|
| |
|
FAQs about Light and Lighting for Marine Systems 18
Related Articles: Marine
Light, & Marine Aquarium
Light Fixtures and Canopies,
Lighting,
Lighting Marine Invertebrates, Anemone
Lighting, Acclimating
Symbiotic Reef Invertebrates to Captive Lighting, Coral
System Lighting, Moving Light Systems, Moving
Light Systems,
Related FAQs: Marine System
Lighting, FAQs
2, FAQs 3,
FAQs 4, FAQs
5, FAQs 6, FAQs
7, FAQs 8, FAQs
9, FAQs 10, FAQs
11, FAQs 12, FAQs
13, FAQs 14,
FAQs 15,
FAQs 16,
FAQs 17,
& FAQs on Marine Lighting: Fixture Selection
1, Fixture Selection 2,
Fixture Selection 3, (incandescent,
fluorescent, MH/HQI, LED, natural...), Lamp/Bulb Selection
1, Lamp/Bulb Selection 2, (See
Fluorescent, LED, MH... below),
Installing, Waste Heat Production/Elimination,
UV
Shielding, Measure,
Troubles/Repairs,
By Manufacturer Make/Model: &
Actinic
Lighting, Metal Halide
Lighting, Fluorescent
Lighting, Compact
Fluorescent Lighting, Small
System Lighting,
Lighting
Marine Invertebrates, LR
Lighting, Tridacnid
Lighting,
|

|
Reef Lighting Question 5/8/08
I currently have a FOWLR setup and I am in the process of changing over to a
reef setup.
<A natural, eventual move!>
I currently am running three 250 watt metal halides with Reeflux 12k bulbs and
four 4 foot 110 watt VHO (2 actinic white and 2 actinic blue) on a 300 gallon
aquarium (96L X 24W X 30H). I am planning on either going with 3-250 watt MH
with 8-110 VHO, which will give me 1630 watts total, or approximately 5.433
watts per gallon.
<Watts per gallon is a poor measure. Depth and livestock planned are far more
important.>
My second choice would be going with 4-250 watt MH with 8-110 VHO, which is 1880
watts total or approximately 6.267 watts per gallon. I am "planning" on keeping
LPS, Mushrooms, Leather, Brain, and maybe a few anemones or clams.
<Anemones will not mix well with the rest.>
Which setup would you recommend and also regarding the 8 VHO's which combination
of Actinic Blue and Actinic White, what would you recommend with the 12K Reeflux
MH's?
<The MH configuration totally depends on what you want. With three on an eight
foot tank you may have darker areas between the lights. Since this is what you
have been running you can make this call fairly easy. Either lighting
configuration will work fine, with the more lighting intensive livestock placed
more directly under the lights rather than between. If you want to be able to
place all wherever (in regards to side to side of the tank) the four MH will be
the way to go. As for the VHO’s, four pure actinics will be all you need. They
add little but aesthetics, if you like a very blue tank you could run eight or a
higher Kelvin MH bulb, but four will suit most all just fine. I honestly see
little advantage to upgrading your current lighting unless you have major
shadows now with just the three, this will depend on the spread provided from
the reflector. I hope this helps you decide, Scott V.>
It's me again! Using WWM, light cycles...
04/22/08
I just Emailed you a couple hours ago and I have a another question.
<I don't see a prev. question... there are a couple dozen of us "here"... need
to send prev. corr. if it's pertinent>
I came into the room to turn off my lamp because I learned that fish need
daylight and darkness too and that reminded me. If I have my lamp on in the
mornings, and turn it off later, would that be any danger to my fish?
Not to be a bother,
Brogan
<See WWM re... regular light cycles are a good idea, but having lights on/off at
a particular time not a big deal... Bob Fenner>
Lighting a Reef in the Canopy
4/11/08
I just bought an 180g AGA.
<Congratulations.>
I'm trying to decide which lighting setup would work with such a limited amount
of room. I like the Maristar unit but also like the SE MHs with VHOs
With about a 9 inch clearance, what road should I go down?
This, by the way, will be a reef tank
Thank you
<This is really a personal call for you. If you plan on keeping SPS or clams,
the MH is the way to go, although the T5 unit can work fine too. If heat may be
an issue for you then the T5 looks better. Your clearance in the canopy is kind
of tight for MH, but can be done. You will have to decide what fits you and your
needs best. Welcome, Scott V.
Aquarium Lighting and
Nuisance Algae – 04/09/07
All,
<<Thomas>>
Thanks again for everything, and it's nice to write in for an opinion verses a
solution.
<<Ah well…hopefully one leads to the other>>
My question is about lighting. I've read lots of the FAQ, spoke with several
stores, etc, seem to get a lot of different answers.
<<And you think coming here will be different? {grin} >>
Perhaps they're just overly complex answers.
<<Ahh…>>
I've seen in stores and read about Halide, HQI, PC, T5, T6, T8, etc. I've
decided I don't want Halide lights.
<<My personal fave>>
I don't think I need them.
<<Okay>>
My tank is 72" long, is a FOWLR setup, and of course there are little hermits
(red & blue leg), some small clams and oysters (compliments of live rock), tiny
fan worms, and copepods. I really like the coralline algae, the purple stuff,
and I want it to thrive and grow.
<I see>>
What light setup is going to provide this what it needs?
<<Lighting does play a part, but is only a portion of the equation. It won’t
matter what type lighting you have if water quality is low and bio-mineral
content is deficient/out of balance. That said…some of the most impressive
Coralline growths I have witnessed were under either high-Kelvin (20,000K) Metal
Halide lighting that was well up off the water…or under Fluorescent lighting
with lots of Actinic>>
I'm leaning towards putting two 36" PC strips on the tank, both having 192 watts
(dual bulbs, one of the actinic variety). That would be a total of 384 watts of
light. Think this would be sufficient?
<<Would be fine here…though be aware the life present on the live rock may
change as only those organisms able to make adjustment/utilize the available
lighting will flourish>>
I'm already wiping down the tank glass once a week to remove algae.
<<Not necessarily a function of the lighting>>
I don't think it's a bad variety, just the common green algae that snails like
to eat.
<<And likely won’t just “go away” with a change in lighting>>
I think I would need 1273 snails to keep up with it though, especially with the
new lighting. It's a different topic, but I've read that nitrates increases the
algae, but they consistently test at less than 20 ppm, and usually it's 10 ppm
or less.
<<And even at that is PLENTY to fuel nuisance algae…though what you describe on
your glass is quite common and easily just “wiped away.” Nothing of concern in
my opinion>>
Is there another factor that causes it that can be controlled, or is it just
something you live with due to the intense lighting?
<<Water quality and the presence (or lack) of herbivores has much more to do
with nuisance algae problems than lighting…if this is your focus then you need
to spend some more time reading. Start here and follow the associated links at
the top of the page: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/nutrientcontrol.htm. But as
already stated the light film of green algae you clean off once a week is not
problematic in my opinion, nor something you will likely ever eliminate no
matter what you do. Many a hobbyist would be happy to have this as their only
algae issue>>
I've been reading about it, but it doesn't seem to be any of the bad algae
(brown, hair, etc), just the green stuff.
<<Agreed…of no concern>>
Well, thanks again and take care!
Thomas Roach
<<Happy to assist. Eric Russell>>
Lighting Debate 4/4/08
WWM Crew,
Hello, thanks for taking my question. You should get your own Sirius radio
station!
<Hello, that would be great…but this media serves us well. We are able to answer
questions when time permits!>
Anyways, here’s my story; I currently have a 220gal with VHO's and I just bought
an Oceanic 90 gallon bowfront with the ABS (plastic) canopy and stand.
<Congratulations.>
Well I bought my first Metal Halide setup,
it's a retro kit. Well come to find out that the canopy is only 8" high and I’m
worried that the MH bulbs will get too hot that close to the water and/or with a
plastic canopy.
<Yes, likely so.>
So I wanted to return my light setup. I won’t lose a restocking fee if I take
store credit $600, from
Hellolights.com, but I don't know what to do. I was thinking about just getting
a all-in-one and mounting it on top of the tank.... Any help
would be great. TIA
<An all-in-one fixture either suspended as a pendant or mounted on legs will
definitely workout fine. Also consider a T5 retrofit. It will give you the
lighting you want without the concentrated heat in one spot. This lighting with
a fan in the canopy will work great with this setup. Welcome, I hope this helps
you decide, Scott V.>
General Question about
lighting, Soft Corals – 03/10/08
Hello and congrats on a great source of info!
<Thank you>
First of all, this is an absolutely great site with an unbelievable amount of
information!
I have a general question about lighting. My wife and I have a 56 gallon display
aquarium that is 30" wide x 24" deep and 30" high (I know, this was her pick
that offset my $$ spend on equipment). My primary question is deals with
lighting. The tank came with a single 20 fluorescent lighting fixture and we
have a Corallife 2x65 watt 30" fixture (New 1 actinic 65 watt and 1 10,00k 65
watt w/2 moonlights) is this enough light for soft corals or leathers?
<Mmm, no... not nearly intense enough... There are some relatively low light
groups, species of Alcyonaceans... and you might "get away" with positioning a
few more light-needing species higher up, on your rock... And I would definitely
switch out the one actinic lamp for another "white"... Much of this is gone over
(and over) on WWM... I would either settle on the three 65 watt "white" lamps
and the arrangement of life as stated, or look into adding, switching out this
fixture for about twice this wattage... The "better" response might well be to
encourage you to ask around at your local fish stores, marine clubs to see if
they have a PAR meter for loan... and actually measure the useful photonic
energy of all here... at various depths... and/or to encourage your regular use
of GAC, ozone... to enhance useful photonic energy transmission... or...>
Your insight, as always, would be appreciated...
Tank set-up now,
56 Gallon w/actual 48 gallons water (DO w/IO SW mix), 7 months old,
62 Lbs live rock,
Remora skimmer w/1200 MaxiJet,
3 MaxiJet 1200 powerheads for circulation,
1 TopFin powerhead for circulation,
Fluval canister w/polyfoam, PhosBan and ChemiPure
3/4" CaribSea live sand
1- 2" Flame Angel
2- Ocellaris clowns 1" & 3/4"
1- Bicolor Blenny 2"
1-Royal Gramma 1 1/2 "
1- 1 1/2" six line wrasse
2- Peppermint Shrimp
20- Assorted hermit crabs and snails.
0-ammonia & nitrite
5-10 nitrate (reading before weekly water change)
PH 8.3
Salinity 1.024
I'm waiting for my Salifert test kit for Ca, Alk. (I'm in Hill Country Texas
...mail order only!)
Weekly 8 gallon water changes w/DO and IO SW mix (aged one week)
Canister cleaning each week.
<Sound/reads very nice indeed>
40 years experience with fresh water aquariums and I had a prior 400 gallon
saltwater aquarium when the only source of saltwater was at Scripps Institute in
San Diego.
<Ahh, I do remember... still live in SD... in East La Jolla, okay... Mira Mesa>
Thanks,
Jim Ferguson
<!? Any relation to friend Mark Ferguson? Bob Fenner>
Internal vs. External Ballast
2/23/08
Hi. I find your site extremely helpful.
<Great!>
I am purchasing an HQI/t-5 /led lighting system or a HQI/compact
fluorescent/lunar lighting system for my saltwater tank. My question is what is
better and external ballast or an internal ballast lighting system. Thanks.
Joann.
