
|
|
FAQs about Light and Lighting for Marine Systems, Lamp/Bulb
Selection 1 Related Articles:
Marine Light, &
Lighting, Marine Aquarium Light
Fixtures and Canopies,
Lighting Marine Invertebrates, Anemone
Lighting, Coral System Lighting, Moving
Light Systems, Related FAQs:
Marine System Lighting,
Marine System Lighting 2,
FAQs 3, FAQs 4,
FAQs 5, FAQs 6,
FAQs 7, FAQs 8,
FAQs 9, FAQs 10,
FAQs 11,
FAQs 12, FAQs 13,
FAQs 14, FAQs 15,
FAQs 16,
FAQs 17, FAQs 18, & FAQs on Marine
Lighting: Fixture Selection 1,
Fixture Selection 2, Fixture Selection
3, (incandescent, fluorescent, MH/HQI, LED, natural...),
Lamp/Bulb Selection 2, (See Fluorescent, LED, MH... below),
Installing, Waste Heat
Production/Elimination, UV Shielding,
Measure, Troubles/Repairs,
By Manufacturer Make/Model: &
Actinic Lighting,
Metal Halide Lighting,
Fluorescent Lighting,
Compact Fluorescent Lighting, Small
System Lighting,
Lighting Marine Invertebrates, LR
Lighting, Tridacnid
Lighting, |
Initial cost is only part of the equation... what are you getting...
for what you are seeking in terms of looks, functionality... per
operational and replacement costs? Oh, and there are indeed
quality differences twixt actual manufacturers and re-labelers |
Kelvin Ratings in the Reef Tank 12/26/05 Mr. Fenner,
<Hi Jon, this is Adam, I’ll be your substitution for Mr. Fenner
tonight.> Thank you and your crew for operating one of the most
valuable websites out there for aquariums. <And thank you for the
kind words.> It is always the first place I go for
answers. Anyway, it's the holiday season again, and once again I enter
the world of "close but not exactly" in terms of gifts for the aquarium.
<Lets see if I can help you out.> I have a 29G reef setup with
2X65watt power compacts. One of the replacement bulbs I got for
Christmas is a 12000K vs. a 10000K I have been using. My understanding
is that the 12000K represents "deeper" light than the 10000K, but I
don't know by how much, or, more importantly, what the effect would be
on my corals. <Generally speaking photosynthetic animals prefer
Kelvin ratings in the 6500K to 10000K range, 12,000K probably has a
slight blue tint to it comparison to 10,000K but it should be
acceptable.> Is it ok to use, or should I go back for the 10000K.
<Shouldn’t be to much of a noticeable difference.> For corals and
inverts, I have a Bubbletip anemone (I know, I know...no place if a reef
tank, but it's really well behaved:)) <Okay you can slide this
time.> , frogspawn, Zoanthids, assorted mushrooms, Ricordea, star
polyps, and pom-pom xenia. Again, appreciate the wonderful service
you provide with the website! <You are quite welcome, Merry
Christmas and Happy Holidays.> Jon Gage <Adam J.>
Lighting/Color Temperature 2/7/06 Good Morning, <Good
morning to you, James. What a nice name. You must be handsome also.> I
have finally decided to jump and recently upgraded from power compacts
(130w 10,000K and 130w actinics) to metal halides. The current bulbs on
the two metal halides are 10,000K 150w double ended with supplemental
lighting of two 96w PC actinics. Would it be possible to use 20,000K
150w metal halides and not bother using the power compacts? <Sure>
Shouldn't the 20,000K provide enough of the blue end spectrum? <Yes>
From what I understand, 10,000K would provide better growth for the
corals (my main concerns are the maxima clam, yellow leather and pipe
organ). <I recall reading somewhere that clams prefer the lower color
temperatures (6500-10000, but also read that Barry Neigut of Clams
Direct uses both 10 and 20K lamps. Corals do seem to do better in the
10K range, personal experience.> I'm not too concerned with growth as
my tank is only a 55g tank, I just want to be sure this would keep the
corals healthy at only two 20,000K 150w metal halides or does growth and
health go hand in hand?<Definitely> I also would rather use the 20,000K
for aesthetics, hoping for a two in one shot with the 20,000K! I may
just use the PC's for a dawn to dusk effect. <Bottom line James, if I
had your set up I'd go with 14K lamps and you will get the best of both
worlds.> Thank you for any assistance you can provide! <James (Salty
Dog)> James
Color Temperature/Photo-Period - 09/03/06
Dear Crew, <<Hello...EricR here>> The fluorescent ballast on my
ARAD 48" fixture stopped working yesterday so my reef tank is now
running solely with the HQI lights. <<Shouldn't be a problem>>
Until now, my 75-gallon tank had the daily benefit of 6 hours of 2 x
150-watt 10K HQI lighting and 12 hours of 36-watt NO actinic fluorescent
lighting. (I never installed the other 36-watt tube.) <<Mmm, you
should increase the photo-period for the MH lighting to about 12
hours. Daylight in the tropics will average around 13 hours, with a
very small seasonal variation. Though some species are highly
adaptable, running such an unnatural light schedule will likely result
in long-term deleterious effects. Please read here and among the
indices in blue:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marlgtganthony.htm>> Without
supplemental actinics, what should I increase the photoperiod of the HQI
lighting to? <<12 hours...whether supplementing with actinics or
not>> Without supplemental actinics, which color temperature should
I select for HQI bulbs? <<The 10000K are fine (plenty of "blue" for
the corals needs), but if "you" want a bit more blue then go with a
12000K-14000K bulb>> I am considering replacing my current fixture
with a SunPod 14K HQI fixture with LED's for twilight viewing. Again,
there is no actinic supplemental lighting. <<And it is not
necessary...in most all cases, the supplementation of actinic lighting
is for the aquarist's/onlooker's benefit...even 6500K metal halide lamps
contain enough light in the "blue" spectrum for most any coral's needs>>
My reasoning is that in nature, there is very little actinic solar
radiation at twilight hours when the atmosphere is permitting primarily
red light. Am I correct? <<Maybe so...but "twilight" only lasts for
moments...not the 6-hours per day you were running previously>>
Thanks very much! <<Happy to assist>> Best regards, Paul
<<Cheers, EricR>> Lighting Spectrum Selection - 04/27/05
Hey, I'm about to buy bulbs for two separate set ups and I was had a few
questions about which spectrum bulbs I should choose. The first is a
saltwater tank that has a harlequin tusk as my center piece. I have live
rock but no other inverts. My current pc bulbs are 10k and actinic but I
have the ability to add a 6700k bulb along with the 10k and actinic when
I replace them all. I was wondering would this accentuate the orange of
my harlequin because it is stronger in that part of the spectrum? My
main concern is the aesthetics of my fish in other words. <The
spectrum you mention will highlight the fish's color more dramatically.>
My other question is about a freshwater tank I have set up for an adult
largemouth bass. It's a 220g with four 36w standard florescent bulbs. I
do a lot of fisheries work and understand that adult bass prefer deeper
waters (10-20ft) away from higher intensity sunlight. so I was thinking
that a higher Kelvin bulb would more closely resemble its natural
habitat. Do you think that 18000-20000K bulbs would be more natural or
better simulate the spectrum that these fish prefer? <It's hard to
say. On the reefs the water is much clearer than in a lake so the
lighting in 15 feet of reef water is going to be brighter than in 15
feet of lake water. I'd probably keep what you have. James (Salty Dog)>
Spectrum Selection (Not a big deal...this time!) - 04/27/05 Hey,
< Hey Brandon...and for future reference...please use proper punctuation
when writing in. > I'm about to buy bulbs for two separate set ups
and I was had a few questions about which spectrum bulbs I should
choose. The first is a saltwater tank that has a harlequin tusk as my
centerpiece. < Lovely fish. > I have live rock but no other
inverts. My current pc bulbs are 10k and actinic but I have the ability
to add a 6700k bulb along with the 10k and actinic when I replace them
all. I was wondering would this accentuate the orange of my harlequin
because it is stronger in that part of the spectrum? My main concern is
the aesthetics of my fish in other words. < Warmer colors will likely
provide the look you're after. While pleasing and even necessary for
some applications, the higher Kelvin bulbs tend to skew (or wash out)
colors in my opinion. I would '86' the actinic bulbs altogether and go
with more bulbs in the 6700K range for this setup. > My other
question is about a freshwater tank I have set up for an adult
largemouth bass. < Another "neato" and interesting fish. > It's a
220g with four 36w standard florescent bulbs. I do a lot of fisheries
work and understand that adult bass prefer deeper waters (10-20ft) away
from higher intensity sunlight. So I was thinking that a higher Kelvin
bulb would more closely resemble its natural habitat. Do you think that
18000-20000K bulbs would be more natural or better simulate the spectrum
that these fish prefer? < Hmm, with proper aquascaping/structure, the
fish will find a spot with a light intensity that's suitable. My first
inclination would be to keep the standard wattage bulbs but reduce the
number to three to dim the lighting as seen in many public displays of
this type...but your idea has merit. If you're willing to go to the
trouble/expense, four 55w/65w PC bulbs in the 14K - 20K range could well
be a more natural look/condition for the fish. > Thanks again,
Brandon. < Welcome, Eric R. > More SW light on the cheap
I currently have a 29 gallon reef tank. My question pertains to
lighting. Right now I have a 65 watt true actinic blue and a 65 watt
10000k day lamp. What I want to know is... is there a supplemental
light I can add. I don't have the disposable income now to purchase a
$300-400 light, but is there a smaller bulb that can be added to the
existing setup. My goal is to sneak in at least another 65 watts.
