for even the pros to do? <Can be done> Someone like
Custom Glass? <Or other glass companies around you... call them re>
If so, I will then have to go through the side. I can only have one
overflow because of where the tank is being placed, so by going through
the bottom back of the tank, what size bulkhead would you use? I was
thinking about 2". <Should work... if placed low enough...
when/where in doubt, make it larger... can be regulated on the discharge
side> It sounds excessive, but it has to go directly into a 90
degree elbow. Do you see any problem with that size because of the
elbow? <Will slow down flow a bit... I encourage you to use a Tee
instead... for venting, noise reduction... read on WWM re> Also it
will then have to Y off to go into two separate chambers of balls. I
read over the faq's on plumbing and got a lot of mixed opinions.
<Then... keep reading till you have your own ideas of how to proceed>
I just don't want to have the wrong size hole drilled. Now to my DIY
sump. I might have a good idea. It's a 40G three foot tank.
I want to use two five gallon buckets filled with bio balls. It seems
like a lot but the fish are big and messy. My main concern is keeping
the nitrates as low as possible between the faithful bi-weekly water
changes. <Skip the wet-dry media (balls) if you want to
avoid nitrate bottle necking> Most wet/dry's with 4 gallons of media
say they're good for 150G. So by having two going, when the nitrates
got too high, I could pull one bucket and clean em up while the other 5
gallons are still holding the bio load. What do you
think? <Won't work... but go ahead and try this... you can always
pull them> Finally, I would like to try out UGJ.(under gravel
jets) Have you heard of anyone using this idea on a s/w tank? <Yes>
I got the idea from
http://www.vatoelvis.com/135g.php. He uses it for cichlids, but I
like the idea. Maybe it would help with circulation at least?
<Maybe> Well, as usual, I'm up at 3:00 a.m., searching the site, and
the rest of the web, for anything new I have not seen yet. Thanks for
the reply whenever you get the time. The site is wonderful, and I'm
looking forward to some new books from you
guys. Thanks, Mike <Keep reading and keeping good
notes Mike... you'll do fine. Bob Fenner> 135G FOWLR follow-up,
cutting glass, overflows, LR over the Net, plumbing and WWM pix
Thank you for the reply Bob, I have just a few more questions and then I
should be good at least until I get this thing set up. I talked to
a bunch of glass shops in the area, and they all said they would drill
the sides, but no one will touch the tempered bottom (can't say I blame
em) With that, they also told me they cannot guarantee the sides will
not break while drilling, but they will do it. That worries me. If it
would happen to anyone, it would happen to me (I know Murphy very
well) So that leads me to overflow boxes, which also worry me. <I'm
more worried about the latter than the former in terms of potential for
trouble> But then I stumbled onto Lifereef.com, telling me that he
hasn't had one malfunction in fifteen years. <Wow! Well, maybe "he"
hasn't... but how about their customers?> I value your opinion very
much and was wondering which route would you take? <In
almost all scenarios to have the tank pre-drilled if possible before
assembly, or drilled after...> Actually, in your experience, are
these custom glass places known for busting even annealed walls, or are
they just covering there butts? <Methinks the latter> Secondly,
I was planning on Caribbean rock for Dr. F&S, and then I found a listing
on eBay, Item number: 4381101282, can you please take a look and tell me
if this stuff is any good? <Mmm, did so... out of Ft.
Lauderdale...> I emailed them and asked about size pieces and they
said to just let em know what I'm looking for. Too good to be true?
<... do you want Caribbean, Florida rock? The South Pacific sources are
better for general purposes... cheaper per volume, function>
Finally, please don't laugh, but in your last reply, you mentioned
nitrate bottle necking. I don't understand what that means. Can you
please explain it to me? Thank you. <Sure... by "driving" the
forward reaction/s of nitrification... lots of aerobic space, oxygenated
water, water flow... nitrate tends to accumulate in high/er
concentrations... the means, mechanisms for nitrate conversion into
other matter are impeded... and hence "bottle necking" (backing up in
the reaction series) occurs> P.S. I would like to send a couple of
pics of my DIY wet/dry, but I don't know what you mean when you talk
about file size. <Kilobytes, megabytes... we prefer a few hundred
Kbytes size maximum... jpegs, bmps preferably> Oh yeah, that
reminds me, if I have only one 8" baffle right after the bio ball
chamber, will the other side of the baffle remain at a 8" depth, even
though the bulkhead for the pump is only about 2" high? Thanks again, I
love you guys.