<Each have advantages/disadvantages. With an external ballast you can mount it
remotely, keeping the heat produced away from your tank. It is also easier to
replace should the ballast go out. The downside is you do have to find a place
to put it. With the internal ballast you have the ease of an all in one unit.
The downside here is more heat from/in your lighting fixture. One is not
inherently better than the other, each just has its advantages. You will have to
choose which suits your situation better. Welcome, Scott V.>
Lighting and reading 2/4/08
Hi all,
<Hello.>
I am confused once again on lighting, I hope you can help.
About a year ago I got some advice from one of the guys on how to get adequate
reef lighting on a budget for my 55 gallon. So I invested in the T5 HO linkable
48 inch retro fit kits from Current. I bought fixtures here and there and I like
them a lot, and so do my fish and corals. (except for the excessive algae,
Grrr).
<Feeding and nutrient control my friend.>
I like the way I can link 2 together and time then to come on gradually, instead
of them all at once. I currently have 2 – 460, 54 watt actinics , and 60,000K of
daylight (two 28 watt, four 54 watt). My first question is… is this too much
light?
<Depends on what you are keeping, likely not. The Kelvin ratings on bulbs are
not cumulative.>
Can it ever be too much?
<Yes.>
A friend told me I should add a couple more daylights (that’d be 80,000K),
is that too much? I can already grow just about anything. Right?
<Not anything.>
I’ve been looking at metal halide systems, since it’s been almost a year I’m due
for new bulbs anyway. I can better afford a metal halide system now. All of the
HQI (24 hour, 48 inch) fixtures and hoods I‘ve looked at have 2 – 10,000K
daylight bulbs, I know with metal halide I’d have a heck of a lot less algae and
that would mean less maintenance!
<The opposite is true here.>
But would it be beneficial for my critters to change the lighting? From 60,000K
of fluorescent down to 20,000K of metal halide?
<?>
I don’t wish to spend the extra money if it isn’t beneficial or no sense to it,
Any perks for switching?
<Depends.>
If not I’ll just save myself the few hundred bucks and only replace my current
bulbs. All the research on pros and cons has only confused me further.
<Keep reading, it will become clear with time.>
Love that all of your guys are here for people like me. J
Thanks so very much in advance,
Rochelle
<Rochelle, I suggest you read more on this site and perhaps others regarding
lighting, what is what, why, and the needs of your specific livestock. Good
luck, Scott V.>
|
Lighting placement,
angle reflection question 01/14/2008
Greetings Dear WWM Crew,
<<Hello Brian, Andrew here>>
First, I'd like to thank the membership of the WWM crew for the
enriching leadership you collectively provide. I have kept freshwater
(Cichlids) for four years now and have often visited this site for
reference. During these freshwater years I have immensely enjoyed
pouring over the great variety of detailed topics relating to marine
systems as well. Long story short...(and after reading Bob's excellent
text (CMA) cover to cover) I'm now venturing into the saltwater realm.
Today, I have a lighting and light-fixture-position/hood-design question
that neither my reading the FAQS nor searching the archives has
answered. I'd be most appreciative of your assistance.
<<Lets see what we can do then>>
I recently purchased a used, 200gal (84 x 24 x 24) Oceanic RR (Dual
"Megaflow"...which by no means actually IS "RR") and am gradually
acquiring components, doing research, etc, that will enable me to reach
my FOWLR and, ultimately, Reef tank goal. The tank came with an
exceptional stand but no hood/canopy. As a somewhat advanced hobbyist
woodworker (furniture), I intend to craft my own. As I collect all the
necessary aquarium equipment, I am trying to "buy once" and obtain
components that will provide prolonged service across the spectrum (no
pun intended with my question) of my development as an aquarist. To this
end, for lighting, few solutions seem to adequately fit the 84-inch long
dimension of this tank. Thinking that an assemblage of separate lighting
fixtures would best suffice, I have acquired 4, 20-inch, Current SunPod
150W/14K (HQI) MH lights which I intend to integrate into the canopy
design.
<<As a note, a single MH bulb is good enough for lighting 2 feet of tank
length>>
My question (at long last) is this: My plan is to design the canopy
mount such that the Sunpods are positioned end-to-end along the 84-inch
length of the tank. However, in order to maintain some nominal distance
between the ends of the fixtures (specifically, to keep the integrated
cooling fans located on the ends of the fixtures free from obstruction),
some fixture offset is, I believe, required. For clarity, the concept is
that the fixtures on either end would be centered (front to back) and
the two fixtures in the center of the tank would be positioned forward
(approx. the 8-inch fixture width). When offsetting the SunPod fixtures
in the center, a nominal space would be left between the end-fans of
these as well. In shifting the center fixtures forward, they would be
closer to the front of the tank and so I was considering angling those
fixtures slightly inward (perhaps 15-20 degrees)...to direct more light
output into the tank and less through the front glass (such as will
occur by being closer to the front and per reflector-coverage design). I
am concerned about the resultant amount of light reflection that might
occur by angling these fixtures, if the reflection would be significant
(considering that the water surface is constantly irregular anyway when
good circulation is achieved). So, I am wondering if the angling of
light fixtures has been successfully done in the past and if a
deleterious effect (light loss to reflection) will result by doing so?
I've attached a rudimentary diagram to help explain the concept.
Any advice would be most appreciated.
<<I would be tempted to only use three of the four fixtures that you
have bought. Your tank is 7 feet long, 3 of the lighting units will be
fine, spaced evenly with 4.5 inches from the outer edge of the lamp unit
to the end of the hood. If you use the method you have mentioned above,
the light will not be adequately dispersed in the aquarium, basically
giving you low lighting at the front as well as an irregular lighting
pattern inside the tank, and I think this will greatly reduce the
viewing pleasure of the aquarium>>
Thank you very much for your time. Best Regards, Brian.
<<Thanks for the questions, A Nixon>>
Re: Lighting
placement, angle reflection question 01/16/2008
Good Morning Andrew,
Reference 01/14/2008 Lighting angle question
<<Good morning again Brian>>
Thank you so much for the fast reply. <<No problem>> The simplicity of
your advised solution is like that "should have had a V8, bonk me on the
head" commercial. No need to overcomplicate, duh! In defense of the
apparent fog that surrounds my decision making, :), I'd actually
considered several options including going with a single, 72-inch,
3-bulb SunPod fixture or, as you suggest, just using 3 of the separate
fixtures. However, the more I looked at the dimensions of the SunPod
product line, the widths of the fixtures and locations of the actual
bulbs (bulb effective centerline within the housing and "centerline" of
overhead/hood placement), the more confused I became. I have seen the
common reference to a single MH bulb's "effective" ability to cover 2ft
of tank bottom. Presumably, this reference takes bulb height (distance
from water surface), substrate depth (i.e. DSB of 4-5 inches), and water
column diffusion factors into account. In my case, if I have a 4-inch
DSB, place my bulbs 8 inches from water surface and have a tank with
24-inch height dimension, then I am looking at a 28-inch distance from
bulb to substrate surface.
<<A single 250w metal halide bulb can penetrate down to 24 inches when
mounted 8 inches above water level>>
Per the common reference to a single MH bulb's ability to "effectively"
shed light on 2ft of tank bottom, my thought would be that the
centerline(s) of MH bulb placement needs to occur at 12-inches from
either end of the tank and at 24-inch increments between bulbs for
multiple bulb fixtures. I'm thinking that it is particularly important
that the bulbs at either end of the tank are placed 12-inches from the
tank end so that aquascaping, such as taller live rock structures
stacked to conceal overflows, are fully illuminated on the ends (outer
sides).
<<I agree, we need the lighting as evenly spaced / spread as possible>>
Many of the products I see available, such as the 36-inch dual bulb
SunPod
for example, place two bulbs (bulb centers) approximately 12-inches
apart...meaning (presumably) much greater (concentrated) illumination in
some areas of the tank and considerably less illumination in others.
<<That happens a lot with multiple bulb fixtures>>
Part of my reasoning in selecting the 20-inch SunPod was that bulb
centerline is 10-inches from the end of the fixture which would allow
hood placement to achieve an effective 12-inches of bulb centerline from
tank end (i.e. the live rock illumination concern noted above).
<<Valid point>>
Considering all of this "over thinking" I wonder if, in my case with the
7ft tank, center brace location, etc, a return of the 4, 20-inch SunPod
fixtures and purchase of 2, 36-inch (dual 150w MH bulb) fixtures would
be worth considering in order to achieve the most evenly concentrated
distribution of light (bang for the buck)? What say you?
<<I would agree that would be far better in the situation you have with
the hood and brace setup. I would go for the 250w bulbs as this will
provide you with more punch of light down towards the bottom of the
tank>>
Again, many thanks for your time. Your advice is most appreciated. Warm
Regards, Brian.
<<My time is your time Brian, many thanks for the questions. A Nixon>> |
|
 |
Lighting Bowfront 12/20/07
I have just purchased a 72 gal. bow front and need to light it for a reef
aquarium. I want to use Metal Halide perhaps in combination with other lighting,
but because of the bow there is only 12" of width at each end of the aquarium. I
know I can use pendants or attached, but I had thought there is a light I could
set on top of the aquarium with legs. Do you know of such a light or what my
other options are for combination lighting?
Thanks.
<Several manufacturers make fixtures that will fit here. Aquamedic and Current
just to name two that can use the mounting legs. Another option would be to get
a pendant and mount it inside a canopy, but canopies for Bowfronts are usually
flimsy and too shallow for this. Don’t discount the pendant idea, it can have an
appealing look once installed and can be far cheaper. Keep in mind that actinics
are not a must. Welcome, hope this helps you decide, Scott V.>
Re: Lighting Bowfront
12/21/07
I couldn't find any with legs on the Aquamedic site.
<Sexy series, mucho dinero.>
Just hang from the ceiling types. (My wife has said NO to that) And I can't find
'Current' at all doing a Google search. Is that the name of the company?
<Current USA http://www.current-usa.com/ >
(I did find a SunPod HQI that will work, but if you do know about another one I
should check out, let me know.)
<Yes, they are made by Current USA. These are probably your best bet per your
requirements. Just a thought, any of the hanging fixtures could work if you
fabricate your own mounting legs. Have fun, Scott V.>
Switching lights 12/18/07
Good day crew,
<Hello.>
I short but quick question. I have a 75 gallon system that contains a pagoda,
three clams, candy cane coral, BTA, Galaxea, Fiji spaghetti leather, various
polyps, Zoanthids and various fish. Two of which are my favorite, mystery wrasse
and a chevron tang.
<OK>
I currently use two 150 watt metal halide bulbs with two 96 watt actinic, and I
wish to change to a light fixture whose information is below. Can you please
give me a recommendation if this is ok, or stick with what I have. This claims
to replace 400 watt metal halide 1-for-1. Thanks. A have a great holiday!
SPECS: 280 WATT 5900K, 96 C.R.I., Fixture lumen - Photopic 8,500, Fixture Lumens
- Scotopic 65,500 and
http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/pupil_lumens.htm Visual Acuity Lumens Per
Watt 230
Mark Formica
<Mark, I could not find the specific product you reference from the link. From
what you describe it sound like it could work. Although this color spectrum may
work, do realize that it will appear very yellow compared to most the reef
lighting that is out there today. Dual 150 halides sounds perfect for your set
up. I would stick with what you have and invest your money elsewhere. Happy
reefing, Scott V.>
Re: Switching lights 12/19/07
Scott, I appreciate your help.