<I'd just trade out the actinic for another "white" lamp. Please see
here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/setup/lighting/actinicfaqs.htm
Bob Fenner> Lighting color choice 4/9/04
Hellooo all, Thanks ahead of time for the help. I have a few lighting
questions. Right now I'm using 4 3ft VHO bulbs over my tank (70g tall
36x18x24). There are 2 actinics along with 1 50/50 and one 10k spectrum
bulb. One of my questions is should I buy more 10k or 50/50 bulbs if I
want more usable light? I've read on this site and many others that the
actinics don't really have much use to corals at all. Regular "white"
spectrum lights have enough blue to provide for all the inhabitants. So,
I was thinking to change my 2 actinics for a 50/50 and 10k. Then I'd
have 4 "white" lights which I would think would be better for my tank,
however, is four 3 footers enough for such a tall tank (24")? I was
thinking of upgrading my lights to some MHs but wanted to consult you
guys first. thanks again!! Chris aka fishtank. <The color of the
lamps that you choose is mostly an aesthetic choice. Whiter lamps may
produce slightly more usable light, but not by a large margin. Four
lamps over a 24" tank is plenty for a wide variety of animals, although
some very high light animals (shallow water Acroporas and clams, mostly)
may not hold their color or grow very fast. If you wish to keep some of
these very high light animals, you may want to consider MH, otherwise,
choose your florescent lamps based on the appearance that you find
pleasing. As a side note.... Unlike with fluorescents, the general rule
that bluer lamps produce less output is very true with MH. Best Regards.
Adam> Question on Lighting Spectrum 5/1/04 I just had
the opportunity to purchase a rose bulb anemone, E. quadricolor, at an
amazingly low price. I decided to go ahead and not pass up this offer.
For the occasion, I am going to put it in a 20G tank that is already
started until my big tank (125G) is up and running in about 2 months.
<good... much better than putting it in a tank with other stinging
animals/corals... they fare best in biotope and species specific
displays by far. Less room to roam and get into trouble too! <G>> To
facilitate this anemone, I just purchased a major light upgrade to PCs,
and there will be about 8.5 watts per gallon. My question is this, the
fixture has two separate bulbs, both independently controlled. It came
with one 10,000K bulb and one actinic bulb. Do I really need an actinic
bulb since the depth is only 12"? Or would I be better off going with
two 10,000K bulbs? <2 10k K lamps would be more useful by far>
Finally, is it correct to assume that 8.5 watts of light per gallon in
that shallow of a tank is acceptable? <for this anemone, yes... if
acclimated slowly (using screen method, staggered light schedule, etc)
to adjust from previous light scheme if lower (merchants tank,
wholesaler's tank, etc.> It will be supplementally fed with seafood
<very good... a variety of very finely minced meats of marine origin
including Mysid shrimp and pacific plankton (tiny krill) would be very
nice> and Mark Weiss ComboVital as well. <errrr.... interesting.>
Thanks! <best regards, Anthony>
Lighting 2/2/04 I have been reading a lot about lighting, and
have been hearing a ton of different opinions. <not much
controversy needed if/when you tale the time to pick a compatible
group of corals/inverts and then address their lighting needs.
Shallow water SPS corals = bright, warm daylight (6k K to 7k K)...
deep water Corallimorphs and LPS (moderate wattage cooler lamps (10k
K range)... Metal Halides over 30" + deep tanks... fluorescents are
fine over less deep tanks, etc)> I have a 55 gallon tank with a
2x65 watt Coralife Aqualight. I am trying to do low-light soft
corals for now and will eventually upgrade to a 4x65 watt light or a
metal halide. For corals I have some kind of colonial anemone (I
think it is Palythoa - the store had it marked as Goniopora but it
is definitely not), a green star polyp, and a tiny stalk of
non-pulsing Xenia high in the tank. Is my lighting adequate for
what I have now? <It seems weak even for low-med light soft
corals unless you can heap all within 10" of the surface> What
other low light soft corals would you recommend for the setup I
have? I am trying to find something very colorful. Thanks, Ken
<low light soft corals tend to be brown my friend... because, in
part, they do not need the colorful proteins to reflect excessive
(not here) UV light. Your best bet for color in this case will be
Corallimorphs and Zoanthids in my opinion. For a lighting upgrade,
you would not be disappointed to add a single 150 watt double ended
HQI lamp to the present outfit. Excellent all-around light. Anthony>
Lighting question 10k K vs. 20k K 1/30/04 Thanks for the
quick reply. One last Q....I have 20,000K hi intensity white
(fluorescents). What's the major difference between 10,000K and
20,000K...? <the cooler temp of the 20k K bulb indicates that it
peaks high/excessively in the cooler (blue/violet, etc) end of the
spectrum. This makes some corals look very nice, but is far more
"blue-white" than needed by any coral. This color light is produced
at the expense of warmer daylight which could yield better growth
for you. I recommend 6500-10k K if good growth is a primary goal.
Anthony> Lighting Question III 2/2/04 So 2(Two) 20W
10,000K hi intensity and 1 20W 20,000K Actinic is the best way to go
for growth....Thanks Jess <not exactly... quoting from our last
e-mail: "I recommend 6500-10k K if good growth is a primary
goal." And to be even more specific, lamps with colors over 10k K
are frankly excessive it he blue spectrum. Use them only if you
want/need them for aesthetics (a good reason... but not for maximum
growth). Anthony> Lighting...question IV 2/3/04
OK...one last time....sorry....What if I changed them to be all
50/50's....I'm looking for growth vs. aesthetics.... <your
inexperience is shining through, and that's not a bad thing. But you
simply need to do more reading/research before rapid firing
questions or making impulse purchases. 50/50 is not a lamp color (as
indicated by a CRI rating or a color temperature in Kelvin)... it is
a marketing/trade name. For the 3rd time, my friend... seek bulbs in
the 6500 0 10,000 Kelvin range of color for optimal growth of most
popular corals. Speaking to the 50/50s you have seen... you need to
discover if that particular lamp falls within that color range if
you'll take my advice. Anthony> Lighting (suggestions)
discrepancies Dear Bob, Why does Anthony Calfo say to
choose a light with a minimum 6500 K to 10,000 while you indicate
that between 5000 to 6200 which is equivalent of our sun. Am I
reading incorrectly? Anthony also indicates that below 6500 will
allow growth of nuisance algae. I was set to purchase Vita-lite plus
but now I am confused. Any clarifications would be greatly
appreciated. Chris <Mmm, will have to ask Anthony here as
well... my opinion is that most anything above 5,000 Kelvin is fine
for most marine aquarium use... higher incandescent temperatures are
fine... and though the light-extinction coefficient works against
their penetration in water as well, do "look nicer" to many folks...