Mike <If your water flow is not too fast and I understand what you
mean here, yes. Bob Fenner>
- Overflow and Plumbing Flow
Rates - How much over flow (max) do you feel a 1.5 inch overflow
can handle, per hour? <Well... please keep in mind that these are two
separate questions. A 1.5" piece of tubing can flow roughly 3,500 GPH.
The "overflow" may [in fact probably will] limit this by the size and
number of slots that allow water to pass through it.> Now, how much do
you feel it should handle, being conservative and safe? <Again, depends
on the manufacturer of the overflow.> Same questions for a 3/4 inch
overflow (for a 90 gallon oceanic, drilled with a 1.5 and 3/4, I was
contemplating using both for overflow, but at a rate well below what
each could handle collectively). <Not entirely sure. Know that
Oceanic/AllGlass have improved their overflow boxes to handle higher
flow rates, but you should really get in touch with them to see if their
overflow box will in fact handle what you're looking to push through
it.> hear that 1.5 inch can max out at 750 GPH, maybe I'm wrong. <Do
believe it's more that that. The old style AllGlass overflows could
handle 900 GPH per overflow box, the Oceanic ones could handle about
1200 GPH> Not sure of the safe/reasonable level. <Again, should contact
the manufacturer.> I haven't seen info. on a 3/4 as it relates to
"overflow". Thanks very much. <Cheers, J -- > Overflow
Tube Size Hi guys/gals- <<And hello to you...>> I am looking
for your guidance once again. I am setting up a 125 AGA salt tank & 2
corner overflows with fish and live rock. An upgrade from a 5yr old
55gal set up. <<Interesting, just moved my 54 into a 180... have fun!>>
I have been told that the 1" bulkheads will move about 600gph each. If I
stepped the 1" pipe up to a 1 1/4" right after it is connected to the
overflow at the bottom of the tank, will this improve the flow rate at
all? <<Not above and beyond what you can get through a 1" bulkhead, but
I think that is actually higher than 600gph - I think this specification
may be that of the overflow.>> I would still have the 1" bulkheads but I
thought the larger diameter would move more volume from that point on.
<<The bulkhead is the limiting factor, even though it's not really
limiting you.>> I have a 2 magdrive12 pumps and am not sure if I need
both or not. If I used both I think would need more overflow than the 1"
bulkheads can provide. correct? <<Well, I think this pump is rated at
something like 900-ish at a 4' head, and even this would be more than
600-gph per overflow. I'd try it when you do your leak test, and just
plumb in valves on both pumps so you can dial them back a notch. More
flow is always better if you can do it.>> I am keeping Tangs (Naso,
Sailfin, regal blue and yellow) ,live rock and 2 Condy anemone, lots of
snails/hermits. Plus an arrow crab. I have a 30 gal refugium and a 20
gal sump. Do you think that my tank would benefit from the increased
flow from two mag12 pumps? <<Oh yes.>> Could I use both pumps and close
down the shut-off valve a little bit on both without damaging the pumps?