<Any time.>
This link has the light fixture that I had in mind.
www.fullspectrumsolutions.com. The light fixture is called Ultralux HD.
<Ahh, found model no ULHBT5-646, this could work.>
Just looking to shave cost and the T5/T6 lighting is where I thought I could
start. Do you have any other recommendations in lighting that I could switch
too?
<The T5 could work here, do realize that these will probably not be water
resistant end caps. Also, you will likely end up replacing some of the bulbs,
most people would not be satisfied with the look of strictly 5900K lighting. You
will just have to weigh power cost, bulb replacement cost and personal
preference on the overall look of the tank to decide here.>
Thanks. A (passionate) hobbyist forever,
Mark Formica
<Welcome, great to hear! Scott V.>
Is wattage per gallon the
best method? 11/30/07
Happy Holidays to you at WWM!
<And to you Dan>
I've been thinking about all of the advice given to reefkeepers regarding
lighting needs of stony corals. The answer always seems to involve watts per
gallon or watts per square foot of tank surface, regardless of lighting source
(i.e., MH, NO, HO, VHO, PC). Something tells me that while this may be adequate,
wattage alone not necessarily the best solution for optimum coral growth and
health.< the wattage rules are for base guidelines only.>
Wouldn't it be better to recommend a solution that is stated in lumens per area
or volume?
<This is why PAR readings listed on the by the manufacturers of the bulbs are so
important. PAR is the most important for the photosynthesis.>
Would it also be a good idea to base the recommendation on the spectral needs of
stony corals?< This is where the color spectrum of the bulb comes into play. The
Kelvin rating indicates the color "temperature" of the bulb , but will also
relay where in the color spectrum the bulb is. LED lighting by Solaris has the
most stable, and correct spectrums for corals.>
I'm sure there are other variables, such as tank depth, color temperature, bulb
type, differences between manufacturers' bulbs, etc. may come into play, but it
seems some sort of charts or calculators can be developed to recommend
poor/good/better/best/overkill lighting solutions based on whatever tank
parameters are used as the basis for the calculations.<Dr. Sanjay Joshi has made
many of these very charts. The problem is one bulb from one manufacturer will
have different PAR readings from different ballasts. So it is very hard to say
what spectrum and PAR you will actually be at from just the "Bulbs" perspective.
My personal experience over the last 25 years has me to believe that 6500K bulbs
offer the best growth rate, then 10,000k bulbs which also look whiter, then the
12-14,000K bulbs which are much bluer to the eye, and then finally the 20,000k
bulbs which are the bluest. The 20,000K bulbs also do not last as long as the
lower Kelvin bulbs and have lower PAR readings. Again, this is why the LED
technology is so promising.>
I'm not sure whether this may be too complicated to resolve. Ideas?
<As technology continues to improve, there should be more progress in the LED
market that will make the color spectrum and lamp choices much easier.
Thanks-Rich.. aka.. Mr. Firemouth>
Dan
Light Hanging Question
11/18/07
Thanks for all the help on the issue of overheating. Leaving the top off and
raising the light has helped and I've got a desk fan on the way to lower it even
more.
<Awesome, am glad to help.>
I am probably going to have to build an automatic top off device to go with the
sump though, as I'm having to top up about every 2 days or so (any advice on how
to do that would also be appreciated).
<There are many do it yourself plans on the internet, one can be found at
http://ozreef.org/diy_plans/electronic_projects/water_level_switch.html . Just
keep in mind that you will be dealing with 110, not 240. I personally use and am
a huge advocate of the Tunze water top off system. It is kind of pricey, but
well worth it. It has an optical sensor that keeps your water level super
consistent, an overflow sensor that shuts the unit off if activated, and it
shuts the unit down if it is on for more than ten minutes at a time. Also, it
comes with a 12V pump that will pump from a reservoir to the sump to top off.
This limits your top off capacity to the reservoir, limiting flooding capacity.
All this adds up to an extremely reliable top off system. I have personally
replaced the pump in the kit with a 12V liquid solenoid hooked directly to my RO
unit, I don’t like hauling water if I don’t have to.>
My primary question, though, is a rather simple one and I feel a bit ridiculous
that I'm even asking given that there's probably a very easy explanation. I have
the Current-USA Outer Orbit T5HO lamp hanging from my ceiling by the kit that it
came with. In my zealousness to lower the temperature, I hoisted the thing up
and it's now about 11 inches above the tank. It looks like there's a UFO
hovering in my living room. So I'd like to lower it back down a little bit
towards the 7-8 in. range and monitor to prevent overheating, but I can't seem
to figure out how to do that. I know product questions aren't your usual
schtick, but I thought one of you guys might have this setup and know what I'm
talking about. As it is, I'm contemplating heading back to my LFS and getting
another hanging kit for 10-20 bucks just so the family doesn't flip when they
come over for Thanksgiving at the big THING floating in the air over the living
room.
<That can certainly be unappealing, not to mention the value of being able to
adjust the height of your light. The bracket that mounts to the ceiling has a
little wire outlet in it. By pressing the wire outlet into the mount you should
be able to slide the cable in and out to adjust the length. A PDF with
instructions for the mount can be found at
http://www.marineandreef.com/shoppro/metal_SunPod.htm
I hope this helps, have a nice Thanksgiving, Scott V.>
Re: Light Hanging Question
11/18/07
Miracle workers, all of you ;)
<Have just battled the same woes.>
Can't believe I hadn't figured out the lights before, but it worked and they
look fantastic.
<Excellent, good to hear! >
Sent an e-mail off to Aqua-C about this last question since I know that's what
you recommend, but in the meantime, just wondering if you have any advice. I set
up a new Aqua-C EV120 in the same tank. I have a problem though. I've set it up
and have it operating for bout 2 days now and after the first day, it started
producing MASSIVE amounts of wet foam. So much so that I had to do what they
initially suggested and put the outlet hose back into the sump. I figured this
might be part of the break in process, but opened the gate valve all the way and
it's still producing this volcano of wet foam a day later. Any advice? Is this
normal?
Thanks!
Frank
PS Using a Mag 5 with it, for reference.
<Is it normal? Sometimes. Many times you will see the opposite during break in.
You may want to try restricting the air intake on the skimmer and check the
water level the skimmer sits in to see if it is within the recommended range. If
you add supplements to your water or vitamins to your food it will very often
make the skimmer go nuts like this. If all of the above is in order then just
give it some time to settle in. Happy reefing, Scott V.>
Re: Marine Compatibility, and
Cichlid Feeding Questions... Now either/or purch. of lambda or LR
11/14/07
Hello Bob,
<Eric>
Thank you for the help on both the Hawk and the Cichlid questions. It's always
much appreciated. I have decided not to purchase the Flame hawk.
There are many reasons for this, and after reading I think there will be
aggression issues with the Blenny and possibly others. ...and I really think I'm
close to the 'stocking limit' for my FOWLR tank anyway. I do have another
question, somewhat of a "this or that" situation. Here's a bit of background: In
my 55 gallon FOWLR, I have about 40 lbs of live rock, a Whisper 60 filter, a
Turboflotor Multi HOT skimmer, two powerheads (one with filter attachment) (both
of which are pointed toward each other to ... at least somewhat.. randomize
flow) and approximately one inch of sugar fine, live sand.
Here's the question: I have the opportunity to buy about 45-50 additional lbs of
live rock from a fellow aquarist who is getting rid of his tank. It's in good
shape, and he's asking $100 for it. I figure this is a great deal... considering
most LFS sell theirs for +/- $8/lb. I have read a ton, and figure that I should
have, as a rule, about 1-1.5 lbs of live rock per gallon.. Generally speaking of
course. Adding this much live rock would push that a bit. I do want my fish to
have ample swimming room, but also want them to have adequate biological
filtration.
<Yes... and/but this is a 55... 13 inches wide... likely tall enough to stack
this rock up... if it is dense...>
Should I use that money toward purchasing this rock, or spend the money on
another good deal: a brand new 130 Watt PC light fixture for $110 from a
reputable online retailer. I currently have the standard Fluorescent lighting
that came with the tank, but I'd like my fish to have better illumination, as
well as help the coralline algae grow on my live rock. (I'm also aware of
testing for calcium, iodine, etc. levels in the tank, and keeping pristine water
quality for this)
<Ah, good...>
Which, in your opinion, is the better usage of the $100 +/-? Unfortunately I
don't have enough money to justify both. To be honest, I am leaning toward the
lighting option, unless the 130 watts won't be sufficient to be aesthetically
pleasing...at least a significant, really noticeable improvement over the
lighting I currently have... which is somewhere near 35 watts, I believe?
<Mmm, a single four foot lamp of normal output would be 40 watts... two, 80
watts... but luminal output/appreciation is akin to comparing proverbial fruit
types here... the new lighting will appear MUCH brighter>
(The two fish in particular I want to illuminate are my Blue Spot Toby and my
Starry Blenny.. as well as the others.. if that makes a difference).
Again, thank you for your help! Eric
<Myself... unless you intend to trade up to a larger system soon (in which case
I'd get the rock), I'd go for the new lighting. BobF>
Re: Do It Yourself Lighting
Question...LOA Fixtures From HD? – 10/20/07
Eric,
<<Jim>>
Thanks for the quick reply. I appreciate it.
<<Quite welcome>>
And I checked--according to both the box and the website, the 85W and 100W
versions are both 6500K.
<<Oh, excellent! I’ll have to look in to getting a couple of these higher
wattage fixtures>>
Maybe that's new.
<<Maybe so>>
I was just about ready to begin setting this all up, when I came across an eBay
listing for a MH/PC combo fixture for $330 (plus $70 S&H). It has 2x250W HQI and
2x96W PC Actinic.
<<This configuration would be quite suitable for your 150g tank…in my opinion>>
Now I am back to wondering what to do.
<<Up to you…but I vote for metal halide over PC fluorescent (the first choice in
your original query) any day>>
I just want to make the best choice for my animals and for my wallet, but it
seems like I am always trying to come up with the "alternative" instead of going
with contemporary wisdom. Can you explain to me why MH is preferred above all
else by most hobbyists?
<<Many hobbyists choose/use the different methodologies to good end…”this”
hobbyist prefers metal halide for its greater punch/exceptional lumens-per-watt
output, its aesthetics (single-point light source = glitter lines), and its
versatility (differing combinations of wattage, Kelvin temperature, and bulb
distance from the water make it suitable for “almost” any marine system>>
Is it just that MH was the first lighting solution with the intensity to grow
corals in larger tanks, and people are still committed to it (the way I still
use VHO's instead of PC/T5)?
<<I don’t think so, at least not these days. The viability of VHO/T5 systems is
a fact>>
I have been told that MH has more "punch", that they penetrate deeper than the
same wattage of VHO/PC.
<<Indeed>>
I don't know about wattage, but as someone who studied physics, it seems to me
that 100 lumens/sq inch is 100 lumens/sq inch.
<<Yes…and a watt is a watt... but, how many watts of a specific lighting type
does is take to create that 100 lumens/sq inch?>>
I don't see how the source of the light changes the quality or character of the
light itself (other than temperature/spectrum).
<<Mmm, is more a question of the “strength” here…its ability to “penetrate” the
water column. But do have a read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/PlantedTksSubWebIndex/lightingags.htm>>
Or is the main reason MH seem to "penetrate" better is that they are generally
higher temperature than fluorescents?