do get more useful (PAR) light/lumens/photons down to
photosynthates... One way I might put this apparent difference (if
Anthony weren't about to respond), would be that he thinks starting
with a higher temperature light source works better. Bob Fenner>
Re: Lighting (suggestions) discrepancies Agreed. The
warmer/more natural Kelvin lamps are much better for growing most
coral. Aquarists keeping shallow water species report better results
with using lamps in that 6k K range. But do keep in perspective,
Chris, that you need to choose your corals before you select your
lamps (and before you hold anyone accountable for a necessarily
generalized statement;)) If you end up keeping a mixed garden reef
tank like most folks with (unnatural) mixes of
corals/Corallimorphs/Zoanthids from rather deep and fairly shallow
water alike, then you will need a more standardized lighting to suit
all. And if the Corallimorphs and Euphylliids (octopus, torch,
hammer, fox corals), e.g., do not wince under heavy daylight, they
at least will look simply awful. They are some of the popular corals
that favor a cooler colored lamp. Add to this mix the too
common reality of weak water changes and modest skimming in many
aquarists tanks and you get a recipe for accelerated brown algae
growth under very warm lights. So either lighting scheme can
work well with some finesse. My hope is that you plan for long
term success and make your list of corals in advance to replicate a
more natural biotope (shallow water sps, deep water soft corals,
gorgs of the Carib, etc) and do not make your hobby and more
difficult by keeping unnatural tankmates. Its much easier to
tailor hardware (lights, water flow, etc) when you do this... and a
much more attractive presentation IMO. Best regards, Anthony
Lighting discrepancies II 1/30/04 Anthony, Thank you for your
quick response. <very welcome my friend>> I have been out of
the marine aquarium or about 12 years and have now a custom in wall
tank of 280 gal. empty. <ah, welcome back my!> Lots have
changed, or I guess I should say, lots of advancements since.
<exactly... even in just the last 5 years. The commonplace breeding
and rearing of seahorses... tangs being spawned... dwarf angles
(Flame, Interruptus) being produced commercial/tank-raised, etc>
Please do not think I meant any harm. I am overjoyed with the site.
What an education you guys give. <no offense taken at all, my
friend... and my concise emphasis was intended to help you and in
light of the number of questions we get on this topic. Its easy for
one to get led astray. Moreover, lighting technologies evolve faster
than most any other in our biz... thus, something written 6 months
ago can easily be outdated. 'Tis the reason for evaluating your tank
inhabitants needs before pondering what lights to buy. Else its like
putting the cart before the horse> I am simply at a loss and
wanted clarifications for my own info. I failed to mention that the
tank will be a fish only (for now). <ahh... all good. At this
point, make your decision largely on aesthetics (liking more
yellow/warm light or blue/cool whites). For like rock health, future
corals and a slight edge on nuisance algae... I still suggest you
opt for a slightly bluer color (closer to 10k K rather than 6k K)>
It is epoxied plywood three sides with the face side glass with
synthetic coral also epoxied to the rear wall of the tank that in my
opinion looks quit realistic. <sounds very neat> I hope to be
able to keep it this way without having lots of algae cover them.
They are colored very realistically. They cost a lot and have come
from various sources. I even was even going to use a trickle wet dry
filter that I purchased and now after reading about nitrates that
result (also adding to algae) I have decided to use a large skimmer
(aqua c I think) and in the sump add live rock or live sand.
<yes... agreed... live rock, skimmer, love sand and skip the trickle
filter unless you plan to keep rather large fishes> Could I
impose on you again? I read that Knop Aquarientechnik has a good air
skimmer that supposedly accomplishes better results (that is,
removes more bad stuff and less good stuff) than downdrafts and
venturi. Is this true? <different styles of skimmer (air driven,
various venturis... aspirated, downdraft, spray infection, etc) each
do pull different components... each with advantages. My personal
experience with many years of air driven 6' German-style skimmers in
my greenhouse and personal displays sides with air driven models.
And Knop is an excellent brand> Could you help me with what size
and type of skimmer is best? Money is not an option. <simply heed
the manufactures advice and size up at least one model for room>
Should I also put live sand on the tank bottom and if so how much?
<in the display... 1/2 inch or less or over 4" for denitrification.
You can also get denitrification from a deep bucket of sand tapped
inline below with the sump/plumbing instead of a deep sand bed in
the display> I really do not have a lot of room for much live
rock in the tank with all the artificial corals. <this is clearly
a big disadvantage. Perhaps keep a vat/vessel of live rock inline
below with the sump/filtration> Should I put live sand or live
rock in the sump. <either or both. Do get out to see some local
aquarists displays for perspective. Find a local or regional
aquarium club (keyword search on the net, our WWM links, message
boars like reefcentral.com) with forums. The experience and
perspective will be invaluable> I am hoping to achieve good water
quality with the protein skimmer and live rock/sand. I even am
thinking of two skimmers. One for the skim layer of water and one to
be placed in a sump. I simply want no ugly algae to form. <the
algae is natural and inevitable. Can be controlled with aggressive
skimming (two skimmers cleaned alternately are better than one... do
consider)> I will purchase a RO/DI. Any recommendations here?
Kent has a model Max60HiS 4 stage that sounds good to me. <I am
not a big fan of Kent products for many years. Do check the message
boards here for consumer perspective on what's hot and what's not
currently. My personal choice is a Kati/Ani 2-column deionizer (no
waste water... a beauty). Drs Foster and Smiths are one of the
bigger distributors of this model.> Thank you, Chris Drialo.
<best of luck! Anthony> |
Re: Lighting
Question Hi WWM crew, sorry to bother you again but I once again
need your assistance. I only have one question today. Will metal
halide bulbs from home depot suffice in my 180 gallon tank? Is there
any danger to purchasing these lights instead of purchasing them from my
LFS? Thank you. <This depends on the color rendition of these bulbs.
Unlikely. The bulbs from your LFS or on-line stores are designed to
produce the proper light spectrum and intensity for your corals instead
of lighting the garage. These could work with additional lighting to
supply the needed spectrum in addition to the output of the standard
bulbs. IOW, you won't save a penny purchasing these bulbs instead of the
bulbs designed specifically for corals. There is MUCH difference in
output/color/intensity/growth rate, etc. between bulbs, do take time to
shop around and SEE the difference. Best of luck! Craig>
Lighting question: the best bulbs are...?? (02/16/03) Sorry to
keep hounding you guys, but I'm going to anyway. :) <That's what
we're here for, just gluttons for punishment... oops, I mean, fun!
Seriously, if we didn't like doing this, we wouldn't.> Reading a
couple of articles on the WetWebMedia I have drawn the conclusion that
you seem to prefer NO fluorescent over any other light source. <For
the typical fish-only or fish-only with live rock tank, and most
freshwater tanks, yes... but definitely not in all cases.> I need to
ask a few qualifying questions. I have heard that metal halide lights
are better at penetrating the water than fluorescent... is this true?
<Yep.> I have a 24" deep tank with 2-3" of substrate... will
fluorescent be good enough? <As always, it depends on what you want
to have in the tank.> I'm sure more information is required to answer
that question, so here goes: I would like to house mostly SPS and clams
and because of my tank's dimensions I would have to use VHO rather than
NO fluorescent... 440 watts for a 90 gallon tank. By the (albeit,
rudimentary) rules of thumb, almost 5 watts/gallon should be sufficient
for these creatures. <Hunh. Some SPS's need more light than others.