<<Any restriction/valve placed on a pump should be done after the
pump... if there is a valve in front of the pump, use this only to shut
off the line and remove the pump for service.>> I am not sure if this
idea is nuts or not...... <<nuts... you mean like true-unions? These are
excellent - use them everywhere you hard-plumb. Or do you mean the nuts
on the bulkheads? If these make you nervous, smear some aquarium
silicone on the gasket and put it together. It will be fine.>> Could
I tap off of a overflow line with a T and run some water into the
refugium and have the overflow from the refugium tap back into the same
overflow line farther down line? No pumps involved. Both T's would be
before the sump. <<You could - might be best to try and arrange the
refugium above the sump so that it could overflow into the sump. Is this
what you were thinking?>> The reason I ask is that I am hoping I can
keep the refugium under the main tank on display but sump, pump,
skimmer, etc.. would be on the other side of the wall in the room next
door. <<Oh... sure. If you are taking the time to do a built-in with
separate room, for certain.>> Thanks and have a good weekend!!!
Den <<You too. Cheers, J -- >> Overflows and Refugium
Hello, I have a 120 gal tank with one overflow going to a sump with a
mag drive 500gph. My question is can I add another overflow to go to a
10 gal refugium with a smaller pump or will it overflow. <its not
clear what you mean here? A second drilled hole overflowing to the
refugium but still draining to the main sump? If so, yes... will be
fine. You mention another pump though? Does this mean a second pump
returning the water back to the display from the refugium which acts
instead like a second sump. If that's the case... no way, a danger. You
best bet is to simply tap a refugium inline on the way down to the sump
(or atop above the display and the refugium will overflow back in>
Also would a 36watt pc 50/50 be sufficient for a refugium with macro
algae, live rock, polyps, and mushrooms? <if said vessel was very
shallow (12" or less). Anthony> - Flow Dynamics - <Hi,
Bill, JasonC again...> Hi guys a couple things that don't make sense
to me in your return E-mail to me. I asked you how many overflow pipes
you thought I would need to get around 4000 GPH from the overflow box to
the sump your statement was <<How about this: for schedule 40 PVC 1.5"
will give you 60 GPM, 2" will give you 150 GPM - you might want to
consider 2" or larger for this application.>> What I don't get is you
say a 2" will give me 150 GPM and a1.5" will give me 60 GPM. So that is
saying that one 2"(150 GPM) will give me more than two 1.5" (60 GPM + 60
GPM = 120 GPM) What I'm thinking if I had 2-1.5" pipes that would be
like having one 3" pipe. <It's really true - without digressing into a
long discussion of physics and geometry, it has to do with induced drag
and the actual area of the inside of that pipe... but it is in fact true
- one 2" pipe can flow more water that two 1.5" pipes.> Something is not
adding up right here. Could you explain to me how I will get more flow
out of one 2" then I would get out of two 1.5"? <Not in this email - if
you are really dying to know the answer, pick up the book Aquatic
Systems Engineering by Pedro Ramon Escobar - the answers are all
there.><<The surface area of a circle... pi R squared... do the math...
2" is more than twice the surface area than twice times 1.5"... RMF>>
Also how did you derive at these numbers now this is siphon only no
pressure (2"=150GPM &1.5" 60GPM) is there a formula or a chart (on
siphon flow) that you got these numbers from?. <Those numbers reflect
maximum flow, most likely under pressure which is going to be about as
much as you can push through there. Again, pick up that book - it has
all the math and related formulae in there.> You also state that I
should go with a 2" or larger a 2"@150 GPM = 9000 GPH I only need 4000
GPH. <More is better for this application. And really, the tank isn't
going to overflow more than you are pumping in, with multiple 2" pipes
you are just creating a margin for error.> Would I be better off going
with a 1.5" and a 3/4" (1.5"@60GPM & 3/4" I'm guessing about 30 GPM=90
GPM=5400 GPH. <No, it doesn't make any sense to try and size things
exactly - no room for mistakes.> Man ya need to be a rocket scientist to
figure this out! <Not exactly.> You also stated(>In fact, the volume of
your tank is large enough that overflow boxes would be unwise.>) (WHY
did you make this statement?) Isn't there thousands of people out there
using overflow boxes. <On tanks much smaller, yes... and they still have