<<No…though color temperature does affect PAR in most cases>>
Is it just personal preference, or is MH really better?
<<A bit of both…it is “my” preference for the reasons stated…but as also stated,
many hobbyists use other methodologies with very good success>>
And lastly, how can a person reasonably compare the intensity/quality of
different lighting options to make an informed decision (and not one motivated
purely by hype or vague impressions)?
<<Research the different options…chat with folks using re>>
Wattage seems to be a lousy criterion--150W of MH is definitely brighter than
150W of VHO.
<<But again, differing methodologies. They have their advantages for different
reasons, and the side-by-side comparison only highlights their differences. Is
up to you to decide which best suits you/your system. Likely either will work
when applied correctly>>
It doesn't seem like 110W of VHO is the same as 110W of PC is the same as 110W
T5, either.
<<Differences in style/quality of reflectors will also have a large impact>>
Is there some way (other than buy all four) to make an objective comparison?
<<As stated…by consulting with others using the differing lighting methods>>
I am sorry to bug you guys again, but I just want to understand.
<<Understood…but like many things in this hobby, this too is not a simple matter
of “black and white.” Differences in tank size/depth, livestock selection (most
important), even how clean or clear the water is can dictate the “best”
lighting. I can only offer you “my” opinions and experience…as well as encourage
you to seek info from differing sources to allow you to apply your own good
judgment to make a decision>>
Thanks again for all your help,
Jim
<<Always welcome. EricR>>
Re: Aquarium lip 10/3/07
Thanks for the reply. I thought I'd let you know how I ended up handling
this situation. What I did was buy a few 1/4" acrylic squares. Using aquarium
safe silicon I attached them to the inside of the aquarium 1/8" down (level with
the center bar) - I put on each side in the corners. In essence they function
much like the little pegs that hold up adjustable shelves on the bookcases we
are all familiar with (of course you can't adjust these so easily). I like the
solution because it is invisible, smaller than a normal lip that runs all the
way around and still lets me put my glass versa top cover on the aquarium (so I
sit my lights on it, etc.)...
Terry
<Sounds good. Hope this works well. Not wild above cover glasses though. They
cut out A LOT of light, especially by the time lime or salt builds up on them,
as it will. Much better to do without. In which case, make sure you use
water-proof light fittings though. If something goes wrong, it helps to know
that the lights won't explode if they fall into the water! Cheers, Neale>
A Flicker Of Light...Is This The End of
The Tunnel? – 09/23/07
I had a hard time finding the information I am looking for.
<<Okay>>
I apologize if this question is similar in content to others you have answered.
<<No worries>>
I have a 55-gallon reef tank that has been up and running successfully for two
years.
<<Excellent>>
All parameters are normal; fish and corals thriving. I have a Current Satellite
fixture that has been an excellent choice. However within the past six months
the lamps (bulbs) on one of the ballast began to flicker.
<<Do swap bulbs around to determine this is not the problem>>
At first the flickering was temporary, then it became constant. I bought new
lamps and this did not solve the problem. Then my boyfriend (an electrician)
disassembled and reassembled the unit. It did not flicker again for about two
weeks. Now it flickers randomly once or twice a week, maybe more, and I am not
there to notice. Several opinions have me confused.
<<Oh?>>
One source told me that it was probably a loose wire, not to worry.
<<Mmm, possibly…but “is” a worry and should be found/fixed if so>>
Another told me that a new ballast was needed.
<<Another possibility, yes>>
Before I spend the money on a new ballast, is the now, temporary flickering,
harmful and or indicative of a larger issue?
<<If this is a loose wire, the flickering may well prematurely wear the bulb or
ballast…might even constitute a fire hazard>>
If it is, or was, a loose wire would a new ballast be of any benefit?
<<Only if replacing the ballast addresses the loose wire…otherwise you are no
better off. You state your boyfriend is an electrician…I would think it a simple
matter for him to determine the problem here>>
I tend to be a hypochondriac but it seems that my anemone may be "reaching" for
light more than is usual.
<<The lamps are likely in need of replacement>>
Could the lamps be producing less light, without giving any visual indication?
<<Oh yes!>>
Is there any way to measure the light that the tank is receiving?
<<Indeed there is… To get a true reading of the Photosynthectically Available
Radiation (PAR), or effectiveness, of your chosen bulbs you would need to invest
in a PAR meter…and then one that has a waterproof sensor that can be submersed
(not cheap/easily found…though an enterprising DIYer might rig one themselves).
There is a waterproof LUX meter available in the trade for about a C-note. This
meter will measure foot-candles (brightness/luminance) at a specific distance
and if readings are taken on new bulbs, they can be used as a “benchmark” to
measure diminished luminance with age…
Any input would be most appreciated.
Thank-you.
<<Quite welcome. EricR>>
So confused on lighting my 210gallon tank.
Lighting/Heating/Energy Issues...Which
Lighting System Is Best? – 07/23/07
Hi all!
<<Howdy Nick!>>
Love your site and have read countless Q&A's from it, but it all seems to just
confuse me when it comes to the right lighting.
<<Oh?>>
I am new to saltwater aquariums and have a 210-gallon acrylic tank (72" long x
24" wide x 30" high) with a 50-gallon sump (40"x18"x16").
<<Neat!>>
The canopy only has 5.5" of vertical space in it when the hinged top is closed.
<<Mmm...not enough clearance for halides in my opinion...looks like VHO or T5s
might be your best option if you plan to use this hood>>
Currently there is nothing in the tank except water and sand. I need to finish
lighting (and most likely chilling) the tank before I want to add livestock.
<<Okay...but “what” livestock? You should decide this before choosing/purchasing
your lighting>>
I plan on keeping fish, live-rock, and eventually easy invertebrates (those that
don't require super water movement and light output).
<<Light output will be variable, indeed...but virtually ALL require good water
movement>>
I read that I would need 3-5watts per gallon for that setup, so around
600-1000watts of light.
<<Again...you need to be specific about what you want to keep>>
Now to my questions. I am SO confused about what I should do to light my tank. I
don't want to spend $1000's on a system, and I certainly do not want a high
electric bill from my lighting each month (nor does my mother).
<<Then research the animals you think you want and design/setup a system that
does not require lots of high-intensity lighting>>
I have read some things saying MH's are the most cost-efficient in the long run,
but then I hear that they are costly each month in terms of electric bills.
<<No more costly than any other lighting which consumes the same wattage. And I
agree they provide the best look/bang for the buck>>
As far as fluorescent PCs, T5's, etc... I don't know if they will be strong
enough for a tank of my height.
<<Goes back to “what you plan to keep”>>
Heat is also a concern. My tank right now is at 88 degrees F, with no lights at
all!
<<Some hot running pumps/equipment, eh?>>
Ambient room temp is kept at 75-80degrees? All I have is an Iwaki 70RLT pump
circulating the water from my sump to the tank. (I was told Iwaki's are great,
but didn't think they would boil my water like that!)
<<And it shouldn’t be...sounds like something else may be at play here>>
So, even without lighting, I am going to need a chiller.
<<As it is now...yes>>
Unless there is a better pump on the market I should get?? One that won't cause
so much heat.
<<Iwaki is one of the best...is this pump new? You might consider an exchange if
possible. This pump should not be heating your tank like this. Do also
investigate that something else isn’t amiss somewhere>>
Other things specific to MH that confuse me:
Magnetic vs. Electronic ballasts- A WWM crewmember said this- "<the benefits of
electronic ballasts are a figment of marketing imagination>" and in an answer to
a comment by a reader: "So far, the electronic ballast is much more efficient in
terms of energy, heat, and bulb life." he answered: <not even close to being
true by one expert I am aware of (unbiased, unpaid and very convincing> (this
comes from http://www.wetwebmedia.com/mhmedsysfaqs.htm)
<<Opinions vary...I prefer the E-ballasts because they are weigh less, draw less
power, and generate less heat than the magnetic ballasts...in my
opinion/experience>>
But then I have seen other WWM crewmembers say that electronic are much better
than magnetic...
<<In some aspects maybe...but the magnetic ballasts are generally less expensive
to purchase...and many believe the “get more” out of the bulbs they power>>
It is just a huge mind bending area!
<<Just keep reading my friend>>
I've been looking at possibly getting 2-3 250-watt pendants to suspend over my
tank, then I had read that pendants aren't good because they don't spread the
light out.
<<Was/is largely true with the “vertical” pendants of past years, but today’s
“horizontal” pendants don’t have the same limitations>>
I was looking at IceCap 250 HQI Pendant and Ballast
(http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=12780&prodid=25174&catid=115)
or something like OceanLight HQI 250
(http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=12112&prodid=23526&catid=115).
<<Either would be fine...my choice would be the IceCap gear>>
Or for fluorescents I was considering 2 Orbit Compact 36" 384watts, though a bit
on the pricey side
(http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Product/Prod_Display.cfm?pcatid=15690&N=2004+113345).
<<Indeed...and again, would likely serve>>
Also, in terms of heat given and electricity used... Wouldn't a 750w fluorescent
system equal a 750w MH system? They are both using 750watts of energy aren't
they?
<<Yes and yes>>
Or, for example, do 750watt fluorescents just use 50% of the watts as actual
electricity, etc?
<<No>>
Then I was considering just doing an IceCap retrofit, but I don't have enough
space in my canopy to install them and still keep them 6"+ above the water. (I
heard you need lights to be more that 6-8" above the water, and my canopy only
has a total of 5.5" of space in it.)
<<A bit cramped, agreed>>
While with a pre-made fixture, I can just take off my canopy's hinged top and
use docking mounts or pendant mounts for the lights. I also was thinking it
would be better to get 2 or more smaller fixtures than 1 big 72" light. (So I
won't have to move one huge light out of the way every time I need access to the
water, etc. Easier to move 2x 36" units than one heavy 72" all the time)
<<Agreed>>
Once I get my lighting I can see how hot my tank gets so I can size a chiller as
my next step.
<<I still think something is very wrong re your tank temperature...are you
certain the measuring device is accurate?>>
Thanks for any help you can give!
Nick
<<Happy to assist. EricR>>
Metal halides and T5 brands
6/13/07
Hello Crew,
<Michele>
I tried to send this to the chat forum, but could not log on. I apologize if
I missed the answer in the archives. I am trying to purchase new lights for
my husband for Father's day....yep, last minute, probably going to have to
wrap up a picture instead of the actual lights!
<Heee! Good idea>
Anyway, I want to avoid the cheaper non-brand name lights, but I am having
trouble knowing what the best brand is! We are in process of upgrading from
a 90 to a 220 gallon reef with primarily SPS and fish (2 tangs, 1
Rabbitfish, 2 clowns, 1 mandarin). My husband has requested 3-250 watt
10,000 K retro metal halides and 4-36 watt retro T5s. Any suggestions for a
good brand name? Ice cap? Hamilton? Coralife?
<These are actually all re-packaged, re-labeled products... Not made by
these folks... But of these three, the first two are better investments...
Such gear buys are better researched ala "Consumer Reports", i.e., by
querying on a BB re many users experiences concerning function, longevity,
cost per performance and issues such as customer service... Our archived
input on these can be found here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm
at the bottom trays...>
Thanks for any assistance.