The same is true of clams. The most brightly-colored clams might want
more light than that.> This number isn't far off the 500 watts of
metal halide my LFS wants to get me into for about $1000 US. Are
watts watts, and lumens lumens, or is there a difference in the quality
of the light from each source. <I'm learning to really dislike
wattage as a measurement of lighting. It's how much energy the bulb
uses, not how bright the bulb is. That's why you see those fancy
fluorescent bulbs labeled with things like "11 watts -- as bright as a
60 watt bulb!" (or whatever the exact numbers are). There is a
noticeable difference in the way VHOs look vs. the way metal halides
look, not to mention the differences in the way various colors of bulb
look.> I really like the affordability of the Ice Cap electronic VHO
ballast system (both up front, and in terms of energy costs). <You
also need to consider bulb replacement costs. You're looking at several
VHO bulbs, replaced at six-to-nine month intervals vs. two metal halide
bulbs, replaced at twelve-to-fifteen month intervals.> Related to
that: the articles go on to say that the effective life (not actual
life) of all the bulbs tends to be the same, and all should be replaced
approximately every year. <Hmmm. Probably more true when it was
written than now, as bulb manufacturers are making improvements and
changes... > My LFS sells Coralife VHO tubes at very reasonable
prices, and assuming the bulbs all last about the same amount of time,
the VHO seems to be the best cost / watt X hour factor of any lighting
system (including MH and power compact). Your thoughts please. <Do
some more comparison shopping, particularly at the on-line sources for
lighting.> Finally: two articles actually list the effective life of
fluorescents at different values; one says 1 year, one says 2. What's
the final word on this (my instinct says 1 year)? <I hesitate to
give a "final" wording on this... But my gut tells me that effective
life over the display tank might be one year, with possibly another year
over the refugium....> How close to the surface of the tank could I
situate the 4VHO tube configuration I'm thinking about to maximize the
light that penetrates the water. <I would recommend metal halides
instead, perhaps with VHO or compact fluorescent actinics. The actinics
could be situated a couple of inches above the water, as long as you
have them behind something to keep the salt spray away from them and
adequate cooling in the canopy.> Again, thanks for your input, and
know that I made every effort to actually try to figure something out
for myself before I came crying to you guys. :) Jeremy <You're
welcome, and thanks for doing the research first. --Ananda>
Throwing Some Light On Things! Sorry to pester you busy folks
again. <Never a bother- that's why we're here! Scott F. with you
today!> I recently acquired an Ice Cap 430 ballast for the 90 gal.
FOWLR tank I'm trying to get set-up. What bulb or bulb combination
would be best for the coralline & macro algae in the tank, as well as
make the fish look their best? I've read about the 10,000K & 12,000K
50/50 bulbs. Should I use them by themselves, or with actinic? <I
like the 10000k/actinic combo, myself> Also, on the IceCap
applications page, it indicates that this ballast will run 3 4' 110 w.
bulbs, but Champion & other sites say only 2. Which is right? <Hmm-
I always thought that the 430 powers up to four 2 ft bulbs (for a total
of 320 watts). Both of your information sources are obviously
knowledgeable (Ice cap makes 'em, Champion sells and uses 'em). Not to
take anything away from the good people at Champion (a great source,
IMO), I'd talk to the people at Ice Cap in their R & D department. These
guys could tell you exactly what this ballast was manufactured to do,
and how best to maximize it's efficiency. Should I decide later to
turn this into a reef tank, with corals & anemones, how many VHO bulbs
will I need to properly light the tank? <Totally dependent upon the
types of corals that you are keeping, how far the light source is from
the surface, etc. I'd err on the side of conservatism and get a larger
Ice Cap ballast> I'm thinking the addition of a IC 660 4
bulb ballast will work. <Yep- just my thinking! LOL> That will
give me 6 or 7 110 w bulbs. I was sorry to hear that Duro Test went
"belly up". They made a good product. Used their lights for years in
my freshwater planted tanks. <I loved those Vita Lites, especially
the "power twists". Bummer> Thanks again for your time. Neil
<Thanks for stopping by, Neil. I think both of those ballasts are great
products, so you'll be fine. Good luck! Regards, Scott F.> A
Horse Of A Different Color? Hello! <Hi there! Scott F. here>
I've heard about positive reaction on seahorses' coloration to 50/50
pink white bulbs. Do You know something about it. <Not specifically
regarding the light bulbs- but these are nice bulbs> In my country -
Poland only available seahorses are H. kuda and I'd really love to have
red ones. What can I do? Do red environment (red algae), red background?
<Yes, sort of! They will often take on the color of their environment-
I'd try to use some red colored artificial corals, plants, etc. to
"assist" them> Or add some red light (Fluora by Osram) to 10000K and
tl03? to make algae grow ad seahorses turn red? Maybe 20000K light?
<I'd stick to the 50/50s or 20000ks. The red light will not look too
nice, IMO!> Best regards. Darek <Thanks for stopping by, Darek!
Good luck!> Bulb Color Temp...still misunderstood Hi
Crew!! <Cheers, Bill> Thanks to Mr. Fenner for a great book, I am
excited about the upcoming release from the 'whole club'!!!
<agreed... and thanks kindly :) > OK, to my question, I have a new
100W MH ballast, I was thinking of using it on my 30g FOWLR and
converting to reef type plan. The only decent bulb I can find for a
100W MH is 5500K, can I supplement a 5500K bulb with blue, probably
PCs, and not cause a major issue with problem species growth? <a
fine idea. No worries... 5500K light can grow reef invertebrates well.
It is a warm daylight color and quite useful for many shallow water
corals and algae/plants. Just be mindful of good nutrient control
(fine-tuned skimming, water changes, careful feeding, etc). Warm light
is prone to stimulating some nuisance algae growth. All is easily
tempered though with nutrient cycling> I know there is no such thing
as a 'rule' but how about a 'guideline' or 'starting point' for lighting
wattage and color? <anywhere between 5500K and 10K is fine by me
for coral growth. And it is better for desirable plants and algae. Over
10K is too blue and simply an aesthetic preference by aquarists> As
always, thank you for the time, effort, care, conscience and energy you
put into the hobby. <best regards, Anthony> Lighting and
corals with tiny little sunglasses Hi again, crew... <cheers>
I read the Calfo article on lighting...helpful, but doesn't answer my
main question: what's the best way to shift the lighting in the tank
a little more blue when the halides are on? <bluer halogen lamps
(20K) or add fluorescent blue (VHO actinics)> Recap: 75 gallon tall
(24" deep), 2 250W 10K MH, 4 55W PC actinic. Sounds like a lot of light
now, <sounds like?! It is a lot of light, my friend. Too much for
almost everything you will want to keep unless you are keeping only
shallow water SPS corals and clams. Even then it is a stretch> but at
the time I installed, it was recommended by several sources. <OK...