large problems, which means with 650 gallons, your problems can/will be
even larger.> I'm sure they all can't be having these problems with
siphon tubes getting air in the tube and causing a disaster. Or am I
just going about it the wrong way?<I think so, but this is my "opinion"
- you're not obliged to listen to my advice at all.> The glass is bullet
proof glass I was told I would be taking a big chance in drilling it
some even told me it can't be drilled. If you think it is too risky for
me to run a overflow box with a sump (believe me I don't want any floods
she'll have me sleeping in the shed) <Oh, no doubt... as well as a
potential insurance cancellation - no thanks.> I really want to get rid
of this pain in the *** canister filter and fluidized bed filters. I'm
also unable to use a Protein skimmer because the top of tank is to high
off the floor 65" this is where a sump would come in handy. Do you know
any other way I can make a better filtration system on this tank seeing
you think my idea of a overflow box and sump is to risky? <Again, I
would query around with knowledgeable glass people - many tanks of this
size are drilled, and there is a good chance your glass is drillable
too... probably not with the run-of-the-mill glass cutting kit, but it
can be done. It will probably take a day or more, and you'll probably
have to drain the tank, and house everyone elsewhere temporarily.> I
hate to keep bugging ya about this but I sure could use your help. <No
worries.> Thanks again guys. Bill <Cheers, J -- > - More
on the Dynamics of Overflow Boxes - Jason Bill here again <Hi.> I
promise I won't bug you again on this overflow deal could you please go
to this site
(http://atlas.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua/overflow.htm according to the
plans on this overflow box if built and installed it correct way you
should never have any problems with air getting in the overflow tubes or
creating a siphon brake. Could you please take a look and let me know
what you think. <Well, personally, I try not to use the word "never" -
it's very final, and quite all inclusive. Will the person who designed
this overflow buy you new carpet should the design that 'never fails',
fail? All overflow boxes have a similar problem: the siphon tube.
Likewise, it's not that overflow boxes don't work at all, but rather
that they are prone to failure, and because Murphy's law will always
reign supreme, it will happen when you aren't home. Personally, I don't
trust overflow boxes of any type. If you are set on this solution,
install double the number you think you might need as a redundancy
measure so that if one or more fail, you'd still have some others to
keep you from sleeping in the shed, and also keep the insurance wolves
from your door.> I do very much value your opinion. Thanks Bill
<Cheers, J -- >
- Plumbing the Overflow in a Small
Tank - To the experts, Please help I'm going nuts! I have
searched the web site for hours and cannot resolve my plumbing problem.
These are the basics. 30 gallon tank with a 10 gallon sump. DIY overflow
(2 Lee's breeder boxes) 3/4 U pipe and 3/4 bulkhead fitting. 3/4 tubing
down to sump. Return back to the tank is as follows: Mag 5 pump to 1/2
in. tubing to a Y fitting to 1/2 in. tubing to 1/2 in. 90's with Line
lock fittings ending in the main tank. Now to the problem. I can't run
the Mag 5 full open unless I remove the Durso stand pipe I've installed
in the over flow. I have made 3 designs with the same results. All are
design's from Mr. Durso's web site. All are based on 1 pipe size larger
than the bulkhead, meaning they are constructed out of 1 in. pipe tee's,
90's etc. . I even made the straight 1 with out the Tee. All with the
same results. Also can you help me out with flow rates with a 3/4
bulkhead and a 1in. bulkhead in my situation? <Hmm... think you are
suffering from a couple of issues - first, I'm pretty sure the outlet of
that pump is 1/2" which means that you are not restricting the pump when
you use 1/2" plumbing which in turn means that the pump will perform at
the rated flow. So onto the bulkhead - I think the maximum flow rate for
a 3/4" bulkhead is 1,000 GPH, but not sure what the standpipe would do
to change that - you might want to experiment by taking off the top of
the Durso, so you just have a straight pipe, see how that runs with the
pump wide open and then add the parts one by one until you find the
limiting factor.> All help would be greatly appreciated, Thanks from a
big fan. <Cheers, J -- ><<The flow rate of this pump is too great for
this system/drain pipe diameter to accommodate. RMF>>
|
|