Michele
<Welcome. Bob Fenner>
Another Aquarium Lighting Question –
6/8/07
Dear Sirs <and Madams>,
I have recently purchased a 46 gallon acrylic bowfront tank. I have just
begun in this hobby and have been poring over articles and FAQs, besides
taking advice from our local shop. <It is a hobby of life-long learning
indeed!> Unfortunately, every bit of information seems different, and
occasionally even contrary. <A very frustrating phenomenon. The more you
learn and experience, you will start to sort the junk from the gems more
easily.> I have made effort to contact you because I find your website
helpful and apparently knowledgeable. <We try. Thank you.>
Here is where I am. I have a 46 gallon bowfront with an overflow box and
sump (AMiracle Advanced SL Trickle Filter), a SeaClone 100 protein skimmer
<Not very effective. Some find them acceptable with major DIY modifications.
I gave up on mine. Does it produce skimmate for you?>, and a Coralife 36"
2x96 PC light (one actinic and one 10000k) - Deluxe Lunar Fixture. <A nice
fixture, I have the 48” version.>
My question is regarding lighting, corals, and additional equipment.
Currently I am planning a mini-reef. Will this amount of lighting accomplish
the job? <This will be fine for many soft corals and LPS.> And if I decide
on SPS corals will I need more light? <It is borderline. Some would say to
replace the actinic with another daylight bulb to give more useable light. I
like the color with the actinic. Maybe try a small frag of your desired
coral and see how it does. This is a reasonable amount of wattage, and I
think metal halide fans underestimate the PC’s sometimes. You may need to
put some specimens higher up on the rocks.> Finally, what sorts of
additional equipment should I plan on eventually installing/purchasing if I
wanted to keep plenty of healthy SPS corals. <Number one is a real protein
skimmer. Lots of live rock and a deep sand bed for denitrification. If a DSB
is not for you, I also had great success with a small plenum and lots of
live rock with a moderate depth sand bed. Refugiums are also great additions
to reef tanks. Oh, and a supply of clean water - so if you don't have
exceptional water quality, a RO/DI water purification system or some other
means of having plenty of clean water.>
And while I'm at it, the aquarist I frequent instructed me to put down about
a half inch of substrate at the bottom of the tank, which I did, do I need
more? <This is fine for appearance and buffering, but won’t help with
denitrification. If you aren’t having a nitrate problem, then it is fine.>
Sincerely,
Carl VerPlanck
<Cheers, Alex Miller>
Lighting Question, wherefore art thou measures? 5/24/07
Hi all...
On many sites that sell corals and in books lighting is usually stated in terms
of "low", "moderate", and "high". But exactly how are those defined?
<Various ways by different writers... the best measures are PAR related,
measured at the point of intercept by the colonies... See the works (many on the
Net) of Sanjay Joshi and Dana Riddle here>
I have two saltwater tanks one 20 gallon and one 10 gallon but both are
identical in height/water depth. The 10 gallon has been upgraded from 40 watts
PC 50/50 to 80 watts PC 50/50 and the 20 gallon has a 65 watt PC 50/50 (which I
don't want to spend additional money changing lighting). I consider both to be
between moderate to low lighting for the depth of the tanks.
<I agree with the low end>
Both lights on those tanks are on legs which raises the lighting about 4 inches
from the water. Although I've read about "watts per gallon" I find this
difficult to understand when tanks are identical in depth. With that
calculation it would appear my 10 gallon tank is getting 8 watts per gallon and
the 20 gallon is getting only 3 watts per gallon.
<Mmm, yes... but/and the actual useful photonic energy available at/near the
organism in question is really the only valid measure... Many factors
involved... other than rating, consumption values for fixtures/lamps... angles
of dispersion, color in the water, reflector use... among others. See the Net re
PAR meters, measures...>
Just a note: the upgrade in the 10 gallon from 40w to 80w was because the two
very small xenia that came on Nerite snail shells purchased the first week of
March have now split into 8 not so small xenia and all are headed to the top of
the tank. So I sort of hoped higher lighting might keep the ones lower in the
tank happy where they are.... just a thought.
<What do folks say re Billy.G/Microsoft?: "Resistance is futile. You will be
assimilated". Applies to many Xeniid systems>
Anyway, a greater understanding of those lighting terms for corals will help
me make the right decisions for the 20 gallon. My sun corals have been moved to
the 20 gallon since the xenia now leave me little room for handling them in the
10 gallon. Again, thank you so much for this site and everyone's
assistance. Regards, Debbie
<Mmm, much that can/could be discoursed here. Deb, do you participate in a local
marine/reef club? I do think you'd be very happy to be face to face, mind to
mind (in semi-real time) in such an association. BobF>
VHO - vs. MH; Lighting Choices, Types and Temperature 4/26/07
Hello crew,
<Hi.>
I hope all is well.
<Thank you.>
Thanks again for this great site and all the help.
<Welcome.>
I have a question about lighting.
<Okay.>
I have a 120gal acrylic (48"x24"x24") that has been setup and running for about
a year now. (also a 55 upstairs that has been up and running for about 7 years)
I have been running VHOs (2ea, 4' AquaSun, 4' Actinic/White (URI) and 3'
Actinic). My green zoas have turned a reddish brown and my metallic pink zoas
have also turned a bit dim. I was wondering if it is the light or if it's the
micro-vert that I put in the tank? (assuming more the light than anything)
<Could be a combination of both, what are your phosphate and nitrate levels? How
old are the light bulbs?>
I recently bought a 6' Odyssea (I know, not the best brand) MH/PC setup, tore it
all apart, and shortened it to 4'. I now am running all 3 MH over my tank.
<Yes, this could be a reaction by the animals to cope with the new abundance of
intense light.>
Each bulb is a 250w 20K bulb. The bulbs are 11-12" above the water.
<How did you acclimate the animals to the new lighting?>
I tossed the PC lights they were not working anyway and being in the same
fixture, at 12" over the water, I figured they wouldn't do much good. Will the
3 20K MH bulbs be Ok, or should I swap out one or more of the bulbs for 10K or
15K bulbs? (or drop to 2 MH and add a couple VHO back in?)
<I would prefer to see the MH's remain in a 6500k to 10,000k range and if you
want a "bluer" look then supplement with a fluorescent bulb of your
choice...anything but PowerCompacts.>
I do want the nice vibrant colors bit also want my corals healthy. I have some
Hammer coral, a Frogspawn, some Kenya tree, Toadstool Leathers, Mushrooms, Zoas,
Colt coral, green and pink star polyps and a bubble coral.
<One more question from me; Why did you switch to the MH? Do you plan on keeping
more light demanding creatures in the future?>
Take care, Mike
<You as well, Adam J.>
Kelvin/Incandescence ratings... 4/21/07
Can you explain to me what the different colors and K's do?
What would they be best used for?
White 7100k is for?
blue 12000k is for?
pink 800k is for?
thank you
<The practical value of such ratings is covered on WWM:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marine/setup/lighting/index.htm
In essence, there are "temperatures" that are of utility for engendering
photosynthesis... starting at about 5,500K... "Warmer" lights for looks,
bluer for depth... Bob Fenner>
Upgrading Lighting and Coral Compatibility... part msg./reply
4/15/07
Sorry my name is Joe.
<Mmm, why sorry Joe?>
It looks like you got cut up when replying something, starting as "wife are not
a problem...". I couldn't make out exactly what you
were saying, other than mentioning a lighting fixture.
<Strange...>
Also, the only problem with adding a fixture is that my tank is 30 inches in
length, and wasn't sure to get a 24" with strong light or a 36".
<The two-footer>
I wouldn't be sure if it wouldn't fit or would be too big. How many watts was
that one fixture you suggested?
Thanks again,
Joe
<Need to see the previous correspondence... there are twenty or so of us here...
Don't know if this is for fresh, marine... a reef, for aquaculture, what type of
life, purpose/s... Please read here:
http://wetwebmedia.com/marsetupindex2.htm
the bottom/last tray... on Marine Aquarium Lighting. Bob Fenner>
Crew, I have a general lighting question - 4/7/07
I have a large clam, a hammer coral, a candy cane, numerous polyps and
mushrooms, with over 100lbs. of live rock.. All have been in my 135 tank for
over 3 years now. All doing well. I currently have VHO bulbs over my tanks, as
follows:
10K
50/50
03 actinic
Everything is thriving. I have been told by my LFS, that by adding more
actinic, that this will encourage coralline algae to grow. Is this true?
<Mmm, sort of... actually just cutting down on the "white" lighting will favor
this group of Red algae over other photosynthetic/competing life>
For the first 2 years, I only had the 10K and 03 actinic, and it was
everywhere. In my third year, I added the 50/50 bulb. and have very little
coralline in my tank now. Should I remove the 50/50 and replace with another
type of bulb?
<Mmm, maybe... but could be other things at play here... >
What would you recommend.
<To read re Corallines:
http://wetwebmedia.com/corallinealg.htm
and the related FAQs linked above... and mostly consider replacing, adding to
your calcareous material (Rock and Substrate)... and measure for alkalinity,
Magnesium balance>
I also have a 55-gallon tank I'm thinking about setting up again, and was
considering using power compacts.
<Mmm, do look into VHO's, T-5's and...>
I've read a lot of the FAQ's on your site, but I can't get an honest answer.
<Mmm, not to accuse you of being disingenuous... but all of our responses/inputs
are honest>
Which are better for the over all health of the tank? VHO or power compacts?
<The former IMO>
One LFS says one thing, Another says the opposite. Or is there any combination
that you would recommend. If I stay with the VHO, what would be the best
combination of bulbs to use?
Thanks,
Chris
<Let's skip ahead here... the best thing for you to do period would be to read
what is posted on WWM, elsewhere, and make up your own mind re the facts
presented. Bob Fenner>
Re: Crew, I have a general lighting question 4/9/07
Thank you Mr. Fenner. Let me apologize. What I meant by not being able to
get an honest answer, I meant, as to which is better. VHO or PC. At your
recommendation, I'll stick with the VHO set up's I have.
<Ah, real good. Thank you for this clarification. BobF>
Need help with lighting choice for my first Salt Water Tank 3/21/07
Hello
<Hi there.>
I'm setting up my first salt water tank.
<Good for you.>
Have everything except for the lights.
<As far as I am concerned this is one of the most critical choices that you
have.>
I have a 53gallon Elos tank (30.5" x 19.5" x19.5") and I will have soft corals
and fish. Haven't decided if I'd like a clam or two, but clams aren't a
priority, and I could do without them if it makes a big difference on lighting
choices. NO SPS or Anemones.
<The clams will need Metal Halides.>
I know I want a 24" T5 light. But....do I need 4, 5 or 6 bulbs?
<I would say 6 24" bulbs, two 10,000K, two 50/50, and two Actinic 03 blue.>
Would 4 24w bulbs be enough for my set up? Who makes a good light with
individual reflectors? I'd prefer a built in fan too.
<I have never been a fan of T5, PC, or VHO. I like MH, and that is what I will
stay with.>
I've been looking at the Aquactinics, Sunlight Tek-Light, and Helio Lights.
<I will say that I have heard good things about Helio.>
Any others that I should be looking at? It's not always clear if they have
individual reflectors or not. And lastly...what would you recommend for
bulbs? I don't want the tank too blue.
<Please see above.>
I want it to look pretty natural without the light looking too white or too
blue. Maybe white with a hint of blue.
<This will be the most eye pleasing. Please see here,
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/T5fluorFAQs.htm, as well as here,
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marlgtganthony.htm. I hope that this helps.>
Thanks so much!
<You are welcome. Brandon.>
Pam
Thanks Brandon!!