but do consider that these sources might be wrong or inexperienced
(tanks set up less just a few years). I assure you that many corals will
seem to fare well for as much as a year before suffering from
photoinhibition. Pale colors, mysterious deaths (zooxanthellae shut-down
and corals starves), etc. I still haven't heard your complete livestock
selection (fishes and corals) but again... this much light lets you
safely keep less than 20% of what's on the market>> Very white when
the MHs are on, even with the actinic PCs. Should I lower the 2 250Ws to
2 175Ws? <that would be awesome... and if you really like blue
color, do get 20K Radiums... the best of the blue halides> Change the
spectrum on the bulbs from 10K to 14K, or even 20K? <indeed if it
suits you. 20K Radiums give a wonderful blue color in my opinion, grow
most corals reasonably well and keep most (not all) iridescent pigments
from shifting (the sexy colored corals)> And if I change the bulbs,
any recommendations on how to break them in? <the bulbs or the
corals?> When I installed the MHs originally, I burned in the bulbs
for 100 hours, but I don't have any "spare" ballasts to do that...how
critical is the 100 hour break-in? <not that critical here stepping
down from the 250s> And if I lower from 250W to 175W bulbs, is there
a way to help the corals and clams keep from suffering in the transition
to lower light <regular feedings> levels, or will they even
notice? <they will notice but adapt> A lot of questions, but I'm
unsure how to proceed at this point. <no worries at all... I hope we
are helping you along!> Again, thanks for your time... Arthur
<best regards, Anthony> Inexpensive lighting being a
poor reef keeper who can not afford metal halide at this point, would I
be better off with 2 -50/50 and 2- 20,000K Coralife bulbs or 4-20,000 or
4 50/50? I do want to keep several different types of corals and know
that many need very high-intensity lighting. <with any such
fluorescents... be sure that all corals are kept within the top 10-12"
of the water surface and most importantly (!) that the lamps are mounted
no further than 3" off the surface of the water. With that said... for
optimal coral health, use heavy daylight colored lamps emphasizing
6500-10K colors. 20K lighting is too blue for coral health. 4- 50/50
bulbs might be best. Remember to replace bulbs every 6-10 months for
best success. See a lighting synopsis here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marlgtganthony.htm > thanks Robert
<best regards, Anthony> REPLACEMENT LAMPS I currently
own a 100 gallon aquarium with a few soft corals. The lamps are now 1
year old. <Old for any fluorescent lamp. My rule of thumb is replace
NO lamps every 9-12 months, VHO's every 6-9 months, PC every year, and
MH's every 12-18 months.> Currently, I'm running 1 50/50, 1 actinic,
and 1 AquaSun. To cut down on hair algae and to provide better lighting,
I am going to replace the AquaSun and the 50/50 with 2 Aquasuns 10,000
K. Currently, the AquaSun is only 6500 K. Is this a good idea? <It
may help somewhat with your hair algae problem, but nutrient control is
more important. Whatever your lighting is, if you have too many
nutrients, hair algae is going to thrive.> Thanks, Dave d. <Good
luck! -Steven Pro> Lighting Question I recently swapped
out my 10K 175w bulb over my 30g tank for the 6500k that came with it,
and the leather corals I had in their went nuts. rampant polyp extension
and I've seen a lot of growth over the last few weeks. So, I'm curious
as I had been lead to believe that you'd get better results with 10K
being more like the light conditions found in a reef. <Somewhat
analogous from going from Grape Nuts to Count Chocula cereal... oh, and
yes.> on a whole 'nother topic... one of the things I've observed
about lighting is that there's a fair amount of effort to filter out UV
from artificial light. <This is beyond you! How to start here... life
filters out these wavelengths... plays "a/the dangerous game" of
utilization and screening to prevent genetic and developmental
changes... that by and large are not advantageous... and so
manufacturers of lumination have done about the same> at the same
time, corals assume their colors to protect themselves from said UV that
occurs in nature. <A principle advantage. There are others> I've
seen several LFS's that had black light fluorescent bulbs in stock, but
I didn't have a chance to talk to them about it. I was wondering, would
a small UV light (I've seen 13w CF socket bulbs for sale on the
internet) running for a short duration (say, the equivalent of "reef
noon" over the tank, i.e. the midpoint of the light cycle) for 2 hours
(for example, on my tank, the VHO actinics come on at 10am, off at 10pm,
MH on at 1pm, off at 9pm, put black light on from say 4:30 - 6:00pm)
cause the corals to keep their colors and increase photosynthesis? just
an idea. PF <A good one, and yes. Such stimulation has been shown to
"work"... I hasten to add, in the grand scheme of enhanced
skeletogenesis in Scleractinians, there are other factors of much
greater import... e.g. steady alkaline reserve, proportion of alkaline
earth cation concentration... Bob Fenner, who will stop bugging you as
soon as Barb is off WWM> [Cute, Bob! and "Hi, Pinky!" Barb--]
btw, you'da been proud of me. at The Reef Tank/Pacific Northwest Marine
Aquarium Society yours truly kicked butt at Reef Jeopardy, in no small
part to all the reading I've done of your respective works (BoCPV1 and
CMA), and all I've read on the board. If I could'a just remembered to
always answer in the form of a question... Red night viewing
lights Hello: <cheers!> I have been reading a lot from your
site daily, and love all the available information and resources. I am
putting together a 180 gallon reef tank. I would like to have two (?
Enough) 4 foot red fluorescent lights for night viewing. My difficulty
is trying to find them for sale on the internet. <actually...red
plastic sleeves for these bulbs are made for this purpose. Else you
could just use incandescent red party bulbs> Would you have any
recommendations for where I may purchase these, or viable alternatives?
I wasn't really excited about using just incandescent red bulbs due to
the potential exposure to moisture, and difficulty getting enough across
the tank for viewing. Thanks for the feedback. Dr. Mac <agreed, my
friend... I cannot remember the name of the sleeve mfg I saw last but I
understand they are common. Some photo hobby shops perhaps have insight
on such plastics for fluorescents (dark room lighting). Best regards,
Anthony Calfo> Re: 90 gal reef Thanks for the follow up
Steven, is there a metal halide fixture out there for me other than the
space light that is light and could be hung above the tank? <I am
glad you wrote back. I just read an interesting article last night about
double ended lamps vs. single ended lamps and I must admit now that I
was wrong before. The entire article is based on dispelling myths about
double ended lamps, primarily being that they are more powerful than
their single ended counterparts. Basically, double ended lamps do not
have a built in UV shield and are generally tested with a reflector
while single ended lamps are tested without. This gives the data a
skewed picture. The article is here
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/aug2002/review.htm> I just
haven't found any fixtures that can be supported above the tank. I
don't think it would be a good idea to place a metal halide unit right
on top of the glass. <Correct> Any suggestions? Ideas? Thanks!
<This unit will be fine. Keep your LPS near the bottom, though. -Steven
Pro> Lighting and More Lighting So should I
go with the Ushio or AB? <both bulbs are excellent... and the
question would be impossible to answer even if not so. One cannot select
lighting so specifically without knowing what inverts you will keep and
their respective needs (peaking on blue end of spectrum or closer to
daylight/red, etc)> Is a AB hood of good quality or is there
something that you recommend like the Custom Sealife or other? <I
have no hood brand preference... I'm a diehard DIYer> Does the AB
hood come with the ballast? I think I seen that AB doesn't make 175watt
bulbs. <this falls under consumer research my friend... I apologize,
but a three member crew spend hours daily struggling to keep up with the
e-mail here and serve the greater good of aquarists in need. This I'll
have to ask you to hunt down on your own> With the ballasts, if the
ballast is rated for 250watt bulbs can I use 175watt bulbs on it?
<many aquarists have asked this.. I personally would not recommend it>
I need to know the exact specifics because this is my first time and I
do not want to mess up. Please give me more specific and detailed
answers. Thank you greatly. <do look up a local aquarium society my
friend where you can actually see and discuss the different set ups of
several sort many aquarists rather than just take one man's biased
opinion. Form your own intelligent and informed consensus from displays
that you see that your like. If you cannot find a local club,
participate on any one of the many message boards/forms where such a
continuing dialogue will be more fruitful to you. Please forgive the
brevity, but it honestly is an effort to help as many folks as possible
every day through e-mail and this is more of a consumer question and
somewhat of a personal preference when comparing two such excellent
lamps. Best regards,>
Color Spectrum VS Color Temperature (lighting a 2' deep tank, mix of
invertebrates...) Bob, <Steven Pro in this afternoon.>
I have a 180 gallon fish/coral setup and I am getting varying
opinions on lighting recommendations. I house soft corals only:
leathers, mushrooms, and anemones, and need proper lighting for
them. Currently I have two power compact systems a four foot
retrofit (including two 22" 65 watt Ultra-Actinic and two 22" 65
watt 6700K Ultra-Daylight bulbs) and a six foot retrofit (including
two 34" 65 watt Ultra-Actinic and two 34" 96 watt 6700K
Ultra-Daylight bulbs), total of eight power compacts. My first
question is which is more important to these corals color spectrum
or the color temperature? <The most important factor is
intensity, then spectrum.> Second question is should I have more
actinic lighting or higher color temperatures to keep the corals
healthy and growing? <Full-spectrum/daylight lighting is best for
corals with some actinic lighting for appearance sake.> Third
question is do the reef critters see blue light as high noon?
<That is not my understanding.> Should the bright daylight bulbs
come on first and go off last while the blue bulbs come on second
and go off first? <Most people run there tanks the other way
around, actinics first to come on and last to go off.> Thanks,
Dave <You are welcome. -Steven Pro>Color Spectrum VS Color
Temperature II Steven, Thanks for the quick response and
answering all of my questions. My reason for asking the third
question was that I obtained some information from the Pet
Solutions' (mail order company) web sight that I wasn't to sure of
"To the reef critters, blue light is high noon, so actinic bulbs
really should not be used to simulate a sunrise/sunset with other
daylight bulbs. The "bright" daylight bulbs should come on first,
then the actinic." I always use to have my blues come on first and
go off last, as well, until I read this article. Take a look at
their web site to see for yourself if you're interested. The
information is located in their Reference section under Diving
Deeper - Lighting Basics For Mini Reefs. <I found and took a
quick read through the article. It does not say much more than your
quote. First, most white-appearing lamps for reef aquariums have a
lot of blue white in them, many the same as full actinic lamps. It
is just that they have a lot of other color spectrums too which
gives them an overall appearance of white light. Take the example of
the 6,500 K Iwasaki MH lamps. No one is going to say they appear
blue, more likely yellow/green, but they have a substantial amount
of blue spectrum light and are quite capable of growing thriving
corals without any supplemental lighting, although the appearance
and fluorescence of the corals will not be the same. Secondly, most
aquaria are so shallow you are not going to get a lot of blocking
out of the other color spectrums. I think it is at 10 or 20 meters
that all of the other spectrums have been completely blocked out.