<You are most welcome. Please feel free to share the outcome with
us. Brandon.>
Pam
Aquarium lighting question, SW, vague - 3/12/07
I am in the process of setting up an aquarium, I want to make sure my
lighting is sufficient to accommodate most corals and anemones. I was going to
use a 3 light system inside my canopy. 2 - White Actinic (50% 7100k & 50%
6000k) VHO 48" 110 Watt Bulbs & 1- 100% actinic 03 solid Blue, VHO 48" 110 Watt
Bulb.
Would this be sufficient lighting for a 48"long X 24" deep, 70 gal tank?
<This really depends on what types of corals you want to keep. For most soft
corals yes this would work. I would not recommend anemones in this system. You
will most likely need more light than this for anemones. Depending on the
ballast, I would say three 48" 110 watt, Full spectrum 10k, and one 110 watt,
actinic 03. Or conversely, you could go with metal halide, and not have to
worry about actinic, and be able to keep everything. Please see here,
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marlgtganthony.htm. Brandon>
Coralife HOB 150 watt HQI Fixture 3/2/07
Bob,
<James>
I received above fixture yesterday. Decided to upgrade my lighting as my LFS
always has beautiful Monti fragments available that I could not keep with my
previous fixture (twin 65 PCs).
I must say that this fixture has to be the bargain of the century. It attaches
to the back wall of the aquarium by plastic/nylon screws. It has a cooling fan
built into the fixture which is dead quiet, and also comes with a 14K lamp.
I'm not a fan of canopies as they are a pain every time you want to get into the
tank for maintenance or any other reason, along with heat issues, and this sure
fills the bill. Have a gander here if you wish.
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=13922&prodid=27192&catid=115
Am going to set up a 29 in the basement with the PC lighting, and propagate
yellow polyps which are getting way out of hand in my display tank. My dealer
agreed to take all I can supply him with.
James
<I sense an article coming on... With pix! BobF>
About one of your articles on lighting and marine inverts
2/20/07
Mr. Fenner,
I must say, in a hobby where its hard to get direct answers, its nice to know
someone/people are willing to give out the answers, and I thank you. Anyhow,
recently I read an article on your website http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/setup/lighting/index.htm
Title: Marine Lighting: Quantity Quality and Duration. In it you gave the
recommendation for "reef-building organisms" is 50-100 lumens per gallon. The
18" vita-lite T8 Fluorescent light bulb is 610 lumens. This bulb is only
15Ws. However according to your article for a 10gallon tank this light fixture
should be good enough for reef building organisms. e.g. 10x50= 500 lumens. (the
10G tank is used as a sump, but I am interested in growing macroalgae so I'm
looking into fixtures.) I am sure I missed a fact somewhere, because from
everyone I talk to, I need a stronger light fixture and more watts. Any help in
this matter would be appreciated.
-Joe Coov
<You are correct... this is an ancient piece... Dura/Vita-lite has been out of
business for years... I would go with similar high CRI, color temp. lamps of a
few (2,3 times) more intensity nowadays for this application. Bob Fenner>
Company information, Need to contact Odyssea. - 02/11/2007
Hey crew,
<Hi Brandon, Mich here.>
Since you know all... and I mean ALL!
<Mmm, not all my friend.>
I have been searching everywhere for company information of Odyssea lights. I
have a problem with my ballast that
is only 6 months old but can not find company information anywhere. Every search
I try just takes me to e-bay! Do you have a website, address, phone number in
your rolodex anywhere?
<Mmm, you might try contacting someone who distributes this company's
products. You might try here: http://www.aquatraders.com/index.asp?txtSearch=odyssea&PageAction=PRODSEARCH&btnSearch2.x=7&btnSearch2.y=10 >
Any help would be awesome!
<Hope this helps. -Mich>
Brandon
Re: Ich, Low pH, Low Calcium, Possibly Elevated Magnesium
1/23/07
Mich,
<Hello again Jennifer!>
After perusing the expansive website I think I have come across a setup problem
that could be the root cause of all my problems...lighting.
<Heee! If it were only that easy!>
The cover that came with the tank is a split lid and accommodates 18" bulbs. So
I have put 2 18" Coralife 50/50 true actinic, but from what I gather that is not
nearly enough light.
<Not enough for a reef set up.>
So before I add live rock I need light.
<Mmm, would be better, but not required for filtration enhancement.>
I've read so much about VHOs and metal halides and fluorescents...could you tell
me what I need?
<Well, it depends on what you want to do. If you are not interested in keeping
corals, you can keep what you have. If you want to keep what you have but
upgrade slightly, you could change your bulbs from 50/50 to purely 10K and you
might try to get bulbs with an internal reflector, which will assist with light
distribution. I believe URI makes them among other manufacturers. If you are
interested in keeping corals in the future you might explore other
options. Possibilities are numerous, but it may be possible to supplement your
current set up with fluorescent or T5 lights, or you may decide to replace the
whole thing and go for VHO, MH or a combination hood which may combine several
types of light. If you are considering going this route there is much info
available on this site. Go to WWM homepage and click Marine articles, then
Marine Set-up 2 and read the articles first, explore the FAQ's later.>
I'm just going to have live rock, inverts, and fish. no corals. Tank is standard
55 gal; 18" deep. Thank you for all your help...and patience!!!
<Welcome! -Mich>
Jennifer
To light or not to light? -
1/18/07
Hi how is everyone doing today.
<Hello Clinton, JustinN with you on this chilly day.>
I have 125 gallon full blown reef system with a refugium underneath.
The water parameters are near perfect, at least as close as I can get to
the nature ocean environment.
PH 8.1
Alk 8
Ca 426
Nit 0
Ni 0
Amm 0
Phos 0
sal .125
RedOx 350
temp 79.1
protein skimming with calcium reactor
<Excellent>
I have the lights setup so that the refugium light stays on all the time
and of course the main lights are on a timer. However I am having a
problem with nuisance algae.
Every time I stir the gravel or get it off, it comes back in a few
hours. I was wondering if by leaving the refugium light system on or
24/7 was causing a problem in the growth of the algae.
<Mmm, not likely, though, if you are not utilizing a Caulerpa sp. of
algae in your refugium, the 24 hour lighting is not necessary. If you
are utilizing the much more common (and suitable) Chaetomorpha, this
should be lit on a 12 hour schedule, reverse of that on the display tank
(also known as Reverse Daylight Photoperiod, or RDP).>
This stuff is the most annoying stuff in the world and I only feed
my fish every other day.
thank you
<Well, Clinton, from your description and pictures, I do believe you are
battling with the infamous Cyanobacteria. Have a read here for more
information on solutions:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/bluegralgae.htm and the files linked in
blue above. -JustinN> |
|
.jpg) |
Lighting interference with pocket pH tester 1/12/06
Belated Happy New Year!
<Thanks>
I thought I would pass on an experience I have had recently that cost me dearly.
I bought a Milwaukee pH tester, waterproof, very nice. Next I bought a new Jebo
pc fixture with 2 65W half 10000K and half actinic lamps. This fixture has an
external ballast which is very nice, lighter in weight and easier to hang above
the tank.
Now for the bad part. When I used my new tester on my tanks, I have 2, it read
perfectly, 8.2 to 8.3 on each tank. Before I checked my pH levels again I bought
the new light and was using it. On my smaller tank the pH was still 8.2 to 8.3
but my big tank was 6.9!! I panicked and got some buffer and started trying to
get the pH up. Nothing was working. I don't know how much I finally ended up
adding but I couldn't get the pH above 7.3.
Hindsight being 20/20, I realize how big a mistake I made and won't repeat it.
But I didn't find out what was the problem until I tried to show a friend the
way the pH tester worked and had it in a cup of water and turned on. It was
reading 7.2 in the cup but when I brought the cup up to the top of the tank to
test the water there the reading dropped to 5.4! I moved the cup with the tester
in it back and forth a few times and watched the reading go up and down. Finally
I turned the Jebo light off and the reading stayed put. And it tested the same
as the test kit showed.
I never thought about a light fixture interfering with a tester.
<Mmm... RF... electronics...>
Unfortunately I didn't learn until after I burned up most everything in my tank
with high pH, 8.8 was the highest it tested. And of course then I started doing
water changes and everything I could think of to bring it back down. It seemed
to take forever to stabilize. I lost all of my 'pods, some snails, my serpent
star, and cleaner shrimp which had gotten so big. I was heart broken for I don't
know how long.
The good news is that after what has seemed like forever my tank is back
healthy. Even my 'pods are back and I have baby Nassarius snails too. They look
really cute in there. I am still dealing with algae problems like a newly cycled
tank but it's getting better.
I am telling all of this to hopefully keep someone else from having a similar
disaster.
Agnes
<Mmm, Please do consider writing Jebo re this interference issue... Could be
very important to their business... especially when the folks at UL catch up
with this part of the trade again. Bob Fenner>
Lighting Question 11/4/06
Good morning Crew!
<Dustin>
I hope this finds you all doing well. I have been an aquarium enthusiast for a
number of years and learned most of my info by getting a job with a great
saltwater store several years back.
<Ah, good>
I had a large beautiful reef about 4 years ago but due to multiple moves had to
sell it all to my former employer. I have dipped back in and have setup another
tank. Actual gallons is around 35 but the tank is deep. It's only 30 inches
wide but 24 inches deep. I have live sand, a protein skimmer, decent amount of
live rock, and a canister filter (I know). I have been having a high nitrate
problem but I think I am on the right track to curing it. My protein skimmer
would get very dirty and I would just empty it and keep going. I have been
cleaning it regularly and it is running more efficiently now.
<Is of great benefit/improvement>
Also, there was a bio-pad in the canister which I removed, so now it just has
two clean floss pads for mechanical filtration. Only a clown and anemone are
present. Does it sound like I am on the right track there?
<Mmm, thus far>
My real question. Since my last move, unfortunately, I have one LFS that isn't
worth mentioning. Prices are through the roof and staff is not too
knowledgeable.
<How would you help them?>
It is time for me to invest in lighting and I have some confusion. Before I
ask, I know there is tons of info about lighting on your site and I have read
through lots already. I have narrowed it down to two units. The biggest
problem is having a 30 inch width (knocks out 36 inch units). So it will either
be a 30 inch power compact unit (2x65 bulbs), or a 24 inch T5HO unit (4x24
bulbs). I am not going with any demanding corals but do want my anemone happy.
<Mmm, a small MH pendant would be best here...>
The PC unit would cover my entire width and has more wattage, but I am thinking
the T5 unit, although only 24 inches, may be more effective.
<Could be... along with meaty feedings>
Any advice on choosing a unit would be appreciated. By the way, they are the
same price.
Thanks!
<A small... metal halide is my best advice/choice. Bob Fenner>
T5 vs. PC vs. HQI for mixed reef 11/4/06
Hello,
Love the web site! haven't had a question I couldn't find an answer to until
now. My wife and I are trying to decide what type of light to use with our tank
with. First a little about our setup:
We have a 75 gal (48"LX18"DX20"H) main tank with a 40 gal tank used for a
refugium down below. We have not yet decided the specifics for what types of
coral etc we want but do know that we love soft corals and fish. Problem is we
also know we want to put in a few clams and maybe some SPS (we are working on
our list).
<And maybe on another system...>
Our problem is we would like to buy a light that gives us the ability to add
some SPS later if want and allows us to keep the clams and we are not sure what
to get. right now we are leaning toward T5HO. We are considering the following
options:
PC - Presently we do not think these are appropriate for clams and SPS (we have
been told and read PC with clams and SPS is pushing it). That being said we had
initially dismissed PC fixtures and decided on HQI HQI - We were considering the
AquaLight advanced 48" fixture with two 150w bulbs. We know this will work for
the clams and SPS. Having decided on HQI we then learned about T5HO
T5HO - It is my understanding that T5HO provides more lumens (5000 initial for a
54W bulb) per watt than PC (4800 for a 55w bulb) and the individual
reflectors allow better use of the light. After hearing that and looking up the
lumens for the bulbs for the manufacturers I began reading about t5 in earnest
and notice that they are in many of the conversations with HQI about being able
to support clams and SPS.
<Yes>
Assuming my knowledge above is correct my questions are as follows:
1 - Would a TekLight 4-54W or 6-54W 48" fixture be appropriate on my tank?
<Could work>
2 - Would going with HQI be the better option given that it is about $100 more
than the 6 bulb t5 and $200 more than the 4 bulb?
<Would be better>
3 - what are your impressions of the T5HO?
<Is/are good units>
4 - I read that T5HO bulbs have longer life than PC bulbs but my local store
strongly disagreed and said that t5 bulbs would need to be replaced every 6
months.
<Some makes/models have longer useful lives...>
The store also said I would need a fan on the T5HO bulbs to maintain light
quality.
<?>
They favored the HQI saying the light is better and in the long run cheaper
given that I will spend more on bulbs for my T5. can you confirm their assertion
(it conflicts with what I read else where)?
<Hard to make sweeping generalized statements... but w/in the circumstances,
choices you list, the MH/HQI would produce more useful photonic energy per watt
consumed, dollar cost in the long/er haul... all costs considered... But I
hasten to add, do you know for sure or semi-certain, that you want/need such
intensity? If indeed you want to, are willing to match the "other aspects" of
husbandry (water quality checks, adjustments... mainly) to the boosted light
output... I'd go with the HQI mix>
5 - another thoughts?
Thanks for all your help!
V/R
Mike
<Welcome. Bob Fenner>
Your opinion on Catalina Aquarium lighting - 11/02/06
Hello,
<Howdy>
First off, thank you guys so much for the great web site! You provide a world
of information!
<Welcome>
Now. I need your opinion. I have searched the web high and low for
information regarding Catalina Aquarium light fixtures.
<Mmm, totally unfamiliar with the/this brand... see only a couple references to
being sold on auction sites...>
I can not find any reviews or comments (that are of any worth) anywhere! The
unit that I am looking at is a 48" 6*65 power compact fixture, 6 lunar lights, 3
cords, cooling fan, dimmer on the lunars, and choice of bulbs (10k, actinic,
etc. I was thinking about 4 10k and 2 actinic....do you agree?)
<Mmm, nope... am not a fan of actinics... as you'll find if you read what is
archived on WWM>
, 5 year warranty on the electric ballasts, and so on and so on.....here's a
link:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=015&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=250019435309&rd=1&rd=1
<See/saw this>
I currently have a 55 gallon (same old standard size....48 inches long, 18
inches deep...I think 15 front to back), 45 pounds of live rock with some more
coming after the next paycheck, a percula clown and a nuisance blue damsel, 2
Mexican turbo snails, 2 Astrea, one emerald crab that snuck in with the rock
(he's big and a great addition, by the way). I also have some stow away corals
on the rocks. About a half dozen blue/purple mushroom polyps, and small
"branch" of xenia that has actually doubled his number of arms in about 2 weeks
under my crappy lights (he's placed right up near the top), and some other soft
corals that I am yet to ID (these have also been multiplying). What I plan on
setting up are your basic soft and LPS corals, and maybe some kind of Anemone
that would go with the Perc.
<Ah, no... to the anemone... mixing with Scleractinians, alcyonaceans...>
(Are there any that might match up and not hurt any of the corals?).
<Not carte blanche, no>
I have read that there are some SPS corals that can adjust to lower levels of
light as well, so I may look
into those. (This will all be done with more research! I
don't just plan on
throwing my corals to the pit to battle it out in trench warfare, via my tank)
<Good>
With the basic info that I have given you and with my basic desires listed
out, are the 6*65 watt lights that are made by Catalina Aquarium worth, say, the
time that it took me to even write this email? I like the 5 year
warranty, and
I believe it is valid even though it is through eBay.
<Am dubious here re both/either>
I've checked out CatalinaAquarium.com and the lights seem decent, but I'm not
gonna take their word for it (it's like smokers looking to BIG TOBACCO for
cancer info!) Have you heard any pro's or con's regarding Catalina
Aquarium? The deal that I have found seems great. To have the order
custom made
through CatalinaAquarium.com would be a ballpark $600 investment. The
eBay deal
is significantly lower.
<As with all gear choices, I encourage you/others to do a bit of census,
generate your own "Consumers Digest" sort of reviews from surveying other
hobbyists/consumers actual use... through a look/see, querying on the various
BB's... Aquarium Frontiers, Reefs.org... Bob Fenner>
(By the way, if you post this email on your website, PLEASE wait for a day or
two....I plan on buying these lights if they are worth it in about 2 days! I
want them to still be there! THANKS!!!!!)
<No worries... "they'll make more">
Anyways, thanks for your time! You guys rock! And please help this
inquisitive consumer make the right choice.
Have a great day!
Jon
Re: Your opinion on Catalina Aquarium lighting 11/5/06
Awesome, Thanks for the info! Yeah, I jumped the gun on a couple of the
questions I had. I was just exhausted when typing the earlier email and simply
could not look any further....I felt like I was in college again!
<A good feeling!>
Anyways, I did some more research yesterday on the Anemone, and I'm "just saying
so". This has come about now that I have seen that some Clowns will take to
some certain types of corals (thank you WWM). That's all that I am looking for,
the host relationship that is. It's just cool, you know. So that leads me to
my next question.....can you give an example and/or steer me in the right
direction towards any types of specific corals that my False Perc might have
that special something with?
<A good choice would be the genus Euphyllia>
I have found some info here and there, but they are all relating to Tomato or
Clarkii Clowns.....I have been unable to find any info on Brand Perc.
As far as the Catalina Aquarium Lights are concerned, I talked with a handful
of people at various shops that are good at their Hobby even more so than they
are at their Business, if you know what I mean, and I decided to pull the
trigger and went ahead with the purchase. Once I get them and run 'em for a
bit, I will pass on any info that might be useful to the next consumer (or
sap.....we'll see!). I trust my one friend who has been in the hobby and
business for a number of years when he says "I'd give it a shot....you should
get 'em" rather than "well, here....let me show you These"...
Anyways, thanks for all of the info! I'm off and returning to the bowels of
the interweb to do further research! I'm sure I'll be back!
Until then
Mahalo
<Welcome my friend. Bob Fenner>
Marine lighting, quarantine, formalin use 10/29/06
Good morning,
<Gutmorgen!>
Thank you for your wonderful website. It is an extremely valuable tool
for us newcomers to the hobby!
I'll try to keep this concise, while giving you the detail I think you
need.
<Okay>
1.) Set up is a 55 gallon saltwater tank (48 x 13 x 20). There is
50 lbs of Fiji liverock, and another 15 - 20 lbs of "dead" rock, which
we hope will be seeded by the liverock in time. We have been using the
light that came with the tank, which is a useless single 40W fluorescent
bulb. In researching the monstrous amount of information on Wet Web
Media to assist us in upgrading the lighting, we have ruled out metal
halide, and decided to go with Sunlight Supply's Tek T5 HO lighting. We
feel this will give us some better stocking choices over time, as
compared to compact fluorescent lighting. Would you agree?
<Yes, I do>
My question
is whether to go with a 2 lamp fixture (2 at 54W) or a 4 lamp fixture (4
at 54W). My concern is whether the 4 lamp will be too strong for this
size tank, as 216W is about double that when using T5 HO, correct?
<Not too much, and correct>
If
too much, is it possible to run just three lamps of the four on the
larger fixture?
<Mmm... likely these lamps/fixtures are "ganged" and must be run in pairs>
The two lamp fixture does not seem to be enough
lighting. Our hope is to keep soft corals, and if the lighting permits,
some corals that would require a bit more lighting. (Will NOT make the
jump to metal halides.)
2.) Our intention from the beginning was to get enough liverock over
time to enable us to remove the media out of the Eheim Pro II 2026
canister filter and let the liverock do its thing. I am installing an
Aqua C Remora protein skimmer tonight. My thought is that once the
skimmer is running properly, I would move the media that is in the
canister filter. My question is this: How do I know when the "right"
time to do this is?
<Always a bit of a guess... but after a few months... when all seems/appears
stable, the canister can be removed>
If the tank isn't stable enough (it has been
running for three months........liverock about a month), will I run into
problems?
<A possibility. More remote with time going by>
I'm thinking I'd see the ammonia and nitrate levels rise if
the timing is wrong. Can you give some pointers here?
<Wait another month if in doubt at this point in time>
Consistently,
ammonia has been zero, PH 8.3, nitrites zero, SG 1.024 and have been
battling nitrates, but keeping below 10. I have been doing 12% weekly
water changes.
3.) Because of lack of experience, we lost all four of our fish in
the tank to Ich last month. Since then, we have committed to
quarantining. We have been allowing our tank to run fallow for three
weeks now (and continuing normal maintenance). There are 8 crabs, 6
snails, one cleaner shrimp and two feather dusters in the main tank that
all appear to be doing well. Molting of the shrimp and a couple of crabs
has occurred. Two weeks ago, we put two Ocellaris Clownfish and a
Springeri Pseudochromis in quarantine. (Ten gallon with a simple hang
on the back filter and dose of Bio Spira. Water changes every couple of
days. Water is testing fine) Fish have been doing really well. Some
rubbing behavior appeared last week, but no visible signs of Ich.
<Some rubbing is natural>
We
were advised by our local fish store to never treat for Ich unless you
see the white spots on the fish.
<I concur. Much more trouble, losses from "poor" treatments here>
Recently, we noticed more than normal
"bullying"- type behavior between the clowns. Yesterday, it seemed to
move beyond that. When the submissive one was bullied, he would go into
what looked like a one second electric, convulsive shock. He would then
swim off like it never happened.
<Is a sort/type of submissive behavior>
Upon extra careful scrutiny as a
result of this episode, we spotted what appears to be Ich on the Clowns.
<I would not be so fast/sure here. Could be discrete mucus "stress" spotting
alone>
At that point (last night), we treated the quarantine tank with what the
local fish store suggested. We used Formalin-3 and Malachite Green (had
this on hand to be prepared for an Ich incident because of our first
experience).
<Mmm... careful here. These compounds are quite toxic>
Each fish appeared to have no reaction to the medication.
When the dog woke us up at 4am to go out (we have WAY too many pets in
this house!), we checked on the fish. The Springeri Pseudochromis
appeared to be having trouble. He was near the surface of the water,
and looking lethargic. We were thinking this medicine is something he
cannot handle.
<... please see WWM re... Formalin is a biocide... kills all proteinaceous life>
We felt like we had two choices at 4am.......either
leave him and take the chance he dies, or put him in the main tank which
has been fallow for three weeks. We decided to move him there and see
how it goes. If he shows signs of Ich, we will set up a separate tank
to treat him alone. A couple of hours in the main tank and the
Springeri Pseudochromis is looking back to his old self! He is lively,
and actively tried to get some Mysis shrimp put in the tank this
morning. I guess my question is whether the treatment we are using for
the Clowns is sufficient or not. I'm a bit fearful of using copper, but
if it has to be done, I will. Since the Ich is visible on the Clowns,
I'm more concerned for them at the moment.