That is a lot deeper than any aquarium I have ever seen. Now many of
our aquariums are not as clear as open ocean water, but still.
Lastly, waxing and waning is nice, but not absolutely necessary and
you could probably wax and wane whichever with the same effect.>
Thanks, Dave <You are welcome. -Steven Pro> |
Re: Sorry . . . a question about lighting and bulbs Thanks for
answering my last questions so quickly and thoroughly. I have one more
question and that is it. Previously I asked (and you answered): But
what color temp do I want with the daylights? I have no idea. I want to
be able to have as many different types of corals as possible. The AH
Supply website said to go daylight bulbs between 6,400 - 10,000.
<Good advice, or at least I concur> Well there are a few options in
that range. Which does what with regard to a) fish and coral health b)
aesthetic pleasure of the viewer. <One actinic, the others... one
10,000 for now, and two 6,400 and next switch time go with two 10ks>
Taking into account that my tank is 48 inches long and each of the 4
bulbs is only 22 inches long, the bulbs will be se up as 2 on each half
of the tank. If I go with only one actinic bulb, it would be one of the
bulbs on one half of the tank, will the tank look unbalanced with blue
light? <Hmm, it will look a little (masked by the "white light" when
both are on) and actually be unbalanced... but no worries functionally
or IMO esthetically... Nice to not have an overall uniform appearance>
Likewise when the daylights go off and the actinic stays on for awhile
without them (you do this right?) will it be as beneficial,
aesthetically and purposefully? <In my opinion, yes> For some
reason I thought I should have an actinic bulb on each side and a
daylight on each side. Likewise, if I go with only one 10,000 on one
side and one 6,400 on the other, will one side of the tank look a lot
brighter? <Yes... a bit. I would place a 6,400 and 10k white on the
one side (the right...) and the actinic and another 10k on the left>
I promise this is my last light question about lighting. Thanks again
for all your help. My co-worker/friend thanks you too for the lead to
the brackish plant info. <Am out of time today unfortunately...
gearing up for a trip... will write, post ASAP on return next month.
Please remind me to add more to the brackish section if I slip up. Bob
Fenner> Bryan Aalberg Lighting Question Bob, I'm
upgrading my lighting system on my 90 gallon tank. I currently have 2 x
96 watt power compacts and 2 x 30 watt (approx.) conventional fluor. I'm
going to remove the conventional fluor. (won't fit with new setup) and
replace them with 2 more 96 power compacts. My current 2 pc bulbs are
both the CustomSeaLife SmartLamps which are 50% 10000K Ultra Daylight
and 50% Ultra Radiant Actinic Blue. I have a variety of light dependent
species in the tank from hard and soft corals to a clam. What 2 bulbs
would you recommend to add the 2 I currently have, more SmartLamps,
10000K's or some of the lower (5000 - 8800K) bulbs or possible even the
Actinic bulbs or would it best to use a mix?? Any help would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks Phil in San Diego <For me, the two new lamps
I'd make 6,500 or 7,200 Kelvin's... the rest I'd leave as is. Bob
Fenner> VHO or CF? Hi Bob, I am planning a 29
gallon tank for sp corals. I am especially enchanted with Acropora sp. I
have a canopy and must make a decision on the best lighting to install.
I am very tempted to go with 3 24" VHO tubes by URI. I would
definitely use an electronic ballast (probably IceCap). But, in reading
through many of your letters/responses, it seems that you might
recommend going with CF's. The bottom line is that I want the sp corals
to flourish. Please give me your thoughts as specifically as possible
with regard to type, wattage, and spectrum of bulbs. Thanks, Trace
<Actually (this adverb tossed in here to preface what may seem like
contradictory information, instruction sets, but am not paid by the
word...) I would like to suggest a 175 Watt Metal Halide for your 29
gallon... this size/shape system, being quite deep and more "square" in
top profile than many tank models and your apparent desire to culture
SPS corals like the Acroporids... that do best with intense lighting...
causes me to make this my number one choice. I know some folks who would
even undergo the electric bills and induced waste heat
problems/solutions and place a 400 W MH on top of this tank... And
yes to my next choice being a Compact Fluorescent system... not as
spectacular to view or as pretty as the MH possibility, but more light
for less money (useful) than the VHO's... The MH can be most any
temperature from 5,500 Kelvin on up, but wouldn't spend my money on any
above 10k.... and do investigate whose lamps are currently longer
lasting, and record the inception, replacement dates for same in your
calendar/date book.... Guess that's about it. Bob Fenner> New
Lights Hi Bob (AKA Cutie-Pie) It's the newbie again. I know
with 200+ Emails daily you probably hate these repeat patients!!
<Hmm, no> My 92 gal. corner aquarium (up about 3 mos. now) with about
90 pounds of live rock is doing very well. Beautiful coralline growth
and new things showing up almost everyday. I have been using the light
fixture that came with the ALL GLASS AQUARIUM hood but with a used 30
watt Actinic 03 and a used full spectrum (Both Vita-Lite) I have wanted
to upgrade my lighting since I began and I got the chance to buy two PC
fixtures (2x55) this weekend. One came with new lights (ALL GLASS
AQUARIUM fixtures) the other without so I ordered 2 55 watt Actinics to
go in the second one. My question is this....Given these lights that I
have now and with what the new ones are, what is my best plan to change
them out? <One new lamp this week, another a couple weeks from
now...> I don't want to fry anything... I have just the 2 yellow-tail
blue damsels, a domino damsel, a scooter blenny (he's adorable) and my
Hawaiian feather duster that I wrote to you about before that lost his
feathers and in fact, a new little guy has appeared. He's very much more
shy than the first. Could that just be his age? <Yes, assuredly...>
I'm sorry, I think I might be rambling? <No worries> Oh yes the lights
(really I'm not blond...;)...)Thanks for taking the time and Oh yes just
one more thing. I bought this cute little live rock from the LFS because
it had these cute little anemone things growing on it. Oops!!!
Aiptasia!! At first it had about three small little clusters on it and
some wonderful little red worms. Now it has about 8 (but still all on
the original rock). <Don't we wish our bank balances increased as
quickly?> My question is should I get rid of the rock? <I would
take it out and let it air dry in the back yard a couple of weeks...
rinse it in freshwater, and return it to the tank...> I love the
little red worms, all my other live rock worms are white. Okay that's it
I promise (for now) Thanks for your help and I remain your faithful
groupie:)!!!!Joyce <Wowzah! Bob Fenner, the fish star!>
Lighting Questions <<JasonC here...>> Im also looking at a
3x175 halide system with blue actinic pc..... but it comes with has
5500k bulbs should I pay the upgrade fee for the 10k bulbs or is the
5500k bulbs ok? <<I would upgrade to 10K, is the MH that I use, I think
5.5 would be too blue.>> ....and also how high do I mount this set up
,12 inches above the tank?. is that ok? <<sounds good to me. Cheers, J
-- >> Lighting I have a 180 gallon fish and reef tank.
It has been up and running for 12 months. I'm still unsure about the
lighting requirements for my tank. I have 2 actinic 160 watt VHO and 2
daylight 10,000k 160 watt VHO. All of them are 72' . But the actinic are
only on for 3 hours in the morning and then off for the rest of the
day. <Mmm, if it were mine, knowing nothing more than you have
stated thus far, I would replace one of the actinics with a "white bulb"
and turn the odd pair on an hour before, leave them on an hour after
(but on in-between) the other "white" lamps> The only thing on is the
daylight bulbs all day until the actinic come back on at night. Should I
use more light during the day? <Yes... all four lamps... with the
odd pair on before and after for an hour or so... on timers> I was
thinking of 1 or 2 metal halide 400 watt bulbs. I've been having a
problem with brown algae and thought it was due to the lights. <Only
in part... Please read over the several Algae files posted on
WetWebMedia.com> If you could give me some advice on the lighting and
what you would use I would really appreciate it. Thank you very much.