<Allow me to interdict here... if the system was Crypt-infested, the Dottyback
has moved it to the main tank... I would move the Clowns there also at this
point... sans further chemical treatment>
I don't want to wait too
long, or do the wrong thing, in fear of killing yet another fish under
my watch! Also, I'm concerned with the fact that we are dealing with
Ich again. (I tell you, I'm about ready to throw in the towel!) Could
this bout be the result of too many fish in a 10 gallon QT?
<More crowding can indeed be a factor... for stress induction, ease of
re-infestation of hosts>
The QT
tends to have a two degree temp change happening throughout the day.
Could this be the cause?
<This diurnal temp. range should be fine>
I find it very difficult to keep the temp in
the 10 gallon at a constant temp. We have considered adding a UV
sterilizer to the main tank, but after researching, it seems like it is
more trouble than the possible benefits it provides. Are we making a
mistake here?
<Not IMO>
As an aside, we are using tap water treated with a
dechlorinator. I don't know if this info is of any use or not, but
thought I'd let you know.
<No worries>
Any advice you have is greatly appreciated.
Thank you so much for your time.
Regards,
Kim in Boston
<I might consider a pH adjusted FW dip enroute here for your fishes. Bob Fenner,
in Chiang Mai>
Some Light Conversation! 10/3/06
Hi Bob,
<Scott F. in for Bob today!>
Your site is great. I am getting back into the reef hobby after being out for a
long time. I am stetting up a 90 gallon (24" deep x 48" x 18") reef tank. I am
OK with most of my equipment going with a Blue Line 40 pump for circulation, a
Marine Technical Concepts HSA-1000 protein skimmer along with a Blue Line 40 to
run it, and a Marine Technical Concepts Pro Cal calcium
doser. A chiller will have to be a game time decision. If I am lucky I can get
away without one until next summer.
<Hopefully! A chiller can be an expensive proposition.>
My question relates to lighting. I have narrowed it down to a couple of options
but not sure which way to go. After doing a lot of reading, it seems that the
watts per gallon can not used without other information supplied.
<True- really not a good way to determine lighting needs of a system.>
In addition, to that it seems like going with HQI and T5 combo's have more punch
then traditional Metal Halides and VHO's.
<Well, a lot of the "punch" is due to high quality reflectors. In many
instances, a better quality reflector with a lower wattage halide could
out-perform a higher wattage halide with an inferior reflector.>
I am not 100% sure at this point what specimens I plan on keeping. The definite
ones are an anemone, soft corals, and LPS's, and clams (maybe). I am not sure at
this point if I will go with any of the SPS's. I also am not sure if it is a
good idea to house these together with other corals due to compatibility.
<It is not, IMO. The potentially dangerous chemical interactions are too great
to ignore.>
The anemone is a must so please take this into consideration.
<Okay...I'd dedicate the system to the anemone.>
A fixture I was looking at had two 150 watt HQI - 10k bulbs, and four T5 54 watt
actinic bulbs for a total of 516 watts (300+216) which is 5.73 watts per gallon.
Do you feel that this would work WELL with all of the specimens that I have
listed above?
<Again, ditch the "watts-per-gallon" measure, but the lighting sounds pretty
good. At 24" of aquarium depth, you're at the point where you could go for 250
watts of halide. In fact, if it were me, and anemones were in my plan, I'd be
inclined to go with this setup with a 250 watt halide.>
If not what specimens wouldn't do well and what would you suggest in terms of
lighting?
<I think that most (a blanket statement, of course!) of the inhabitants that you
mention would do well under the above-referenced lighting scheme. Some of the
LPS corals may need to be located where they can receive slightly diffused
lighting. Also, be sure to acclimate all of the photosynthetic animals to your
lighting regime before placing them in their final positions within the
aquarium.>
Another fixture that I saw had two 250 watt HQI bulbs- 10K, and two T5 54 watt
actinic bulbs for a total of 608 watts (500 +108) which is 6.75 watts per
gallon. Would the first fixture cover it all, or should I choose the second
fixture? Or, would there be not much extra benefit with the second fixture and
it would just be a waste without getting any major lighting benefits to the
specimens that I can keep?
<If it's a good quality system with a nice reflector, the 250 watt unit would be
a significant upgrade.>
The bottom line is that I want to try to get it right the first time.
<Agreed. I'd go for the 250 for both it's extra power and the flexibility to
grow with you as your interests change (for example, if "SPS" corals are in your
future, you'd want the more powerful system.>
Oh yea, lastly, would either of these fixtures be too much light for some of the
species that I want to keep, or would acclimation take care of the that concern,
and if I through SPS into the mix, would this influence your decision? Again,
not sure if I would get into SPS but was just curious.
<As mentioned above- acclimation, careful placement and observation of your
specimens is key.>
Thank you very much in advance for your comments.
Regards,
Ken
<My pleasure! Good luck with your system! Regards, Scott F.>
Some Light Conversation- Part II 10/4/06
Hi Scott,
<Hello again!>
Thanks for your quick reply. I'm glad I asked you the question as I figured I
was on the borderline of 150 and 250 watt MH's.
<Yep- 24" is at the "decision depth", as I like to call it, where you may be
better off going with 250 watt bulbs if you're keeping light-demanding
invertebrates.>
It seems that the two lamp 250 watt HQI systems only come with two 54 watt T5
bulbs incorporated with them. This would make then make it (500 MH total watts
plus 108 T5 total watts). So you are saying that this will cover my needs for
the anemone, soft and LPS corals. Would this be enough light for clams as well?
<In this dept of setup, I believe it will.>
You had mentioned the importance of a good quality reflector, is there a way for
me to find out if the unit has good quality reflectors if I am purchasing over
the internet? I have heard of the name Reef Optix for reflectors. Have you heard
anything about these.
<Absolutely. I have used a number of them over the years, and they are one of
the best reflectors out there, IMO. Sunlight Supply (the manufacturer) makes a
few different reflectors; I favor double ended halides, so the "Reef Optix III"
or the "Lumenmax" reflectors do a great job, IMO.>
I had seen it with a unit
with the name Maristar and the manufacturer of the lighting system is Sunlight
Supply. Do you have any thoughts on this?
<Excellent units/company. Also check out Aquamedic and Giesemann for quality
lighting systems.>
Lastly, is hanging a unit or putting it on legs better one way or the other?
<Personal preference and aesthetics come into play here...Also, you want to
consider ease of access into your system. I like the idea of hanging it over the
tank- 6-10 inches or so off the water.>
If it is hung, how high off the tank would be recommended for my 24" depth tank.
I was also
wondering if hanging could be beneficial when adding new corals as I could raise
the height of the fixture to lessen the intensity, and then lower it after the
acclimation period.
<Yep!>
Lastly, I don't know your policy on recommending equipment, so you can delete
this portion if you need to if you post this on your website.
<We are not on anyone's payroll, so to speak, so we can make recommendations
based upon our personal experiences and opinions.>
Have you heard good things about the Aqua Medic HQI/T5 systems in terms of
workmanship and their reflectors? I was going to go with this or the Maristar
that I mentioned above.
<Funny- as above, an excellent product, too.>
Thanks again so much.
Regards,
Ken
<My pleasure, Ken. I don't think you can go wrong with any of the products
discussed above! Good luck! Regards, Scott F.>
Which Lighting Solution? - 09/14/06
If I were to make another investment in this tank should I
invest in power compacts, T5's or another type of halide.
<<I prefer metal halide lighting for most any/all marine
systems. Is a great look, and can usually be positioned/Kelvin
temperature adjusted to suit most any biotope>>
There are two anemones, the original one split, all others are soft
corals like mushroom' and leathers.
<<Firstly, this is an unnatural mix, thus making it difficult to
provide suitable lighting. But with the presence of the
anemones...metal halide lighting most definitely, in my opinion>>
The fish include two Perculas and a golden angel. Cost to run and
purchase is a concern, Thanks Ron.
<<Doesn't cost any more to run 300 watts of metal halide lighting
than it does to run 300 watts of fluorescent lighting...and the
metal halide bulbs have a longer useful lifespan. Regards, EricR>>
Coralife lighting rating 9/9/06
Could I ask someone over at WetWeb to rate the Coralife 150 watt
tank mount
metal halide. I did purchase one about six months ago and was later
told
that these lights were not very good. I just upgraded my tank to a
58 gallon
oceanic and have only this metal halide on it, but it does not cover
the
entire length of the tank, so I may need to invest some more money
on this
project, Thanks Ron
<Most Coralife products are not highly regarded... including their
re-labeled lighting. Bob Fenner>
PC or MH? - 09/05/06
Hi,
<<Hello>>
I am confused about what type of lighting system I should go with.
<<Whichever best suits the species of animals you plan to keep>>
I have looked around your site and I'm still a little confused...
<<Did you look here?
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marlgtganthony.htm and here?
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/setup/lighting/index.htm >>
I plan on having soft coral in my 75, tree corals, and some zoos and
possibly a brain coral.... I'm not entirely sure if I should go with power
compact or metal halide with VHO... Thanks.
Adam
<<Either choice will suffice. The power compacts would likely be cheaper to
purchase, but the metal halides give more bang for the buck in my opinion. A
pair of 150w or 175w MH fixtures with bulbs in the 10000K-14000k range should do
nicely. EricR>>
Re: PC or MH? - 09/07/06
Thank you for your advice...
<<My pleasure to share>>
I have one last question... If I went with 2 150w HQI bulbs at the 14k
range, would I be able to leave those on for 8 hrs?
<<Mmm, I recommend you leave them on for 12-13 hours per day as this more
closely replicates the daytime photo-period in the tropics where your tank
inhabitants are/will be collected>>
Thanks again,
Adam Dusza
<<Always happy to assist. Eric Russell>>
115 Gallon Lighting Selection - 09/04/06
Hi Crew,
<<Hello Ambrose>>
I've recently purchased a 115 gallon tank (60 long x 18 deep x 24 tall), and am
now exploring my lighting options.
<<This should be based on your stocking plan>>
Ideally, I'd like to build an environment where I can keep any specimen happy
and long-lived.
<<This is not reality my friend. All corals, invertebrates, even fish, will not
prosper under the same lighting scheme. You need to settle on a particular
species, or on a particular niche on the reef (fore-slope, back-reef,
rubble-zone, etc., etc.), and then gear your lighting to suit>>
I love the "shimmer" effect halides have on tanks, and have decided to include
this as part of my setup.
<<Indeed...halides provide the most "bang for the buck" in my opinion>>
Now the question remains, how many bulbs, how many watts, and color temperature
should I go with?
<<A quite suitable setup would be three 150w or 175w 10000K bulbs. You could
use higher wattages, but they aren't really necessary>>
Hence, the details of my questions:
1. If a 60-inch fixture were used but with only 2 MH bulbs - would this be
strong enough for light to reach the entire tank?
<<It is very likely you won't get an even "spread" of light throughout the
length of the tank...best to figure 1 bulb for every 2' of tank length>>
Or am I better off with a 3-bulb system?
<<Yes>>
2. What is the optimal wattage for a 24 inch deep tank?
<<Again, this will depend mainly on the livestock you wish to keep. If you plan
an SPS dominated "high energy" |