<Mmm, perhaps a cursory reading of the Marine Light, Lighting, many FAQs
sections would serve you well here. Please:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/lighting.htm follow the linked articles,
FAQs along. You will soon know what you want and why. Bob Fenner>
Metal halide, prob. halogen... Dear Bob, I want to add a
metal halide fixture to my 30 gal. reef tank. My question is this. What
kind of bulb? I have a fixture that was given to me that was used as an
outside security light. I can purchase a bulb from my local electrical
supply store. Is it the same bulb that can be purchased from aquarium
supply stores? What's the difference? If the bulb from the electrical
store can be used; what is the correct application? Besides cooling the
fixture is there anything else that needs to be done? I've been told
that UV needs to be blocked by adding glass or Plexiglas between the
bulb and the tank. Anything you can do to help would TRULY be
appreciated. Thanks >> Hmmm, be careful here, I suspect what you
HAVE is a halogen fixture, not a metal halide... very different
animal/source or propagation mode for generating photons. How much re
these differences do you want to know... the physics? the practical
outcome? The one you have makes lots of light (and heat) but very
principally in the warm end of visible spectra... not very useful for
aquarium use. The fixtures and lamps that are MH (metal halides) either
come ready equipped with UV (and splash) shields... or are intended to
be fitted with lamps that are coated in manufacture. There is much more
to say... maybe take a look at light and lighting for marine systems
articles I have archived at the wetwebmedia.com site. I will try to
quickly get around to posting more, including jumps to useful sites. Bob
Fenner I need to get 4 bulbs (36" each) to go over my 125g
fow/lr tank. but the choices are over whelming. There is Life-Glo,
Power-Glo, Marine-Glo, 50/50 and on and on. The ads all speak highly of
each bulb. Could you offer any suggestions? Thanks for your help.
Michelle >> Gosh, I probably should just encourage you to keep
investigating, or send you to my website (wetwebmedia.com) for archived
articles on light and lighting for marine systems. As usual I have all
sorts of suggestions: look for a mix of lamps, one or two actinic (the
bluish looking lamps, when turned on) to run before and after your
"white" lamps... which should be a certain temperature (5,000 K or
higher), Color Rendering Index (CRI), 92 or higher, and do take a gander
at "boosted" lamp and fixture technology... if you're going to keep the
system a good long while, especially look into electronic ballasting. A
real savings in the long haul (a few years). Do take a look at those
articles on the WWM site, and the ones archived by various folks on
AquariumFrontiersOnline and write back if you still are unclear about
your options. Bob Fenner I have a 170 gallon Tidepool reef which
is running well; my question is if I change my 400 watt metal halide
from the present 10k bulb to a 20k what effect will it have ?
Also I am having trouble distinguishing the types of my Tridacna clams,
any reference books or web pages that could help me identify them would
be great. ROBERT WHITE >> Re the lighting switch... be careful
here... if the system is shallow... which I'm sure it is... you may well
"burn" many of your sessile animals... Either move the fixture up,
shield some of the light output, or turn it "down" intensity wise for
the first few weeks... and of course: keep an eye on your (esp.
photosynthetic) organisms. Tridacnid clam i.d.... Daniel Knop has
several worthwhile articles on the family of "giants" archived on the
aquariumfrontiers.com site and my fave single article on i.d. and
general bio. is Bruce Carlson's back in 4/91 in FAMA... and a nice
rundown and pix can be found in Gosliner, Behrens, and Williams 1996
Coral Reef Animals of the Indo-Pacific... and unless my memory fails me,
the folks at FFExpress have some of my pix of these bivalves in their
site catalog and print ads... Bob Fenner, who says, give me specifics
and I'll try to answer more specifically? Help with metal
halide lighting Hi Bob, I was hoping you could answer a
question about this type of lighting. I recently came upon a 175 watt
hanging type metal halide fixture with ballast etc.. I was planning on
hanging this light above my 55g. I want this to keep some hardy soft
corals, mushrooms and some pulsing xenia. I figured that this light
would be good along with the large amount of natural sunlight the tank
gets because of my girlfriends plants in the same room, I was planning
on running it about 9-10 hrs a day. My main question is how far above
the tank should I hang the light, I was thinking 9", and what spectrum
bulb should I get, 5000K, 10000K etc., which would be best for these
soft corals. I know this light wont' cover the whole length of the
tank but I figured the corners would be a good place to start some
mushrooms out. Thanks for your advice, Ehren Crumpler P.S.
Thanks for getting back to me regarding my questions about the recent
bill in the senate. >> Hmmm, well, first off, I'd like you to
consider something other than the MH you have in question. Boosted or
even regular fluorescents in number or better still a compact
fluorescent would be fine functionally for the animals, depth of system
you have in mind... But if you "must" go with the 175w pendant, do hang
it a bit higher (a foot to a foot and a half) over the system for safety
and use sakes.... Higher will give you less "punch" or photonic strength
to the bottom, offset with better spread of signature, but you really
want to discount the heat given off by the light and the likelihood of
splashing the lamp.... and/or burning yourself while tooling around your
tank... and Yes to the use of overhead sun... very good idea in many
respects.. Just, do look into the other lighting possibilities. Less
money to rig up and run, and better, more consistent results. Bob
Fenner I'm finally putting together the tank that I've always
wanted. (50 gallons) I have one last concern though. I've been
receiving various dissenting opinions on whether to get Dual 175's or
Dual 250 watt MH lamps. The tank is 48" long. The lights will be
mounted about 7 inches from the top of the water. I do not plan any
actinic supplementation because I plan on utilizing 10k lamps. The bulbs
will be mounted in polished aluminum reflectors. The Tank will house
a few reef building stony corals ( i.e. Acropora ) and a few of
the more colorful tridacnid clams. So, in your opinion, would I be
better off with the 175's or the 250's. Thanks, Jeremy Keim >>
If it were me, I'd definitely go with the 175's... and, of course I'll
tell you why. First off the twin 175's will generate enough intensity...
Second, they won't cause the water to boil! Really, the 250's at 7" away
from the water will be dangerously hot... and the 175's by themselves
will probably require that you use a chiller... Almost lastly, the 250's
will boost metabolism too much... shortening lifespans, granting you too
small margins if something should go wrong (like a pump or chiller going
out). Then there's the cost of electrical power... not worth the extra
watts consumed in my opinion. Your clams and Acroporids and other
photosynthetic life will do fine on the 175 watt Metal Halides...
without frying. Bob Fenner Duro-Test Vita-Lite Supreme
lights I read your article on WetWebMedia where you recommend
Duro-Test Vita-Lite Supreme lights. Do you still believe these are the
closest lights to natural sunlight? Are these power compacts or regular
fluorescents. And if they are regular fluorescents do you have a
recommendation for power compacts? Thanks, >> These are regular
(T-12) fluorescents... and they "were" the best available, most
appropriate technology... no longer... Compact Fluorescents are the
current winners of that title. Producing the best (functional) amount of
useful radiation per kilowatt hour energy, including initial and ongoing
fixture costs... and producing little waste heat. Bob Fenner, who
agrees that he should go back and place a "written date" on each of the
pieces on WWM... Hi Bob, I've recently found www.ffexpress and
your column. Too bad I did not find it sooner, I would have spared the
lives of many, many fish. I have a 30 gallon tank (12X16X36), live
sand (very recent change) and am currently building up my live rock
collection. My filtration system includes a US Aquariums protein
skimmer, Whisper 3000-wet/dry trickle hang on filter, and two power
heads for additional circulation. I use RO/DI water in my tank (another
recent change). My question revolves along lighting and live rock. Up
until reading your column, I was unaware that live rock needed strong
lighting. I now believe that my current 18” 15-W 50/50 light will not be
strong enough to sustain the live rock. I am contemplating upgrading my
lighting system to a dual strip, 36” fixture that would provide 60 W of
lighting. Is this enough wattage for the live rock? If so, what type
of bulbs would you recommend. I am saving my pennies for a
100-125 gallon reef tank in a year or so, and don't want to spend mucho
dinero on lighting for my 30 gallon. Thanks Bob!!! David Hacker
<Thank you for sending this well thought out and personal note. Yes to
more lighting and if you're going with conventional (T-12) lamps... the
two 36 inchers... do make one a higher full spectrum white (temp. of 5k
plus), and one an actinic variety... and if I may kibitz, have the
actinic come on and go off an hour before/after the white (on a
timer...). If I may go beyond your query (okay, just try to stop me!),
I'd encourage you to even consider another type of lighting system
entirely... the power compacts. They produce more useful light per
kilowatt power, are cooler, and brighter then other fluorescents... more
on light, lighting of marine systems at www.wetwebmedia.com Bob
Fenner> Lighting? Lamps and fixtures Hello Bob, I
have a 30 gallon tall setup w/ eclipse II and I was wondering what
lighting would be best for propagating the growth of my live rock and
inverts? I do not have the ability to use VHO, metal halide or power
compacts. What do you think would be better? 10,000k and 03 Actinic,
20,000k and 03 Actinic or 10,000 k and 20,000 k fluorescent? thanks a
bunch, Ben >> In my opinion... and you know many other folks will
state otherwise, the first choice, the 10k and O3 are best.... for looks
and function overall... Now that bold statement being made, there are
"live rock and inverts" mixes that would quickly change my mind. If/when
you find yourself more interested in small polyped stony corals,
tridacnid clams... or perhaps boosting the growth/metabolism of other
less-light demanding species... But for now, and overall... the 10k and
03. Bob Fenner Hi Bob, what is the difference between 10,000
daylight and 20,000 daylight? >> Let's see if my old High
School teaching of Physics abilities are still with me here: the "color
temperature" of a light source is an approximate measure of it's
relative emittance relative to a heat source of Hydrogen burning at that
temperature... Hmm, well, how about this analogy instead? If you could
"look" at the Sun, with a filter that would only allow you to see the
gasses there combining/falling apart at the 20,000 Kelvin temperature,
this is the light a similarly rated lamp would look like... Any better?
Bob Fenner Aquarium lighting I have a 125 reef tank with
lots of corals and fish. For the past year I have used 4-40 watt
fluorescent lights on the tank. (2-actinic, 2-10,000k) I have been given
a VHO ballast from a friend and am thinking of setting it up. My
plans are to use the VHO along with my fluorescent lighting. I only
have room for 4 lights in my canopy. Should I use 1-VHO-10,000k,
1-VHO-actinic, 1-40watt-10,000k, and 1-40watt-actinic or 2-VHO-actinics,
2-40watt-10,000k? Or do you recommend another setup and how much
better will my corals and fish react to the new lighting? Thank you for
your help. Kris >> Thank you for writing... If it were me, I'd
go with the first configuration... and if you don't invest in a dimmer
mechanism, do consider leaving off the regular output lamps for the
first month... and/or covering the VHOs with some strips of aluminum
foil to cut back their intensity for about a month... You're smart to
ask this about the lighting change... many people literally "burn" their
photosynthetic life consequent to these upgrades. Bob Fenner
Substrate cables (again!). also bulb question Hello again
Robert! Thanks for your reply to my messages. So, in a nutshell,
regarding reef tank substrate heating... would you or wouldn't you?
I don't mind being labeled "experimental," but on the other hand I'm
certainly not made of $, either. Thanks! <Likely not... too much
money I'd rather spend elsewhere... not that much perceived
potential gain for me> Now for a more technical, less theoretical
question (groan...please bear with me)--- Am thinking of the best
way to illuminate my Corner 92 (this is a triangular tank). For
my planted discus tank (also a triangle) I use various CF striplites
arranged across the top, longest in front back to shortest (12") @
rear (all 6500K) and also a simple NO plant bulb (8500K) that is run
longer than the others for a sunrise/set effect (the cardinals
appreciate this transition greatly). <Neat> All this is
mounted to a brace on pulleys that can be raised/lowered to allow
access into the tank, and it works very well, but (and please bear
with me)...... <Okay, good idea on the pulley... have even seen
electrical-motorized ones on big, rich folks set-ups...> I want a
halide for the SW tank! So here is what I plan to do- run a 65W CF
down each side in an inverted 'V' (I will construct a custom brace
for this), and have a MH pendant (spot) in the very center of the
tank, above where the clam will live someday. The two fixtures will
be hung separately, so I can adjust their heights independently. So
far so good, but here is where it gets technical... Firstly, I
want a sunrise/set effect using actinics, arranged in the 'V'. I
could use CF bulbs for this but that sure seems like a lot of watts
for just actinics-- maybe NO tubes would be better here (what do you
think?). <I would maybe make one of the lamps an actinic...>
This setup would have only a 65W above each side (plus actinic)
<Mmm... where are these other lamps coming from?> above where
most of the LR will be. As I hope to someday have an anemone at the
rear corner up relatively high, would this be enough light (as the
halide won't shine here)? Or should I use two 65W each side (I guess
then I could have one each be a 50/50 for the transitions, but 130W
doesn't seem like it'd be too subtle!)? Or two 65W each side plus NO
actinics (YIKES! How many bulbs/timers is that!?!)? Plus the halide!
<I would double the 65 watt fixtures... and have at least one of the
lamps an actinic variety... (Have that odd-pair come, stay on and go
off an hour or so ahead of other lighting)... and place the anemone
thereabouts.> --(deep breath)-- Secondly, with all these
different bulbs, the possible color combinations are huge! Of
course, I'm looking for the most attractive one without having to
actually purchase the bulbs to play around, so... A) What color
halide would you recommend (this probably won't hardly be used until
the clam arrives, but still I want to have a plan)? I was thinking
6500K or 10K. <Me too... or anything in-between these values>
B) What CF temps would you say down each edge (maybe 1@50/50,
1@8800) Please have a good think about this--but don't drive
yourself mad like I'm about to. <No need to drive any further. Am
parked. I like the 8,800 K's> --(whew!-that feels better)--
Thirdly, should I run a nightlight somewhere over this thing (or
will the residual photons be enough-ha!)? <If it's dark in the
area, a night light is a very good idea> This tank will have a
tempered glass "lockdown" lid to contain an eel, so this will
decrease the lights' penetration some. Now, yes, I know that I'm
probably making this harder than necessary by wanting a halide, that
I could simply re-do what works on the discus' tank with all CF
strips, but Bob- I love those little MH light ripples! (but to
the point of insanity?...YES!) Thank you very much! from Erik
(did I write all this?) Nelson <Yes... do "practice" with how hot
the MH will make this top... keep it clean, wiped down regularly.
Bob Fenner>Re: substrate cables (again!). also bulb question
WOW! Now that was a fast reply! So, it sounds like you're
advising-- no to the NO actinics, <Actually yes to one actinic
lamp (the "odd pair")> yes to two pair to 65W CF, each pair
consisting of a 50/50 & a 8800 (the 50/50's being used as the
transitory), and a (175W?,250W?) <The 250 Watt should go...
wouldn't try any higher> MH? Good!-- I know of a retrofit that
includes those two CF temps, plus individual cords for ea. bulb--
sounds like that's just the ticket for my situation! Thank you!
P.S. Do you think that halide shining onto the glass will be a big
temp problem i.e. w/o surface evaporation (both the eel and my
little kids necessitate the tempered glass lockdown-----I am sure
they don't mix). <Will be very warm... Would go with your
glass-shop's recommendation. Bob Fenner> |
Lighting The Way! 7/10/03 Hello,<Hey, you've reached crew member
Phil tonight!> I have a 75 gallon saltwater fish only tank with no live
rock. I would like your suggestions as to a fluorescent bulb that will
bring out the colors in my fish and dead coral. Something to enhance it
so to speak. <I would say something in the bluish color, an "actinic 03"
bulb would be nice. IMO, it will really make the tank/fish look
great.> Thank You.<No problem, good luck! Phil> Lighting
8/9/05 Hi Crew I was wondering which of these fluorescent
bulbs are visually brighter the Coralife RO 10,000K or the 20,000K?
Thanks <The perception of most folks is that higher incandescence (K
rating) appears brighter. Bob Fenner>
|
|